Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients. DESIGN: Two parallel, methodologically identical, phase III, multicenter, double-masked, sham injection-controlled, randomized studies. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with vision loss from DME (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], 20/40-20/320 Snellen equivalent) and central subfield thickness ≥275 µm on time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). INTERVENTION: Monthly intravitreal ranibizumab (0.5 or 0.3 mg) or sham injections. Macular laser was available per-protocol-specified criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients gaining ≥15 letters in BCVA from baseline at 24 months. RESULTS: In RISE (NCT00473330), 377 patients were randomized (127 to sham, 125 to 0.3 mg, 125 to 0.5 mg). At 24 months, 18.1% of sham patients gained ≥15 letters versus 44.8% of 0.3-mg (P<0.0001; difference vs sham adjusted for randomization stratification factors, 24.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.8-34.8) and 39.2% of 0.5-mg ranibizumab patients (P<0.001; adjusted difference, 20.9%; 95% CI, 10.7-31.1). In RIDE (NCT00473382), 382 patients were randomized (130 to sham, 125 to 0.3 mg, 127 to 0.5 mg). Significantly more ranibizumab-treated patients gained ≥15 letters: 12.3% of sham patients versus 33.6% of 0.3-mg patients (P<0.0001; adjusted difference, 20.8%; 95% CI, 11.4-30.2) and 45.7% of 0.5-mg ranibizumab patients (P<0.0001; adjusted difference, 33.3%; 95% CI, 23.8-42.8). Significant improvements in macular edema were noted on OCT, and retinopathy was less likely to worsen and more likely to improve in ranibizumab-treated patients. Ranibizumab-treated patients underwent significantly fewer macular laser procedures (mean of 1.8 and 1.6 laser procedures over 24 months in the sham groups vs 0.3-0.8 in ranibizumab groups). Ocular safety was consistent with prior ranibizumab studies; endophthalmitis occurred in 4 ranibizumab patients. The total incidence of deaths from vascular or unknown causes, nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and nonfatal cerebrovascular accidents, which are possible effects from systemic vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition, was 4.9% to 5.5% of sham patients and 2.4% to 8.8% of ranibizumab patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab rapidly and sustainably improved vision, reduced the risk of further vision loss, and improved macular edema in patients with DME, with low rates of ocular and nonocular harm.

Ranibizumab versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Two-year results of the ANCHOR study.

OBJECTIVE: The 2-year, phase III trial designated Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Antibody for the Treatment of Predominantly Classic Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) in Age-related Macular Degeneration (ANCHOR) compared ranibizumab with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) in treating predominantly classic CNV. DESIGN: Multicenter, international, randomized, double-masked, active-treatment-controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with predominantly classic, subfoveal CNV not previously treated with PDT or antiangiogenic drugs. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to verteporfin PDT plus monthly sham intraocular injection or to sham verteporfin PDT plus monthly intravitreal ranibizumab (0.3 mg or 0.5 mg) injection. The need for PDT (active or sham) retreatment was evaluated every 3 months using fluorescein angiography (FA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary, intent-to-treat efficacy analysis was at 12 months, with continued measurements to month 24. Key measures included the percentage losing <15 letters from baseline visual acuity (VA) score (month 12 primary efficacy outcome measure), percentage gaining >or=15 letters from baseline, and mean change over time in VA score and FA-assessed lesion characteristics. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Of 423 patients (143 PDT, 140 each in the 2 ranibizumab groups), the majority (>or=77% in each group) completed the 2-year study. Consistent with results at month 12, at month 24 the VA benefit from ranibizumab was statistically significant (P<0.0001 vs. PDT) and clinically meaningful: 89.9% to 90.0% of ranibizumab-treated patients had lost <15 letters from baseline (vs. 65.7% of PDT patients); 34% to 41.0% had gained >or=15 letters (vs. 6.3% of PDT group); and, on average, VA was improved from baseline by 8.1 to 10.7 letters (vs. a mean decline of 9.8 letters in PDT group). Changes in lesion anatomic characteristics on FA also favored ranibizumab (all comparisons P<0.0001 vs. PDT). Overall, there was no imbalance among groups in rates of serious ocular and nonocular adverse events. In the pooled ranibizumab groups, 3 of 277 (1.1%) patients developed presumed endophthalmitis in the study eye (rate per injection = 3/5921 [0.05%]). CONCLUSIONS: In this 2-year study, ranibizumab provided greater clinical benefit than verteporfin PDT in patients with age-related macular degeneration with new-onset, predominantly classic CNV. Rates of serious adverse events were low. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

BACKGROUND: We compared ranibizumab--a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal antibody Fab that neutralizes all active forms of vascular endothelial growth factor A--with photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in the treatment of predominantly classic neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: During the first year of this 2-year, multicenter, double-blind study, we randomly assigned patients in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (0.3 mg or 0.5 mg) plus sham verteporfin therapy or monthly sham injections plus active verteporfin therapy. The primary end point was the proportion of patients losing fewer than 15 letters from baseline visual acuity at 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 423 patients enrolled, 94.3% of those given 0.3 mg of ranibizumab and 96.4% of those given 0.5 mg lost fewer than 15 letters, as compared with 64.3% of those in the verteporfin group (P<0.001 for each comparison). Visual acuity improved by 15 letters or more in 35.7% of the 0.3-mg group and 40.3% of the 0.5-mg group, as compared with 5.6% of the verteporfin group (P<0.001 for each comparison). Mean visual acuity increased by 8.5 letters in the 0.3-mg group and 11.3 letters in the 0.5-mg group, as compared with a decrease of 9.5 letters in the verteporfin group (P<0.001 for each comparison). Among 140 patients treated with 0.5 mg of ranibizumab, presumed endophthalmitis occurred in 2 patients (1.4%) and serious uveitis in 1 (0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab was superior to verteporfin as intravitreal treatment of predominantly classic neovascular age-related macular degeneration, with low rates of serious ocular adverse events. Treatment improved visual acuity on average at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00061594 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Ranibizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a phase I/II multicenter, controlled, multidose study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety of repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and to assess changes in visual acuity (VA) and AMD lesion characteristics. DESIGN: Multicenter, controlled, open-label, clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four patients with subfoveal predominantly or minimally classic AMD-related choroidal neovascularization. METHODS: In part 1, subjects were randomized to monthly intravitreal ranibizumab for 3 months (4 injections of 0.3 mg or 1 injection of 0.3 mg followed by 3 injections of 0.5 mg; n = 53) or usual care (UC; n = 11). In part 2, subjects could continue their regimen for 3 additional months or cross over to the alternative treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse events (AEs), intraocular pressure (IOP), VA, and lesion characteristics assessed by fluorescein angiography and fundus photography. RESULTS: Of the 64 randomized subjects, 62 completed the 6-month study. Twenty of 25 subjects (80%) randomized to 0.3 mg, and 22 of 28 subjects (79%) randomized to 0.5-mg ranibizumab in part 1 continued on that treatment in part 2; 9 of 11 (82%) subjects randomized to UC in part 1 crossed over to ranibizumab treatment in part 2. The most common AEs with ranibizumab were reversible inflammation and minor injection-site hemorrhages. Serious AEs were iridocyclitis, endophthalmitis, and central retinal vein occlusion (1 subject each). Postinjection, IOP increased transiently in 22.6% of ranibizumab-treated eyes in parts 1 and 2. After 4 ranibizumab injections (day 98), mean (+/- standard deviation) VA had increased 9.4+/-13.3 and 9.1+/-17.2 letters in the 0.3- and 0.5-mg groups, respectively, but had decreased 5.1+/-9.6 letters with UC. In part 2 (day 210), VA increased from baseline 12.8+/-14.7 and 15.0+/-14.2 letters in subjects continuing on 0.3 and 0.5 mg, respectively. Visual acuity improved from baseline > or =15 letters in 26% (day 98) and 45% (day 210) of subjects initially randomized to and continuing on ranibizumab, respectively, and areas of leakage and subretinal fluid decreased. No UC subject had a > or =15-letter improvement at day 98. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab had a good safety profile and were associated with improved VA and decreased leakage from choroidal neovascularization in subjects with neovascular AMD.

Do growth hormone (GH) serial sampling, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) or auxological measurements have an advantage over GH stimulation testing in predicting the linear growth response to GH therapy?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative utility of GH secretion via pharmacological stimulation, overnight serial sampling, IGF-I levels and auxological variables as predictors of change in height standard deviation score (deltaHt SDS) during GH treatment. DESIGN: A multicentre observational study. PATIENTS: Prepubertal children (n = 825) with idiopathic growth failure who were subsequently treated with GH were divided into two groups, based on their maximum GH response to pharmacological stimulation testing: (1) idiopathic GH deficiency (IGHD), defined by a maximum GH response < 10 microg/l (n = 300); and (2) idiopathic short stature (ISS), with a maximum GH response > or = 10 microg/l (n = 525) (GH conversion factor: 3 IU = 1 mg). MEASUREMENTS: Overnight spontaneous GH secretion was measured in all patients. The following characteristics of spontaneous GH secretion were studied: maximum or peak GH, mean peak GH, number of GH peaks, pooled GH, mean GH, and approximate entropy of GH secretion. RESULTS: Although children with IGHD had lower indices of spontaneous GH secretion, there were no differences between IGHD and ISS groups in baseline Ht SDS, growth rate or IGF-I level. The dose and duration of GH therapy were similar. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean (+/- SD) change in Ht SDS (deltaHt SDS) in the two groups (IGHD 1.3 +/- 0.9 and ISS 1.2 +/- 0.8). Measures of spontaneous secretion, such as peak GH, mean of GH peaks, mean area under GH peaks, and mean GH, as well as IGF-I concentrations, were all statistically significantly correlated with deltaHt SDS in IGHD children (P < 0.0001). A significant correlation was also observed for pooled GH (P = 0.002) and approximate entropy (P = 0.01). Children with the most severe ISS (Ht SDS < -3.33) demonstrated a more disorganized pattern of GH secretion compared to children who were not as short (Ht SDS -2.33 to -1.64), as indicated by a higher approximate entropy (0.673 +/- 0.193 vs. 0.607 +/- 0.161, P < 0.004). This increased disorder in GH secretion was accompanied by lower IGF-I levels (104 +/- 99 microg/l vs. 137 +/- 74 microg/l, P < 0.001), even though pooled GH concentrations were indistinguishable between the two groups (2.2 +/- 1.3 microg/l vs. 2.0 +/- 1.0 microg/l). Children with IGHD demonstrated lower approximate entropy than did those with ISS (0.551 +/- 0.235 vs. 0.631 +/- 0.182, P < 0.0001). Duration of GH treatment, height deficit and genetic potential (midparental Ht SDS) were the most important variables influencing deltaHt SDS in children receiving GH therapy. Maximum stimulated GH, IGF-I and indices of spontaneous GH secretion also correlated with deltaHt SDS, but their relative importance varied among diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GH deficiency demonstrate a reduced capacity for GH secretion, while those with idiopathic short stature exhibit a more disorderly and less functional secretory pattern. Although effective in predicting a response to GH treatment in patients with severe GH deficiency, overnight serial sampling is less practical than other methods currently available. In addition, serial sampling was less useful as a predictor of growth response to exogenous GH in patients with idiopathic short stature.