G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Ligand Pose and Functional Class Prediction.

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) transmembrane protein family members play essential roles in physiology. Numerous pharmaceuticals target GPCRs, and many drug discovery programs utilize virtual screening (VS) against GPCR targets. Improvements in the accuracy of predicting new molecules that bind to and either activate or inhibit GPCR function would accelerate such drug discovery programs. This work addresses two significant research questions. First, do ligand interaction fingerprints provide a substantial advantage over automated methods of binding site selection for classical docking? Second, can the functional status of prospective screening candidates be predicted from ligand interaction fingerprints using a random forest classifier? Ligand interaction fingerprints were found to offer modest advantages in sampling accurate poses, but no substantial advantage in the final set of top-ranked poses after scoring, and, thus, were not used in the generation of the ligand-receptor complexes used to train and test the random forest classifier. A binary classifier which treated agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists as active and all other ligands as inactive proved highly effective in ligand function prediction in an external test set of GPR31 and TAAR2 candidate ligands with a hit rate of 82.6% actual actives within the set of predicted actives.

Structure-based pharmacophore modeling 2. Developing a novel framework for structure-based pharmacophore model generation and selection.

Pharmacophore models are three-dimensional arrangements of molecular features required for biological activity that are used in ligand identification efforts for many biological targets, including G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Though GPCR are integral membrane proteins of considerable interest as targets for drug development, many of these receptors lack known ligands or experimentally determined structures necessary for ligand- or structure-based pharmacophore model generation, respectively. Thus, we here present a structure-based pharmacophore modeling approach that uses fragments placed with Multiple Copy Simultaneous Search (MCSS) to generate high-performing pharmacophore models in the context of experimentally determined, as well as modeled GPCR structures. Moreover, we have addressed the oft-neglected topic of pharmacophore model selection via development of a cluster-then-predict machine learning workflow. Herein score-based pharmacophore models were generated in experimentally determined and modeled structures of 13 class A GPCR and resulted in pharmacophore models exhibiting high enrichment factors when used to search a database containing 569 class A GPCR ligands. In addition, classification of pharmacophore models with the best performing cluster-then-predict logistic regression classifier resulted in positive predictive values (PPV) of 0.88 and 0.76 for selecting high enrichment pharmacophore models from among those generated in experimentally determined and modeled structures, respectively.

Application of computational methods for class A GPCR Ligand discovery.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) are integral membrane proteins of considerable interest as targets for drug development due to their role in transmitting cellular signals in a multitude of biological processes. Of the six classes categorizing GPCR (A, B, C, D, E, and F), class A contains the largest number of therapeutically relevant GPCR. Despite their importance as drug targets, many challenges exist for the discovery of novel class A GPCR ligands serving as drug precursors. Though knowledge of the structural and functional characteristics of GPCR has grown significantly over the past 20 years, a large portion of GPCR lack reported, experimentally determined structures. Furthermore, many GPCR have no known endogenous and/or synthetic ligands, limiting further exploration of their biochemical, cellular, and physiological roles. While many successes in GPCR ligand discovery have resulted from experimental high-throughput screening, computational methods have played an increasingly important role in GPCR ligand identification in the past decade. Here we discuss computational techniques applied to GPCR ligand discovery. This review summarizes class A GPCR structure/function and provides an overview of many obstacles currently faced in GPCR ligand discovery. Furthermore, we discuss applications and recent successes of computational techniques used to predict GPCR structure as well as present a summary of ligand- and structure-based methods used to identify potential GPCR ligands. Finally, we discuss computational hit list generation and refinement and provide comprehensive workflows for GPCR ligand identification.

Structure-based pharmacophore modeling 1. Automated random pharmacophore model generation.

Pharmacophores are three-dimensional arrangements of molecular features required for biological activity that are often used in virtual screening efforts to prioritize ligands for experimental testing. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) are integral membrane proteins of considerable interest as targets for ligand discovery and drug development. Ligand-based pharmacophore models can be constructed to identify structural commonalities between known bioactive ligands for targets including GPCR. However, structure-based pharmacophores (which only require an experimentally determined or modeled structure for a protein target) have gained more attention to aid in virtual screening efforts as the number of publicly available experimentally determined GPCR structures have increased (140 unique GPCR represented as of October 24, 2022). Thus, the goal of this study was to develop a method of structure-based pharmacophore model generation applicable to ligand discovery for GPCR that have few known ligands. Pharmacophore models were generated within the active sites of 8 class A GPCR crystal structures via automated annotation of 5 randomly selected functional group fragments to sample diverse combinations of pharmacophore features. Each of the 5000 generated pharmacophores was then used to search a database containing active and decoy/inactive compounds for 30 class A GPCR and scored using enrichment factor and goodness-of-hit metrics to assess performance. Application of this method to the set of 8 class A GPCR produced pharmacophore models possessing the theoretical maximum enrichment factor value in both resolved structures (8 of 8 cases) and homology models (7 of 8 cases), indicating that generated pharmacophore models can prove useful in the context of virtual screening.

Benchmarking GPCR homology model template selection in combination with de novo loop generation.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) comprise the largest family of membrane proteins and are of considerable interest as targets for drug development. However, many GPCR structures remain unsolved. To address the structural ambiguity of these receptors, computational tools such as homology modeling and loop modeling are often employed to generate predictive receptor structures. Here we combined both methods to benchmark a protocol incorporating homology modeling based on a locally selected template and extracellular loop modeling that additionally evaluates the presence of template ligands during these modeling steps. Ligands were also docked using three docking methods and two pose selection methods to elucidate an optimal ligand pose selection method. Results suggest that local template-based homology models followed by loop modeling produce more accurate and predictive receptor models than models produced without loop modeling, with decreases in average receptor and ligand RMSD of 0.54 Å and 2.91 Å, respectively. Ligand docking results showcased the ability of MOE induced fit docking to produce ligand poses with atom root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values at least 0.20 Å lower (on average) than the other two methods benchmarked in this study. In addition, pose selection methods (software-based scoring, ligand complementation) selected lower RMSD poses with MOE induced fit docking than either of the other methods (averaging at least 1.57 Å lower), indicating that MOE induced fit docking is most suited for docking into GPCR homology models in our hands. In addition, target receptor models produced with a template ligand present throughout the modeling process most often produced target ligand poses with RMSD values ≤ 4.5 Å and Tanimoto coefficients > 0.6 after selection based on ligand complementation than target receptor models produced in the absence of template ligands. Overall, the findings produced by this study support the use of local template homology modeling in combination with de novo ECL2 modeling in the presence of a ligand from the template crystal structure to generate GPCR models intended to study ligand binding interactions.