Correlation Between ImageJ and Conventional Manual Scoring Methods for Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Immuno-Histochemically Stained Sections.

Background: One of the most frequently used methods for quantifying PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1) expression in tumor tissue is IHC (immunohistochemistry). This may predict the patient's response to anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy in cancer. Methods: ImageJ software was used to score IHC-stained sections for PD-L1 and compare the results with the conventional manual method. Results: In diffuse large B cell lymphoma, no significant difference between the scores obtained by the conventional method and ImageJ scores obtained using the option "RGB" or "Brightness/Contrast." On the other hand, a significant difference was found between the conventional and HSB scoring methods. ImageJ faced some challenges in analyzing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tissues because of tissue heterogenicity. A significant difference was found between the conventional and ImageJ scores using HSB or RGB but not with the "Brightness/Contrast" option. Scores obtained by ImageJ analysis after taking images using 20 × objective lens gave significantly higher readings compared to 40 × magnification. A significant difference between camera-captured images' scores and scanner whole slide images' scores was observed. Conclusion: ImageJ can be used to score homogeneous tissues. In the case of highly heterogeneous tissues, it is advised to use the conventional method rather than ImageJ scoring.

Human Papillomavirus Is Rare and Does Not Correlate with p16INK4A Expression in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in a Jordanian Subpopulation.

Background and Objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV) was previously investigated in lung cancer with wide inter-geographic discrepancies. p16INK4a has been used as a surrogate for detecting high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) in some cancer types. This study assessed the evidence of HPV in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among Jordanian patients, investigated the expression of p16INK4a, and evaluated its prognostic value and association with HPV status. Materials and Methods: The archived samples of 100 patients were used. HPV DNA detection was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). p16INK4a expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer protocol (AJCC) of head and neck cancer criteria were applied to evaluate p16INK4a positivity considering a moderate/strong nuclear/cytoplasmic expression intensity with a distribution in ≥75% of cells as positive. Results: HPV DNA was detected in 5% of NSCLC cases. Three positive cases showed HR-HPV subtypes (16, 18, 52), and two cases showed the probable HR-HPV 26 subtype. p16INK4a expression was positive in 20 (20%) NSCLC cases. None of the HPV-positive tumors were positive for p16INK4a expression. A statistically significant association was identified between p16INK4a expression and the pathological stage (p = 0.029) but not with other variables. No survival impact of p16INK4a expression was detected in NSCLC cases as a group; however, it showed a statistically significant association with overall survival (OS) in squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) cases (p = 0.033). Conclusions: This is the first study to assess HPV and p16INK4a expression in a Jordanian population. HPV positivity is rare in NSCLC among a Jordanian subpopulation. P16 INK4a reliability as a surrogate marker for HPV infection in lung cancer must be revisited.

Communicating uncertainty in pathology reports: a descriptive study from a specialized cancer center.

Pathologists use certain terminologies to communicate uncertainty in pathology reports. The message conveyed in pathology reports may be interpreted differently by clinicians leading to possible miscommunication. We aimed to compare the interpretation and impact of uncertainty phrases between pathologists and clinicians. A survey with examples of uncertain diagnoses containing ("suspicious for", "indefinite for", "favor", "cannot exclude", "suggestive of", "compatible with", "cannot rule out", "highly suspicious for" and "consistent with") was sent to pathologists and clinicians. For each diagnosis, participants assigned a level of certainty from 1 to 10 and were asked whether they would recommend treatment based on such phraseology. Thirty-six responses (from 7 pathologists, 10 surgeons, 8 pediatric oncologists, 8 medical oncologists, 2 radiation oncologists and 1 diagnostic radiologist) were received. Pathologists had a narrower range of uncertainty compared to clinicians. Wide variation between both groups was seen for all phrases except "compatible with" and "highly suspicious for". 'Indefinite for' showed the lowest mean of certainty (4.67 for pathologists; 4.00 for clinicians) whereas 'consistent with' had the highest (8.83 for pathologists and 9.38 for clinicians). There was a significant difference in the degree of certainty between both groups for "compatible with" (7.83 for pathologists and 9.06 for clinicians, p = .009). For treatment decisions, pathologists and clinicians agreed on initiating treatment when "consistent with" and "compatible with" were used and gave variable responses for the other terms. They proposed opposing treatment recommendations for "favor". Pathologists and clinicians varied in interpretation of uncertainty phrases which may impact treatment.

COVID-19 Antibody Seroconversion in Cancer Patients: Impact of Therapy Cessation-A Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: The effective development of COVID-19 vaccination has mitigated its harm. Using two laboratory methods, we investigated the efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA and BBIBP-CorV COVID-19 vaccines on seroconversion rates in cancer patients undergoing active cancer treatment. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were scheduled for 134 individuals. The consenting participants submitted three venous blood samples. Three samples: T0, T1, and T2. The ABBOTT-SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant and Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays were used to evaluate the samples and convert the antibody titers to WHO (BAU)/mL units. RESULTS: Cancer patients exhibited a higher seroconversion rate at T2, regardless of vaccination type, and the mean antibody titers at T1 and T2 were higher than those at T0. BBIBP-CorV patients required a booster because BNT162b2 showed a higher seroconversion rate between T0 and T1. Statistics indicate that comparing Abbott and Roche quantitative antibody results without considering the sample collection time is inaccurate. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccines can still induce a humoral immune response in patients undergoing cancer-targeted therapy. The strength of this study is the long-term monitoring of antibody levels after vaccination in cancer patients on active therapy using two different immunoassays. Further multicenter studies with a larger number of patients are required to validate these findings.

QuantiFERON-CMV and monitor predict cytomegalovirus, mortality, and graft-versus-host disease in transplant recipients.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most prevalent infection in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). QuantiFERON-CMV (QF-CMV) and QuantiFERON-Monitor (QFM) assays were used to test whether immune-competent adult allogeneic HSCT recipients with CMV-specific T cells can control CMV infection or reactivation. Our data demonstrated a significant correlation between CMV infection measured by CMV-antigenemia test and QF-CMV results, graft versus host disease (GvHD), and mortality rates. The QF-CMV test revealed that CMV-specific T cells with higher interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release were correlated with lower CMV infection rates. There was a significant negative association between QF-CMV results, GvHD, and mortality rates. Data showed that a one-unit rise in IFN-γ was linked with a 12.7% reduction in GvHD and a 20.7% reduction in the mortality odds ratio. In addition, a negative correlation was found between QF-M results and CMV infection, with the QFM test predicting protection against CMV infection by 1.9%. This is one of the few studies establishing the QF-CMV test's predictive value for GvHD and mortality, its use to monitor HSCT patients for pre-emptive therapy, and the use of the QFM test to predict CMV infection and mortality in HSCT patients. Thus, these assays could be utilized to optimize preventive and pre-emptive therapy procedures to reduce transplant recipient adverse effects and posttransplant therapy costs.

Early T-Cell Precursor Leukemia: A High-Risk Subtype of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Single Center Experience in Jordan.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Early T-cell precursor (ETP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL/LBL) is a newly recognized entity of T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. The optimal therapeutic approaches to adult patients are poorly studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared the outcomes of adult's patents with ETP-ALL/LBL who received frontline chemotherapy regimens with other T-ALL/LBL immunophenotypic subtypes. Patients with ETP-ALL/LBL were identified based on CD1a (-), CD8 (-), CD5 (-) (dim), and positivity for 1 or more stem cell or myeloid antigens. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included between the years 2010 and 2021 (19 ETP-T-ALL/LBL; 50 non ETP- T-cell ALL/LBL). The median age was 26 year (IQR: 21, 33). Fifty-six patients presented as ALL, while 16 with lymphoblastic lymphoma. Forty-seven patients achieved complete remission, and 43 were alive at last encounter. The complete remission rate in patients with ETP-ALL/LBL was lower than that of non-ETP-ALL/LBL patients (32% vs. 68%; P = .2), and the MRD at end of induction was significantly higher (26% vs. 6.2%, P < .001), and more likely to receive allo-SCT consolidation in CR1 (95% vs. 40%, P < .001). After a median follow-up of survivors of 48 months (range: 32-74 months), the median overall survival for patients with ETP-ALL/LBL was not reached versus 11.5 months for the non-ETP-ALL/LBL patients (P = .014)). Twenty-six patients receive allo-SCT in CR1. There was no significant difference in overall survival (79% vs. 70%; P = .49) between both transplant-cohorts in both groups. CONCLUSION: ETP-ALL/LBL represents a high-risk disease subtype of adult ALL. Novel treatment strategies are needed to improve treatment outcomes in this patient's population.

Mixed sex cord-stromal tumor (gynandroblastoma) with malignant morphology involving both ovaries: a case report.

Mixed sex cord-stromal tumors, which consist of poorly differentiated Sertoli cells and Leydig cells and juvenile granulosa cell tumor tissue, are extremely rare. Most of these tumors are unilateral and stage I at the time of diagnosis; nonetheless, according to the available relevant English-language literature, these tumors maintain a malignant potential. We herein report a case involving a 15-year-old girl diagnosed with a mixed sex cord-stromal tumor (gynandroblastoma with juvenile granulosa cell tumor component). Left salpingo-oophorectomy was initially performed, and the diagnosis of a juvenile granulosa cell tumor was established. Right salpingo-oophorectomy was performed 1 year later, at which time the specimen showed a different growth pattern involving epithelioid cells and tubules, resembling a Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor. Immunohistochemical staining was performed and the specimen was compared with that obtained 1 year earlier. We concluded that the tumors were linked and most likely constituted a gynandroblastoma (mixed form of sex cord-stromal tumor). Although this is an extremely uncommon ovarian tumor, it should be considered when diverse tumor morphology is identified. Bilateral metachronous involvement of the ovaries is possible. The grade of the Sertoli-Leydig cell component may influence the prognosis of such a tumor.

Comparative Assessment of the Kinetics of Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccination in Cancer Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The kinetics of immune responses to various SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in cancer patients were investigated. METHODS: In total, 57 cancer patients who received BNT162b2-RNA or BBIBP-CorV vaccines were enrolled. Cellular and humoral immunity were assessed at three-time points, before the first vaccine dose and 14-21 days after the first and second doses. Chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay was used to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG response, and QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 kit assessed T-cell response. RESULTS: Data showed that cancer patients' CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-median IFN-γ secretion of SARS-CoV-2 antigens increased after the first and second vaccine doses (p = 0.027 and p = 0.042). BNT162b2 vaccinees had significantly higher IFN-γ levels to CD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes than BBIBP-CorV vaccinees (p = 0.028). There was a positive correlation between IgG antibody titer and T cell response regardless of vaccine type (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study is one of the first to investigate cellular and humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 immunization in cancer patients on active therapy after each vaccine dose. COVID-19 immunizations helped cancer patients develop an effective immune response. Understanding the cellular and humoral immune response to COVID-19 in cancer patients undergoing active treatment is necessary to improve vaccines and avoid future SARS pandemics.

PD-L1 Expression in Colorectal Carcinoma: A Comparison of 3 Scoring Methods in a Cohort of Jordanian Patients.

Anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatments can improve colorectal carcinoma (CRC) survival; however, there is still controversy regarding the relationship between PD-L1 expression and the outcome of immunotherapeutic treatment and survival. The discrepancies are partly caused by the lack of a unified scoring system. This retrospective, cross-sectional study evaluated PD-L1 by immunohistochemistry in 127 CRC cases and compared the 3 scoring systems used to assess PD-L1: Tumor Percentage Score (TPS), Combined Positive Score (CPS), and immune cell (IC) score. Correlations were calculated using the χ 2 test. Kaplan-Meier curves with the Log-rank test were used to measure the contribution of PD-L1 expression to survival. PD-L1-positive rate were 29.9%, 57.5%, and 55.9% based on TPS, CPS, and IC score, respectively. TPS showed a better correlation with the clinicopathologic features being significantly higher with young age, T4, and adenocarcinomas (compared with mucinous/signet ring). TPS also showed an increasing trend with higher grade, lymph node stage, and male sex, although these variables were not significantly associated with PD-L1 expression. There was no correlation between PD-L1 expression and mismatch repair protein status in the 3 scoring methods. The probability of survival was higher for PD-L1-negative cases in the first 60 months after surgery if scored by the TPS method ( P =0.058). Future efforts correlating PD-L1 status with response to treatment are needed to decide on the best scoring method to be used for making therapy decisions.

Prevalence and clinicopathological associations of HER2 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study in Jordanian patients.

BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), a promising therapeutic target, can be mutated, amplified, or overexpressed in different malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although these alterations showed adverse prognostic effects in many cancers, their clinical significance in NSCLC is controversial. This study primarily assessed the prevalence of HER2 protein expression in NSCLC among Jordanian patients. In addition, the possible association between HER2 protein expression and clinicopathological variables was evaluated. METHODS: A total of 100 surgically resected NSCLC cases treated at King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) between 2009 and 2021 were examined for HER2 protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines for breast cancer were applied to interpret the results with a final score ranging from 0 to 3+, considering a score of 3 + as overexpression. Additionally, a separate subset of patients was tested for HER2 gene mutation. Fisher's exact test was used to assess the association between HER2 scores and the other variables. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival. RESULTS: Of the 100 cases, Her2 overexpression (score 3+) was detected in 2 cases (2%), score 2 + in 10 cases (10%), score 1 + in 12 cases (12%), and score 0 in 76 cases (76%). The two positive cases were one adenocarcinoma and one squamous cell carcinoma; both patients were elderly male smokers. No significant association was identified between Her2 expression and age, gender, smoking, histological subtype, grade, stage, tumor size, and lymph node status. Our findings also showed no association between Her2 expression and survival; however, advanced tumor stages and positive lymph node metastasis were significantly associated with poor overall survival. All cases tested for the Her2 mutation were negative. CONCLUSIONS: Her2 overexpression is uncommon in NSCLC among the Jordanian population. However, when the same scoring criteria are used, the rates are similar to other results found in Asian cohorts. Due to our study's relatively small sample size, a larger one is required to investigate the prognostic value and the molecular associations between the different Her2 alterations.

Non-Dexamethasone Corticosteroid Therapy's Effect on COVID-19 Prognosis in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Anti-inflammatory corticosteroids are used in cancer treatment and COVID-19 infections. Data on the impact of non-dexamethasone corticosteroids on COVID-19 infection severity in cancer patients are minimal. This study investigates if corticosteroid treatment affects the disease severity in adult cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 116 COVID-19-infected cancer patients on hydrocortisone (H) or prednisone (P) were compared to 343 untreated patients. The study included patients who received corticosteroids before (B), after (A), or both before and after (B and A) COVID-19 infections. Ventilation support, hospitalization and mortality were investigated. RESULTS: Our data showed that a significantly greater number of patients taking H or P required ventilation support and hospitalization and that mortality rates were higher than the control group. Patients who received H or P after COVID-19 infection had a significantly worse prognosis than the other sub-groups and the control group. CONCLUSION: Corticosteroids impacted cancer patients' COVID-19 prognosis. Despite the limited sample size, H- and P-treated patients' corticosteroids performed worse than the control, especially if treatments were received after COVID-19 infection. Hence, when a cancer patient already on H or P treatment is diagnosed with COVID-19, we recommend switching to a steroid treatment as suggested by international guidelines.

Programmed death-ligand 1 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is associated with poor prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in some tumors has prognostic implications. This work aims at investigating PD-L1 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and to study its association with clinicopathological variables. METHODS: The study consisted of 75 DLBCL patients who were cared for at the King Hussein Cancer Center during the period 2015-2018. The expression of PD-L1 in tumor tissue was assessed by immunohistochemistry using the anti-human PD-L1 (Clone 22C3) monoclonal antibody. The correlation between gender, age, clinical stage, pre-treatment-LDH level, tumor location, response to therapy, overall and event-free survival with PD-L1 expression was studied. RESULTS: Six patients were excluded from further analysis as they were in relapse at the time of tissue sampling. The tumor proportion score (TPS) was ≥1% in 16/69 (23.2%) of DLBCL cases while the combined positive score (CPS) at a cut-off of ≥20 was observed in 23/69 (33.3%) cases. No significant difference in PD-L1 expression was found between germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) and non-GCB subtypes. Similarly, no differences in PD-L1 expression (at CPS ≥20 and TPS ≥1) were found between different genders, age groups, clinical stages, tumor location, and patient response to therapy. However, base-line lactate dehydrogenase was significantly elevated in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥20. The overall survival was not significantly different between PD-L1-positive and -negative groups. On the other hand, the median event-free survival was higher in either of the PD-L1 TPS or CPS negative groups at 107months each versus 54 months in the PD-L1 positive group of either category. CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 expression can predict event-free survival in DLBCL cases and therefore poor prognosis.

A Rare Case of Nasal Sarcoma with BCOR Internal Tandem Duplication Showing Complete Pathologic Response to the VDC-IE Chemotherapy Protocol.

Sarcoma with BCOR genetic alteration is an exceptionally rare and emerging subtype of sarcoma. It is categorized into two types: BCOR-related gene fusions such as BCOR::CCNB3 sarcomas and other BCOR-rearranged sarcoma and sarcomas with internal tandem duplication of BCOR genes such as infantile undifferentiated round cell sarcomas and primitive myxoid mesenchymal tumors of infancy. BCOR::CCNB3 sarcomas predominantly arise in bone rather than soft tissue and exhibit a higher occurrence in children and adolescent males, whereas sarcomas with BCOR internal tandem duplication show a wider age range but usually arise in the first year of life. Due to their rarity, there is ongoing debate and uncertainty regarding the best treatment approach, with a lack of specific clinical trials addressing these tumors. In this report, we present a unique case of sarcoma with internal tandem duplication of BCOR gene originating in the nasal region. The tumor was successfully and completely resected using the standard VDC-IE chemotherapy protocol, resulting in an unprecedented 100 percent tumor necrosis. The patient has completed the protocol and remains recurrence-free 13 months after diagnosis. This case suggests potential efficacy of the standard VDC-IE protocol in achieving remarkable responses in BCOR rearrangement sarcomas, including the internal tandem duplication subtype. However, further studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment strategies for this disease.

The Impact COVID-19 Infection on Cancer Patients: A Tertiary Cancer Center Experience in Jordan.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are at higher risk of serious complications of COVID-19. Few studies evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries. Our study aims to evaluate the outcomes of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients treated at our institution.  Methods: Medical records of patients with a positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) between April 2020 and October 2020 were reviewed. Fisher's exact test and logistic regression analysis were employed to correlate various variables with mortality. Survival estimates were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 317 patients were included, with a median age was 55 years (range: 19-88). 82 (25.9%) had hematological neoplasms while the remainder had solid cancers. At the time of infection, 220 (69.4%) had active cancer, and 99 (31.2%) had received systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) within four weeks. Hospitalization was required for 101 (31.8%), 17 (5.3%) were admitted to the ICU and 50 (15.8%) died. Among patients with active cancer, SACT was delayed or discontinued in 140 (63.6%) patients.  In the entire patient cohort, low albumin (p=<0.001) and leucocytosis (p=<0.001) correlated with mortality within six months of COVID-19 infection. The six-month mortality rate in patients with active cancer was significantly higher in patients with hypertension (p=0.024), no recent SACT (0.017), hematological cancer (p=0.029), low albumin (p=<0.001), leucocytosis (p=0.002) and lymphocyte count of less than 500/µL (p=0.004). Recent chemotherapy was associated with better 6-month survival rates (78.8% vs 89.9%, p=0.012) in patients with active cancer, patients with solid cancers (95.9% vs 82.2%, p=0.006) and was non-inferior in patient with hematological neoplasms (72% vs 65.4%, p=0.519).  Conclusion: COVID-19 infection in our cancer patients was associated with significant morbidity and mortality and adversely affected their treatment. The decision to delay or discontinue SACT should be individualized, considering other risk factors for mortality.

The Effect of Dexamethasone Treatment on COVID-19 Prognosis in Cancer Patients.

Background: Dexamethasone is used to treat cancer, relieve chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, enhance cancer patients' appetites, and treat COVID-19 patients. There is little evidence of the impact of a dexamethasone treatment plan on the severity of COVID-19 infections in cancer patients. This study explores whether dexamethasone treatment plan influences the severity of COVID-19 in dexamethasone-treated cancer patients. Methods: The medical records of 108 cancer patients receiving dexamethasone at King Hussein Cancer Center with a COVID-19 infection and 343 without corticosteroid treatment were reviewed. Patients on dexamethasone within seven days before infection, after infection, or both were included. Ventilation support, hospitalization, and mortality within 28 days of a COVID-19 diagnosis were key severity factors. Results: We found that dexamethasone before a COVID-19 infection increased the risk of requiring ventilation assistance and mortality within 28 days by a factor of 5.8 (2.8−12.0) relative to control (p < 0.005). Continuing dexamethasone treatment after a COVID-19 infection, or starting it after infection, had a risk factor equivalent to control. Conclusion: Our data showed that dexamethasone therapy protocol affected COVID-19 prognoses in cancer patients, and it is preferable to not discontinue therapy after infection. A rigorous prospective comparison between early and late dexamethasone dosing is needed to determine the best protocol for treatment.

An update on the impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic public awareness on cancer patients' COVID-19 vaccine compliance: Outcomes and recommendations.

Background: Aside from the pandemic's negative health effects, the world was confronted with public confusion since proper communication and favorable decisions became an ongoing challenge. As a result, the public's perceptions were influenced by what they knew, the many sources of COVID-19 information, and how they interpreted it. With cancer patients continuing to oppose COVID-19 vaccines, we sought to investigate the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine sources of this information in adult cancer patients, which either helped or prevented them from taking the vaccine. We also assessed the relevance and impact of their oncologists' recommendations in encouraging them to take the vaccine. Methods: From June to October 2021, an online survey was conducted at King Hussein Cancer Center. A total of 441 adult cancer patients took part in the study. Patients who had granted their consent were requested to complete an online questionnaire, which was collected using the SurveyMonkey questionnaire online platform. Descriptive analysis was done for all variables. The association between categorical and continuous variables was assessed using the Pearson Chi-square and Fisher Exact. Results: Our results showed that 75% of the patients registered for the COVID-19 vaccine, while 12% refused vaccination. The majority of participants acquired their information from news and television shows, whereas (138/441) got their information through World Health Organization websites. Because the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were made in such a short period, 54.7 % assumed the vaccines were unsafe. Only 49% of the patients said their oncologists had informed them about the benefits of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Conclusions: We found that SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy in cancer patients might be related to misinformation obtained from social media despite the availability of supportive scientific information on the vaccine's benefits from the physicians. To combat misleading and unreliable social media news, we recommend that physicians use telehealth technology to reach out to their patients in addition to their face-to-face consultation, which delivers comprehensive, clear, and high-quality digital services that guide and help patients to better understand the advantages of COVID-19 vaccines.

Factors that predict severity of infection and seroconversion in immunocompromised children and adolescents with COVID-19 infection.

Objectives: We aimed to study the outcomes, severity, and seroconversion post SARS-CoV-2 infection in immunocompromised children and adolescents treated at our center. Method: For this observational study, all pediatric patients who had COVID-19 infection from Sep-22-2020 to Nov-10-2021were identified by reviewing our laboratory records. Their charts were reviewed to determine clinical severity and outcome. Blood samples were drawn for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay. Serious COVID-19 infection (SVI) was defined if the patient had moderate, severe, or critical illness. A cutoff of 100 U/mL anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was used to categorize low and high titer seroconversion. Results: We identified 263 pediatric patients with COVID-19; most (68%) were symptomatic: 5% had severe or critical infection, 25% were hospitalized, 12 required respiratory support, 12 were admitted to the ICU, and five patients (2%) died. Multivariable analysis revealed several factors that predict SVI: Age above 12 years (p=0.035), body mass index above 95th percentile (p=0.034), comorbid conditions (p=0.025), absolute neutrophil count ≤500(p=0.014) and absolute lymphocyte count ≤300 (p=0.022). Levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies were obtained for 173 patients at a median of 94 days (range, 14-300) after PCR diagnosis; of them 142 (82%) patients seroconverted; the lowest seroconversion rate was observed in patients with hematological malignancies (79%). Our univariable model showed that the following factors were predictive of low titer: lower ANC, p=0.01; hematologic malignancy, p=0.023; receiving steroids in the last 14 days, p=0.032; time since last chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy less than 30 days, p=0.002; and being on active chemotherapy in the last 3 months prior to infection, p<0.001. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 antibodies developed in most immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 infection in our study. Mortality was relatively low in our patients. Our univariable and multivariable models showed multiple variables that predict severity of infections and antibody response post COVID-19 infection. These observations may guide choice of active therapy during infection and the best timing of vaccination in this high-risk population.

Establishing the First COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Biobank in Jordan.

Background: Antibodies with the specialized ability to fight infection can be found in the blood of individuals who have recovered from or have been vaccinated against COVID-19. As a result, plasma from these individuals could be used to treat critically ill patients. This treatment is known as convalescent plasma (CCP) therapy. Methods: Plasma units from 1555 consented healthy blood bank donors were collected from February to September 2021. Blood units were tested for the quantitative determination of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus using one of the following assays based on the availability of the kits: The LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG assay or the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay. Results: Among the tested donors, 1027 participants tested positive for neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies (66.04%). There were 484 donors whose plasma qualified to be used for CCP therapy (47.13%) and 214 CCP units were stored in the COVID-19 convalescent biobank. Conclusion: We were able to identify and store 214 fresh frozen plasma units qualified for CCP-plasma therapy for COVID-19 patients according to World Health Organization standards. Hence, we established the first COVID-19-convalescent plasma data and plasma biobank for treating COVID-19-infected cancer patients in Jordan and the region.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Jordan.

OBJECTIVE: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is an important oncogenic driver in some non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors improves survival. The availability of diagnostic immunohistochemistry (IHC) has led to a paradigm shift in ALK testing. This study examined the prevalence of ALK rearrangement in Jordanian patients with NSCLC and compared the results of IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detecting ALK rearrangement. METHODS: This retrospective study on 449 patients with NSCLC treated at the King Hussein Cancer Center in Jordan tested biopsy samples for ALK rearrangement using FISH and/or IHC (D5F3) between 2018 and 2020. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (4%) had ALK-positive NSCLC. The calculated sensitivity and specificity of ALK immunostaining compared with FISH were 87.5% and 96%, respectively. ALK-positive patients were significantly younger than their ALK-negative counterparts, and women were three times more likely to carry ALK rearrangement than men. ALK rearrangement was significantly associated with smoking history, with most ALK-positive patients being non-smokers, former smokers, or light smokers. CONCLUSIONS: IHC is a reasonable alternative to FISH for ALK testing with advantages in terms of robustness, turnaround times, and cost-effectiveness.

Comparison of the Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of Various SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines among Healthcare Workers: Are Our White Coat Armies Protected?

Background: The effective immunization of healthcare workers (HCWs) plays a vital role in preventing the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. There is limited data on the immune response to vaccination among HCWs. We aim to determine seroprevalence rates and neutralizing IgG antibody response to various immunizations among HCWs. Methods: This study was conducted between July and September 2021, in which blood samples were obtained from HCWs and SARS-CoV-2 IgG neutralizing antibodies were measured. Data regarding vaccination status with Pfizer/BioNTech, Sinopharm, or AstraZeneca vaccines, occupation, and prior COVID-19 infection were analyzed. Results: COVID-19 infection post-vaccination was associated with higher mean antibody titers, regardless of vaccine type. Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination produced higher mean antibody titers for HCWs with prior COVID-19 infection (p < 0.00001) than other types of vaccines. Although 96% of HCWs were vaccinated, 3% were seronegative. For HCWs who were seropositive, there were no significant differences between the mean antibody titers when comparing occupations and blood indices. Conclusion: Awareness of the immunity status of HCWs is key to protecting this important group against SARS-CoV-2, especially those without prior COVID-19 infection. Further public health efforts regarding booster vaccination for HCWs are crucial to provide necessary antibody protection.