RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) registries provide crucial real-world data on demographics, epidemiology, healthcare, patient outcomes, and treatment efficacy. This paper presents findings from the Indian SCD Registry (ISCDR) on clinical manifestations, crisis episodes, disease management, and healthcare utilization in patients with SCD from 12 primary health centres (PHCs) in six tribal districts of India. METHODS: The ISCDR was introduced along with a three-tier screening process. Its Android-based application incorporates two electronic case report forms for patient data collection over one year. This paper presents a year's data from the ISCDR's 324 patients with SCD. RESULTS: Patients with SCD, aged one to 65 years, exhibited varied clinical manifestations. Most patients (85.2 %) were unaware of their SCD status before enrolling in ISCDR. Moderate to severe anaemia was prevalent (66.05 % and 30.56 %, respectively). Pain was a common complaint (80.86 %; CI: 76.17-85.00), while symptoms of stroke included sudden severe headaches (34.57 %; CI: 29.40-40.02). Common splenic sequestration symptoms included stomach pain (42.90 %; CI: 37.44-48.49) and abdominal tenderness (13.27 %; CI: 9.77-17.46), as a sign. Healthcare utilization was high, with 96.30 % receiving treatment and 83.64 % consuming hydroxyurea. Hospitalization occurred for 38.27 % (CI: 32.95-43.81), and 12.04 % (CI: 8.70-16.09) had blood transfusion during last year. CONCLUSIONS: ISCDR serves as a dynamic digital database on SCD epidemiology, clinical aspects, treatment and healthcare utilization. Notably, many patients lacked prior awareness of their SCD status, underscoring the need for improved awareness and care management. Integrating the registry into the national programme can streamline treatment implementation, prioritize management approaches, and optimize individual benefits.
RESUMO
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a significant public health concern in India, with one of the highest disability burdens worldwide. For the success of the disease prevention and control program that aims to reduce prevalence through health promotion and screening, the public's prior knowledge of the disease is important. Hence, this study was conducted to assess baseline knowledge of the disease and effects of health education and community mobilization program in the SCD endemic tribal community of Gujarat. This quasi-experimental study was conducted in three phases at Chhotaudepur district of Gujarat, India. Knowledge of the community was assessed through the administration of pretested quantitative questionnaire in 1646 and 1631 individuals respectively during formative and evaluation phases. Differences between the proportions of two phases were statistically assessed by chi-square tests. Despite 75.3% of respondents having heard of SCD before, only 20% could perceive the correct cause. It was improved by 42% post-intervention. During the evaluation, 83% respondents recognized the most common symptom of extreme pain, whereas 86.8% identified the correct diagnostic method. Seventy-seven percent respondents reported modern medicine as a treatment for SCD at endline. Knowledge and awareness about SCD were found inadequate in the community. However, health education intervention strategies effectively improved knowledge related to the disease and its causes, diagnosis, and treatment. Hence, urgent action is required to incorporate community mobilization and awareness generation strategies to mitigate the disease burden.
RESUMO
Sickle cell disease (SCD) affects 5% of the global population, with over 300,000 infants born yearly. In India, 73% of those with the sickle hemoglobin gene belong to indigenous tribes in remote regions lacking proper healthcare. Despite the prevalence of SCD, India lacked state-led public health programs until recently, leaving a gap in screening and comprehensive care. Hence, the Indian Council of Medical Research conducted implementation research to address this gap. This paper discusses the development and impact of the program, including screening and treatment coverage for SCD in tribal areas. With a quasi-experimental design, this study was conducted in six tribal-dominated districts in three phases - formative, intervention, and evaluation. The intervention included advocacy, partnership building, building the health system's capacity and community mobilization, and enabling the health systems to screen and manage SCD patients. The capacity building included improving healthcare workers' skills through training and infrastructure development of primary healthcare (PHC) facilities. The impact of the intervention is visible in terms of people's participation (54%, 76% and 93% of the participants participated in some intervention activities, underwent symptomatic screening and demanded the continuity of the program, respectively), and improvement in SCD-related knowledge of the community and health workers (with more than 50% of net change in many of the knowledge-related outcomes). By developing screening and treatment models, this intervention model demonstrated the feasibility of SCD care at the PHC level in remote rural areas. This accessible approach allows the tribal population in India to routinely seek SCD care at their local PHCs, offering great convenience. Nevertheless, additional research employing rigorous methodology is required to fine-tune the model. National SCD program may adopt this model, specifically for community-level screening and management of SCD in remote and rural areas.