RESUMO
Mental health is political, with intersecting economic, cultural, racialized, and affective dimensions making up the care assemblage, signalling how care is conceptualised and who is deserving of care. In this article, we examine emotions circulating in a non-clinical psychosocial support program for culturally and linguistically diverse people experiencing mental ill-health, foregrounding the relations between culture, race, economy, and assumptions underpinning understandings of care. The mental health program under study offers psychosocial support for culturally and linguistically diverse people to manage life challenges and mental ill-health exacerbated by navigating the complexities of Australia's health and social care systems. We draw on interviews with clients, staff, and providers of intersecting services, employing Ahmed's concept of affective economies and Savreemootoo's concept of navigating whiteness to examine the care assemblage within interview transcripts. We provide insight into affective intensities such as hate, anger, and indifference embedded in white Anglo-centric services, positioning culturally and linguistically diverse people on the margins of care. Non-clinical psychosocial support programs can counter such affective intensities by training and employing multicultural peer support workers-people with lived experience-prioritising relational and place-based approaches to care and supporting and providing clients with relevant skills to navigate an Anglo-centric care system. However, this support is filled with affective tensions: (com)passion, frustration and fatigue circulate and clash due to the scarcity of resources, further signalling what type of care (and with/for whom) is prioritised within Australian relations of care.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Person-centred goal setting with people with brain injury, by interdisciplinary teams has benefits including improved communication between patients, families and clinicians, person-centred care, and improved engagement in rehabilitation. Exploring the experiences of team members who have adopted interdisciplinary, person-centred goal setting may assist in understanding what is needed to implement this complex, core component of rehabilitation practice. This study explored experiences of clinicians working in an extended inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit about implementing a role-based goal planning approach within an interdisciplinary team. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 13 clinicians working at the rehabilitation unit explored their experiences about the cognitive participation and collective actions required to carry out the practice, with data analysed using inductive content analysis guided by Normalisation Process Theory. RESULTS: Three primary themes were identified: putting the person at the centre, accepting the mind-shift to participation focused goals and working collaboratively. CONCLUSIONS: This study has elucidated some key processes that occurred and were necessary to carry out goal setting. A mind-shift towards holistic, participation-focussed goal setting was described as "unlearning" discipline-specific goal setting. Development and ownership by the team, acceptance of team members and willingness to share, and structured processes and resources were necessary.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONNormalising interdisciplinary role-based goal setting in multi-professional teams requires a mind-shift away from traditional, discipline-specific goal setting.Implementation of interdisciplinary, collaborative team goal setting within health service settings requires collective actions including collaborative working by team members, structured processes including organised time for collaborative team and family meetings, practical resources and training to support processes.Clinicians perceived the goal setting approach to put the person at the centre resulting in a deep understanding of the person, shared understanding, and motivation for rehabilitation.
