Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Allied Health Clinical Education Programs.

INTRODUCTION: Continuing allied health professional (AHP) clinical education is essential to ensure high-quality patient care; however, the effectiveness of current education programs is unclear. This review aimed to determine whether AHP education programs improve the knowledge of AHPs, change their clinical practice behavior, and/or improve patient-related clinical outcome and to identify important components of these programs. METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched. Controlled clinical trials investigating the effectiveness of clinical education programs were included. Education programs were diverse, varying in design, delivery mode, and intensity. Only therapy-specific AHPs were included. Effectiveness was determined by differences in group outcomes in the domains of AHP knowledge, AHP clinical practice behavior, and patient-related clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Forty-four studies were identified, of which 26 included physiotherapists only. Most control groups were waitlist, passive dissemination of information, or usual care, limiting comparisons between programs. Changes in AHP knowledge was investigated in 20 trials, with 13 showing an improvement. Thirty studies investigated changes in AHP clinical practice behavior, with half demonstrating a difference between groups. Seventeen studies investigated a patient-related clinical outcome, with five finding a difference between groups. Where improvements in outcomes were demonstrated, programs tended to incorporate self-selection and cater to the learner's contextual needs. DISCUSSION: AHP knowledge is effectively improved through targeted education programs. To change AHP behavior and patient outcomes, it seems important to incorporate self-selection for the program and consider the learner's individual needs and contexts through mentoring, outreach visits, reflection, and incorporating patient participation in the learning.

Correction: Validation of a clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcome after non-traumatic spinal cord injury.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Validation of a clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcome after non-traumatic spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To validate a Clinical Prediction Rule (CPR) for ambulation in a non-traumatic spinal cord injury population (NTSCI). SETTING: Tertiary spinal rehabilitation inpatient service, Melbourne, Australia. METHODS: Adults with confirmed NTSCI were recruited between April 2013 and July 2017. Data based on the original van Middendorp CPR (age and four neurological variables) were collected from participant's medical records and by interview. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure item 12 was used to quantify the ability to walk at 6 and 12 months. A receiver operator curve (ROC) was utilised to determine the performance of the CPR. Ambulatory outcomes were compared for AIS A, B, C and D and aetiology groups. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.94 with 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.0 (n = 52). Overall accuracy was 75% at 6 months and 82% at 12 months. For the whole cohort the sensitivity at 12 months was 95% and specificity 73%. However, specificity for AIS C and D was only 50%. CONCLUSION: The CPR correctly predicted those who did not walk at 6 and 12 months following NTSCI, but was less accurate in predicting those who would walk particularly those with an AIS C or D classification. This CPR may be useful to inform planning for future care in individuals with NTSCI, particularly for those who are not expected to walk. Further research with larger sample sizes is required to determine if the trends identified in this study are generalisable.

Physiotherapists' perceptions of workplace competency: a mixed-methods observational study.

Objectives Workplace-based competency is increasingly considered fundamental to patient safety and quality healthcare. The aim of the present study was to identify and describe physiotherapists' perceptions of workplace competency. Methods The present study was a mixed-methods cross-sectional observational study. Thematic and descriptive analysis of qualitative and survey data were undertaken. Forty-six physiotherapists employed at a metropolitan acute public hospital participated in interviews or focus groups; a subgroup of 31 participants also completed an online survey. Results Five main themes were identified: (1) despite the availability of workplace learning opportunities and supports, less-experienced staff reported limited confidence; (2) assessment and feedback around workplace competency was limited, predominantly informal and unstructured, with less than half of the cohort (42%) agreeing feedback received was useful for improving their workplace skills; (3) practicing within individual scope is an important aspect of workplace competency as a physiotherapist; (4) most (81%) agreed it was important for them to self-determine their learning and development goals, and they relied primarily on informal discussion to achieve these goals; and, (5) physiotherapists felt motivated regarding workplace learning, with 97% interested in developing their workplace skills however, nearly half (45%) did not feel they had sufficient time to do so. Conclusions The perceptions of physiotherapists working in a metropolitan acute public hospital are reflected in five themes. These themes elucidate how workplace competency is supported, maintained and developed among physiotherapists in this setting. These themes also highlight key challenges of workplace learning faced by this cohort of physiotherapists and allude to methods that may assist with improving feedback mechanisms and knowledge acquisition. What is known about this topic? Studies investigating employee perceptions around workplace competency, knowledge, skills and learning are found across a range of industries. Workplace-based competency is increasingly considered fundamental to patient safety and quality health care. There is little known about physiotherapists' perceptions of workplace competency. What does this paper add? This study has identified and described themes around physiotherapists' perceptions of their workplace knowledge and skills. What are the implications for practitioners? The themes identified provide support for the development, implementation and evaluation of a workplace-based competency framework for physiotherapists.