Diversity, equity, and inclusion in gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Position Statement.

1: The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) adheres to the overarching principles of equality of opportunity, fair treatment, nondiscrimination, and diversity of health care professionals. 2: ESGE strongly supports the creation of collaborations within and between national and international endoscopy societies to disseminate the principles of diversity, equality, and inclusion (DEI) in the field of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. 3: ESGE aims to reflect the diversity of its membership in all its scientific and educational activities. 4: ESGE supports the fostering of collaborative work settings that empower all members of the endoscopy team to reach their full potential. 5: ESGE supports international and national endoscopy societies in promoting equitable access to high quality endoscopy training. 6: ESGE recommends the implementation of ergonomic principles in endoscopy units to prevent injuries and to provide adapted workplace conditions for personnel with disabilities and/or special needs. 7: ESGE recommends comprehensive mentorship, that includes diverse backgrounds, and equitable sponsorship for professional development, training, and academic excellence. 8: ESGE recommends that endoscopists actively identify, discuss, and attempt to accommodate reasonable patient preferences and expectations regarding endoscopy procedures. 9: ESGE advocates for educational and awareness campaigns targeting both health care professionals and patients, as well as the adoption of cost-effective health care strategies to address disparities and enhance equity in endoscopy care. 10: ESGE is committed to increasing support for underrepresented scholars and minorities pursuing research in endoscopy. 11: ESGE identifies mentorship and sponsorship as factors that may mitigate the barriers to academic careers for underrepresented endoscopy scholars. 12: ESGE recognizes the need to increase awareness of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the field of endoscopy and supports publications on these topics.

Ductal Intervention in Chronic Pancreatitis: Impact on Glycemic Control and Endocrine Insufficiency Management.

Background and aim Pancreatic endotherapy has been established as a viable and effective modality for the management of pain in chronic pancreatitis (CP). However, its impact on endocrine insufficiency has been rarely reported. In this retrospective study, we aimed to assess the impact of endotherapy on glycemic status and the management of diabetes in these patients. Methods A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with CP with pain presenting to the King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, India, from December 2021 to May 2023 was done. Detailed clinical, laboratory, imaging, and treatment data were recorded. Endocrine dysfunction was defined as glycosylated hemoglobin (Hba1C) ≥6.5 g/dl. The status of endocrine function (Hba1C values) before and after endotherapy, as well as the requirement of oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA) and/or insulin, was recorded. Results One hundred forty-one patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the management of pain (mean age: 35 years, 74.5% males). Prior to endotherapy, pathological endocrine dysfunction was seen in 60 patients (42.5%). The mean HbA1c value was 8.46 g/dl (4.5-16.1g/dl). OHAs alone were used in 13/60 (21.6%), and 34/60 (56.6%) required insulin. A combination of OHA and insulin was required in 13/60 (21.6%) of patients. Post-endotherapy, none of the patients were on a combination of OHAs and insulin; 5/13 (38.4%) patients were on OHAs alone, while 8/13 (61.5%) patients were shifted to insulin. Out of the total 47 patients who required insulin, insulin could be stopped in 15/47 (31.9%) of patients. Patients who demonstrated improvement in endocrine dysfunction had significantly lower HbA1c values (6.38 vs. 8.07 g/dl, p < 0.001), a higher proportion of patients with idiopathic pancreatitis (73.3% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.004), and a lower proportion of patients with concomitant exocrine insufficiency (13.3% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.007). Conclusions One-third of the patients had improvements in endocrine dysfunction. Early ductal intervention in a selected subset of patients with CP may have the potential to improve glycemic status.

Fully Covered Self-expandable Metallic Stents for Refractory Benign Pancreatic Duct Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment of refractory pancreatic duct (PD) strictures includes the placement of multiple plastic stents. Recent studies have shown the benefit of fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS). This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and safety of FCSEMS in PD strictures. METHODS: A comprehensive search of all suitable studies was conducted using the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus from inception to November 2022. The outcomes assessed were efficacy and safety of FCSEMS in PD strictures. Using a random-effects inverse-variance model, the pooled proportions were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies with 439 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled stricture resolution rate was 91.6% (95% CI: 87.4-95.7), while the pooled pain resolution rate was 84.9% (95% CI: 77.7-92.1). The pooled incidences of stent-related adverse events, including acute pancreatitis, pain requiring stent removal, and de novo stricture, were 3.9% (95% CI: 1.2-6.7), 0.8% (95% CI: 0.0-2.1), and 3.3% (95% CI: 0.7-5.8). The pooled incidence of stent migration, stricture recurrence, and the need for restenting were 12.9% (95% CI: 6.7-19.1), 9.3% (95% CI: 4.7-13.8), and 12.3% (95% CI: 6.9-17.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FCSEMSs can be considered in carefully selected patients with benign PD strictures with high resolution rate and acceptable adverse event rate. De-novo structure formation appears to be a significant problem. Further studies may help to decide the role of FCSEMS in the algorithm.

Outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps-Insights from western India.

INTRODUCTION: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (uEMR) represents an alternative to conventional EMR for resection of sessile colorectal polyps. We aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of uEMR for sessile colorectal polyps. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of endoscopy database was done for patients who underwent uEMR for sessile colorectal polyps more than 10 mm in size without any features of sub-mucosal invasion from two tertiary care centres in western India between January 2021 and June 2023. Exclusion criteria were other modes of endoscopic resection. Primary outcome was rate of en bloc resection. Secondary outcomes were complete resection rate, adverse events and recurrence rate. RESULTS: During the study period, 159 patients with 261 lesions met the study inclusion. Mean lesion size was 1.935 ± 0.71 cm with most lesion located in the rectum (75, 28.73%) followed by sigmoid colon (69, 26.43%). Most lesions had a Paris 0-Is morphology (192, 73.56%). Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) IIa pattern was seen on narrow band imaging (NBI) in 221 (84.67%) lesions. Complete resection was achieved in 98.46% lesions (257/261). En bloc resection was achieved in 91.82% (236/257) lesions. Complications were seen in 6.8%, all of which were managed endoscopically. Recurrence was seen in 3.1% of polyps on follow-up. CONCLUSION: uEMR is a safe and efficacious technique for endoscopic resection for sessile colorectal polyps with high rates of en bloc resection for polyps more than 10 mm size.

Impact of post-hepatectomy biliary leaks on long-term survival in different liver tumors: A single institute experience.

Backgrounds/Aims: A postoperative biliary leak is one of the most morbid complications occurring after a liver resection, the long-term impact of which remains unknown. Methods: Retrospective analysis of consecutive liver resections performed from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2021. Primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) was compared between patients with and without a bile leak, stratifying for tumor type. Survival curves were plotted using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and differences between them were analyzed using the log-rank test. Results: In toto, 862 patients were analyzed, and included 306 (35.5%) hepatocellular carcinomas, 212 (24.6%) metastatic colorectal cancers, and 111 (12.9%) cholangiocarcinomas (69 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, 42 hilar cholangiocarcinomas). Occurrence of a bile leak was associated with significantly poorer DFS only in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (median DFS 9.9 months vs. 24.9 months, p = 0.013), and further analysis was restricted to this cohort. A Cox regression performed for factors associated with DFS detriment in patients with cholangiocarcinoma showed that apart from node positivity (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.482, p = 0.033) and margin positivity (HR: 2.65, p = 0.021), development of a bile leak was independently associated with worsening DFS on both univariate and multiple regression analyses (HR: 1.896, p = 0.033). Conclusions: Post-hepatectomy biliary leaks are associated with significantly poorer DFS only in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, but not in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods to mitigate this survival detriment need to be explored.

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Avid Benign Anthracotic Mediastinal Lymphadenitis Mimicking Metastatic Lymphadenopathy.

The staging of malignancy is critical for its effective management. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging is a common modality for malignancy staging, which identifies areas of FDG avidity. However, multiple benign etiologies can cause false-positive 18F FDG-avid nodes. Among these, extrapulmonary involvement of anthracosis in the form of lymphadenopathy is a rare entity. In patients with concomitant malignancies, the presence of 18F FDG-avid anthracotic lymph nodal enlargement may mimic nodal metastasis. Endosonography-guided tissue acquisition may help differentiate between the two. Herein, we describe six cases of FDG-avid benign anthracotic lymphadenitis detected during staging workups for patients with malignancies who later underwent curative resection.

Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage: A multicenter study from India (with video).

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) offers a safe and minimally invasive alternative for percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCC) in acute cholecystitis patients with high-surgical risk. Additionally, EUS-GBD serves as a rescue biliary drainage in malignant distal biliary obstruction. Despite its widespread application, data within the Indian context remains sparse. This study aims to report the outcomes of EUS-GBD through the first multi-center study from India. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing EUS-GBD at six tertiary care centers of India from March 2022 to November 2023. EUS-GBD was performed by free hand or over-the-guidewire technique with lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) or large caliber metal stent (LCMS). The primary outcome was technical success (defined as successful deployment of stent between gallbladder and stomach/duodenal lumen). The secondary outcomes were clinical success (defined as resolution of symptoms of acute cholecystitis and more than > 50% reduction in bilirubin level within two weeks in distal biliary obstruction), adverse event rate, 30-day mortality rate and 90-day reintervention rate. RESULTS: Total 29 patients (mean age 65.86 ± 12.91, 11 female) underwent EUS-GBD. The indication for EUS-GBD were acute cholecystitis (79.31%) and rescue biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction (20.69%). LAMS was deployed in 92.86%, predominantly by free-hand technique (78.57%). Technical and clinical success rates were 96.55% and 82.75%, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 27.59% patients, with severe adverse events (bile leak and bleeding) being uncommon (10%). Both 30-day mortality rate and 90-day reintervention rate were 13.79% in patients. Cholecysto-duodenal fistula facilitated cholecystoscopic intervention and stone removal in one patient and transgastric EUS-GBD did not hamper bilio-enteric anastomosis during Whipple surgery in two patients. CONCLUSION: EUS-GBD is a safe and effective technique for managing acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients and for biliary drainage in cases with malignant distal biliary obstruction.

Lumen-apposing metal stents: A primer on indications and technical tips.

Lumen-apposing metal stents have ushered a new frontier for interventional endoscopic ultrasound. Initial use for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections has rapidly expanded to the bile duct, gallbladder and small bowel. Intra-luminal applications for short strictures have also emerged. Electrocautery enhancement has made the stent delivery speedy. While the advent of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has brought a paradigm shift in the practice of interventional endoscopic ultrasound, their use is associated with certain technicalities that any advanced endosonologist should know. Understanding indications for LAMS is critical and their use in appropriate settings. Troubleshooting in tricky situations is always a challenge and the background considerations for their use include knowing the target organ, cautery and puncture technique, managing partially opened LAMS and also managing maldeployment. In this review, we discuss the intricacies and technical tips for the use of lumen-apposing metal stents.

Adverse events with endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The technical and clinical effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided gastroenterostomy (GE) has been reported by several meta-analyses, but few of them have addressed the adverse events (AE). The goal of the current meta-analysis was to analyze the AEs associated with various types of EUS-GE. METHODS: All relevant studies reporting the AEs with EUS-GE were searched from 2000 to 31st March 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus. The event rates were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 36 studies (n = 1846) were included in the meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis reports a pooled technical success rate of 96.9% (95.9-98.0; I2 = 29.3%) with a pooled clinical success rate of 90.6% (88.5-92.7; I2 = 60.9%). The pooled incidence of overall AEs with EUS-GE was 13.0% (10.3-15.7; I2 = 69.7%), with the commonest being maldeployment of the stent, seen in 4.6% (3.2-6.0; I2 = 50.6%). The pooled incidences of serious AE and procedure-related mortality were 1.2% (0.7-1.8; I2 = 1.9%) and 0.3% (0.0-0.7; I2 = 0.0%), respectively. Subgroup analysis of studies using only the free-hand technique showed a significantly lower overall AE and maldeployment but not serious AE and other individual AEs. The pooled incidences of delayed stent migration and stent occlusion were 0.5% (0.0-1.1; I2 = 0.0%) and 0.8% (0.2-1.3; I2 = 0.0%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite a technical and clinical success rate of >90%, AEs are seen in around one-seventh of the cases of EUS-GE, maldeployment being the commonest. However, the pooled incidence of serious AE and mortality remains low, which is reassuring.

Tata Memorial Centre Evidence Based Management of Colorectal cancer.

ABSTRACT: This review article examines the evidence-based management of colorectal cancers, focusing on topics characterized by ongoing debates and evolving evidence. To contribute to the scientific discourse, we intentionally exclude subjects with established guidelines, concentrating instead on areas where the current understanding is dynamic. Our analysis encompasses a thorough exploration of critical themes, including the evidence surrounding complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy in colon cancers. Additionally, we delve into the evolving landscape of perioperative chemotherapy in both colon and rectal cancers, considering its nuanced role in the context of contemporary treatment strategies. Advancements in surgical techniques are a pivotal aspect of our discussion, with an emphasis on the utilization of minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery in both colon and rectal cancers, including advanced rectal cases. Moving beyond conventional radical procedures, we scrutinize the feasibility and implications of endoscopic resections for small tumors, explore the paradigm of organ preservation in locally advanced rectal cancers, and assess the utility of total neoadjuvant therapy in the current treatment landscape. Our final segment reviews pivotal trials that have significantly influenced the management of colorectal liver and peritoneal metastasis.

Current paradigm of endoscopic ultrasound in biliary and pancreatic duct drainage: an update.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the workhorse for biliary and pancreatic ductal interventions. Despite advances in both endoscopes and accessories for ERCP, it still has limitations in the presence of altered anatomy, luminal obstruction hindering access to the papilla, and proximal duct obstructions by tight stricture, calculi or intraductal growth. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) and EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD) have expanded the rescue procedures after failed ERCP. This review discusses the techniques and results of various EUS-BD procedures, as well as EUS-PDD.

Endoscopic retrieval of migrated Foley catheter: A clinical case series.

Use of Foley catheter in patients with ileostomy, for the decompression of large bowel distal to stoma or for the administration of large bowel enema through colostomy, either to treat constipation or for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy, is a common practice. Accidental migration of catheter during bowel irrigation through stoma can take place if it is not secured externally to the skin. We present 2 such cases with intra-colonic migration of Foley catheter that occurred during bowel irrigation and were retrieved endoscopically. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of endoscopic removal of Foley catheter that migrated internally through the stoma.

Single-use accessories and endoscopes in the era of sustainability and climate change-A balancing act.

Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is among the highest waste generator in healthcare facilities. The major reasons include production of large-volume non-renewable waste, use of single-use devices, and reprocessing or decontamination processes. Single-use endoscopic accessories have gradually replaced reusable devices over last two decades contributing to the rising impact of GI endoscopy on ecosystem. Several reports of infection outbreaks with reusable duodenoscopes raised concerns regarding the efficacy and adherence to standard disinfection protocols. Even the enhanced reprocessing techniques like double high-level disinfection have not been found to be the perfect ways for decontamination of duodenoscopes and therefore, paved the way for the development of single-use duodenoscopes. However, the use of single-use endoscopes is likely to amplify the net waste generated and carbon footprint of any endoscopy unit. Moreover, single-use devices challenge one of the major pillars of sustainability, that is, "reuse." In the era of climate change, a balanced approach is required taking into consideration patient safety as well as financial and environmental implications. The possible solutions to provide optimum care while addressing the impact on climate include selective use of disposable duodenoscopes and careful selection of accessories during a case. Other options include use of disposable endcaps and development of effective high-level disinfection techniques. The collaboration between the healthcare professionals and the manufacturers is paramount for the development of environmental friendly devices with low carbon footprint.

Predictors of proximal migration of straight biliary plastic stents.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proximal biliary plastic stent migration (PSM) remains a challenging complication. The study aims at determining the PSM rate, retrieval outcomes and factors associated with PSM. METHODS: Endoscopy database was analyzed from January 2016 to January 2021 to identify 1137 patients, who underwent stent removal or repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Demography, methods of stent retrieval, outcomes and complications were noted. Logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors for PSM. Propensity score matching was done in a 1:1 manner using age, sex, comorbidities and indication to assess endoscopy-related factors. Clinical trial registration done (CTRI/2022/02/040516). RESULTS: PSM was noted in 74 (6.5%) cases. Stent retrieval was successful in 94.59% (70/74) of cases. A balloon catheter (46/74) was commonly used. Technical failure was due to an impacted stent (2) and stent above the stricture (2). Complications were seen in 2.7% of cases. On multi-variate regression, sphincteroplasty at index ERCP (Odds ratio [OR] = 5.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.7-11.89), stent length < 10 cm (OR = 8.53, 95% CI = 3.2-22.47), 7-Fr stent (OR = 18.25, 95% CI = 6.5-50.64), dilated bile duct (mean diameter- 9.2 ± 3.94 mm) (OR = 0.384, 95% CI = 0.18-0.72) and delayed ERCP by > 3 months from index ERCP (OR = 15.28, 95% CI = 8.1-28.49). After performing propensity score matching for age, sex, comorbidities and indication to determine endoscopy-related factors, 7-Fr stent size (OR 3.495; 95% CI-1.23-9.93) and duration of indwelling stent for more than three months (OR-3.37; 95% CI-1.646-6.76) were significantly associated with proximal stent migration. CONCLUSION: Proximally migrated straight stents can be successfully retrieved using standard accessories. The use of 7-Fr size stent, stents indwelling for more than three months, sphincteroplasty at index ERCP, stent length < 10 cm and dilated bile duct were associated with increased risk of proximal migration of straight biliary plastic stents. After propensity score matching, the use of 7-Fr size stents and stent indwelling for over three months were endoscopy-related factors associated with proximal migration.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of gastric wall thickening: a retrospective study with meta-analysis.

Background: Tissue acquisition from a thickened gastric wall using biopsy forceps may not always lead to diagnosis, given the submucosal location of the pathology. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (TA) may serve as a minimally invasive diagnostic tool in such cases. Hence, we aimed to assess the diagnostic outcome and safety of EUS-TA from thickened gastric walls. Methods: Data from patients with gastric wall thickening undergoing EUS-TA at 5 tertiary care centers from August 2020 to August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. These data were pooled with studies obtained from a comprehensive search of Medline, Embase and Scopus from January 2000 to November 2022 and a meta-analysis was performed. Pooled event rates were calculated using an inverse variance model. Results: The search strategy yielded 13 studies that were combined with data from 30 patients from our centers; a total of 399 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled rate of sample adequacy was 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.0-98.2), while the pooled rate of diagnostic accuracy was 91.3% (95%CI 87.0-95.5). The pooled sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing malignant lesions with EUS-TA from gastric wall thickening were 94.8% (95%CI 91.3-97.2) and 100% (95%CI 93.6-100), respectively. There were no reported adverse events in any of the studies. Conclusions: EUS-TA offers a safe and accurate diagnostic modality for the etiological diagnosis of thickened gastric walls. Further research is required to identify the needle type and optimal technique for improving outcomes.