Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
Cancer ; 53(6): 1397-404, 1984 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6692329

RESUMO

Intraarterial (IA) chemotherapy can theoretically result in a high tissue level of the drug with reduced systemic toxicity compared with intravenous (IV) administration. The authors compared these two modes of therapy using Adriamycin (doxorubicin) in the rabbit Vx-2 tumor system. Vx-2 was implanted in hind limb muscle, and silastic catheters were placed in the jugular vein and femoral artery. Nuclear imaging of technetium-99m-labeled autologous erythrocytes in nine animals was used to measure the kinetics of tumor blood flow. Presence of tumor increased flow through the involved limb up to threefold. One minute following injection there was no difference in concentration of 99mTc in tumor whether labeled cells were introduced IA or IV. Twelve rabbits received IA (N = 6) or IV (N = 6) Adriamycin (3 mg/kg), while eight animals received normal saline IA or IV as controls. Tumor progressed in all control rabbits, whereas there was an objective or complete response in 83% of animals receiving Adriamycin. One hundred percent of those treated IA responded compared with 67% for IV (P = 0.04). Median time to initial response in animals treated IA was 7 days versus 21 days for those treated IV (P = 0.02). Thus, IA Adriamycin achieves a more complete and more rapid response than the drug given IV. This occurs despite a large tumor blood flow and rapid equilibration using both methods.


Assuntos
Carcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Doenças Musculares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Carcinoma/patologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Avaliação de Medicamentos , Hemodinâmica , Injeções Intra-Arteriais , Injeções Intravenosas , Contagem de Leucócitos , Transplante de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/patologia , Coelhos , Fatores de Tempo
4.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 80(5): 656-60, 1980 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6968856

RESUMO

Levels of circulating T lymphocytes sensitized to human lung tumor--associated antigens (LTA) were determined by the antigen-stimulated active rosette-forming T cell (AgARFC) assay. These levels were correlated with detection, pathological tumor stage, and postassay survival of patients with lung carcinoma. Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs), from patients found to have lung cancer, were incubated with LTA and produced increased AgARFC compared to PBLs incubated without LTA. Significant levels of LTA-sensitive T cells were found in preoperative PBLs of 80% of patients with Stage I disease (8/10, p < 0.0005), 60% of those with Stage II disease (3/5, p < 0.025), and 46% of those with Stage III primary lung cancer (12/26, p < 0.01), compared with 11% of patients with either benign lung lesions (2/12) or lung metastases (0/6) of nonpulmonary malignant tumors (by chi square analysis). Postoperative survival correlated significantly with preoperative levels of LTA-sensitive T cells by AgARFC assay within Stage I lung cancer (r = 0.807, p < 0.0005). Stage I + II (r = 0.689, p < 0.001), and Stage III (r = 0.657, p < 0.001, not treated with chemotherapy). Preoperative PBL from patients with Stage I + II lung cancer were more frequently sensitized to LTA in the AgARFC assay than from patients with nonpulmonary carcinomas (0/22) or cigarette smokers (1/7) without pulmonary lesions (p < 0.0005). These findings demonstrate a high rate of detection of early, resectable lung carcinomas by preoperative AgARFC assay of PBL sensitized to LTA, and a significant correlation of LTA-sensitive T cell levels with tumor stage and patient survival. The AgARFC assay may be of prognostic as well as diagnostic value in the evaluation of patients with lung carcinoma.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Formação de Roseta , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Antígenos de Neoplasias/imunologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico
9.
Surgery ; 83(6): 741-5, 1978 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-347619

RESUMO

The antigen-stimulated active rosette-forming T-cell (AgARFC) assay was adapted for the preoperative study of 21 consecutive kidney transplants (17 cadaver donors and four living related donors; five retransplants). Recipient peripheral blood lymphocytes were incubated for 15 minutes with donor histocompatibility antigens preparaed by sonication of donor peripheral blood or splenic lymphocytes. Recipient presensitization to donor antigens was expressed as the difference between active rosette formation in the presence (%AgARFC) and in the absence (%ARFC) of donor antigens. This antigen-induced difference is rosette formation (%AgARFC - %ARFC) for all patients ranged from - 7.0% to 24.2%. Of those patients with pretransplant sensitization greater than 6.3% (group I: mean, 13.2 +/- 3.0; n = 7), 71% had severe acute rejection requiring dialysis within the first 2 weeks of transplantation. In contrast, none of the patients with pretransplant values below 6.3% (group II: mean, -0.8 +/- 1.0; n = 14) had rejection requiring dialysis within the first 2 weeks. Group I patients had 43% graft survival at 1 month and 14% survival at 2 months, whereas group II had 86% graft survival at 1 month and 71% at 2 months. The AgARFC assay provided a rapid means of measuring recipient T-cell presensitization to donor alloantigens, which was correlated with the accelerated rejection of renal allografts.


Assuntos
Reações Antígeno-Anticorpo , Imunidade Celular , Transplante de Rim , Citotoxicidade Imunológica , Rejeição de Enxerto , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidade/análise , Humanos , Formação de Roseta , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Transplante Homólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA