Primary anastomosing hemangioma as a preoperative diagnostic mimicker of retroperitoneal cavernous hemangioma: A case report.

Anastomosing hemangioma (AH) is rare and a newly recognized variant of capillary hemangioma that is mostly found in the genitourinary tract. Additionally, AH is sometimes difficult to diagnose without pathological specimens. It is difficult to diagnose preoperatively due to the lack of specific clinical and radiologic appearance. The present report describes the imaging features from a radiological perspective and outlines the clinicopathologic features and treatment options. A 67-year-old woman was referred to Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center (Koshigaya, Japan) for a retroperitoneal tumor that was identified at a medical checkup 4 years prior. The patient had no symptoms, no abnormal physical signs and no past medical or specific family history. Routine blood tests were all within the normal ranges. A nonenhanced CT scan showed a circular, homogenous, well-circumscribed retroperitoneal tumor that was ~32×23 mm in size, between the abdominal aorta and the inferior vena cava, and just below the left renal vein. On a contrast-enhanced multidetector CT scan, the tumor showed heterogeneous septal enhancement in the arterial phase and persistent enhancement in the portal phase. The tumor was diagnosed as a benign neurogenic tumor or a retroperitoneal cavernous hemangioma at the time, and the patient was intended to be followed up at the outpatient clinic. However, it gradually increased to a maximum diameter of 35 mm over 4 years. Finally, it was completely resected by open laparotomy and pathologically diagnosed as AH. Retroperitoneal hemangioma is extremely rare in adulthood and has been confirmed in only 1-3% of all retroperitoneal tumors. To the best of our knowledge, only 6 cases of para-aortic AH have been reported. The incidence of this variant is very low. However, AH may be included in the differential diagnosis when a slowly progressing heterogeneous mass appears in the para-aortic region that exhibits a CT-enhanced pattern similar to a typical cavernous hemangioma.

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm presenting as a massive cystic liver tumor mimicking mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver: A case report and literature review.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) preferentially arise in the bronchopulmonary tree or the gastrointestinal tract. Notably, primary hepatic NENs are extremely rare. The present study describes a case of hepatic NEN presenting as a giant hepatic cystic lesion. A 42-year-old woman presented with a large liver tumor. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography revealed a cystic tumor (18 cm) in their left liver. The tumor exhibited liquid components and mural solid nodules with enhanced effects. The lesion was diagnosed as mucinous cystic carcinoma (MCC) preoperatively. The patient underwent a left hepatectomy, and the postoperative course was uneventful. The patient has been alive without recurrence for 36 months postoperatively. The pathological diagnosis was NEN G2. This patient had ectopic pancreatic tissue in the liver and thus the ectopic pancreatic origin of the tumor was suspected. The present study describes a case of resected cystic primary NEN of the liver that was difficult to differentiate from mucinous cystic neoplasms. As primary liver NENs are extremely rare, further studies are needed to establish their diagnosis and treatment.

Surgical site infection after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is associated with compromised long-term oncological outcome.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the influence of infectious complications, particularly surgical site infection (SSI), on long-term oncological results after elective laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 199 patients who underwent laparoscopic elective resection with negative resection margins for stage I-III colorectal cancer were retrospectively examined. The postoperative course was recorded based on hospital records, and cancer relapse was diagnosed based on radiological or pathological findings under a standardized follow-up program. The severity of complications was graded using Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. RESULTS: SSI was found in 25 patients (12.6%), with 12 (6.0%) showing anastomotic leak. The postoperative relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was significantly lower in patients with SSI (49.2%) than in patients without SSI (87.2%, P<0.001). Differences in RFS were found after both colectomy and rectal resection (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). RFS did not differ between patients who had major SSI CD (grade III) and those who had minor SSI CD (grades I or II). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the occurrence of SSI and pathological stage as independent co-factors for RFS (P<0.001 and P=0.003). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that postoperative SSI compromises long-term oncological results after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Further improvements in surgical technique and refinements in perioperative care may improve long-term oncological results.

A case with mesenteric desmoid tumor after laparoscopic resection of stage I sigmoid colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal desmoid tumors are rare and generally occur in some patients with familial adenomatous polyposis or secondary to an external stimulus such as surgical trauma. We report herein a case of intra-abdominal desmoid tumor in the jejunal mesentery after laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid colon cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old woman underwent laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for colon cancer with pathological stage I. Follow-up computed tomography (CT) 18 months after primary surgery showed a nodular and enhanced soft tissue density mass, 20 mm in size, in the mesentery at the left side of the abdomen. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels were within the normal range. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography did not suggest cancer recurrence. Another CT scan, done 1 month later, revealed that the tumor had enlarged to 25 mm in size. Although the pathological diagnosis was not obtained, we suspected recurrence of the sigmoid colon cancer and applied chemotherapy using capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab. After 3 cycles of chemotherapy, however, the tumor had enlarged further. Therefore, the surgical resection of the tumor was performed to determine the diagnosis and to achieve possible curative resection of the tumor. The tumor existed in the mesentery of the jejunum, 100 cm from the ligament of Treitz, and showed invasive growth. We resected 40 cm of the jejunal segment together with the tumor. Microscopically, the tumor was composed of fibroblast, myofibroblast, and infiltrating the inflammatory cell and diagnosed as desmoid tumor by immunostaining (desmin+/-, ß-catenin+, CD117-, vimentin+). At 33 months after the resection of the desmoid tumor, neither the sigmoid colon cancer nor desmoid tumor has had a recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: After surgery for gastrointestinal cancer, it is difficult to differentiate between intra-abdominal desmoid tumor and recurrence. The possibility of intra-abdominal desmoid should be considered along with tumor recurrence during postoperative surveillance after resection of gastrointestinal cancer, especially when the risk of recurrence is low.