Perspectives on preparedness for pediatric emergencies after residency: A needs assessment.

Background: General emergency physicians provide most pediatric emergency care in the United States yet report more challenges managing emergencies in children than adults. Recommendations for standardized pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) curricula to address educational gaps due to variations in pediatric exposure during emergency medicine (EM) training lack learner input. This study surveyed senior EM residents and recent graduates about their perceived preparedness to manage pediatric emergencies to better inform PEM curricula design. Methods: In 2021, senior EM residents and graduates from the classes of 2020 and 2019 across eight EM programs with PEM rotations at the same children's hospital were recruited and surveyed electronically to assess perceived preparedness for 42 pediatric emergencies and procedures by age: infants under 1 year, toddlers, and children over 4 years. Preparedness was reported on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 or 2 defined as "unprepared." A chi-square test of independence compared the proportion of respondents unprepared to manage each condition across age groups, and a p-value < 0.05 demonstrated significance. Results: The response rate was 53% (129/242), with a higher response rate from senior residents (65%). Respondents reported feeling unprepared to manage more emergency conditions in infants compared to other age groups. Respondents felt least prepared to manage inborn errors of metabolism and congenital heart disease, with 45%-68% unprepared for these conditions across ages. A heat map compared senior residents to recent graduates. More graduates reported feeling unprepared for major trauma, impending respiratory failure, and pediatric advanced life support algorithms. Conclusions: This study, describing the perspective of EM senior residents and recent graduates, offers unique insights into PEM curricular needs during EM training. Future PEM curricula should target infant complaints and conditions with lower preparedness scores across ages. Other centers training EM residents could use our findings and methods to bolster PEM curricula.

A Framework for Quality Assurance of Pediatric Revisits to the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department return visits significantly impact medical costs and patient flow. A comprehensive approach to understanding these patients is required to identify deficits in care, system level inefficiencies, and improve diagnosis specific management protocols. We aimed to identify factors needed to successfully analyze return visits to explore root causes leading to unplanned returns and inform system-level improvements. METHODS: A multidisciplinary committee collaborated to develop a quality review process for return visits within 72 hours to our pediatric emergency department that were then subsequently admitted to the hospital. The committee developed methodology and a web-based tool for chart review and analysis. RESULTS: Of 197,076 ED visits (159,164 discharged at initial visit), 5390 (3.4%) patients were discharged and represented to the ED within 72 hours and 1658 (1.0%) of those resulted in admission. Using defined criteria, approximately one third (n = 564) of revisits with admission were identified for chart review. Reason for revisit included natural progression of disease (67.6%), new condition or problem (11.2%), diagnostic error (6.9%), and scheduled or planned readmissions (3.5%). All diagnostic errors had not been previously identified by ED leadership. Of the reviewed cases, most were not preventable (84.0%); however, a number of system-level actions resulted from discussion of the potentially preventable revisits. CONCLUSIONS: Seventy-two-hour ED revisits were efficiently and systematically categorized with determination of root causes and preventability. This process resulted in shared provider-level feedback, identifying trends in revisits, and implementation of system-level actions, therefore, encouraging other institutions to adopt a similar process.

Bloodstream Infections in Patients With Intestinal Failure Presenting to a Pediatric Emergency Department With Fever and a Central Line.

OBJECTIVE: Previous small studies have found a high occurrence of bloodstream infections (BSIs) in patients with intestinal failure, and these rates are higher than reported rates in other pediatric populations with central lines. The primary study objective was to describe the occurrence of BSIs in patients with intestinal failure who present to the pediatric emergency department (ED) with fever. METHODS: This 5-year retrospective chart review included febrile patients with intestinal failure and central lines who presented to the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh ED between 2006 and 2011. Each febrile episode was analyzed at the visit level. RESULTS: During the study, 72 patients with 519 febrile episodes were identified. Central blood cultures were obtained in 93% (480/519) of episodes and 69% (330/480) were positive. Of all BSIs, 38% (124/330) were polymicrobial, 32% (105/330) were a single gram-positive organism, 25% (84/330) were a single gram-negative organism, and 5% (17/330) were a single fungal organism. Of the bacterial pathogens, 48% (223/460) were gram-negative. Overall, 60% were enteric organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients with intestinal failure and central lines have a high occurrence of BSIs with 69% of cultures positive in this study of ED febrile episodes. In contrast to reports in other populations with central lines, BSI occurrence in patients with intestinal failure and fever is higher and larger proportions are gram-negative and enteric organisms. For these patients, we recommend central and peripheral blood cultures, empiric broad spectrum antibiotics targeting gram-negative and enteric organisms, and hospital admission.