Rotator cuff training with upper extremity blood flow restriction produces favorable adaptations in division IA collegiate pitchers: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence indicates that combined upper extremity blood flow restriction (BFR, applied distally to the shoulder) and low-load resistance exercise (LIX) augments clinically meaningful responses in shoulder region tissues proximal to the occlusion site. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the efficacy of BFR-LIX for the shoulder when added to standard offseason training in Division IA collegiate baseball pitchers. We hypothesized that BFR-LIX would augment training-induced increases in shoulder-region lean mass, rotator cuff strength, and endurance. As secondary outcomes, we sought to explore the impact of BFR-LIX rotator cuff training on pitching mechanics. METHODS: Twenty-eight collegiate baseball pitchers were randomized into 2 groups (BFRN = 15 and non-BFR [NOBFR]N = 13) that, in conjunction with offseason training, performed 8 weeks of shoulder LIX (Throwing arm only; 2/week, 4 sets [30/15/15/fatigue], 20% isometric max) using 4 exercises (cable external and internal rotation [ER/IR], dumbbell scaption, and side-lying dumbbell ER). The BFR group also trained with an automated tourniquet on the proximal arm (50% occlusion). Regional lean mass (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry), rotator cuff strength (dynamometry: IR 0 & 90, ° ER 0 & 90, ° Scaption, Flexion), and fastball biomechanics were assessed pre and post-training. Achievable workload (sets × reps × resistance) was also recorded. An ANCOVA (covaried on baseline measures) repeated on training timepoint was used to detect within-group and between-group differences in outcome measures (α = 0.05). For significant pairwise comparisons, effect size (ES) was calculated using a Cohen's d statistic and interpreted as: 0-0.1, negligible; 0.1-0.3, small; 0.3-0.5, moderate; 0.5-0.7, large; >0.7, and very large (VL). RESULTS: Following training, the BFR group experienced greater increases in shoulder-region lean mass (BFR: ↑ 227 ± 60g, NOBFR: ↑ 75 ± 37g, P = .018, ES = 1.0 VL) and isometric strength for IR 90 ° (↑ 2.4 ± 2.3 kg, P = .041, ES = 0.9VL). The NOBFR group experienced decreased shoulder flexion ↓ 1.6 ± 0.8 kg, P = .007, ES = 1.4VL) and IR at 0 ° ↓ 2.9 ± 1.5 kg, P = .004, ES = 1.1VL). The BFR group had a greater increase in achievable workload for the scaption exercise (BFR: ↑ 190 ± 3.2 kg, NOBFR: ↑ 90 ± 3.3 kg, P = .005, ES = 0.8VL). Only the NOBFR group was observed to experience changes in pitching mechanics following training with increased shoulder external rotation at lead foot contact (↑ 9.0° ± 7.9, P = .028, ES = 0.8VL) as well as reduced forward ↓ 3.6° ± 2.1, P = .001, ES = 1.2VL) and lateral ↓ 4.6° ± 3.4, P = .007, ES = 1.0VL) trunk tilt at ball release. CONCLUSION: BFR-LIX rotator cuff training performed in conjunction with a collegiate offseason program augments increases in shoulder lean mass as well as muscular endurance while maintaining rotator cuff strength and possibly pitching mechanics in a manner that may contribute to favorable outcomes and injury prevention in baseball pitching athletes.

Blood Flow Restriction Training for the Shoulder: A Case for Proximal Benefit.

BACKGROUND: Although blood flow restriction (BFR) is becoming increasingly popular in physical therapy and athletic training settings, little is known about the effects of BFR combined with low-intensity exercise (LIX) on muscles proximal to the site of occlusion. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: Determine whether LIX combined with BFR applied distally to the shoulder on the brachial region of the arm (BFR-LIX) promotes greater increases in shoulder lean mass, rotator cuff strength, endurance, and acute increases in shoulder muscle activation compared with LIX alone. We hypothesized that BFR-LIX would elicit greater increases in rotator cuff strength, endurance, and muscle mass. We also hypothesized that the application of BFR would increase EMG amplitude in the shoulder muscles during acute exercise. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: 32 healthy adults were randomized into 2 groups (BFR group, 13 men, 3 women; No-BFR group, 10 men, 6 women) who performed 8 weeks of shoulder LIX (2 times per week; 4 sets [30/15/15/fatigue]; 20% maximum) using common rotator cuff exercises (cable external rotation [ER], cable internal rotation [IR], dumbbell scaption, and side-lying dumbbell ER). The BFR group also trained with an automated tourniquet placed at the proximal arm (50% occlusion). Regional lean mass (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry), isometric strength, and muscular endurance (repetitions to fatigue [RTF]; 20% maximum; with and without 50% occlusion) were measured before and after training. Electromyographic amplitude (EMGa) was recorded from target shoulder muscles during endurance testing. A mixed-model analysis of covariance (covaried on baseline measures) was used to detect within-group and between-group differences in primary outcome measures (α = .05). RESULTS: The BFR group had greater increases in lean mass in the arm (mean ± 95% CI: BFR, 175 ± 54 g; No BFR, -17 ± 77 g; P < .01) and shoulder (mean ± 95% CI: BFR, 278 ± 90 g; No BFR, 96 ± 61 g; P < .01), isometric IR strength (mean ± 95% CI: BFR, 2.9 ± 1.3 kg; No BFR, 0.1 ± 1.3 kg; P < .01), single-set RTF volume (repetitions × resistance) for IR (~1.7- to 2.1-fold higher; P < .01), and weekly training volume (weeks 4, 6-8, ~5%-22%; P < .05). Acute occlusion (independent of group or timepoint) yielded increases in EMGa during RTF (~10%-20%; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Combined BFR-LIX may yield greater increases in shoulder and arm lean mass, strength, and muscular endurance compared with fatiguing LIX alone during rotator cuff exercises. These findings may be due, in part, to a greater activation of shoulder muscles while using BFR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study demonstrates that BFR-LIX may be a suitable candidate for augmenting preventive training or rehabilitation outcomes for the shoulder.

Pelvic region bone density, soft tissue mass, and injury frequency in female professional ballet dancers and soccer athletes.

We recently observed a high prevalence of low pelvic bone mineral density (BMD) in female professional ballet performers. Because this population is susceptible to musculoskeletal overuse injuries, we aimed to determine which regions of the pelvis may be at greatest risk compared to general population females (GENPOP) as well as professional female soccer players (SOCCER, a comparison to other elite athletes regularly subjected to high degrees of loading). Three groups of age-matched females [(GENPOP; n = 38, 27±1yrs), (BALLET; single company, n = 36, 26±3yrs), (SOCCER; single NWSL® club, n = 34, 25±1yrs)] consented to have their BMD and body composition assessed (DEXA, GE®). In addition to soft tissue and total and regional BMD analyses, a segmental analysis of the pelvis was performed to determine site-specific BMD for the iliac fossa, iliac fossa/iliac crest/ilium combined, pubic bone, ischium, and sacrum. A mixed-model ANOVA followed by a Tukey's post-hoc test was used to compare the groups (Type-I error; α = 0.05). The BALLET group had lower pelvic BMD for all measures (Avg.%Diff. = 15%-27%, p<0.001) compared to the SOCCER group and for the ischium (Avg.%Diff.= 8%; p=0.007) and sacrum (Avg.%Diff. â€‹= â€‹7%; p = 0.028) compared to the GENPOP group. The BALLET group had lower lean mass for all measures compared to the other groups (Avg.%Diff. = 12%-18%; p < 0.01). Professional ballet performers exhibit reduced pelvic region soft tissue and site-specific BMD not previously detected using standard DEXA analyses. These findings highlight which pelvic regions may benefit from preventative strength training and/or nutritional interventions.