A Deep Learning Model Enhances Clinicians' Diagnostic Accuracy to More Than 96% for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning model to accurately detect anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to evaluate its effect on the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of clinicians. METHODS: A training dataset was built from MRIs acquired from January 2017 to June 2021, including patients with knee symptoms, irrespective of ACL ruptures. An external validation dataset was built from MRIs acquired from January 2021 to June 2022, including patients who underwent knee arthroscopy or arthroplasty. Patients with fractures or prior knee surgeries were excluded in both datasets. Subsequently, a deep learning model was developed and validated using these datasets. Clinicians of varying expertise levels in sports medicine and radiology were recruited, and their capacities in diagnosing ACL injuries in terms of accuracy and diagnosing time were evaluated both with and without artificial intelligence (AI) assistance. RESULTS: A deep learning model was developed based on the training dataset of 22,767 MRIs from 5 centers and verified with external validation dataset of 4,086 MRIs from 6 centers. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.987 and a sensitivity and specificity of 95.1%. Thirty-eight clinicians from 25 centers were recruited to diagnose 3,800 MRIs. The AI assistance significantly improved the accuracy of all clinicians, exceeding 96%. Additionally, a notable reduction in diagnostic time was observed. The most significant improvements in accuracy and time efficiency were observed in the trainee groups, suggesting that AI support is particularly beneficial for clinicians with moderately limited diagnostic expertise. CONCLUSIONS: This deep learning model demonstrated expert-level diagnostic performance for ACL ruptures, serving as a valuable tool to assist clinicians of various specialties and experience levels in making accurate and efficient diagnoses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Artificial intelligence suppression as a strategy to mitigate artificial intelligence automation bias.

BACKGROUND: Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into clinics brings the risk of automation bias, which potentially misleads the clinician's decision-making. The purpose of this study was to propose a potential strategy to mitigate automation bias. METHODS: This was a laboratory study with a randomized cross-over design. The diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture, a common injury, on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used as an example. Forty clinicians were invited to diagnose 200 ACLs with and without AI assistance. The AI's correcting and misleading (automation bias) effects on the clinicians' decision-making processes were analyzed. An ordinal logistic regression model was employed to predict the correcting and misleading probabilities of the AI. We further proposed an AI suppression strategy that retracted AI diagnoses with a higher misleading probability and provided AI diagnoses with a higher correcting probability. RESULTS: The AI significantly increased clinicians' accuracy from 87.2%±13.1% to 96.4%±1.9% (P < .001). However, the clinicians' errors in the AI-assisted round were associated with automation bias, accounting for 45.5% of the total mistakes. The automation bias was found to affect clinicians of all levels of expertise. Using a logistic regression model, we identified an AI output zone with higher probability to generate misleading diagnoses. The proposed AI suppression strategy was estimated to decrease clinicians' automation bias by 41.7%. CONCLUSION: Although AI improved clinicians' diagnostic performance, automation bias was a serious problem that should be addressed in clinical practice. The proposed AI suppression strategy is a practical method for decreasing automation bias.

Functional connectome automatically differentiates multiple system atrophy (parkinsonian type) from idiopathic Parkinson's disease at early stages.

Differentiating the parkinsonian variant of multiple system atrophy (MSA-P) from idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) is challenging, especially in the early stages. This study aimed to investigate differences and similarities in the brain functional connectomes of IPD and MSA-P patients and use machine learning methods to explore the diagnostic utility of these features. Resting-state fMRI data were acquired from 88 healthy controls, 76 MSA-P patients, and 53 IPD patients using a 3.0 T scanner. The whole-brain functional connectome was constructed by thresholding the Pearson correlation matrices of 116 regions, and topological properties were evaluated through graph theory approaches. Connectome measurements were used as features in machine learning models (random forest [RF]/logistic regression [LR]/support vector machine) to distinguish IPD and MSA-P patients. Regarding graph metrics, early IPD and MSA-P patients shared network topological properties. Both patient groups showed functional connectivity disruptions within the cerebellum-basal ganglia-cortical network, but these disconnections were mainly in the cortico-thalamo-cerebellar circuits in MSA-P patients and the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuits in IPD patients. Among the connectome parameters, t tests combined with the RF method identified 15 features, from which the LR classifier achieved the best diagnostic performance on the validation set (accuracy = 92.31%, sensitivity = 90.91%, specificity = 93.33%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.89). MSA-P and IPD patients show similar whole-brain network topological alterations. MSA-P primarily affects cerebellar nodes, and IPD primarily affects basal ganglia nodes; both conditions disrupt the cerebellum-basal ganglia-cortical network. Moreover, functional connectome parameters showed outstanding value in the differential diagnosis of early MSA-P and IPD.

Novel Deep Learning Technique Used in Management and Discharge of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in China.

PURPOSE: The low sensitivity and false-negative results of nucleic acid testing greatly affect its performance in diagnosing and discharging patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Chest computed tomography (CT)-based evaluation of pneumonia may indicate a need for isolation. Therefore, this radiologic modality plays an important role in managing patients with suspected COVID-19. Meanwhile, deep learning (DL) technology has been successful in detecting various imaging features of chest CT. This study applied a novel DL technique to standardize the discharge criteria of COVID-19 patients with consecutive negative respiratory pathogen nucleic acid test results at a "square cabin" hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: DL was used to evaluate the chest CT scans of 270 hospitalized COVID-19 patients who had two consecutive negative nucleic acid tests (sampling interval >1 day). The CT scans evaluated were obtained after the patients' second negative test result. The standard criterion determined by DL for patient discharge was a total volume ratio of lesion to lung <50%. RESULTS: The mean number of days between hospitalization and DL was 14.3 (± 2.4). The average intersection over union was 0.7894. Two hundred and thirteen (78.9%) patients exhibited pneumonia, of whom 54.0% (115/213) had mild interstitial fibrosis. Twenty-one, 33, and 4 cases exhibited vascular enlargement, pleural thickening, and mediastinal lymphadenopathy, respectively. Of the latter, 18.8% (40/213) had a total volume ratio of lesions to lung ≥50% according to our severity scale and were monitored continuously in the hospital. Three cases had a positive follow-up nucleic acid test during hospitalization. None of the 230 discharged cases later tested positive or exhibited pneumonia progression. CONCLUSION: The novel DL enables the accurate management of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and can help avoid cluster transmission or exacerbation in patients with false-negative acid test.