Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Ophthalmol ; 2019: 4964595, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31737356

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiological and visual outcomes and to identify the main prognostic factors of intralenticular foreign body (ILFB) injuries. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 21 patients (21 eyes) referred to Hebei Eye Hospital in North China from January 2012 to December 2017, who underwent surgical removal of ILFBs and associated ocular trauma repairs. Data regarding the patient demographics, cause of the injury, nature of the ILFB, clinical features, time interval between the injury and the ILFB removal, time interval between the presentation and the surgery, and the initial and final best-corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) were analyzed, and the main prognostic factors were identified. RESULTS: Male adults were most affected by ILFBs (90.5%). The mean age of the patients was 41.5 years (median: 46 years, range: 21 to 60 years). None of the patients were wearing goggles at the time of the injury. The most common ILFB cause was hammering the metal (57.1%), and most of the ILFBs were metallic (71.4%). After medical treatment, the final BCVA was improved significantly (Z = 2.49, P=0.015). There was a significant association between the ILFBs with posterior segment injuries and the final BCVA (χ 2 = 10.03, P=0.01). Those factors showing no statistical association with the final BCVA included the age (χ 2 = 0.36, P=1.0), gender (χ 2 = 0.52, P=1.0), nature of the ILFB (χ 2 = 1.11, P=0.54), entrance wound location (χ 2 = 2.85, P=0.25), and time interval between the injury and the ILFB removal (χ 2 = 1.87, P=0.23). CONCLUSION: This is the first local study to explore the epidemiology of ILFB injuries and to identify the main prognostic factors. There was a significant association between the ILFBs with posterior segment injuries and the final BCVA. Improved public awareness and strengthened education regarding safety are the key approaches to reduce the incidence of eye injuries.

2.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(7): 2261-2264, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31503115

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bicanalicular lacerations are relatively rare and more of a surgical challenge in clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of bicanalicular lacerations with a new bicanalicular silicone stent at a tertiary eye care center. METHODS: All patients who underwent bicanalicular lacerations repair from January 2013 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected for each patient included patient demographics, affected sides, cause of injuries, the timing of management, associated ocular injuries, the timing of stent removal, duration of follow-up and the outcomes of the surgical repair with a new bicanalicular silicone stent. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with bicanalicular lacerations met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients was 43.8 years old (range: 2-73years). Of the 36 patients, 33 (91.7%) were males and 3 (8.3%) were females. The right eye was injured in 17 patients (47.2%). All patients underwent surgical intervention within 24 hours. The most common cause of bicanalicular lacerations was electric bicycles accidents (7 patients, 19.4%), and followed by motor vehicle accidents (6 patients, 16.7%), blunt objects (6 patients, 16.7%), fights (6 patients, 16.7%), falls (3 patients, 12%), dog bites (2 patients, 5.6%), hook injuries (2 patients, 5.6%), broken glass (2 patients, 5.6%), and sharp objects (2 patients, 5.6%). The most common associated ocular injuries were orbital fracture (61.1%), followed by lid lacerations and open globe injuries. The functional success rate was 86.1%. The average interval between the surgery and the stent removal was 13.8 weeks (range: 8-20 weeks). All the stents were removed successfully without any difficulty in the outpatient department. The follow-up after stent removal ranged from 2 to 12 months (mean: 5.1months). CONCLUSIONS: Bicanalicular lacerations involvement occured in 6.8% of all canalicular lacerations. The most common cause of bicanalicular lacerations was electric bicycles accidents and the most common associated ocular injuries was orbital fracture in North China. The new bicanalicular silicone stent achieved good functional success (86.1%) in the management of bicanalicular lacerations.


Assuntos
Lacerações/cirurgia , Stents , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Traumatismos Oculares/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças do Aparelho Lacrimal/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fraturas Orbitárias/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Silicones , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA