Immediate Versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

A strategy of complete revascularization (CR) is recommended in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and multivessel disease (MVD). However, the optimal timing of CR remains equivocal. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immediate CR (ICR) with staged CR in patients with ACS and MVD. Our primary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. All outcomes were assessed at 3 time points: in-hospital or at 30 days, at 6 months to 1 year, and at >1 year. Data were pooled in RevMan 5.4 using risk ratios as the effect measure. A total of 9 RCTs (7,506 patients) were included in our review. A total of 7 trials enrolled patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 1 enrolled patients with non-STEMI only, and 1 enrolled patients with all types of ACS. There was no difference between ICR and staged CR regarding all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at any time window. ICR reduced the rate of myocardial infarction and decreased the rate of repeat revascularization at 6 months and beyond. The rates of cerebrovascular events and stent thrombosis were similar between the 2 groups. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis demonstrated a lower rate of myocardial infarction and a reduction in repeat revascularization at and after 6 months with ICR strategy in patients with mainly STEMI and MVD. The 2 groups had no difference in the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Further RCTs are needed to provide more definitive conclusions and investigate CR strategies in other ACS.

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Risk-Prediction Model for 30-Day Readmission for Heart Failure Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR-HF Score).

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the treatment of choice for patients with severe aortic stenosis across the spectrum of surgical risk. About one-third of 30-day readmissions following TAVR are related to heart failure (HF). Hence, we aim to develop an easy-to-use clinical predictive model to identify patients at risk for HF readmission. We used data from the National Readmission Database (2015-2018) utilizing ICD-10 codes to identify TAVR procedures. Readmission was defined as the first unplanned HF readmission within 30-day of discharge. A machine learning framework was used to develop a 30-day TAVR-HF readmission score. The receiver operator characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive power of the model. A total of 92,363 cases of TAVR were included in the analysis. Of the included patients, 3299 (3.6%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge with HF. Individuals who got readmitted, vs those without readmission, had more emergent admissions during index procedure (33.4% vs 19.8%), electrolyte abnormalities (38% vs 16.7%), chronic kidney disease (34.8% vs 21.2%), and atrial fibrillation (60.1% vs 40.7%). Candidate variables were ranked by importance using a parsimony plot. A total of 7 variables were selected based on predictive ability as well as clinical relevance: HF with reduced ejection fraction (25 points), HF preserved EF (20 points), electrolyte abnormalities (17 points), atrial fibrillation (12 points), Charlson comorbidity index (<6 = 0, 6-8 = 9, 9-10 = 13, >10 = 14 points), chronic kidney disease (7 points), and emergent index admission (5 points). On performance evaluation using the testing dataset, an area under the curve of 0.761 (95% CI 0.744-0.778) was achieved. Thirty-day TAVR-HF readmission score is an easy-to-use risk prediction tool. The score can be incorporated into electronic health record systems to identify at-risk individuals for readmissions with HF following TAVR. However, further external validation studies are needed.

Mapping the Heartbeat of America with ChatGPT-4: Unpacking the Interplay of Social Vulnerability, Digital Literacy, and Cardiovascular Mortality in County Residency Choices.

Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States (US). Although high-quality data are accessible in the US for cardiovascular research, digital literacy (DL) has not been explored as a potential factor influencing cardiovascular mortality, although the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) has been used previously as a variable in predictive modeling. Utilizing a large language model, ChatGPT4, we investigated the variability in CVD-specific mortality that could be explained by DL and SVI using regression modeling. We fitted two models to calculate the crude and adjusted CVD mortality rates. Mortality data using ICD-10 codes were retrieved from CDC WONDER, and the geographic level data was retrieved from the US Department of Agriculture. Both datasets were merged using the Federal Information Processing Standards code. The initial exploration involved data from 1999 through 2020 (n = 65,791; 99.98% complete for all US Counties) for crude cardiovascular mortality (CCM). Age-adjusted cardiovascular mortality (ACM) had data for 2020 (n = 3118 rows; 99% complete for all US Counties), with the inclusion of SVI and DL in the model (a composite of literacy and internet access). By leveraging on the advanced capabilities of ChatGPT4 and linear regression, we successfully highlighted the importance of incorporating the SVI and DL in predicting adjusted cardiovascular mortality. Our findings imply that just incorporating internet availability in the regression model may not be sufficient without incorporating significant variables, such as DL and SVI, to predict ACM. Further, our approach could enable future researchers to consider DL and SVI as key variables to study other health outcomes of public-health importance, which could inform future clinical practices and policies.

Revascularization strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease based on sex and age.

OBJECTIVES: This study describes coronary revascularization strategies used by sex and age in the USA. METHODS: A sex-stratified cohort study from the National Inpatient Sample from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (USA) including patients admitted for coronary revascularization with primary or secondary diagnoses of chronic coronary syndrome or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction who underwent ≥3-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention from January 2019 to December 2020. The primary outcome was the use rate of coronary artery bypass grafting or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Prespecified subgroups included age and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Among 121 150 patients (21.7% women), there were no sex differences in age (women: 66.6 [66.5-66.7], men: 67.6 [67.5-67.7], standardized mean difference: 0.1) or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction incidence (women: 37.4%, men: 45.7%, standardized mean difference: 0.17). The majority of women (74.2%) and men (84.9%) underwent bypass grafting, which was unaffected by age, race or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Women were less likely to undergo bypass grafting than percutaneous intervention (adjusted odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.54; P < 0.001) and a disparity most pronounced in patients >80 years old (adjusted odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.45; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with multivessel coronary artery disease needing revascularization undergo bypass grafting, irrespective of sex, age or clinical presentation. The sex disparity in the use of bypass grafting is mostly seen among patients >80 years old.

Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-Term Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background Patient-reported outcome measures have been shown to have important prognostic value after various cardiac interventions. We assessed the association between the change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire 12 (KCCQ-12) score after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and mortality. Methods and Results We included patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement at Mayo Clinic between February 2012 to June 2022 and who completed a KCCQ-12 before and 30 to 45 days after the procedure. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: those who experienced significant (>+19 points; group 1), modest (1-19 points; group 2), and no (≤0 points; group 3) improvement. A total of 1124 patients were included: 60.8% men; 97.6% White. Mean age was 79.4±8.3 years, baseline KCCQ-12 score was 53.9±24.5, and median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 4.9% (interquartile range, 3.1-8.0). At 45 days, the mean change in KCCQ-12 score was 19±24 points; 46.3% (n=520) of patients had a significant improvement in their KCCQ-12 score, while 33.4% (n=375) and 20.4% (n=229) had modest and no improvement, respectively. Median survival was higher in group 1 (5.7±0.2 years) compared with groups 2 and 3 (5.1±0.3 and 4.1±0.4 years, respectively; P<0.001). Compared with patients in group 1, those in groups 2 and 3 had higher long-term risk-adjusted mortality (adjusted hazard ratios, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.20-1.96], and 2.30 [95% CI, 1.74-3.04], respectively). Conclusions Patients who experience modest or no improvement in KCCQ-12 score after transcatheter aortic valve replacement have substantially higher long-term mortality. Delta KCCQ-12 is a cost-effective, efficient tool that can identify patients at increased risk of death at long-term follow-up post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Outcomes of Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect Closure With Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair and Transseptal Mitral Valve Replacement (2015 to 2020).

Patients who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) or transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) have a transeptal access created by an iatrogenic atrial septal defect (ASD) which leads to significant complications requiring closure. Given limited data, we used the National Inpatient Sample between 2015 and 2020 to evaluate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous closure of ASD (PC-ASD) in TEER/TMVR hospitalizations. A total of 44,065 eligible weighted hospitalizations with either TEER (n = 39,625, 89.9%) or TMVR (n = 4,440, 10.1%) with a higher rate of PC-ASD in the TMVR group (10.7% vs 2.0%, p <0.01). The TEER with PC-ASD group were more likely to experience acute heart failure and right ventricular failure and had longer hospital stays but there was no difference in in-hospital mortality compared with the no PC-ASD group. In the TMVR group, there was no difference in the odds of acute heart failure, right ventricular failure, cardiogenic shock, or acute hypoxic respiratory failure, but the odds of mechanical circulatory support, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay were significantly higher in patients with PC-ASD in the TMVR group. In conclusion, rates of percutaneous closure of ASD after TEER were lower than after TMVR and associated with worse in-hospital mortality in TMVR but not in TEER. Further prospective clinical trials are needed to identify patients who would benefit from the closure of iatrogenic ASD.

Utilization and outcomes of protamine after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the use pattern and outcomes of protamine administration for heparin reversal among sites performing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). METHODS: We identified 45,135 patients who underwent LAAO at 243 hospitals participating in Vizient® Clinical Database between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021. Patients were stratified according to protamine administration after the procedure. Outcomes of interest included vascular complications, major bleeding, ischemic events, and same-day discharge. RESULTS: A total of 40,278 patients were included in the propensity-matched comparison, of whom 50% received protamine after the LAAO procedure. The use of protamine varied across hospitals, with 88 hospitals (36.2%) using protamine in >75% of cases and 32 hospitals (13.1%) not using protamine at all. Major bleeding occurred less frequently in the protamine group compared with the control group (2.4% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.03). Major vascular complications and pericardial tamponade were rare but slightly higher in the protamine group (0.8% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.04) and (1.0% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.01), respectively. There were no differences in the rates of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause mortality, or the rate of any major adverse event between the two groups. Same-day discharge was more frequent in the protamine group (12.3% vs 9.4%, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Protamine is used in approximately 50% of LAAO procedures and is associated with lower bleeding events and higher rates of same-day discharge. The higher vascular complication and tamponade is likely due to its ad-hoc use as a reversal agent in these patients.

Cardiovascular Outcomes of Transulnar Versus Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A Regression Matched Meta-Analysis.

Transradial access (TRA) and transulnar access (TUA) are in close vicinity, but TRA is the preferred intervention route. The cardiovascular outcomes and access site complications of TUA and TRA are understudied. Databases, including MEDLINE and Cochrane Central registry, were queried to find studies comparing safety outcomes of both procedures. The outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality and access site bleeding. Secondary outcomes were all-cause major adverse cardiovascular events, crossover rate, artery spasm, access site large hematoma, and access site complications between TUA and TRA. A random-effect model was used with regression to report unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) by limiting confounders and effect modifiers, using software STATA V.17. A total of 4,796 patients in 8 studies were included in our analysis (TUA = 2,420 [50.4%] and TRA = 2,376 [49.6%]). The average age was 61.3 and 60.1 years and the patients predominantly male (69.2% vs 68.4%) for TUA and TRA, respectively. TUA had lower rates of local access site bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.97, I2 = 1.89%, p = 0.04) but higher crossover rate (OR 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 3.11, I2 = 75.37%, p = 0.04) than did TRA. There was no difference in in-hospital mortality, all-cause major adverse cardiovascular events, arterial spasm, and large hematoma between both cohorts. Furthermore, there was no difference in procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume used between TUA and TRA. TUA is a safer approach, associated with lower access site bleeding but higher crossover rates, than TRA. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the safety and long-term outcomes of both procedures.

Seasonal Variation in the Incidence of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal variation in cardiovascular outcomes, including out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, has been described. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate seasonal differences in the incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and associated mortality. METHODS: Using National Inpatient Sample data from 2005 to 2019, we determined the incidence of IHCA in 4 seasons. The primary objective was to evaluate overall seasonal trends in the incidence of IHCA and trends stratified by sex, age, and region. The secondary aim was to determine common causes of admission that led to IHCA, differences in those with shockable vs nonshockable IHCA, independent predictors of IHCA, and seasonal variation in IHCA-related in-hospital mortality and length of stay. RESULTS: A consistent winter peak was observed in the incidence of IHCA in both male and female patients over the years in all age groups except young (<45 years) and in all regions. In 2019, both unadjusted and risk-adjusted odds of IHCA were higher (OR: 1.13; P < 0.001; adjusted OR: 1.08; P = 0.033) in winter than in summer. Patients with shockable IHCA were mainly admitted for cardiac and those with nonshockable IHCA for noncardiac conditions. No seasonal variation was observed in in-hospital mortality after IHCA. Therefore, seasonal variation exists, with a higher IHCA event rate in winter than summer. CONCLUSIONS: Improving insights into factors that influence the higher IHCA event rate during winter may help with proper resource allocation, development of strategies for early recognition of patients vulnerable to IHCA, and closer monitoring and optimization of care to prevent IHCA and improve outcomes.

Machine learning vs. conventional methods for prediction of 30-day readmission following percutaneous mitral edge-to-edge repair.

BACKGROUND: Identifying predictors of readmissions after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (MV-TEER) is essential for risk stratification and optimization of clinical outcomes. AIMS: We investigated the performance of machine learning [ML] algorithms vs. logistic regression in predicting readmissions after MV-TEER. METHODS: We utilized the National-Readmission-Database to identify patients who underwent MV-TEER between 2015 and 2018. The database was randomly split into training (70 %) and testing (30 %) sets. Lasso regression was used to remove non-informative variables and rank informative ones. The top 50 informative predictors were tested using 4 ML models: ML-logistic regression [LR], Naive Bayes [NB], random forest [RF], and artificial neural network [ANN]/For comparison, we used a traditional statistical method (principal component analysis logistic regression PCA-LR). RESULTS: A total of 9425 index hospitalizations for MV-TEER were included. Overall, the 30-day readmission rate was 14.6 %, and heart failure was the most common cause of readmission (32 %). The readmission cohort had a higher burden of comorbidities (median Elixhauser score 5 vs. 3) and frailty score (3.7 vs. 2.9), longer hospital stays (3 vs. 2 days), and higher rates of non-home discharges (17.4 % vs. 8.5 %). The traditional PCA-LR model yielded a modest predictive value (area under the curve [AUC] 0.615 [0.587-0.644]). Two ML algorithms demonstrated superior performance than the traditional PCA-LR model; ML-LR (AUC 0.692 [0.667-0.717]), and NB (AUC 0.724 [0.700-0.748]). RF (AUC 0.62 [0.592-0.677]) and ANN (0.65 [0.623-0.677]) had modest performance. CONCLUSION: Machine learning algorithms may provide a useful tool for predicting readmissions after MV-TEER using administrative databases.

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the Elderly: Insights From PROTECT-AF, PREVAIL, and Continuous Access Registries.

BACKGROUND: Data on the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in elderly patients are limited. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of LAAO between patients ≥80 and <80 years of age. METHODS: We included patients enrolled in randomized trials and nonrandomized registries of the Watchman 2.5 device. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular/unknown death, stroke, or systemic embolism at 5 years. Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular/unknown death, stroke, systemic embolism, and major and nonprocedural bleeding. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards, and competing risk analysis methods. Interaction terms were used to compare the 2 age groups. We also estimated the average treatment effect of the device with the use of inverse probability weighting. RESULTS: We studied 2,258 patients, of whom 570 (25.2%) were ≥80 years old, and 1,688 (74.8%) were <80 years old. Procedural complications at 7 days were similar in both age groups. The primary endpoint occurred in 12.0% in the device group vs 13.8% in the control group (HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.6-1.4) among patients <80 years of age and in 25.3% vs 21.7%, respectively (HR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.7-2.0) among patients ≥80 (interaction P = 0.48). There was no interaction between age and treatment effect for any of the secondary outcomes. The average treatment effects of LAAO (compared with warfarin) were similar in the elderly population (compared with younger patients). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the higher event rates, octogenarians derive similar benefits from LAAO as their younger counterparts. Age alone should not preclude LAAO in otherwise suitable candidates.

Comparison of Sex-Based In-Hospital Procedural Outcomes and Hospital Readmission Frequency After Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder Device Placement: A Propensity Matched National Cohort.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder device has been shown to reduce the chance of recurrent stroke. Per guidelines, stroke is higher in females but procedural efficacy and complications based on sex difference is understudied. The nationwide readmission database (NRD) was used to create sex cohorts using ICD-10 Procedural code for elective PFO occluder device placement performed during the years 2016-2019. The 2 groups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate regression models that matched for confounders to report multivariate odds ratio (mOR) for primary and secondary cardiovascular outcomes. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), acute ischemic stroke, postprocedure bleeding, and cardiac tamponade. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA v. 17. A total of 5818 patients who underwent PFO occluder device placement were identified, of which 3144 (54.0%) were females, and 2673 (46.0%) were males. There was no difference in periprocedural in-hospital mortality, new onset acute ischemic stroke, postprocedural bleeding, or cardiac tamponade between both sexes undergoing occluder device placement. AKI incidence was higher in males compared to females after matching for CKD (mOR = 0.66; 95% CI [0.48-0.92]; P = 0.016) this can be procedural or can be secondary to volume status or nephrotoxins. Males also had a higher length of stay (LOS) at their index hospitalization (2 days vs 1 day) which led to slightly higher total hospitalization cost ($26,585 vs $24,265). Our data did not show a statistically significant difference in the readmission LOS trends between the 2 groups at 30, 90, and 180 days. This national retrospective cohort study of PFO occluder outcomes shows similar efficacy and complication rates between sexes, with the exception of AKI incidence which was higher in males. AKI occurrence was high in males that can be limited due to unavailability of data about hydration status and nephrotoxic medications.

Sixteen-Year National Trends in Use and Outcomes of VA-ECMO in Cardiogenic Shock.

There is a lack of data on contemporary trends in the use and outcomes of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for cardiogenic shock (CS) at a national level. Patients with CS admitted during January 1st, 2002-December 31, 2018, were identified from the United States National Inpatient Sample. Among all patients admitted with CS, those who received VA-ECMO were identified. We report the trends in use and outcomes in terms of mortality, exit strategies and complications among all patients who received VA ECMO for CS. Among a total of approximately 1.6 million patients admitted with CS during the period from January 1st, 2002 to December 31, 2018; 25, 621(1.5 %) received VA-ECMO. There has been a 23-fold increase in the use of VA-ECMO over the study period, from 0.1 % in 2002 to 3 % in 2018, with a simultaneous decreasing trend of in hospital mortality from 77 % in 2002 to 50 % in 2018. Only approximately 15 % of VA-ECMO patients are discharged home with most survivors discharged to a skilled nursing facility or short-term rehabilitation. Moreover, only a minor proportion of patients on VA ECMO are bridged to heart replacement therapy with durable LVAD (6 %) or cardiac transplantation (2.5 %). In conclusion, the use of VA-ECMO in CS has increased 23-fold from January 2002 to December 2018 with a concomitant decrease in mortality from 77 % in 2002 to 50 % in 2018, only a minority of patients on VA-ECMO for CS are bridged to durable LVAD or cardiac transplantation.

Interhospital Readmissions and Early Post-Discharge Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair.

INTRODUCTION: Fragmented postoperative care following elective procedures has been associated with poor outcomes. However, the association between interhospital readmission (IHR) and clinical outcomes after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is unknown. METHODS: Adults who underwent TEER between 2014 and 2018 were identified in the National Readmission Database (NRD). We classified patients who were re-hospitalized within 90-days after TEER as: patients admitted to the index hospital (same hospital readmission; SHR) and those admitted to a different hospital (interhospital readmission; IHR). We compared 90-day outcomes, cause of readmission, length of stay (LOS), and costs between the two groups. Moreover, we tested whether IHR was an independent predictor of 180-day morality using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 12,716 patients who underwent TEER, 2444 were hospitalized within 90-days; among those, 1179 (48.2%) were admitted to a different hospital (IHR). Cardiovascular causes of readmission were more common in the SHR group (63.5% vs 56.7%, P < 0.001). After PSM, major adverse events were higher in the SHR group during both the index admission and during rehospitalization. Also, during the readmission, LOS and cost of care were both higher in the SHR group, while non-home discharge rates were higher in the IHR group. In the logistic regression model, IHR was not independently associated with 180-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Admission to a different hospital post TEER was not associated with higher adverse event rate. The current system of care wherein patients requiring TEER are referred to tertiary centers of excellence appears appropriate.

Trends in outcomes, cost, and readmissions of transcatheter edge to edge repair in the United States (2014-2018).

INTRODUCTION: Despite the growth in transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) volume in the United States, data on the temporal changes in procedural outcomes are lacking. METHODS: We utilized the National Readmission Database to assess the annual changes in patient's characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, cost, and readmissions for patients who underwent TEER between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018. Outcomes of interest included mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and any adverse event (AE). We also assessed length of stay and cost. RESULTS: A total of 22,692 hospitalizations were included. The mean age increased from 75.2 ± 12.9 in 2014 to 78.1 ± 9.8 years in 2018. Changes in the prevalence of risk factors were heterogenous. The incidence of in-hospital mortality decreased from 4.0% in 2014 to 2.0% in 2018. Both MACE and any AE decreased significantly. Although the incidence of 30-day readmission remained stable, there was a trend towards a temporal increase in both 90-day and 180-day. The adjusted median length of stay of the index admission decreased by 50% and this trend was associated with a $2100 reduction in risk and inflation adjusted in-hospital cost, however, this reduction was offset by the increased total cost of readmissions within the first 6 months resulting in similar net-cost. CONCLUSION: The volume of TEER has grown substantially between 2014 and 2018 coupled with a temporal improvement in in-hospital outcomes and reduction in cost and length of stay. Re-hospitalization rates after TEER remained steady at 30-day and trended towards worsening overtime at 90- and 180-days.

Association of Chronic Kidney Disease With In-Hospital Outcomes of Endovascular Stroke Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Data on the differential impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the outcomes of endovascular stroke interventions (ESI) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are limited. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent ESI for AIS between October 1st, 2015 and September 30th, 2019, were identified in a national multicenter database. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and poor functional outcomes. Secondary endpoints included intracranial hemorrhage, mechanical ventilation, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, blood transfusion, length of stay, and cost. A multilevel mixed-effects regression model was used to derive adjusted outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 22,193 AIS patients who underwent ESI at 99 centers were included. Among those, 18,881 (85%) had no CKD, and 3312 (15%) had CKD. Patients with CKD were older and had a higher prevalence of key comorbidities. After multivariable risk adjustment, patients with CKD had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.55 [95% Confidence Interval] [CI] 1.40-1.73, p < 0.01), and poor functional outcomes (OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.26-1.50, p < 0.01). Major complications, including mechanical ventilation, pneumonia, blood transfusion, and myocardial infarction, were more common among CKD patients, who also had longer hospitalizations and accrued higher cost. CONCLUSION: The presence of CKD in patients with AIS treated with ESI is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and poor functional outcomes at discharge.

Treatment Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Dialysis Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Patients receiving maintenance dialysis have higher mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) than patients not receiving dialysis. Whether pPCI confers a benefit to patients receiving dialysis that is similar to that which occurs in lower-risk groups remains unknown. We compared the effect of pPCI on in-hospital outcomes among patients hospitalized for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and receiving maintenance dialysis with the effect among patients hospitalized for STEMI but not receiving dialysis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: We used the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2018) and included all adult hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of STEMI. PREDICTORS: Primary exposure was PCI. Confounders included dialysis status, demographics, insurance, household income, comorbidities, and the elective nature of the admission. OUTCOME: In-hospital mortality, stroke, acute kidney injury, new dialysis requirement, vascular complications, gastrointestinal bleeding, blood transfusion, mechanical ventilation, palliative care, and discharge destination. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: The average treatment effect (ATE) of pPCI was estimated using propensity score matching independently within the group receiving dialysis and the group not receiving dialysis to explore whether the effect is modified by dialysis status. Additionally, the average marginal effect (AME) was calculated accounting for the clustering within hospitals. RESULTS: Among hospitalizations, 4,220 (1.07%) out of 413,500 were for patients receiving dialysis. The dialysis cohort was older (65.2 ± 12.2 vs 63.4 ± 13.1, P < 0.001), had a higher proportion of women (42.4% vs 30.6%, P < 0.001) and more comorbidities, and had a lower proportion of White patients (41.1% vs 71.7%, P < 0.001). Patients receiving dialysis were less likely to undergo angiography (73.1% vs 85.4%, P < 0.001) or pPCI (57.5% vs 79.8%, P < 0.001). Primary PCI was associated with lower mortality in patients receiving dialysis (15.7% vs 27.1%, P < 0.001) as well as in those who were not (5.0% vs 17.4%, P < 0.001). The ATE on mortality did not differ significantly (P interaction = 0.9) between patients receiving dialysis (-8.6% [95% CI, -15.6% to -1.6%], P = 0.02) and those who were not (-8.2% [95% CI, -8.8% to -7.5%], P < 0.001). The AME method showed similar results among patients receiving dialysis (-9.4% [95% CI, -14.8% to -4.0%], P < 0.001) and those who were not (-7.9% [95% CI, -8.5% to -7.4%], P < 0.001) (P interaction = 0.6). Both the ATE and AME were comparable for other in-hospital outcomes in both groups. LIMITATIONS: Administrative data, lack of pharmacotherapy and long-term outcome data, and residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conservative management, pPCI for STEMI was associated with comparable reductions in short-term mortality among patients irrespective of their receipt of maintenance dialysis.