Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Public Health ; 18(1): 1376, 2018 Dec 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30558592

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Registered healthcare workers worldwide have a high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, particularly of the back. Multidisciplinary interventions among these workers have improved fear avoidance beliefs, but not low back pain (LBP) and related sickness absences, cost-effectiveness studies are scarce. Our purpose was to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three intervention-arms (combined neuromuscular exercise and back care counselling or either alone) compared with non-treatment. METHODS: We randomly assigned female healthcare workers with recurrent non-specific LBP to one of four study-arms: Combined neuromuscular exercise and back care counseling; Exercise; Counseling; and no intervention Control. We assessed the effectiveness of the interventions on intensity of LBP, pain interfering with work and fear avoidance beliefs against the Control, and calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for sickness absence and QALY. RESULTS: We conducted three sub-studies in consecutive years of 2011, 2012, and 2013 to reach an adequate sample size. All together 219 women were randomized within each sub-study, of whom 74 and 68% had adequate questionnaire data at 6 and 12 months, respectively. No adverse events occurred. Compliance rates varied between intervention-arms. After 12 months, the Combined-arm showed reduced intensity of LBP (p = 0.006; effect size 0.70, confidence interval 0.23 to 1.17) and pain interfering with work (p = 0.011) compared with the Control-arm. Work-related fear of pain was reduced in both the Combined- (p = 0.003) and Exercise-arm (p = 0.002). Physical activity-related fear was reduced only in the Exercise-arm (p = 0.008). During the study period (0-12 months) mean total costs were lowest in the Combined-arm (€476 vs. €1062-€1992, p < 0.001) as were the mean number of sickness absence days (0.15 vs. 2.29-4.17, p = 0.025). None of the intervention-arms was cost-effective for sickness absence. There was 85% probability of exercise-arm being cost-effective if willing to pay €3550 for QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise once a week for 6 months combined with five sessions of back care counseling after working hours in real-life settings effectively reduced the intensity of LBP, work interference due to LBP, and fear of pain, but was not cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01465698 November 7, 2011 (prospective).


Assuntos
Aconselhamento/economia , Terapia por Exercício/economia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Dor Lombar/terapia , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Medo , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Licença Médica/economia , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med ; 4(1): e000363, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29765701

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We investigated differences in objectively measured sedentary behaviour (SB) and physical activity (PA) levels in subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) diagnosis or high CVD risk compared with healthy controls. METHODS: The present study includes a subsample (n=1398, Health 2011 Study) of participants, who attended health examinations and wore a triaxial accelerometer (≥4 days). Patients with CVD were identified and CVD risk was calculated for others using Framingham Risk Score (FRS). Participants were categorised into groups: FRS<10%; FRS=10%-30%; FRS>30%/CVD. Raw acceleration data were analysed with mean amplitude deviation (MAD) and angle for posture estimation (APE). MAD corresponding to intensity of PA was converted to metabolic equivalents (MET) and categorised to light (1.5-2.9 METs) and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA≥3.0 METs). APE recognises SB and standing. RESULTS: Daily accumulated time of >30 s MVPA bouts was higher in FRS<10% group (46 min) than in FRS>30%/CVD group (29 min) (p<0.001). FRS>30%/CVD group were more sedentary, their mean daily number of >10 min SB bouts (13.2) was higher than in FRS <10% group (11.5) (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Number and accumulated times of SB and PA bouts differed between the CVD risk groups. Causative research is required to assess the importance of SB and PA in prevention and rehabilitation of CVDs.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA