A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing highly purified hMG with recombinant FSH in women undergoing ICSI: ovarian response and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: To assess the clinical profile and efficacy in assisted reproductive treatment of a new human-derived highly purified (HP) menotropin, we compared HP hMG and recombinant (r) FSHalpha use in ICSI within a prospective, randomized, controlled study. METHODS: 100 infertile women were treated with HP hMG (50 patients) or rFSHalpha (50 patients). All patients received the same daily gonadotrophin dose (150 IU) following GnRH agonist suppression (long regimen) until more than three follicles >17 mm and estradiol (E(2)) levels >600 pg/ml were reached. Patients were monitored with daily LH, FSH, hCG, estradiol (E(2)), progesterone, and testosterone measurements; and alternate day pelvic ultrasound. RESULTS: Treatment duration (11.1 +/- 0.4 versus 12.9 +/- 0.5 days, P < 0.05) and gonadotrophin dose (22.4 +/- 1.0 versus 27.0 +/- 1.5 ampoules, P < 0.05) were lower in the HP hMG group. Conversely, peak pre-ovulatory E(2) (1342 +/- 127 versus 933 +/- 109 pg/ml, P < 0.005); and area under the curve of E(2) (3491 +/- 350 versus 2602 +/- 349 pg/ml.day, P < 0.05), immunoreactive serum FSH (65.9 +/- 2.1 versus 48.8 +/- 1.8 IU/l.day, P < 0.001). and hCG (1.7 +/- 0.3 versus 0.0 +/- 0.0 IU/l/day, P < 0.001) during treatment were higher in the HP hMG group. Cycle cancellation rates, transferred embryo number, pregnancy rates per started cycle (30 versus 28%) and per embryo transfer (35 versus 35%) and miscarriage rates (6 versus 6%) were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: HP hMG treatment was associated with: (i) a more efficient patient response, as reflected by reduced treatment duration and gonadotrophin requirements; (ii) increased serum levels of hCG, E(2), and immunoreactive FSH during treatment; (iii) an ICSI outcome indistinguishable from rFSHalpha.

Modulation of folliculogenesis and steroidogenesis in women by graded menotrophin administration.

BACKGROUND: To test the effects of progressively decreasing dosages of exogenous LH we combined various amounts of HMG, containing FSH, LH and HCG, and highly purified (HP) FSH to treat 120 GnRH agonist-suppressed infertile female patients as candidates for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned to four treatment groups that received the following daily i.m. gonadotrophin regimens: A, FSH 150 IU only; B, FSH 150 IU and LH activity 37.5 IU; C, FSH 150 IU and LH activity 75 IU; D, FSH 150 IU and LH activity 150 IU. FSH dose adjustments were allowed only after the 14th treatment day. Monitoring included transvaginal ultrasound at 2-day intervals and daily determinations of LH, FSH, estradiol (E(2)), progesterone, testosterone and HCG. RESULTS: Duration of COS was significantly shortened in patients receiving at least 75 IU daily of LH activity. Small (<10 mm diameter) pre-ovulatory ovarian follicle occurrence was inversely correlated with LH activity dose administered (r = -0.648, P < 0.0001) and serum HCG levels (r = -0.272, P < 0.01) but not to serum LH levels. Serum testosterone levels were positively correlated to the LH activity dose administered (r = 0.313, P < 0.001), while serum progesterone levels were positively correlated to the FSH dose administered (r = 0.447, P < 0.00001) but not to the LH activity dose administered. CONCLUSIONS: Firstly, HCG content considerably contributes to HMG activity; secondly, menotrophin LH activity content can reduce in a dose-dependent manner the occurrence of small pre-ovulatory follicles; and finally, contrary to common belief, enhanced FSH stimulation rather than LH activity appears to cause premature follicle luteinization during COS.

Stimulation and growth of antral ovarian follicles by selective LH activity administration in women.

Intensive FSH stimulation is a key tool of assisted reproduction technology but can cause severe complications through the development of an excessive number of small ovarian follicles. We tested the hypothesis that, in the late stages of ovulation induction, LH activity in the form of low-dose human CG (hCG) can stimulate and selectively modulate ovarian follicle function and growth, independently of FSH administration. Four groups of GnRH agonist-suppressed normoovulatory women (10 each group) received recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH) (150 IU/d) for 7 d followed by: group A, r-hFSH 150 IU/d alone; group B, r-hFSH 50 IU/d and hCG 50 IU/d; group C, r-hFSH 25 IU/d and hCG 100 IU/d; group D, hCG 200 IU/d alone. Despite several days of lowered or absent r-hFSH administration, 70% of hCG-treated patients successfully completed treatment. In these subjects, preovulatory E2 levels and large (>14 mm diameter) ovarian follicle development were not reduced; conversely, the number of small (<10 mm diameter) ovarian follicles was significantly decreased in groups B-D vs. group A. Low-dose hCG administration did not cause follicle luteinization. We conclude that, following FSH priming, LH activity administration can: 1) stimulate folliculogenesis for several days, in spite of rapidly declining FSH levels; and 2) hasten small follicle demise. Therefore, LH activity administration could be used to design radically novel ovulation induction regimens that, by partly or completely replacing mid-/late follicular phase FSH administration, may reduce costs and improve safety of assisted reproduction technology.

Interaction between menstrual cyclicity and gonadotropin pulsatility.

Pulsatile gonadotropin secretion is a critical endocrine component of the regulation of the normal menstrual cycle. Pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion changes dynamically across the menstrual cycle. Derangements of pulsatile LH secretion are found in virtually every menstrual disorder. This article summarizes the key features of pulsatile LH secretion in the normal menstrual cycle and in ovulatory disorders.

Subcutaneous administration of a depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist induces profound reproductive axis suppression in women.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the i.m. and s.c. routes of depot GnRH agonist administration. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled pharmacokinetics study. SETTING: Volunteers in an academic research environment. PATIENT(S): Forty women with benign gynecologic disorders. INTERVENTION(S): Triptorelin administration (3.75 mg) at 28-day intervals for 6 consecutive months. Twenty patients were treated with IM triptorelin, and 20 patients were treated with SC triptorelin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Assessment of side effects, GnRH test results, and triptorelin, LH, FSH, estradiol, and progesterone levels. RESULT(S): The occurrence of injection site redness and itching and of some hypoestrogenic side effects was increased significantly in the SC group. Plasma triptorelin levels were significantly higher in the IM group in the first month of treatment; thereafter, the pattern reversed, with a nonsignificant trend toward higher plasma triptorelin levels in the SC group. Serum LH, FSH, estradiol, and progesterone levels were low after the first month of treatment and did not differ between the two treatment groups. On day 196 (2 months after the last depot triptorelin injection), triptorelin was still measurable and gonadotropins and gonadal steroids were still suppressed. Spontaneous menses returned significantly later in the SC group than in the IM group. CONCLUSION(S): Subcutaneous triptorelin can be administered by the patient. Both IM and SC triptorelin administration are cliniclly effective, but they result in different triptorelin pharmacokinetics. Subcutaneous triptorelin is associated with more prolonged amenorrhea than is IM triptorelin, suggesting enhanced pituitary-ovarian suppression. These results suggest that SC triptorelin may allow lower drug dosage administration and/or longer administration intervals.

Role of different GnRH agonist regimens in pituitary suppression and the outcome of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists have become irreplaceable addition to gonadotrophins in ovulation induction for assisted reproduction. Of the several schemes currently employed, long regimens appear to be maximally effective to optimize patient scheduling and to improve clinical results.

Is multiple pregnancy an unavoidable complication of ovulation induction? The case for pulsatile GnRH.

Ovarian hyperstimulation (OHS) and multiple pregnancy are dreaded complications of ovulation induction. The use of pulsatile GnRH permits to prevent the occurrence of OHS and results in few multiple pregnancies. Low-dose GnRH administration, avoidance of preovulatory hCG, patient selection, and the use of GnRH agonist pituitary desensitization in selected patients permits to limit multiple conceptions to a level comparable with the occurrence of this complication in normal unstimulated women.