Establishing a health-based recommended occupational exposure limit for isoflurane using experimental animal data: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Isoflurane is used as an inhalation anesthetic in medical, paramedical, and veterinary practice. Epidemiological studies suggest an increased risk of miscarriages and malformations at birth related to maternal exposure to isoflurane and other inhalation anesthetics. However, these studies cannot be used to derive an occupational exposure level (OEL), because exposure was not determined quantitatively and other risk factors such as co-exposures to other inhalation anesthetics and other work-related factors may also have contributed to the observed adverse outcomes. The aim of this systematic review project is to assess all available evidence on the effects of isoflurane in studies of controlled exposures in laboratory animals to derive a health-based recommended OEL. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was developed to retrieve all animal studies addressing isoflurane exposure from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Title-abstract screening will be performed by machine learning, and full-text screening by one reviewer. Discrepancies will be resolved by discussion. We will include primary research in healthy, sexually mature (non human) vertebrates of single exposure to isoflurane. Studies describing combined exposure and treatments with > = 1 vol% isoflurane will be excluded. Subsequently, details regarding study identification, study design, animal model, and intervention will be summarized. All relevant exposure characteristics and outcomes will be extracted. The risk of bias will be assessed by two independent reviewers using an adapted version of the SYRCLE's risk of bias tool and an addition of the OHAT tool. For all outcomes for which dose-response curves can be derived, the benchmark dose (BMD) approach will be used to establish a point of departure for deriving a recommended health-based recommended OEL for 8 h (workshift exposure) and for 15 min (short-term exposure). DISCUSSION: Included studies should be sufficiently sensitive to detect the adverse health outcomes of interest. Uncertainties in the extrapolation from animals to humans will be addressed using assessment factor. These factors are justified in accordance with current practice in chemical risk assessment. A panel of experts will be involved to reach consensus decisions regarding significant steps in this project, such as determination of the critical effects and how to extrapolate from animals to humans. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022308978.

Exposure to halogenated ethers causes neurodegeneration and behavioural changes in young healthy experimental animals: a systematic review and meta analyses.

The FDA issued a warning that repeated and prolonged use of inhalational anaesthetics in children younger than 3 years may increase the risk of neurological damage. Robust clinical evidence supporting this warning is however lacking. A systematic review of all preclinical evidence concerning isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane and enflurane exposure in young experimental animals on neurodegeneration and behaviour may elucidate how severe this risk actually is PubMed and Embase were comprehensively searched on November 23, 2022. Based on predefined selection criteria the obtained references were screened by two independent reviewers. Data regarding study design and outcome data (Caspase-3 and TUNEL for neurodegeneration, Morris water maze (MWM), Elevated plus maze (EPM), Open field (OF) and Fear conditioning (FC)) were extracted, and individual effect sizes were calculated and subsequently pooled using the random effects model. Subgroup analyses were predefined and conducted for species, sex, age at anesthesia, repeated or single exposure and on time of outcome measurement. Out of the 19.796 references screened 324 could be included in the review. For enflurane there were too few studies to conduct meta-analysis (n = 1). Exposure to sevoflurane, isoflurane and desflurane significantly increases Caspase-3 levels and TUNEL levels. Further, sevoflurane and isoflurane also cause learning and memory impairment, and increase anxiety. Desflurane showed little effect on learning and memory, and no effect on anxiety. Long term effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane on neurodegeneration could not be analysed due to too few studies. For behavioural outcomes, however, this was possible and revealed that sevoflurane caused impaired learning and memory in all three related outcomes and increased anxiety in the elevated plus maze. For isoflurane, impaired learning and memory was observed as well, but only sufficient data was available for two of the learning and memory related outcomes. Further, single exposure to either sevoflurane or isoflurane increased neurodegeneration and impaired learning and memory. In summary, we show evidence that exposure to halogenated ethers causes neurodegeneration and behavioural changes. These effects are most pronounced for sevoflurane and isoflurane and already present after single exposure. To date there are not sufficient studies to estimate the presence of long term neurodegenerative effects. Nevertheless, we provide evidence in this review of behavioral changes later in life, suggesting some permanent neurodegenerative changes. Altogether, In contrast to the warning issued by the FDA we show that already single exposure to isoflurane and sevoflurane negatively affects brain development. Based on the results of this review use of sevoflurane and isoflurane should be restrained as much as possible in this young vulnerable group, until more research on the long term permanent effects have been conducted.

The Effect of Growth Factors on Vaginal Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Surgical outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery are poor, resulting in a 20% recurrence risk. Following the hypothesis that impaired wound healing is the main determinant of recurrent POP, growth factors have the potential to promote wound healing and may improve surgical outcomes. In this study, we systematically reviewed the effect of growth factors on vaginal wound healing in both in vitro and animal studies. For each independent comparison, the standardized mean difference and 95% CI were calculated using the Hedges' g correction. Of the 3858 retrieved studies, seven studies were included, of which six were included in meta-analysis (three in vitro studies and four in vivo studies). In vitro, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) promotes proliferation, differentiation, and collagen types I and III production. Epidermal growth factor stimulates proliferation and connective tissue growth factor promotes Tenascin-C expression. These effects, however, are less pronounced in vivo; only bFGF slightly promotes collagen production. The review shows that growth factors, particularly bFGF, are able to promote vaginal wound healing in vitro. The uncertain in vivo findings suggest that preclinical models should be improved. The ultimate goal is to develop effective growth factor-supplemented therapies that improve surgical outcomes for POP.

Identifying Key Factors for Accelerating the Transition to Animal-Testing-Free Medical Science through Co-Creative, Interdisciplinary Learning between Students and Teachers.

Even with the introduction of the replacement, reduction, refinement (the three Rs) approach and promising technological developments in animal-testing-free alternatives over the past two decades, a significant number of animal tests are still performed in medical science today. This article analyses which factors could accelerate the transition to animal-free medical science, applying the multi-level perspective (MLP) framework. The analysis was based on qualitative research, including a desk study (literature review and document analysis), lectures from experts, and nine online focus group sessions with experts on 26 July 2021. These were undertaken as part of an honours project between May and September 2021 to identify barriers, levers, and opportunities for accelerating this transition. The MLP framework identifies required changes at three levels: innovations and new practices (niche level), the current (bio)medical research system (regime level), and larger societal forces (landscape level). All three levels interact in a non-linear fashion. The model enabled us to identify many relevant factors influencing the transition to animal-testing-free medical science and enabled priority setting. Our findings supported the formulation of six "focus areas" to which stakeholders could devote efforts in order to accelerate the transition to animal-testing-free medical science: (1) thorough and translatable new approach methods (NAMs) for human-relevant medical research; (2) open science and sharing data; (3) targeted funding for NAMs; (4) implementing and modernising legislation for NAMs; (5) interdisciplinary education on animal-testing-free medical science; and (6) facilitating a shift in societal views, as this would be of benefit to both animals and humans. It is proposed that these focus areas should be implemented in parallel.