Evaluation of a transcription mediated amplification assay for detection of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 mRNA in clinical specimens.

BACKGROUND: Herpes simplex viruses (HSV) are double-stranded DNA human herpesviruses (HHVs) that have the capacity to cause significant morbidity and mortality in humans. Like HHV5 (Cytomegalovirus) and HHV8 (Kaposi's sarcoma virus), HSV type 1 (HSV-1), and HSV type 2 (HSV-2) (HHV1, HHV2) selectively package certain viral messenger RNAs inside mature virions, as well as expressing those mRNAs in infected cells. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and analytical performance of Aptima HSV 1&2 assay (AHSV), a newly developed automated real time transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for HSV-1 and 2 UL42 mRNAs, compared to viral culture and HSV DNA NAAT. STUDY DESIGN: Cutaneous and mucocutaneous lesion swab specimens from a population of symptomatic female and male subjects attending a U.S. public health clinic (n=758) were evaluated by shell vial culture with fluorescent antibody staining for HSV-1 and 2. Specimens were then tested with AHSV for HSV-1 and 2 on the Panther instrument. Specimens from subjects with discordant culture-TMA paired results were tested using an FDA-cleared test for HSV-1 and 2 viral DNA. Analytical performance of AHSV was evaluated using test panels consisting of laboratory strains of HSV-1 and 2 and a variety of non-target human DNA viruses. RESULTS: Compared to culture, AHSV was sensitive and specific for detection of HSV-1 and 2 in patient lesion swab specimens, exhibiting clinical sensitivities of 98.2% (95% CI: 92.9-99.7) and 99.4% (95% CI: 96.0-99.9), respectively. Addition of HSV DNA NAAT discordant resolution testing results to culture results improved AHSV sensitivity for HSV-1 and 2-99.2% (95% CI: 94.7-99.9) and 100% (95% CI: 97.5-100), respectively. Clinical specificity of AHSV for HSV-1 and 2 detection was 97.8% (95% CI: 96.3-98.8) and 94.5% (95% CI: 92.2-96.1), respectively, compared to culture; and 99.5% (95% CI: 98.5-99.9) and 99.5% (95% CI: 98.3-99.7), respectively, compared to culture with discordant resolution. Analytical sensitivity (95% limit of detection) of AHSV for HSV-1 (McIntyre strain) was 28.9 TCID50/mL (95% FL: 23.4-37.9), and 0.54 TCID50/mL (95% FL: 0.42-0.75) for HSV-2 (MS strain). AHSV did not cross-react with laboratory strains of HHV-3, HHV-4, HHV-5, HHV-6, and four other non-HHV human DNA viruses. CONCLUSIONS: Real time transcription-mediated amplification NAAT for HSV viral mRNA is a sensitive and specific method for detection of herpes simplex virus infection in symptomatic patients.

Performance of Determine Combo and other point-of-care HIV tests among Seattle MSM.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The rapid test study was a real-time comparison of point-of-care (POC) HIV tests to determine their abilities to detect early HIV infection. STUDY DESIGN: Men and transgender persons reporting sex with men in the prior year were recruited at the Public Health-Seattle & King County STD Clinic, Gay City Health Project, and University of Washington Primary Infection Clinic. Study tests included the OraQuick ADVANCE Rapid HIV-1/2 Antibody Test performed on oral fluids and tests performed on fingerstick whole blood specimens including OraQuick, Uni-Gold Recombigen HIV test, Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo, and INSTI HIV-1 Rapid Antibody Test. Specimens from subjects with negative results were sent for EIA and nucleic acid amplification testing. McNemar's exact tests compared the numbers of HIV-infected subjects detected. RESULTS: Between February 2010 and August 2014, there were 3438 study visits. Twenty-four subjects had discordant POC results with at least one reactive and one non-reactive test, including one subject with a reactive Determine p24 antigen. OraQuick performed on oral fluids identified fewer persons compared to all fingerstick tests. OraQuick performed on fingerstick whole blood detected fewer persons compared to the Determine Combo antibody component (p=.008) and Combo overall (p=.004), and there was a trend when compared to INSTI (p=.06). The Determine Combo specificity was 98.99%. CONCLUSIONS: As reported by others, Determine Combo underperforms compared to laboratory-based testing, but it did detect one acute infection. If these results are validated, the specificity of Determine Combo may limit its usefulness in populations with lower HIV incidence.

Relative accuracy of serum, whole blood, and oral fluid HIV tests among Seattle men who have sex with men.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (POC) rapid HIV tests have sensitivity during the "window period" comparable only to earliest generation EIAs. To date, it is unclear whether any POC test performs significantly better than others. OBJECTIVE: Compare abilities of POC tests to detect early infection in real time. STUDY DESIGN: Men who have sex with men (MSM) were recruited into a prospective, cross-sectional study at two HIV testing sites and a research clinic. Procedures compared four POC tests: one performed on oral fluids and three on fingerstick whole blood specimens. Specimens from participants with negative POC results were tested by EIA and pooled nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT). McNemar's exact tests compared numbers of HIV-infected participants detected. RESULTS: Between February 2010 and May 2013, 104 men tested HIV-positive during 2479 visits. Eighty-two participants had concordant reactive POC results, 3 participants had concordant non-reactive POC tests but reactive EIAs, and 8 participants had acute infection. Of 12 participants with discordant POC results, OraQuick ADVANCE Rapid HIV-1/2 Antibody Test performed on oral fluids identified fewer infections than OraQuick performed on fingerstick (p = .005), Uni-Gold Recombigen HIV test (p = .01), and determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab combo (p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm that oral fluid POC testing detects fewer infections than other methods and is best reserved for circumstances precluding fingerstick or venipuncture. Regardless of specimen type, POC tests failed to identify many HIV-infected MSM in Seattle. In populations with high HIV incidence, the currently approved POC antibody tests are inadequate unless supplemented with p24 antigen tests or NAAT.

HIV testing in a high-incidence population: is antibody testing alone good enough?

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently recommended the expansion of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody testing. However, antibody tests have longer "window periods" after HIV acquisition than do nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). METHODS: Public Health-Seattle & King County offered HIV antibody testing to men who have sex with men (MSM) using the OraQuick Advance Rapid HIV-1/2 Antibody Test (OraQuick; OraSure Technologies) on oral fluid or finger-stick blood specimens or using a first- or second-generation enzyme immunoassay. The enzyme immunoassay was also used to confirm reactive rapid test results and to screen specimens from OraQuick-negative MSM prior to pooling for HIV NAAT. Serum specimens obtained from subsets of HIV-infected persons were retrospectively evaluated by use of other HIV tests, including a fourth-generation antigen-antibody combination assay. RESULTS: From September 2003 through June 2008, a total of 328 (2.3%) of 14,005 specimens were HIV antibody positive, and 36 (0.3%) of 13,677 antibody-negative specimens were NAAT positive (indicating acute HIV infection). Among 6811 specimens obtained from MSM who were initially screened by rapid testing, OraQuick detected only 153 (91%) of 169 antibody-positive MSM and 80% of the 192 HIV-infected MSM detected by the HIV NAAT program. HIV was detected in serum samples obtained from 15 of 16 MSM with acute HIV infection that were retrospectively tested using the antigen-antibody combination assay. CONCLUSIONS: OraQuick may be less sensitive than enzyme immunoassays during early HIV infection. NAAT should be integrated into HIV testing programs that serve populations that undergo frequent testing and that have high rates of HIV acquisition, particularly if rapid HIV antibody testing is employed. Antigen-antibody combination assays may be a reasonably sensitive alternative to HIV NAAT.

Screening for acute HIV infection: lessons learned.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) nucleic acid testing is increasingly being used by researchers and public health screening programs to identify highly infectious, HIV antibody-negative individuals with acute HIV infection. We present cases to illustrate unusual instances of acute HIV screening, which include "window period" testing and the discovery of low-level HIV RNA.

Targeted screening for primary HIV infection through pooled HIV-RNA testing in men who have sex with men.

HIV-RNA testing may identify individuals with primary HIV infection. Men who have sex with men (MSM) having HIV testing through Public Health, Seattle and King County were screened for primary infection through pooled RNA testing. Eighty-one out of 3525 specimens (2.3%) had detectable antibody and RNA, and seven out of 3439 antibody-negative specimens (0.2%) had HIV RNA. Targeted screening for primary infection through pooled RNA testing in MSM is a useful addition to HIV case finding.

Positive predictive value of Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo 2 testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in a population of women with low prevalence of N. gonorrhoeae infection.

We collected specimens from women who tested positive for Neisseria gonorrhoeae using the Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo 2 (AC2), and we performed confirmatory tests using a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) that targets alternate gonococcal nucleic acid sequences. Among 59,664 specimens, 280 (0.47%) had positive results using AC2; 265 of these specimens were tested using the confirmatory NAAT, of which 258 yielded positive results (positive predictive value, 97.4%; 95% confidence interval, 95.1%-98.8%). Routine confirmatory testing of specimens with positive AC2 gonorrhea test results is not indicated.