Temsirolimus combined with sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase I dose-finding trial with pharmacokinetic and biomarker correlates.

BACKGROUND: Based upon preclinical evidence for improved antitumor activity in combination, this phase I study investigated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and biomarkers of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, temsirolimus, combined with sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with incurable HCC and Child Pugh score ≤B7 were treated with sorafenib plus temsirolimus by 3 + 3 design. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) interval was 28 days. The response was assessed every two cycles. PK of temsirolimus was measured in a cohort at MTD. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. The MTD was temsirolimus 10 mg weekly plus sorafenib 200 mg twice daily. Among 18 patients at MTD, DLT included grade 3 hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) and grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 or 4 related adverse events at MTD included hypophosphatemia (33%), infection (22%), thrombocytopenia (17%), HFSR (11%), and fatigue (11%). With sorafenib, temsirolimus clearance was more rapid (P < 0.05). Two patients (8%) had a confirmed partial response (PR); 15 (60%) had stable disease (SD). Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) declined ≥50% in 60% assessable patients. CONCLUSION: The MTD of sorafenib plus temsirolimus in HCC was lower than in other tumor types. HCC-specific phase I studies are necessary. The observed efficacy warrants further study.

Screening for colorectal cancer: developing a preventive healthcare program utilizing nurse endoscopists.

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. In 2000, approximately 130,200 new cases of colorectal cancer will be diagnosed, and 56,300 persons will die from the disease (Greenlee, Murray, Boldan, & Wingo, 2000). A survey conducted for the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable by the Gallup Organization, found that 47% of people over 50 are not being screened. The National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month, which began in March 2000, will educate Americans age 50 and older and prescribe physicians about the importance of colorectal cancer screening tests. The effect of increased education and directing physicians to include colorectal screening for their patients will create a need for non-physician endoscopists to meet the screening needs of the population. A colorectal cancer screening center was developed at a large Midwestern teaching hospital utilizing nurse endoscopists. The purpose of this article is to provide information for institutions to develop and implement a colorectal cancer screening center utilizing nurse endoscopists.

Chronic daily low dose of 4-methyl-5-(2-pyrazinyl)-1,2-dithiole-3-thione (Oltipraz) in patients with previously resected colon polyps and first degree female relatives of breast cancer patients.

The chemoprevention agent oltipraz, one of the most active chemopreventive compounds in preclinical studies, has been shown to induce glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity in animals. Oltipraz was evaluated in a Phase I trial at daily oral doses of 20 mg (L1), 50 mg (L2), and 100 mg (L3) and twice weekly doses of 125 mg (L4) taken for 6 months with 6 patients entered at L1 and L2 and 7 patients entered at L3 and L4 (26 subjects: 19 females and 7 males). The subject population included patients with previously resected colon polyps and first-degree female relatives of breast cancer patients. Patients with resected colon polyps underwent rectal biopsy for GST and glutathione (GSH) analyses. Of the 26 subjects, the following completed 6 months of therapy: 4 of 6 patients (L1), 4 of 6 patients (L2), 5 of 7 patients (L3), and 4 of 7 patients (L4). Toxicities were mild to severe and included: gastrointestinal symptoms, photosensitivity/heat intolerance, and neurological symptoms. Monthly plasma samples were obtained 2-3 h after oltipraz ingestion with minimally detectable plasma concentrations at L1. There was a significant difference in mean oltipraz concentration across the four doses, with no significant differences in mean oltipraz concentration over time. Rectal tissue and lymphocyte GSH and GST were variable, with no significant difference in mean levels across doses. At the 100-mg/day dose (L3), 1 patient experienced significant increase in rectal tissue GSH and GST activity, whereas 3 additional patients (L1 and L4) had >50% increase in tissue GSH. Lymphocyte GSH level was significantly related to plasma oltipraz concentration. There were no significant correlations between plasma oltipraz concentration and lymphocyte GST level nor any significant correlation between plasma concentration and percentage of change in tissue GSH or GST. Further investigation of dose/schedule and biological end points is ongoing.

New agents in gastrointestinal malignancies: Part 2: Gemcitabine in clinical practice.

This is part two of the two-part series on new chemotherapy agents for gastrointestinal malignancies. The first article addressed the agent irinotecan hydrochloride (CAMPTOSAR Injection, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI; also investigated under the name CPT-11) for use with metastatic colon cancer. This article discusses gemcitabine hydrochloride (GEMZAR for Injection, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; also referred to as dFdC) for advanced pancreatic cancer. The article reviews the current clinical use, safety profile, and key patient management guidelines for the new and novel cytotoxic agent, gemcitabine, which was approved in 1996. This agent has demonstrated activity in pancreatic cancer, is generally well tolerated, and can safely be administered on an outpatient basis. Therapy-related side effects are manageable with appropriate monitoring and intervention, and reversible with dose modification or discontinuation. As clinical and investigational use of gemcitabine increases, the oncology nurse and other members of the health care team will need to anticipate potential treatment-associated toxicities and be knowledgeable in their early identification and management. As patient advocates, oncology nurses play a key role in treatment outcome and related quality of life through expert patient education, symptom recognition, and intervention according to individual patient tolerance.

New agents in gastrointestinal malignancies: Part 1: Irinotecan in clinical practice.

In 1996 two chemotherapy agents were introduced by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with indications for the gastrointestinal malignancies for advanced colon and pancreatic cancers. The agents approved were irinotecan hydrochloride (CAMPTOSAR Injection, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI; also investigated under the name CPT-11) for the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, recurrent or relapsed, after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based therapy, and gemcitabine hydrochloride (GEMZAR for injection, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; also referred to as dFdC) for first-line treatment of locally advanced and metastatic cancer of the pancreas. Irinotecan and gemcitabine, with demonstrated activity in colorectal and pancreatic cancer, respectively, are generally well tolerated and can be administered safely on an outpatient basis. Clinically relevant activity is documented for both single agents. Therapy-related side effects are manageable with appropriate monitoring and intervention, and reversible with dose modification or discontinuation. This article is one of a two-part series on new chemotherapeutic agents for gastrointestinal malignancies. The first in the series, this article addresses the agent irinotecan hydrochloride (CAMPTOSAR Injection). The second article, appearing in a subsequent issue, will review gemcitabine hydrochloride (Gemzar for Injection). Both articles review the current clinical use, safety profile, and key patient management guidelines for these new and novel cytotoxics. As clinical and investigational use of irinotecan and gemcitabine increases, the oncology nurse and other members of the health care team will need to anticipate potential treatment associated toxicities and be knowledgeable in their early identification and management. As patient advocates, oncology nurses play a key role in treatment outcome and related quality of life through expert patient education, symptom recognition, and intervention individualized to patient tolerance. This first article of the series addresses irinotecan, which in 1996 was approved for the second-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer, recurrent or elapsed, after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).