RESUMO
Background: Percutaneous closure of the patent foramen ovale (PFO) is primarily guided by fluoroscopy in the catheter room, during which procedure both the guidewire and sheath need to pass through the PFO. We performed PFO closure using a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided approach and only the sheath was passed through the PFO during the procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of PFO closure using this technique. Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed. A total of 117 consecutive adult patients underwent percutaneous PFO closure without fluoroscopy, under the sole guidance of TEE in our hospital between December 2018 and December 2021. The data of each patient consisted of preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables collected. The primary outcome is that the occluder was successfully released. The secondary outcomes included perioperative and follow-up transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), Headache impact test-6 (HIT-6) score and clinical symptoms. Results: Transvenous PFO closure under TEE guidance was successful in all cases. The sample consisted of 93 females and 24 males with an average age of 42.3±7.8 years. There were 28 patients with preoperative cerebral infarction [Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score >6 points] and 89 patients with migraine. All patients underwent a preoperative TEE to confirm the presence of PFO, and contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (c-TCD) acoustic contrast suggested grades 3 to 4. The average time of surgery for patients (puncture to removal of the sheath) was 32 minutes. Three cases of vagus nerve reflex manifestations during surgery and two cases of transient ventricular arrhythmia all improved after symptomatic treatment. There were no instances of metal allergy, hemolysis, or other acute vascular procedural complications. For all 89 patients with migraine, significant relief or resolution was achieved during the first six-month follow-up (P<0.001). Conclusions: As a monotherapy, percutaneous closure of PFO guided by TEE where only the sheath passes through the PFO during the operation is an effective procedure with a high success rate and a low complication rate.
RESUMO
Introduction: The diagnosis of pulmonary infection and the identification of pathogens are still clinical challenges in immunocompromised patients. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has emerged as a promising infection diagnostic technique. However, its diagnostic value in immunocompromised patients needs further exploration. Purposes: This study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of mNGS compared with comprehensive conventional pathogen tests (CTs) in the etiology of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients and immunocompetent patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 53 patients who were diagnosed with pneumonia from May 2019 to June 2021. There were 32 immunocompromised patients and 21 immunocompetent patients with pneumonia who received both mNGS and CTs. The diagnostic performance was compared between mNGS and CTs in immunocompromised patients, using the composite diagnosis as the reference standard. And, the diagnostic value of mNGS for mixed infections was further analyzed. Results: Compared to immunocompetent patients, the most commonly pathogens, followed by Cytomegalovirus, Pneumocystis jirovecii and Klebsiella pneumoniae in immunocompromised patients. Furthermore, more mixed infections were diagnosed, and bacterial-fungal-virus coinfection was the most frequent combination (43.8%). mNGS can detect more types of pathogenic microorganisms than CTs in both groups (78.1% vs. 62.5%, P = 0.016and 57.1% vs. 42.9%, P = 0.048). The overall diagnostic positive rate of mNGS for pathogens was higher in immunocompromised patients (P = 0.002). In immunocompromised patients, a comparable diagnostic accuracy of mNGS and CTs was found for bacterial, fungal, and viral infections and coinfection. mNGS had a much higher sensitivity for bacterial infections (92.9% vs. 50%, P < 0.001) and coinfections (68.8% vs. 48.3%, P < 0.05), and it had no significant advantage in the detection of fungal infections, mainly due to the high sensitivity for Pneumocystis jirovecii in both groups. Conclusion: mNGS is more valuable in immunocompromised patients and exhibits apparent advantages in detecting bacterial and mixed infections. It may be an alternative or complementary diagnostic method for the diagnosis of complicated infections in immunocompromised patients.