Eribulin versus S-1 as first or second-line chemotherapy to assess health-related quality of life and overall survival in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (RESQ study): a non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Background: Eribulin prolongs overall survival (OS) of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), particularly in later chemotherapy (ChT) treatment. However, the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and efficacy of first or second-line therapy in eribulin-treated patients remain unknown. Using eribulin in the first- or second-line may demonstrate the non-inferiority of HRQoL compared to S-1, an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative, while maintaining OS. Methods: This randomised, controlled, open-label, phase III trial was conducted at 50 hospitals in Japan. Patients were enrolled from June 2016 and October 2019. Patients with HER2-negative MBC once under or no previous ChT were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive eribulin or S-1. HRQoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) every six weeks until week 24 and every nine weeks until week 42. The primary endpoint was the deterioration defined as more than 10 points worsening of the general health score of QLQ-C30 or death within one year after randomisation. The secondary endpoints included OS. (Trial ID: UMIN000021398). Findings: Three hundred and two patients were enrolled, with 152 and 148 assigned to the eribulin and S-1 groups, respectively. The questionnaire compliance rate was 85.6%. Risk difference of global health status deterioration through one year was -0.66% (95% CI: -12.47-11.16; non-inferiority P = 0.077) for eribulin compared to S-1 groups. Median time to first deterioration for global health status score was 5.64 (95% CI: 3.51-8.00) and 5.28 months (95% CI: 3.28-7.80) in the eribulin and S-1 groups, respectively. The median OS was 34.7 and 27.8 months, (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.96; P = 0.026); the median progression-free survival was 7.57 and 6.75 months in the eribulin and S-1 groups, (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.67-1.16; P = 0.35), respectively. No new adverse events occurred. Interpretation: The time of the first clinical deterioration was similar between the two groups and OS significantly increased in eribulin-treated patients. Funding: This study was funded by CSPOR-BC and Eisai CO., Ltd.

The effect of exercise and educational programs for breast cancer patients on the development of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: secondary endpoint from a randomized controlled trial in the Setouchi Breast Project-10.

BACKGROUND: Although the association between higher physical activity and preventive effect on breast-cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) has been reported, it is unclear what intervention is optimal. We aimed to investigate the effect of exercise and educational programs on BCRL development. METHODS: This study was a secondary endpoint analysis from a prospective randomized controlled trial. We enrolled patients with stage 0-III breast cancer from March 2016 to March 2020 and randomly assigned them to the control (n = 111), education (n = 115), or exercise (n = 104) group. As secondary endpoint, we assessed the incidence of and preventive effect on BCRL at 12 months post-intervention. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence of BCRL at 12 months post-intervention between the exercise and control groups (9.8% and 10.8%, P = 0.83) and the education and control groups (11.6% and 10.8%, P = 1.00). There were no significant differences in time to BCRL onset from the day of surgery between the exercise and control groups (event rate at 12 months: 20.7% and 17.2%, log-rank, P = 0.54) and the education and control groups (18.8% and 17.2%, log-rank, P = 0.57). The multivariable analyses indicated that axillary dissection and obesity significantly increased the risk of BCRL [hazard ratio (HR): 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-3.67 and HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.07-2.63, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention did not decrease the risk of BCRL, and axillary dissection and obesity were the risk factors of BCRL. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000020595 at UMIN Clinical Trial Registry.

Baseline gut microbiota as a predictive marker for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study in the Setouchi Breast Project-14.

PURPOSE: Various studies have demonstrated the causal relationship between gut microbiota and efficacy of chemotherapy; however, the impact of gut microbiota on breast cancer has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between the gut microbiota before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its consequent efficacy in breast cancer. METHODS: This prospective observational study included patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary early breast cancer at eight institutions between October 1, 2019, and March 31, 2022. We performed 16S rRNA analysis of fecal samples and α and ß diversity analyses of the gut microbiota. The primary endpoint was the association between the gut microbiota and pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Among the 183 patients, the pCR rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 36.1% in all patients and 12.9% (9/70), 69.5% (41/59), and 29.6% (16/54) in those with the luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and triple-negative types, respectively. The α diversity of the gut microbiota did not significantly differ between patients with pCR and those without pCR. Among the gut microbiota, two species (Victivallales, P = 0.001 and Anaerolineales, P = 0.001) were associated with pCR, and one (Gemellales, P = 0.002) was associated with non-pCR. CONCLUSION: Three species in the gut microbiota had potential associations with neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy, but the diversity of the gut microbiota was not associated with response to chemotherapy. Further research is needed to validate our findings.

A randomized trial of the impact of symptom monitoring using an electronic patient-reported outcome app on health-related quality of life in postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy.

BACKGROUND: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) monitoring is a useful communication tool for cancer patients and healthcare providers. In this study, we examined the impact of symptom monitoring using an ePRO app on quality of life (QoL) in postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy. METHODS: The free app "Welby My Carte ONC" was used in the study. Patients with breast cancer starting adjuvant endocrine therapy were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to ePRO monitoring (ONC) and control groups. The ONC group reported five symptoms extracted from the Patient-Reported Outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) (insomnia, joint pain, headache, anxiety, and hot flashes) weekly for 3 months through the app. Reported symptoms were shared with medical personnel. When serious symptoms were reported, these personnel ascertained the patient's health status and provided advice over the phone. The primary endpoint was QoL measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) at 3 months from enrollment. Differences between groups were tested using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: The study included 125 subjects with mean age of 64 years in the ONC group (n = 61) and 63 years in the control group (n = 64). In the ONC group, the response rate to PRO-CTCAE was about 70% or higher until week 10. The item missing rate was 0. The ONC group reported more symptoms related to joint pain and insomnia. The difference in FACT-B total score between the groups was - 1.55 (95% confidence interval: - 5.91, 2.81), indicating no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom monitoring using ePRO early after initiation of adjuvant endocrine therapy after surgery did not improve QoL of breast cancer patients.

Radiation­induced pleomorphic liposarcoma after hypofractionated radiotherapy following breast­conserving surgery: A case report and literature review.

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer globally. Radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery is the standard treatment of breast cancer. Recently, hypofractionated irradiation comprising 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions was selected as a viable radiation therapeutic option. Radiation-induced sarcoma is the most prevalent secondary malignancy in patients undergoing radiotherapy after breast cancer surgery. Angiosarcomas are the predominant type of radiation-induced sarcomas, whereas liposarcomas have rarely been reported. The present report details an uncommon instance of radiation-induced pleomorphic liposarcoma that occurred 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and hypofractionated radiotherapy. The patient visited the hospital due to hardening of the tissue beneath the skin of the right breast. Ultrasonography revealed a hypoechoic mass in the lower part of the right breast containing internal blood flow. An excisional biopsy revealed that the tumor contained infiltrating spindle-shaped cells without a capsule containing pleomorphic cells. Lipoblasts were also observed and tended to differentiate into adipose tissue, leading to a diagnosis of pleomorphic liposarcoma. Immunostaining revealed negativity for cytokeratin AE1/AE3, ERG, MDM2 and S-100 protein; the Ki-67 index was ~20%. An enlargement resection involving a postoperative bed was performed because of close tumor margins. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography revealed pale accumulation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in the right chest wall, which was interpreted as a postoperative change owing to the resection biopsy. The tumor was observed in the irradiated field with no distant metastases. Following extensive resection, the patient maintained a recurrence-free survival period of 3 years and 2 months, during which no adjuvant therapy was administered. Therefore, follow-up is necessary in patients with breast cancer treated with radiotherapy.

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer, 2022 Edition: changes from the 2018 edition and general statements on breast cancer treatment.

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer, 2022 Edition was published in June 2022. The guidelines were prepared while conforming as much as possible to the "Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020 ver. 3.0." edited by the Minds Manual Development Committee of the Japan Council for Quality Health Care in 2021. In addition, a survey of Japanese Breast Cancer Society members on the 2018 edition of the guidelines was conducted from February 19 to March 4, 2021. Based on the responses from over 600 members, original innovations were made to make the guidelines more user-friendly. The 2018 edition of the guidelines was developed to provide support tools for physicians and patients to utilize shared decision-making. The 2022 guidelines consist of two volumes: (1) an "Epidemiology and Diagnosis" section covering "Screening and Diagnosis", "Radiological diagnosis", and "Pathological diagnosis", and (2) a "Treatment" section covering "Surgical therapy", "Radiation therapy", and "Systemic therapy". We believe that this concise summary of the guidelines will be useful to physicians and researchers in Japan and overseas.

Severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia in a Breast Cancer Patient Despite Pegfilgrastim Administration.

Pegfilgrastim dramatically reduces febrile neutropenia (FN) caused by high-risk chemotherapy. This report details the presentation of a 72-year-old female who developed a fatal infection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia that occurred during preoperative chemotherapy despite pegfilgrastim administration. She was brought to the hospital with symptoms of high fever and general fatigue during chemotherapy, but her respiratory symptoms were minimal, and a chest computed tomography (CT) showed no obvious signs of pneumonia. She had FN. After she was hospitalized, her breathing and consciousness worsened rapidly, and the chest CT showed prominent lobar pneumonia. Her blood cultures suggested P. aeruginosa, so she was quickly switched to meropenem. She was diagnosed with septic shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome due to severe P. aeruginosa pneumonia, and she was started on noninvasive positive pressure ventilation with immunoglobulin preparations. P. aeruginosa developed drug resistance, so it was necessary to change antibiotics. She was discharged without complications of pulmonary fibrosis on chest CT. It is crucial to always be aware that severe infections can occur even with pegfilgrastim administration, promptly identify the causative pathogen, and intervene with early treatment.

Lung Oligometastasis of Breast Cancer: Prospective Cohort Study of Treatment Strategies (SBP-06).

While local treatment of metastases is considered to be unrelated to prognosis, previous studies have suggested that local treatment of isolated lung metastases may have positive prognostic impact. We designed this prospective cohort study to investigate the clinical situation and its outcomes. We enrolled patients with fewer than 3 lung nodules suspected of being oligometastases after curative breast cancer surgery. Treatments, including local and systemic therapy, were selected by the physician and patient in consultation. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes were the efficacy and the safety of the surgery for lung oligometastases. Between May 2015 and May 2019, 14 patients were enrolled. Resection of lung nodules (metastasectomy) was performed in 11 (78.6%) of 14 patients, and one of these cases was diagnosed as primary lung cancer. Metastasectomies were all performed employing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) without perioperative complications. Systemic therapies were administered to all patients except one. The respective 3-year and 5-year OS rates of patients with lung oligometastases were 91.6% and 81.5%, respectively. Progression occurred in 6 patients: 3 of the 10 with metastasectomy and all 3 without this surgical procedure. Lung metastasectomy was worthwhile as a diagnostic evaluation and may provide long-term benefit in some patients.

Pilot trial of an electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring system in patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Electronic patient-reported outcomes monitoring (ePROM) is a useful communication tool for patients and healthcare providers in cancer chemotherapy. In this study, we examined the feasibility of our newly developed ePROM system, which we refer to as "Hibilog". METHODS: An ePROM app was developed by extracting 18 items from the Patient-Reported Outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Symptom monitoring was conducted every two weeks for patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. The primary outcome was the response rate to the ePROM system. The secondary outcomes were response time, item missing rate, and distribution of responses for each symptom. RESULTS: A total of 71 cases (mean age 52.6 years) were analyzed. Performance status was 0 in 76% of the cases and 1 or higher in 24%. First-line treatment was being administered in 30% of cases, second-line treatment in 17%, and third-line or higher treatment in 53%. The response rate to the ePROM system from registration to week 40 remained high at around 80%, indicating good compliance. The average response time was 5.5 min and the missing rate for each item was below 0.4%. Among 1,093 responses, the top 3 symptoms causing interference with daily life were Fatigue (63%), Numbness and tingling (48%), and General pain (46%). CONCLUSION: Our developed ePROM system was able to capture symptoms accurately in patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy while maintaining a high response compliance.

Long-Term Physical Activity and Body Composition After Exercise and Educational Programs for Breast Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial From the Setouchi Breast Project-10.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear what interventions can sustain long-term higher physical activity (PA) to improve breast cancer outcomes. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of interventions on PA after breast cancer treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial for patients with stage 0 to III breast cancer evaluating the efficacy of exercise and educational programs on long-term PA compared with usual care. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients with recreational PA (RPA) ≥5 metabolic equivalents (METs)/week at 1 year after registration. RESULTS: From March 16, 2016, to March 15, 2020, breast cancer patients were registered in the control (n = 120), education (n = 121), or exercise (n = 115) group. There were no significant differences in proportion of RPA ≥5 METs/week at 1 year between the exercise and control groups (54% and 53%, P = .492) and between the education and control groups (62% and 53%, P = .126). Significant difference in reductions from baseline at 1 year were noted on body weight (P = .0083), BMI (P = .0034), and body fat percentage (P = .0027) between education and control groups. Similarly, the exercise group showed significant difference in reduction in body fat percentage (P = .0038) compared to control group. CONCLUSION: Although there were no significant effects on RPA 1 year after exercise and educational programs for breast cancer survivors, both interventions reduced body composition. Future studies on PA should investigate appropriate interventions to improve overall survival.

Systemic immunity markers are associated with clinical outcomes of atezolizumab treatment in patients with triple-negative advanced breast cancer: a retrospective multicenter observational study.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are reportedly efficacious against triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and are now recommended as first-line therapy. Systemic immunity markers, the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), have been identified as predict ICI efficacy in patients with various cancers. We retrospectively enrolled 36 TNBC patients who received atezolizumab treatment between September 2019 and May 2021 at eight Japanese medical institutions. We evaluated systemic immunity markers, including dynamic changes in these markers, as predictors of survival benefit derived from atezolizumab treatment. Median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were 116 days and "not reached", respectively. Patients with low NLR at baseline and decreased NLR at the start of the second cycle (SO2nd) had significantly longer OS than those with high NLR at baseline and increased NLR (SO2nd) (log-rank P < 0.001 and log-rank P = 0.049, respectively). Multivariate analyses identified high ALC at baseline and decreased NLR (SO2nd) as independent predictive markers for longer TTF (P = 0.043 and P = 0.002, respectively), and low NLR at baseline and decreased NLR (SO2nd) as independent predictive markers for longer OS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.013, respectively). The safety profile was consistent with those of previous trials. This retrospective multicenter observational study showed the clinical efficacy and safety of atezolizumab treatment. Furthermore, systemic immunity markers, including their dynamic changes, were found to be associated with clinical outcomes of atezolizumab treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC.

Immunohistological analysis of B7-H4, IDO1, and PD-L1 expression and tumor immune microenvironment based on triple-negative breast cancer subtypes.

BACKGROUND: B7 homolog 4 (B7-H4) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO1) are factors involved in the inhibition of antitumor activity and are new therapeutic targets for immune checkpoint therapy. Our study aimed to simultaneously investigate the interrelationship among B7-H4, IDO1 and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), including tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and TNBC subtypes. METHODS: Immunostaining for PD-L1, B7-H4, and IDO1 was performed on whole-slide sections of 119 cases of TNBC. The TIME was evaluated based on stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs; %), pattern classification of TILs, tumor-stroma ratio (TSR), and tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS). TNBC subtypes were also determined by immunohistochemistry analysis of cytokeratin 5/6 and androgen receptor (AR) expression. RESULTS: B7-H4 expression was significantly higher in cases with a combined positive score cutoff of 5 for PD-L1 (clone 28-8; p = 0.021), inflamed TIL pattern (p = 0.007), and TLS ≥ 4 (p = 0.006). B7-H4 expression was higher in case of CK5/6 ≥ 10 (p = 0.035). The H-scores of AR and B7-H4 were inversely correlated (ρ = - 0.509, p < 0.001). B7-H4 and IDO1 expression levels were inversely correlated in cases with AR < 10 (ρ = - 0.354, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that considering the TIL pattern and TLS and identifying the expression of PD-L1 and the basal-like type are useful for estimating B7-H4 expression. In addition, luminal androgen receptor (LAR)-type is frequently deficient in B7-H4 expression. In non-LAR types, B7-H4 and IDO1 expression are exclusive.

Development and validation of a symptom illustration scale from the patient-reported outcome common terminology criteria for adverse events for patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Emojis are commonly used for daily communication and may be useful in assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a Symptom Illustration Scale (SIS) as a new PRO measurement. METHODS: Eighteen original SIS items were developed from the PRO-CTCAE. In cohort one, the SIS validity and reliability were examined in patients with breast cancer, using a semi-structured five-question survey to investigate content validity. PROs with PRO-CTCAE and SIS were examined twice to determine criteria validity and test-retest reliability. In cohort two, the responsiveness of the scales were examined in patients treated with anthracycline, docetaxel, paclitaxel, and endocrine therapy. PROs with PRO-CTCAE and SIS were investigated two or three times, depending on the therapy. RESULTS: Patients were enrolled from August 2019 to October 2020. In cohort one (n = 70), most patients had no difficulties with the SIS, but 16 patients indicated that it was difficult to understand severities in the SIS. For criterion validity, Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rs) between PRO-CTCAE and SIS items were ≥ 0.41, except for "Decreased appetite." For test-retest reliability, κ coefficients of the SIS were ≥ 0.41 for 16/18 items (88.9%). Response time was significantly shorter for the SIS than for PRO-CTCAE (p < 0.001). In cohort two (n = 106), score changes between PRO-CTCAE and SIS for relevant symptoms all had correlations with rs ≥ 0.41. CONCLUSION: An original SIS from the PRO-CTCAE for patients with breast cancer were verified the validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Further studies to improve and validate the SIS are needed.

Impact of Immediate Breast Reconstruction on Survival of Breast Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Observational Study.

Although immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy has become increasingly common, its oncological safety has been debated. We enrolled patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery at Okayama University Hospital between 2007 and 2013. The primary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes were overall survival and the duration from the surgery to the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. We divided into immediate breast reconstruction, mastectomy alone, and breast conservative surgery groups. Outcomes were compared using Cox's regression analysis. A total of 614 patients were included (reconstruction: 125, mastectomy: 128, breast conservative surgery: 361). The median follow-up duration was 79.0±31.9 months. The immediate-reconstruction patients were younger, had more lymph node metastases, and more often received postoperative chemotherapy. The RFS was better after the breast conservative surgery compared to after reconstruction (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.144-0.763). The proportion of local recurrence was highest in the reconstruction group. No patients in the reconstruction group underwent postoperative radiation therapy. However, reconstruction did not affect overall survival or the time to the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgeons should explain the risks of breast reconstruction to their patients preoperatively. Careful long-term follow-up is required after such procedures.

An observational study of the impact of immediate breast reconstruction on perioperative inflammatory cytokines.

PURPOSE: Perioperative inflammatory cytokines may be related to cancer proliferation, although few studies have investigated this issue in patients undergoing breast reconstruction surgery. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of patients scheduled for mastectomy only, mastectomy plus deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction (DIEP), or mastectomy plus tissue expander reconstruction (TE), with or without axial dissection (Ax), for primary breast cancer. Blood samples were collected for analysis of serum IL-6 and VEGF preoperatively, then within 24 h postoperatively (POD 1), and 4-6 days postoperatively (POD 4-6). We investigated the difference in serum cytokine levels over time for each surgical procedure and the difference in serum cytokine levels among the procedures at the three measurement time points. RESULTS: There were 120 patients included in the final analysis. Serum IL-6 was significantly higher than the preoperative level on POD 1 in patients who underwent mastectomy only, DIEP, or TE and Ax (+), with higher values persisting on POD 4-6 except in those who underwent DIEP. IL-6 was significantly higher after DIEP than after mastectomy only on POD 1, but no differences were observed at POD 4-6. VEGF did not differ significantly among the surgical procedures at any time. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in IL-6 was short term and immediate breast reconstruction is considered a safe procedure.

Phase III study of long-term prognosis of estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with/without adjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is a treatment option for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC). This phase III trial evaluated the prognosis of EBC patients treated with/without chemotherapy (CT) following NET. METHODS: ER+/HER2-, T1c-2, and clinically node-negative EBC patients were enrolled in 2008-2013 and treated with endocrine therapy (ET) in weeks 24-28. All patients, excluding those with progressive disease (PD) during NET or ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes after surgery, were randomized to ET for 4.5-5 years with/without CT. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included distant DFS (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and DFS/DDFS/OS according to clinical response to NET. RESULTS: Of 904 patients, 669 were randomized to CT+ET (n = 333) or ET alone (n = 336). The median follow-up was 7.8 years. DFS (CT+ET, 47 events; ET alone, 70 events) and DDFS did not reach the planned numbers of events. Eight-year DFS/DDFS rates were 86%/93% and 83%/92%, respectively. DFS was significantly better in CT+ET than ET alone in subgroups aged < 60 years (P = 0.016), T2 (P = 0.013), or Ki67 > 20% (P = 0.026). Progesterone receptor and histological grade were predictive markers for clinical responses to NET. CONCLUSION: NET may be used as standard treatment for patients with ER+EBC. Although it is difficult to decide whether to administer adjuvant CT based solely on the effect of NET, the response to NET may help to inform this decision. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry under UMIN000001090 (registered 20 March 2008).

Safety and Efficacy of a Well-Fitting Brassiere after Breast Reconstruction: A Qualitative Study.

The importance of a well-fitted, comfortable brassiere to overall quality of life after breast reconstruction has not been evaluated. Our aim was to determine the impact of a semi-customized brassiere on patients' health-related quality of life after breast reconstruction. The subjects were prospective patients with mastectomy who were to undergo immediate or delayed breast reconstruction at our hospital. After surgery, a professional bra fitter sized each patient for a semi-customized brassiere and provided follow-up consultations. A self-reported questionnaire on breast aesthetics, postoperative pain, and satisfaction was used to assess the primary outcomes. Data were prospectively collected at baseline (before surgery) and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and analyzed. Forty-six patients (50 breasts) were included in the analysis. Consistent wearing of the brassiere reduced pain (p<0.05), with good overall satisfaction (p<0.001). Aesthetic scores on breast shape and size were higher with than without the custom brassiere at 3 months (p=0.02) and 6 months (p=0.03) after surgery. Wearing the brassiere reduced anxiety at all time points of measurement. A well-fitting brassiere ensured safety and provided a high degree of satisfaction without anxiety for patients after breast reconstruction.

Impacts of the preceding cancer-specific health-related quality of life instruments on the responses to the subsequent EQ-5D-5L.

BACKGROUND: In clinical studies, the EQ-5D-5L is often employed with disease-specific health-related quality of life instruments. The questions in the former are more general than the latter; however, it is known that responses to general questions can be influenced by preceding specific questions. Thus, the responses to the EQ-5D-5L have the possibility of being influenced by the preceding disease-specific health-related quality of life instruments. This may lead to bias in the cost-effectiveness analysis results. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of the preceding cancer-specific health-related quality of life instruments on the EQ-5D-5L responses. METHODS: We prepared questionnaire booklets containing the EQ-5D-5L, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General with different orders. Using a quasi-randomized design, they were distributed to the patients undergoing drug therapy for advanced cancer, who were classified into three groups: Groups 1, 2, and 3 (the EQ-5D-5L placed first, second, and last, respectively). We compared the EQ-5D-5L index and the missingness of EQ-5D-5L among the groups. RESULTS: The mean EQ-5D-5L index was 0.796, 0.760, and 0.789 for groups 1 (n = 300), 2 (n = 306), and 3 (n = 331), respectively. The difference between Groups 2 and 1 was - 0.036 (95% CI - 0.065 to - 0.007; p = 0.015). The proportion of patients with an incomplete EQ-5D-5L was 0.11, 0.11, and 0.05 for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The difference of the proportions between group 3 and 1 and between 3 and 2 was - 0.06 (95% CI - 0.10 to - 0.02; p = 0.003) and - 0.06 (95% CI - 0.10 to - 0.02; p = 0.003), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the EQ-5D-5L index differed according to the instrument orders, the difference size would not be considerably larger than the minimally important difference. The patients tended to complete the EQ-5D-5L when they were placed at the end of the questionnaire.

Gradient Boosted Tree Approaches for Mapping European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 Onto 5-Level Version of EQ-5D Index for Patients With Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop direct and response mapping algorithms from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 onto the 5-level version of EQ-5D index based on the gradient boosted tree (GBT), a promising modern machine learning method. METHODS: We used the Quality of Life Mapping Algorithm for Cancer study data (903 observations from 903 patients) for training GBTs and testing their predictive performance. In the Quality of Life Mapping Algorithm for Cancer study, patients with advanced solid tumor were enrolled, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and 5-level version of EQ-5D were simultaneously evaluated. The Japanese value set was used for direct mapping, whereas the Japanese and US value sets were used for response mapping. We trained the GBTs in the training data set (80%) with cross-validation and tested the predictive performance measured by the root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean error in the test data set (20%). RESULTS: The RMSE and MAE in the test data set were larger in the GBT approaches than in the previously developed regression-based approaches. The mean error in the test data set tended to be smaller in the GBT approaches than in the previously developed regression-based approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive performances in the RMSE and MAE did not improve by the GBT approaches compared with regression approaches. The flexibility of the GBT approaches had the potential to reduce overprediction and underprediction in poor and good health, respectively. Further research is needed to establish the role of machine learning methods in mapping a nonpreference-based measure onto health utility.