Genetic characteristics of a patient with multiple primary cancers: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Two or multiple primary malignant neoplasms (MPMNs) rarely occur in the same patient. It has been reported that MPMNs are easily misdiagnosed as the recurrence or metastasis of malignancies in clinical practice, affecting the choice of treatment for the patients, thereby resulting in the delay of optimal diagnosis. Next generation sequencing (NGS) can be used to distinguish between multiple primary lung cancers and intrapulmonary metastasis, and may distinguish the origin of tumours in different sites of the body. CASE SUMMARY: We report the case of 66-year-old woman who suffered from different malignant neoplasms in the rectum and esophageal and gastrointestinal tract. The first neoplasm rectal adenocarcinoma was diagnosed and removed in 2016. The second and third lesions were diagnosed with esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) and gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), respectively, in 2019. Next-generation whole exome sequencing was performed on the tissue specimens of rectal carcinoma, esophageal cancer, GIST, and white blood cells to investigate the relationship between malignancies at different timeframe and determine whether the ESCC and GIST evolved from the rectal adenocarcinoma. Mutations including v-Ki-ras2-Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog, adenomatosis polyposis coli, and mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 were detected in rectal adenocarcinoma sample, mast/stem cell growth factor receptor was detected in GIST tissue, and lysine methyltransferase 2D was detected in ESCC specimen. Overall, ESCC and GIST were not genetically evolved from rectal adenocarcinoma, and this patient did not have a trunk driven clone. CONCLUSION: NGS is an effective tool to study clonal evolution of tumours and distinguish between MPMNs and intrapulmonary metastasis.

Prognostic Model to Predict Overall Survival for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Chemotherapy Combined With Concurrent Radiation Therapy to the Primary Tumor: Analysis From Two Prospective Studies.

PURPOSE: The role of radiotherapy, in addition to chemotherapy, has not been thoroughly determined in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of the study was to investigate the prognostic factors and to establish a model for the prediction of overall survival (OS) in metastatic NSCLC patients who received chemotherapy combined with the radiation therapy to the primary tumor. METHODS: The study retrospectively reviewed 243 patients with metastatic NSCLC in two prospective studies. A prognostic model was established based on the results of the Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that being male, Karnofsky Performance Status score < 80, the number of chemotherapy cycles <4, hemoglobin level ≤120 g/L, the count of neutrophils greater than 5.8 ×109/L, and the count of platelets greater than 220 ×109/L independently predicted worse OS. According to the number of risk factors, patients were further divided into one of three risk groups: those having ≤ 2 risk factors were scored as the low-risk group, those having 3 risk factors were scored as the moderate-risk group, and those having ≥ 4 risk factors were scored as the high-risk group. In the low-risk group, 1-year OS is 67.7%, 2-year OS is 32.1%, and 3-year OS is 19.3%; in the moderate-risk group, 1-year OS is 59.6%, 2-year OS is 18.0%, and 3-year OS is 7.9%; the corresponding OS rates for the high-risk group were 26.2%, 7.9%, and 0% (P<0.001) respectively. CONCLUSION: Metastatic NSCLC patients treated with chemotherapy in combination with thoracic radiation may be classified as low-risk, moderate-risk, or high-risk group using six independent prognostic factors. This prognostic model may help design the study and develop the plans of individualized treatment.

Simultaneous integrated boost of intensity-modulated radiation therapy to Stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer with metastatic lymph nodes.

Local tumor failure remains a major problem after radiation-based nonsurgical treatment for unresectable locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC）and inoperable stage II NSCLC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of simultaneous integrated boost of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) to stage II-III NSCLC with metastatic lymph nodes (ChiCTR 2000029304). Patients were diagnosed by pathology or PET-CT. PTV was divided into two parts as follows, the PTV of primary tumor (PTVp) and the PTV of metastatic lymph nodes (PTVn). The radiotherapy doses were simultaneously prescripted 78 Gy (BED = 101.48 Gy) for PTVp and 60-65 Gy (BED = 73.6-81.25 Gy) for PTVn, 26f/5.2 weeks. Response was scored according to WHO criteria. Radiotherapy toxicity was scored according to RTOG criteria. Hematology and gastrointestinal toxicity were scored according to CTCAE1.0 criteria. A total of 20 patients were enrolled. Seventeen patients were diagnosed by pathology and three patients were diagnosed by PET-CT. All patients were treated with SIB-IMRT. The objective response rate (ORR) was 90%, with CR 25%, PR 65%, NC 10%, and PD 0%. Although radiotherapy toxicity was common, there were no grade ≥3, with radiation pneumonitis (10 cases), esophagitis (17 cases), and dermatitis (12 cases). The local control rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 85%, 75%, and 70%, respectively. The overall survival（OS）and local progression-free survival (LPFS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 90%, 42.6%, and 35.5% and 84.4%, 35.5%, and 28.4%, respectively. SIB-IMRT can significantly improve ORR and survival for stage II-III NSCLC with metastatic lymph nodes, with high safety, and satisfactory efficacy. However, due to the limitation of small sample, these findings are needed to confirm by future trials with a larger sample size.

Randomized phase II study of pemetrexed-cisplatin or docetaxel-cisplatin plus thoracic intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma.

Systemic chemotherapy is the standard treatment modality for stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR wild-type or unknown mutation status. Recent years, there is increasing evidence showed that selected patients with stage IV disease could benefit from aggressive thoracic radiotherapy. Either pemetrexed or docetaxel, combined with cisplatin, can be used for patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma. However, no prospective trials have confirmed that Pem-Cis was superior to Doc-Cis in lung adenocarcinoma. In this randomized phase 2 trial, we evaluated survival outcomes, and toxicity of Pemetrexed-Cisplatin (arm A) or Docetaxel-Cisplatin (arm B) with concurrent IMRT to the primary tumor for stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR wild-type or unknown mutation status. Totally, 101 patients were randomly assigned (50 in arm A and 51 in arm B). Using an intention-to-treat analysis, one-year survival rates were 72.0% and 52.9%, respectively (P=0.020). Progression-free survival was also significantly improved in the arm A (median, 12.6 v 7.5 months, P=0.013). The incidence and severity of acute pneumonitis and esophagitis was similar between two arms. Although more of grade 3 or 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia in arm A, and higher rates grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, and leukopenia were observed in arm B. Pem-Cis first-line chemotherapy with concurrent radiation therapy for stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR wild-type or unknown mutation status represents a potential treatment option with acceptable toxicity and high overall survival rates.

Pathogenesis and Prevention of Radiation-induced Myocardial Fibrosis

Radiation therapy is one of the most important methods for the treatment of malignant tumors. However, in radiotherapy for thoracic tumors such as breast cancer, lung cancer, esophageal cancer, and mediastinal lymphoma, the heart, located in the mediastinum, is inevitably affected by the irradiation, leading to pericardial disease, myocardial fibrosis, coronary artery disease, valvular lesions, and cardiac conduction system injury, which are considered radiation-induced heart diseases. Delayed cardiac injury especially myocardial fibrosis is more prominent, and its incidence is as high as 20­80%. Myocardial fibrosis is the final stage of radiation-induced heart diseases, and it increases the stiffness of the myocardium and decreases myocardial systolic and diastolic function, resulting in myocardial electrical physiological disorder, arrhythmia, incomplete heart function, or even sudden death. This article reviews the pathogenesis and prevention of radiation-induced myocardial fibrosis for providing references for the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced myocardial fibrosis.

Radiation dose and survival of patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy: reanalysis of the findings of a single-center prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the radiation dose and response in terms of local-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy. METHODS: In all, we enrolled 201 patients with stage IV NSCLC in this study and analyzed OS in 159 patients and LRPFS in 120. RESULTS: The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 46.2%, 19.5%, 11.7%, and 5.8%, respectively, the median survival time being 12 months. The median survival times in differential treatment response of primary tumors were 19 of complete response, 13 of partial response, 8 of stable disease, and 6 months of progressive disease, respectively (P = 0.000). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year LRPFS rates of patients undergoing four to five cycles with doses ≥63 Gy and <63 Gy were 77.4% and 32.6%, 36.2% and 21.7%, 27.2% and 0, and 15.9% and 0, respectively (P = 0.002). According to multivariate analyses, four to five cycles of chemotherapy, gross tumor volume <175.00 cm3 and post-treatment Karnofsky Performance Status score stable or increased by at least 10 units were independent prognostic factors for better OS (P = 0.035, P = 0.008, and P = 0.000, respectively). Radiation dose to the primary tumor ≥63 Gy resulted in better OS (P = 0.057) and LRPFS (P = 0.051), both findings being of borderline significance. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of IV NSCLC with joint administration of four to five cycles of chemotherapy and three-dimensional radiotherapy may prolong survival, particularly in patients receiving ≥63 Gy radiotherapy, with gross tumor volume <175.00 cm3 and post-treatment Karnofsky Performance Status score not lower than pretreatment values.

Prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients with bone oligometastases treated concurrently with thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of three-dimensional radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with bone metastases. METHODS: Clinical data for 95 NSCLC patients with bone metastases were collected and prognostic factors were analyzed. All patients received radiation to their thoracic primary tumor and ≥2 cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of these 95 patients, 47 patients had only bone metastases and 48 had both bone metastases and other organ metastases. Univariate analysis showed that factors that statistically significantly contributed to patients having longer overall survival (OS) included receiving a radiation dose to the primary tumor ≥63 Gy, responding to treatment and receiving ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy (p = 0.001, p = 0.037 and p = 0.009, respectively). A radiation dose to the primary tumor ≥63 Gy remained significant for patients with bone metastases only as well as those with bone and other organ metastases when they were analyzed separately (p = 0.045 and p = 0.012, respectively). For patients with bone metastases only, those with T1-2 tumors had longer OS than those with T3-4 (p = 0.048); and patients who received ≥4 cycles chemotherapy compared with those who received <4 cycles had similar OS (p = 0.385). On multivariate analysis, only a radiation dose ≥63 Gy (p = 0.028) and having only bone metastases (p = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors for better OS. CONCLUSIONS: A radiation dose to the primary tumor ≥63 Gy and having only bone metastases were associated with better OS in NSCLC patients with bone metastases. For patients with bone metastases only, besides radiation dose, T status was also correlated with OS, whereas the number of chemotherapy cycles was not. Therefore, aggressive thoracic radiation may play an important role in improving OS.

Overall survival and toxicities regarding thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: results of a prospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND: The role of chemotherapy given concurrently with thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not well defined. We performed this study to investigate overall survival and toxicity in patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with this modality. METHODS: From 2003 to 2010, 201 patients were enrolled in this study. All patients received chemotherapy with concurrent thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy. The study endpoints were the assessment of overall survival (OS) and acute toxicity. RESULTS: For all patients, the median survival time (MST) was 10.0 months, and the 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were 40.2%, 16.4%, and 9.6%, respectively. The MST was 14.0 months for patients who received a total radiation dose ≥63 Gy to the primary tumor, whereas it was 8.0 months for patients who received a total dose <63 Gy (P = 0.000). On multivariate analysis, a total dose ≥63 Gy, a single site of metastatic disease, and undergoing ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for better OS (P = 0.007, P = 0.014, and P = 0.038, respectively); radiotherapy involving metastatic sites was a marginally significant prognostic factor (P = 0.063). When the whole group was subdivided into patients with metastasis at a single site and multiple sites, a higher radiation dose to the primary tumor remained a significant prognostic factor for improved OS. For patients who received ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy, high radiation dose remained of benefit for OS (P = 0.001). Moreover, for the subgroup that received <4 chemotherapy cycles, the radiation dose was of marginal statistical significance regarding OS (P = 0.063). Treatment-related toxicity was found to be acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation dose to primary tumor, the number of metastatic sites, and the number of chemotherapy cycles were independent prognostic factors for OS in stage IV NSCLC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In addition to systemic chemotherapy, aggressive thoracic radiotherapy was shown to play an important role in improving OS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on (ChiCTR-TNC-10001026).

Analysis of dosimetric factors associated with temporal lobe necrosis (TLN) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after intensity modulated radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The radiation tolerance dose-volume in brain remains unclear for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). We performed this study to investigate dosimetric factors associated with temporal lobe necrosis (TLN) in NPC patients treated with IMRT. METHODS: From 2001 to 2008, 870 NPC patients were treated with IMRT. For the whole group, 40 patients have developed MRI-diagnosed TLN, and 219 patients were followed-up more than 60 months. Predictive dosimetric factors for TLN were identified by using univariate and multivariate analysis in these 259 patients. RESULTS: By univariate analyses, rVX ( percent of temporal lobes receiving ≥ X Gy) and aVX ( absolute volumes of temporal lobes receiving ≥ X Gy, values of X considered were 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 66 and 70) were all significantly associated with TLN. Multivariate analysis by logistic regression showed that rV40 and aV40 were significant factors for TLN. All dosimetric factors in current serials were highly correlated one another (p < 0.001). The 5-year incidence of TLN for rV40 <10% or aV40 <5 cc is less than 5%. The incidence for rV40 ≥ 15% or aV40c ≥ 10c is increased significantly and more than 20%. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, all dosimetric factors were highly correlated, rV40 and aV40 were independent predictive factors for TLN, IMRT with rV40 <10% or aV40 <5 cc in temporal lobe is relatively safe.

Clinical and dosimetric characteristics of temporal lobe injury following intensity modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the temporal lobe injury (TLI) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who had received intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and to assess the dosimetric parameters associated with TLI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty of 870 patients were diagnosed with TLI after IMRT, the clinical and dosimetric characteristics of these TLI were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 4.6% (40/870) patients have developed TLI. However, TLI is not observed in T1-2 patients, the incidences are 3.1% and 13.4% in T3 and T4 patients respectively. The Dmax (maximum point dose, Gy) and D1 cc (the dose delivered to the 1 cubic centimeter volume, Gy) in injured temporal lobes (TLs) are greater than that in normal TLs (P<0.01). TLI is not observed in TLs with Dmax<64 Gy or D1 cc<52 Gy, and the 5-year incidence of TLI in patients with Dmax 64-68 Gy or D1 cc 52-58 Gy is <5.0%. A linear regression demonstrates a 2.6% augment of TLI per Gy of Dmax exceeding 64 Gy and a 2.5% augment of TLI per Gy of D1 cc exceeding 52 Gy; TLI is correlated with Dmax (r=0.89, P<0.01) and D1 cc (r=0.87, P<0.01) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TLI is relatively high, especially for patients with advanced T-stage NPC, and correlated with Dmax and D1 cc. IMRT with Dmax<68 Gy or D1 cc<58 Gy in TLs is relatively safe.

Long-term outcomes of early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone.

PURPOSE: Reports of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) have been limited. The present study evaluated the long-term survival outcomes and toxicity of early-stage NPC patients treated with IMRT alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February 2001 and January 2008, 198 early-stage (T1-T2bN0-N1M0) NPC patients had undergone IMRT alone. The data from these patients were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were treated to 68 Gy at 2.27 Gy/fraction prescribed to the planning target volume of the primary nasopharygeal gross tumor volume. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scoring system was used to assess the toxicity. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 50.9 months (range, 12-104), the 5-year estimated disease-specific survival, local recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival rate was 97.3%, 97.7%, and 97.8%, respectively. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival rate was 100% for those with Stage T1 and T2a and 94.2% for those with Stage T2b lesions (p = 0.252). The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rate for Stage T1N0, T2N0, T1N1, and T2N1 patients was 100%, 98.8%, 100%, and 93.8%, respectively (p = .073). All local recurrence occurred in patients with T2b lesions. Five patients developed distant metastasis. Of these 5 patients, 4 had had Stage T2bN1 disease and 1 had had Stage T2bN0 disease with retropharyngeal lymph node involvement. The most common acute toxicities were mainly Grade 1 or 2. At 24 months after IMRT, no Grade 3 or 4 xerostomia had developed, and 62 (96.9%) of 64 evaluated patients were free of trismus; only 2 patients (3.1%) had Grade 1 trismus. Radiation encephalopathy and cranial nerve injury were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT alone for Stage T1N0, T2N0, T1N1, and T2N1 yielded satisfactory survival outcomes with acceptable toxicity, and no differences were found in survival outcomes among these four subgroups. Patients with Stage T2b lesions might have relatively greater risk of local recurrence and those with T2bN1 disease mighth have a greater risk of distant metastasis.

Treatment outcomes for different subgroups of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Although many studies have investigated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), sample sizes in the reported studies are usually small and different in outcomes in different T and N subgroups are seldom analyzed. Herein, we evaluated the outcomes of NPC patients treated with IMRT and further explored treatment strategy to improve such outcome. We collected clinical data of 865 NPC patients treated with IMRT alone or in combination with chemotherapy, and classified all cases into the following prognostic categories according to different TNM stages: early stage group (T1-2N0-1M0), advanced local disease group (T3-4N0-1M0), advanced nodal disease group (T1-2N2-3M0), and advanced locoregional disease group (T3-4N2-3M0). The 5-year overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) were 83.0%, 90.4%, and 84.0%, respectively. The early disease group had the lowest treatment failure rate, with a 5-year OS of 95.6%. The advanced local disease group and advanced nodal disease group had similar failure pattern and treatment outcomes as well as similar hazard ratios for death (4.230 and 4.625, respectively). The advanced locoregional disease group had the highest incidence of relapse and death, with a 5-year DMFS and OS of 62.3% and 62.2%, respectively, and a hazard ratio for death of 10.402. Comparing with IMRT alone, IMRT in combination with chemotherapy provided no significant benefit to locoregionally advanced NPC. Our results suggest that the decision of treatment strategy for NPC patients should consider combinations of T and N stages, and that IMRT alone for early stage NPC patients can produce satisfactory results. However, for advanced local, nodal, and locoregional disease groups, a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is recommended.

[The effect of overall treatment time on local control in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy].

OBJECTIVE: At present, the clinical data about the effect of overall treatment time (OTT) on local control for nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC) patients mainly derived from conventional radiotherapy (CRT). The effect of OTT on local control for NPC patients treated with IMRT is still unclear. This study was to explore the effect of OTT on local control in IMRT for NPC patients. METHODS: Clinical data of 850 NPC (T1-4N0-3M0) patients that had undergone radical radiotherapy with IMRT from May 2001 to January 2008 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were divided into two groups, which were group with OTT ≤ 42 and group with OTT > 42 days respectively. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves. The effect of clinical factors and treatment related factors on LCR were studied with univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression. RESULTS: The 5-years local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rate of group with OTT ≤ 42 were 90.7%, and 90.9% in group with OTT > 42, no significant differences were found between these two groups (χ² = 0.028, P = 0.866). Further stratified analysis found that the LRFS rate for early T-stage patients was no significant difference between group with OTT ≤ 42 and group with > 42 days, they were 97.2% and 97.9% (χ² = 0.672, P = 0.412). For advanced T-stage patients, the LRFS rate of OTT ≤ 42 and > 42 days were 86.5% and 87.2% respectively (χ² = 0.151, P = 0.698). The 5-year LRFS rate were 94.4% vs 93.0% (χ² = 0.090, P = 0.764) at OTT > 42 vs ≤ 42 days for patients treated with IMRT alone, and 89.7% vs 87.6% (χ² = 0.060, P = 0.807) for patients in combination chemotherapy with IMRT. We divided all patients into three groups: OTT ≤ 42 d, 43 - 49 d and ≥ 50 d, the 5-years LRFS rate of the three group was 90.7%, 91.7% and 88.4%, respectively, there was no significant difference of LRFS among those three groups (χ² = 0.136, P = 0.934). Univariate analysis showed that T-stage and GTV volume were correlation with local control. In multivariate analysis, GTV volume was confirmed as independent prognostic factors for local control. CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of the OTT observed in our study, prolonged OTT did not have adverse effect on local control. GTV volume was independent prognostic factors in local control for NPC patients treated with IMRT.