The impact of national guidelines on the waiting list for colonoscopy: a quantitative clinical audit.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the compliance of the surveillance colonoscopy waiting list with ACPGBI/BSG guidelines for colonoscopy follow-up and to measure the impact of adjusting referrals to be inline with the guidelines. DESIGN AND SETTING: This is a quantitative five-stage clinical audit cycle involving a large patient cohort from the Kent and Medway Cancer Network, which includes seven hospitals across four NHS Hospital Trusts and an estimated population of 1.8 million. PARTICIPANTS: 3020 patients were waiting for a surveillance colonoscopy. Their notes were reviewed and the indications for colonoscopy were compared with the ACPGBI/BSG 2002 guidelines. INTERVENTIONS: Those patients whose referral to the surveillance colonoscopy waiting list was not found to be compliant were adjusted to be inline with the guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The impact of adjusting the surveillance colonoscopy waiting list on the diagnostic colonoscopy service was assessed by measuring the average waiting times for a colonoscopy before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Around 22% (n = 664) of surveillance colonoscopy referrals were inline with the guidelines, 51% (n = 1540) could be cancelled from the list and 27% (n = 816) could be given a new date. Implementing these recommendations reduced the average wait for a diagnostic colonoscopy from 76.8 to 56.0 days (P = 0.0022). CONCLUSION: Following guidelines for surveillance colonoscopy can reduce waiting times for diagnostic colonoscopy. This allows a faster patient journey for diagnostic colonoscopy and a uniform plan for duration and frequency of surveillance colonoscopy. However, this action promoted serious debate on the social, moral and ethical issues.

'How compliant do we want to be with the colonoscopy surveillance guidelines?'.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the referral practice for surveillance colonoscopy amongst clinicians and to measure whether practice was inline with the current Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines. METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to members of the ACPGBI. RESULTS: A total of 195 (49%) clinicians responded, providing information on their referral habits with comments on where they deviated from the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The BSG and ACPGBI guidelines are well established amongst clinicians and generally accepted as best practice, however, the majority of clinicians deviate from the guidelines for particular clinical scenarios. In fact only 18% of respondents followed all recommendations for surveillance colonoscopy for patients with polyps, previous cancers and a family history.

A personal view on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Benefits such as reduced morbidity and shorter length of stay have been demonstrated for laparoscopic colon cancer resection, Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is thought to be more challenging and it is not clear if it offers the same benefits. There are concerns about oncological outcome and anastomotic technique and complications. In this review we discuss the difficulties and challenges of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery within the context of our own personal experience and with regard to some of the current literature. We propose that laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery both have a role and the challenge is selection of appropriate patients for each technique.

Why wait for a colonoscopy? An easy cure.

OBJECTIVE: Three thousand five hundred and forty-nine patients are waiting for a colonoscopy in the Kent and Medway cancer network. New guidelines identify those who require surveillance for polyp, cancer, IBD and family history. Our hypothesis was that most of the patients on the waiting list would no longer need a colonoscopy if the new guidelines were applied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared the ACPGBI guidelines for screening/surveillance colonoscopy with the indications in 411 notes of one hospital's waiting list and removed patients as appropriate. In the second part of study we analysed 192 patients attending colonoscopy in seven hospitals in the region and calculated the potential impact of the guidelines on our waiting lists. RESULTS: Of 411 patients on the waiting list in one hospital, only 98 (24%) needed to remain on the list. 142 (34%) were cancelled completely. One hundred and seventy-one (42%) were taken off the 'waiting' list and rebooked for a later date since according to the new guidelines the colonoscopy was not due yet. Of 192 colonoscopies actually performed during the study period in 7 hospitals of Kent and Medway cancer network, 72 (38%) were for surveillance. Two thirds of those were not in line with the guidelines. As a result of implementing the guidelines, waiting times for diagnostic colonoscopy fell from 12 to 4 weeks for urgent, and from 40 to 15 weeks for routine referrals. CONCLUSION: A quarter of the 8000 colonoscopies performed annually in our region are unnecessary when compared to the guidelines. More than three quarters of our waiting list could be removed by reviewing the notes. Implementing the guidelines in one cancer network would save pounds 1 million per year even on conservative estimates of pounds 500 per colonoscopy. It would also reduce the waiting times for diagnostic colonoscopy.

Reducing surgical outpatient waiting is not the solution to meeting the 2005 colorectal cancer target.

OBJECTIVES: The majority of colorectal cancers (CRC) are not diagnosed through the Rapid access route (RAR) and follow-ups (FU) may prolong outpatient-waiting time for new referrals. The aim of this study was to assess the relative contributions of an efficient colorectal clinic and a stringent colonoscopy booking system on the total journey time for CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reduced the number of follow-up appointments with the introduction of 'Paper clinics'. The composition of the new clinic was determined by the known cancer yield through RAR and non-RAR route. A prospective analysis of clinics and CRC journey times was undertaken from November 2003 for 13 months, with the new outpatient clinic template introduced in December 2003. This coincided with a stringent policy on referral pattern for colonoscopy. RESULTS: In our hospital, only 4% of RAR yield CRC. Seventy-five percent of our CRC are referred through the non-RAR route. Eighty-one percent of follow-ups in a 'paper clinic' were discharged. A flexible template for the outpatient clinics, introduced a corresponding reduction in follow-up and increased urgent and routine slots. There was a progressive drop in the follow-up to new ratio and the waiting times for routine and urgent category decreased from a median of 15.9 and 3.4 weeks to 6.7 and 0.7 weeks, respectively (P < 0.001). Average waiting times for all categories fell from 13.35 weeks in November 2003 to 3.5 weeks in December 2004, while the number of patients waiting less than 4 weeks rose from 46% to 71%. This was associated with reduction in total journey times from 93 days to 62 days (P < 0.05). DNA rates remained unaffected. CONCLUSION: Modifying outpatient clinic composition with 'paper clinics' reduces the waiting time for all referrals to a surgical clinic with a modest effect on CRC clinic waiting time. Reduction in the total waiting time to first treatment (for CRC) is due to reducing the demand on colonoscopy in favour of barium enema. Redirecting the flow of patients towards barium enema is perhaps one way of improving the existing CRC journey time to first treatment, within existing resources. Achieving the 62 day target for cancer journey time will be difficult unless traditional surgical clinic habits are challenged.

Retrograde commercial colonic hydrotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the current practice of commercial colonic hydrotherapy in the UK and to collect data on the profiles of both the practitioners and their clients. In addition to understand how colonic hydrotherapy is perceived by those who use it and how much economic benefit it generates for the practitioners. Information as to training and complications was sought. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all 80 practitioners registered with the Association of Colonic Hydrotherapists (ACH) of the UK. The practitioners who responded were sent 10 questionnaires to be given to a group of consecutive clients. This client questionnaire included an SF-36 self-administered scoring system and a satisfaction survey. To understand the methodology and ritual of the hydrotherapy procedure a field trip was arranged and two of the authors (NJT and PJM) underwent one colonic hydrotherapy session with an experience practitioner. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (48%) of practitioners responded to our practitioner survey and 242 client questionnaires were returned. One third of practitioners reported a previous clinical background and 32 (83%) were single-handed practitioners. The average time in practice was six years and with an average age of the hydrotherapists being 50 years (22-78 years). Estimated number of sessions conducted were 3200 (range 140-10 000). Average annual income before expenses per practitioner was estimated at pound 45 675. The clients' ages ranged was 18 and 82 years of age (mean 44 years) and had undergone an average of 35 hydrotherapy treatments (range 1-2500). Clients had lower SF-36 scores than the UK norm. CONCLUSION: Colonic hydrotherapy is practised widely in the UK with an estimated 5600 procedures carried out by ACH practitioners monthly. It is not known how much activity is carried out by non-ACH members. ACH practitioners appear to be well trained and a proportion have medical backgrounds. Clients, who are often unhappy with orthodox medicine seem satisfied enough with the experience of colonic hydrotherapy to undergo regular purgings. No serious side-effects have been reported to us. Economic factors could be a driving force for the continuation of the practice as the monies earnt are not inconsiderable.

The effects of different viewing conditions on performance in simulated minimal access surgery.

This study aimed to assess performance in simulated minimal access surgery (MAS) tasks under a range of viewing conditions. MAS conventionally uses 2d viewing systems which produce a flat image. However, 3d viewing systems which produce stereoscopic depth information should in principle lead to better depth perception, and improve performance on tasks which require appropriate spatial representation of layout and depth. The study compared a novel 3d viewing system with a state of the art 2d viewing system and a direct viewing condition ('open surgery') as a point of reference. Tasks included pulling and cutting of threads using standard surgical instruments. Medical students (n = 16) were allocated to viewing conditions according to a Latin square and carried out 120 tasks each. Assessment was by means of a 3d movement tracking device providing a number of performance parameters (time on task, velocity, number of movements, distance travelled). In addition instrument movement was video-recorded and analysed by four observers to validate the tracking device. Results from tracking data and observer data were highly correlated (r > 0.85). While open surgery naturally scored highest, the key finding was the clearly superior performance in the 3d condition compared to 2d. Thus modern 3d viewing systems can improve performance in a realistic task.

Motion analysis.

BACKGROUND: The ability to make an objective evaluation of a surgeon's operative ability remains an elusive goal. In this study, we used motion analysis as a measure of dexterity in the performance of a simulated operation. METHODS: Fifteen surgeons performed a total of 45 laboratory-based laparoscopic cholecystectomies on a cadaveric porcine liver model. Subjects were assigned to one of three groups according to their level of experience in human laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Electromagnetic tracking devices were used to analyze the surgeon's hand movements as they performed the procedure. Movement data (time, distance, number of movements, and speed of movement) were then compared. RESULTS: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) movement scores across the three groups showed significantly better performance among the experienced laparoscopic surgeons than the novices. Learning curves across repetitions of procedures were plotted. Novices made more improvement than experts. CONCLUSIONS: Motion analysis provides useful data for the assessment of laparoscopic dexterity, and the porcine liver model is a valid simulation of the real procedure.

Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexy.

BACKGROUND: Rectopexy is one of the accepted treatment options for full-thickness rectal prolapse, but the details of the technique remain controversial. This unit has adopted a laparoscopic approach as an alternative to open surgery, and has used three techniques: mesh, suture, and resection. This retrospective study compares the long-term outcome. METHODS: From 1993 to 1995, 14 patients underwent a laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy. From 1996 to 1999, 34 patients underwent laparoscopic suture rectopexy with (n = 18) or without sigmoid resection (n = 16). RESULTS: There was no postoperative mortality, and morbidity was similar in the three groups, ranging from 11 to 19%. The mean follow-up was 47, 24, and 20 months for mesh, suture, and resection rectopexy, respectively. During follow-up, 1 patient in each group developed mucosal prolapse. There was no difference between the three groups for incontinence rate, which improved in more than 75% of patients who had impaired continence preoperatively. Postoperative constipation was observed in 2 patients (11%) after resection rectopexy, in 10 (62%) after suture rectopexy (P < 0.01 versus resection), and in 9 (64%) after mesh rectopexy (P < 0.01 versus resection). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the addition of sigmoid resection to laparoscopic rectopexy is safe and could contribute to reduce the risk of severe constipation after operation. Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy confers no advantage over the sutured technique, which we now use as our fixation method of choice.

[Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a forgotten minimally invasive technique]. / Exérèse transanale par microchirurgie endoscopique: une technique trop peu utilisée.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate transanal endoscopic microsurgery in patients with benign and malignant rectal tumours with special reference to feasibility, morbidity, and recurrence rate. METHODS: Forty-three patients underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumours between 1996 and 2000. The histological diagnosis was benign adenoma in 30 and invasive carcinoma in 13. The mean height of the tumour above the anal verge was 11.2 +/- 3 cm and the mean diameter of the lesion was 3.4 +/- 1.5 cm. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 85 +/- 26 min and in one case (2%), it was necessary to convert to an anterior resection. The morbidity rate was 18%. Mean hospital stay was 3.9 +/- 2.4 days. Complete excision of the tumour with histological confirmation was achieved in 42 cases (98%). With a mean follow-up of 26 months, benign tumour recurrence was observed in one patient (3%). Of the 13 patients with carcinoma, two had immediate further radical resection. For the remaining 11 patients, with a mean follow-up of 19 months, the recurrence rate was 75% for T2 tumours and nil for T1 tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is safe and feasible technique which should have a useful place in the management of sessile adenomas of the mid and upper rectum. Its role in the management of rectal cancer is limited, although it may be appropriate for carefully selected cases.

The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic surgeons rely on visual feedback to control their movements but lack stereopsis, an important depth cue. Previous three-dimensional (3D) systems alternated images on a two-dimensional (2D) screen, which was uncomfortable for surgeons. A second-generation 3D system provides continuous stereoscopic images on a monitor suspended at arm's length. We studied its effect on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. METHODS: Experienced laparoscopic surgeons (n = 12) and novices (n = 16) performed a total of 672 tasks in 2D, 3D, and under direct vision. Precision was assessed using the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD), which generates objective scores of performance by analyzing the movements of surgical instruments. RESULTS: We found that 2D endoscopic vision impaired performance by 35-100% when compared with direct vision, whereas 3D reduced this endoscopic handicap by 41-53% in novices and experienced surgeons (p < 0.03). No side effects were reported with the new 3D system. Even in 2D, novices performed better with an image at arm's length (p < 0. 03). CONCLUSIONS: Second-generation 3D significantly improved the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons, without the side effects reported from previous systems. This technology is expected to improve the ease and safety of laparoscopic surgery.

Early experience and validation work with Procedicus VA--the Prosolvia virtual reality shoulder arthroscopy trainer.

Shoulder arthroscopy is a difficult procedure, commonly used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Until now, the majority of training has been done in theatre, assisting and practising under supervision. Few good simulations exist. Procedicus VA, from Prosolvia Clarus, is a virtual reality simulation of shoulder arthroscopy, with interactive graphics and haptic feedback. The simulator has various modes including anatomy manipulation pathology subacromial decompression. We describe our experience with the simulator, attempting to validate some of the scoring mechanisms, and highlighting some of the pitfalls discovered as the simulator is first trialled by surgeons. This early experience has highlighted both successful aspects of the simulator, and some of the initial pitfalls. Our initial experience confirms the need for close collaboration between virtual programmers and surgical trainers. We are revising the assessment criteria over the coming months.

Sigmoidoscopy in a nurse-practitioner community clinic using telemedicine.

We evaluated the feasibility of remote endoscopy in a community setting. Realtime teleconsultation and telesigmoidoscopy were carried out by a nurse practitioner at a community clinic while a colorectal specialist was present at the main hospital. Rigid video-sigmoidoscopes were used and the images were transmitted via ISDN lines at 384 kbit/s. Over three months, 32 patients (mean age 35 years; 19 men and 13 women) with bleeding per rectum took part in the study. Evaluation was carried out using satisfaction questionnaires for the patients, the nurse practitioner and the clinicians. The mean grade for clarity of intraluminal views was 3.5 (1 poor, 4 excellent). Only two cases had views graded less than 3, due to the presence of excessive faecal residue. All the patients were satisfied with the teleconsultation and video-endoscopy and would return for a similar visit. User satisfaction was also high on the part of the nurse practitioner and the clinician.

Rigid videosigmoidoscopy vs conventional sigmoidoscopy. A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Not only is rigid sigmoidoscopy uncomfortable for patients, but visualisation of the rectosigmoid junction and sigmoid colon is successful in only 40-70% of examinations. A novel fine-bore rigid videosigmoidoscope is described and then compared with a rigid conventional sigmoidoscope for patient discomfort and length of insertion. METHOD: A total of 58 patients were examined with both sigmoidoscopes in a random order. Discomfort was scored on a visual analogue scale; length of insertion was scored by the surgeon. Patients were blinded to which sigmoidoscope was being used. The images from the video examination were transmitted in real time for a second opinion in a different hospital. RESULTS: The mean (SD) insertion distance of the videosigmoidoscope was 23.2 (5.9) cm, which was significantly further than with the conventional sigmoidosocpe 16.5 (3.8) cm (p < 0.01). The discomfort on a visual analogue score for the videosigmoidoscope was 3.0 (1.8), which was significantly less than for the conventional sigmoidoscope 5.5 (2.7) (p < 0.01). The five users of the equipment (four surgeons and one colorectal nurse practitioner) preferred the videosigmoidoscope for image quality and ease of examination. CONCLUSIONS: A thinner, longer, rigid videosigmoidoscope is a more effective means of looking at the proximal sigmoid colon. Despite being inserted further, it caused less discomfort than the conventional sigmoidoscope. High-quality video images can be recorded or transmitted for real-time teleconsultation.

Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator.

Objective assessment of surgical technique is currently impossible. A virtual reality simulator for laparoscopic surgery (MIST VR) models the movements needed to perform minimally invasive surgery and can generate a score for various aspects of psychomotor skill. Two studies were performed using the simulator: first to assess surgeons of different surgical experience to validate the scoring system; second to assess in a randomised controlled way, the effect of a standard laparoscopic surgery training course. Experienced surgeons (> 100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies) were significantly more efficient, made less correctional submovements and completed the virtual reality tasks faster than trainee surgeons or non-surgeons. The training course caused an improvement in efficiency and a reduction in errors, without a significant increase in speed when compared with the control group. The MIST VR simulator can objectively assess a number of desirable qualities in laparoscopic surgery, and can distinguish between experienced and novice surgeons. We have also quantified the beneficial effect of a structured training course on psychomotor skill acquisition.

Bacterial contamination of pneumoperitoneum gas in peritonitis and controls: a prospective laparoscopic study.

There is a theoretical risk that the pneumoperitoneum gas could carry bacteria in aerosol form and spread infection throughout the peritoneal cavity during laparoscopy for infective conditions such as appendicitis. The aim of this study was to attempt to culture bacteria from the pneumoperitoneum gas during laparoscopy for potentially infected cases and a group of controls. A total of 53 consecutive laparoscopies were studied, of which 21 were potentially infected and 32 served as controls. A lavage of the operative site was positive for pathogenic bacteria in almost 30% of the potentially infected group and only 3% of the control group. The pneumoperitoneum gas was bubbled through blood culture medium at the beginning and the end of the procedure, but only one of the 106 bottles grew any bacteria, and the specimen was a likely contaminant. In conclusion, we were unable to grow any significant bacteria from any of our cases despite using a sensitive method and demonstrating pathogenic bacteria in the peritoneal lavages. The pneumoperitoneum itself is unlikely to disperse bacteria.

Cells are present in the smoke created during laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: The application of laparoscopy for malignancy has been halted in many centres because of a growing number of reports of metastases arising in port sites. The smoke created by coagulation during laparoscopic surgery appears to contain particles visible to the naked eye. This study tested the hypothesis that whole cells can be carried as an aerosol in the pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy. METHODS: Nine patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for benign and metastatic disease were studied. Throughout the procedure the gas of the pneumoperitoneum was allowed to escape through a filter. The filters and tubing were washed, and washing solution was centrifuged and stained immunohistochemically to identify the cells. Three of the filters were also examined with an electron microscope. RESULTS: Six of the nine samples contained cells. Clumps of whole cells were identified as mesothelial in origin; the electron micrographs showed many other cells stuck to the filter, which appeared to be blood and mesothelial cells but were not analysed further. CONCLUSION: The presence of whole identifiable cells carried in the pneumoperitoneum raises concerns for operating staff and could be a mechanism for tumour implantation. No malignant cells were found, but ethical considerations prevented intentional coagulation of malignant tissue.