Impact of Class of Obesity on Clinical Outcomes Following Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Obesity represents a prevalent and escalating health concern among vascular surgery patients. Evidence pertaining to the influence of body mass index (BMI) on clinical outcomes after fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (B/FEVAR) remains unclear. This study aims to assess the effect of obesity on short- and midterm clinical outcomes among individuals undergoing B/FEVAR. METHODS: This was a single center retrospective analysis of all patients that underwent B/FEVAR from 2007 to 2020, with a median follow-up of 3.3 years [interquartile range 1.6-5.3]. Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m2. Patients were divided into non-obese (NO) and obese cohorts according to their BMI. Outcomes were compared between the two groups subsequently. RESULTS: A total of 264 patients, 96 obese and 168 NO were included. Patients with obesity were younger (72.8 ± 6.9 vs 76 ± 7.3 years, P< 0.001) but had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (27.1% vs 12%, P= 0.01) and dyslipidemia (80.2% vs 68.5%, P=0.03). Both cohorts had similar rates of percutaneous access (37.5% for obese vs 35.1%, P=0.7), and no significant differences in the rate of conversion to open access (8.3% for obese vs 4.2%, P=0.16). Technical success was similar between the cohorts (89% for obese vs 86%, P=0.59). Major adverse events (MAEs) were higher in the NO group (13.1% vs 4.2%, P= 0.02). Patients in the obese cohort suffered more access site related infections (7.3% vs 1.2%, P= 0.01). All-cause mortality over 5 years was significant higher in the NO group (35.1% vs 21.9%, P= 0.02). No statistical differences were found in spinal cord injury or dialysis requirement rates. Furthermore, on follow-up at 5 years, endoleak, branch instability, and reintervention rates were not statistically different between the two cohorts. CONCLUSION: Patients with obesity are on average younger, however, were more likely to suffer access site infections compared to non-obese patients. They had increased survival rates on follow-up although rates of reinterventions and endoleaks were similar between the two cohorts. Our study demonstrates that despite higher comorbidities, patients with obesity had similar intraoperative success with reduced post operative mortality, however access site infections remains a significant clinical concern.

Ascending aortic geometry and its relationship to the biomechanical properties of aortic tissue.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between ascending aortic geometry and biomechanical properties. Methods: Preoperative computed tomography scans from ascending aortic aneurysm patients were analyzed using a center line technique (n = 68). Aortic length was measured from annulus to innominate artery, and maximal diameter from this segment was recorded. Biaxial tensile testing of excised tissue was performed to derive biomechanical parameters energy loss (efficiency in performing the Windkessel function) and modulus of elasticity (stiffness). Delamination testing (simulation of dissection) was performed to derive delamination strength (strength between tissue layers). Results: Aortic diameter weakly correlated with energy loss (r 2 = 0.10; P < .01), but not with modulus of elasticity (P = .13) or delamination strength (P = .36). Aortic length was not associated with energy loss (P = .87), modulus of elasticity (P = .13) or delamination strength (P = .90). Using current diameter guidelines, aortas >55 mm (n = 33) demonstrated higher energy loss than those <55 mm (n = 35; P = .05), but no difference in modulus of elasticity (P = .25) or delamination strength (P = .89). A length cutoff of 110 mm was proposed as an indication for repair. Aortas >110 mm (n = 37) did not exhibit a difference in energy loss (P = .40), modulus of elasticity (P = .69), or delamination strength (P = .68) compared with aortas <110 mm (n = 31). Aortas above diameter and length thresholds (n = 21) showed no difference in energy loss (P = .35), modulus of elasticity (P = .55), or delamination strength (P = .61) compared with smaller aortas (n = 47). Conclusions: Aortic geometry poorly reflects the mechanical properties of aortic tissue. Weak association between energy loss and diameter supports intervention at larger diameters. Further research into markers that better capture aortic biomechanics is needed.

Outcomes in octogenarians after thoracoabdominal and juxtarenal aortic aneurysm repair using fenestrated-branched devices justifies treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between octogenarians and nonoctogenarians undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair and juxtarenal aortic aneurysm repair using branched and/or fenestrated endovascular devices (F/BEVAR) and compare octogenarian survival to population survival statistics from Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Patients who underwent F/BEVAR at a single institution between 2007 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed with a median follow-up of 3.3 years (interquartile range, 1.6-5.3). The median survival of an average 84-year-old Ontarian from Canada, adjusted for a male:female ratio of 4:1, was retrieved from publicly available Statistics Canada data. RESULTS: In total, 68 octogenarians (25.8%) and 196 nonoctogenarians (74.2%) were included (mean age, 83.5 ± 3.0 vs 71.9 ± 5.8 years; P ≤ .001). The maximum aneurysm size was significantly larger in octogenarians (68.9 ± 11.4 mm vs 65.4 ± 10.0 mm; P = .017). No differences in the number of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs (29.4% vs 38.3%; P = .19) or operative technical success (92.6% vs 85.7%; P = .136) were observed between the two cohorts. Postoperatively, no significant differences in overall in-hospital mortality (7.3% vs 5.1%; P = .49), elective in-hospital mortality (6.1% vs 4.4%; P = .49), stroke (1.5% vs 3.6%; P = .384), or spinal cord ischemia (2.9% vs 9.2%; P = .094) were seen between octogenarians and nonoctogenarians. There was no difference in survival at 4 years between the two cohorts (62.9% vs 71.1%; P = .22), however, survival at 6 years was significantly lower for octogenarians (44.5% vs 64.1%; hazard ratio, 1.96; P = .02). The cumulative rate of reintervention (44.1% vs 41.3%; P = .84) and freedom from branch instability (67.6% vs 73.5%; P = .33) at 6 years were not different between the two groups. When comparing octogenarians who survived to discharge from index hospitalization after F/BEVAR with 84-year-old Ontarians unmatched for comorbidities, a survival difference of 4.8% and 11.1% was noted at 4 and 6 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: F/BEVAR in octogenarians is associated with no differences in technical success or postoperative adverse outcomes when compared with their younger counterparts. Octogenarians had increased mortality after 4 years and their survival at 4 years was comparable with that of an 84-year-old Ontarian. F/BEVAR was safe and effective in octogenarians deemed fit for intervention. Further research into preoperative patient selection and improving perioperative outcomes is needed.

Females experience elevated early morbidity and mortality but similar midterm survival compared to males after branched/fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify sex-related differences in outcomes following branched and/or fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (B/FEVAR) for thoracoabdominal (TAAA) and juxtarenal (JRAA) aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Chart review completed on 242 B/FEVAR patients (57 female; 23.5%) between 2007 and 2020 at a single center. Median follow-up time was 3.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.6-5.3 years). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in age (females, 75.9 ± 5.4 years vs males, 74.7 ± 7.2 years; P = .162) or aneurysm size (64.9 ± 6.8 vs 65.8 ± 9.4 mm; P = .41) at presentation were observed between sexes. Females presented with fewer JRAAs (45.6% vs 73%; P < .001) and received more Crawford extent II (26.3% vs 10.8%; P =.004) TAAA coverage. Increased incidence of moderate/severe target vessel stenosis (29.8% vs 14%; P = .022) was observed in female patients. Intraoperatively, females had higher procedure times (530 [IQR, 425-625] vs 420 [IQR, 350-510] minutes; P < .001), fluoroscopy times (124.1 ± 49 vs 107.3 ± 43.5 minutes; P = .017), and contrast usage (200 [IQR, 150-270] vs 175 [IQR, 130-225] mL; P = .005). Unplanned intraoperative maneuvers (45.6% vs 28.1%; P = .043), graft delivery issues (24.6% vs 4.9%; P < .001), and additional intraoperative complications (61.4% vs 35.7%; P < .001) were also increased in females. Postoperatively, females had a longer intensive care unit (3 [IQR, 1-5] vs 1 [IQR, 1-3] days; P = .002) and hospital stay (8 [IQR, 5-13] vs 5 [IQR, 3-9] days; P < .001) and experienced increased rates of spinal cord ischemia (15.8% vs 3.8%; P = .001) and bowel ischemia (10.5% vs 2.7%; P = .013). In-hospital mortality (12.3% vs 2.7%; P = .004) was higher in female patients but midterm (6-year) survival was 60.2% for all patients (95% confidence interval, 53.0%-68.5%) and was similar between sexes (hazard ratio, 0.95; P = .83), which were the primary endpoints. No sex differences in midterm follow-up reintervention, endoleak, and rupture rates were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Females experienced significantly higher B/FEVAR intraoperative times, complications, and in-hospital morbidity and mortality compared with males but similar midterm outcomes. Anatomic and atherosclerotic differences may have contributed to the observed in-hospital differences.

Percutaneous Drainage for Aortic Graft Infection Post-aneurysm Repair: A Viable Option?

PURPOSE: Non-operative management of aortic graft infection is usually only considered in a palliative context. We describe the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of percutaneous drainage of aortic graft infections (AGI) following either open or endovascular repair of aneurysmal disease. METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients (11 males, 1 female, mean age 72.7 ± 10.3 years, age range 52-88 years) between January 2010-July 2020 who underwent percutaneous drain insertion in either an infected aortic sac or periaortic abscess cavity following endovascular or open surgical graft repair were identified. Patient and procedural characteristics as well as clinical outcomes were determined. RESULTS: Of the 12 patients who underwent percutaneous drain insertion, five (41.7%) had undergone open abdominal aneurysm repair, one (8.3%) open thoracoabdominal aneurysmal repair, and six (50%) endovascular abdominal aneurysm repairs. Drain size ranged from 10-20 French. All were inserted under ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and/or fluoroscopic guidance. Median duration of drain placement was 55.2 days (range 3-174). Five patients (41.7%) had the drain in place as a stabilizing bridge until or after definitive surgical explantation and aortic reconstruction. Seven patients (58.3%) were managed with drain placement and antibiotic therapy without surgical intervention. Six (50%) were alive at the most recent time of follow-up (median, 732 days, range 166-1650 days). Three patients (25%) died during follow-up with causes including erosion of aortic reconstruction into sigmoid colon, unrelated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation, and severe clostridium difficile colitis and pseudomonal pneumonia (median 1244 days, range 992-1597 days). Three (25%) patients were lost to follow-up. No drain-related complications were noted. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous drainage of AGI following endovascular or open aneurysm repair is a safe and viable management option either as a temporizing measure as a bridge to surgical graft explantation or as a non-surgical therapy for long term management.

Importance of computed tomography in defining segmental disease in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Radiological assessment of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is critical to decide whether patients should be treated with pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Although computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is increasingly used for decision making in CTEPH, the value of CTPA to predict surgical findings and outcome has never been explored. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive patients with high-quality CTPA undergoing PEA for CTEPH between May 2015 and December 2017. The most proximal level of disease in the pulmonary artery on CTPA was classified by two blinded radiologists as level 1 (main pulmonary artery), 2a (lobar pulmonary artery), 2b (origin of basal segmental pulmonary artery), 3 (segmental pulmonary artery) or 4 (predominantly subsegmental pulmonary artery). RESULTS: CTPA demonstrated level 1 in 20%, level 2a in 43%, level 2b in 11%, level 3 in 23% and level 4 in 3%. A majority of males presented with level 1 (55%) and level 2 (57%), and a majority of females (83%) with level 3 (p=0.01). Levels 3 and 4 were associated with longer duration of circulatory arrest (p=0.03) and higher frequency of Jamieson type III disease at surgery (p<0.0001). Requirement for targeted pulmonary hypertension therapy after PEA was 28% at 3 years in level 2b/3/4 compared with 6% in level 2a and 13% in level 1 (p=0.002). Level 2b/3/4 was an independent predictor for targeted pulmonary hypertension therapy after PEA (hazard ratio 4.23, 95% CI 1.24-14.39; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: High-quality CTPA provides accurate evaluation of CTEPH patients. The level of disease on CTPA can help guide peri-operative planning and post-operative monitoring.

IVC filter removal after extended implantation periods.

OBJECTIVE: Life-threatening complications have been reported in patients with chronic retrievable IVC filters. National health agencies have urged hospitals to assess all patients with retrievable IVC filters for filter removal. The aim of the current study was to identify those patients with unretrieved chronic IVC filters, document complications and removal techniques. METHODS: We identified a cohort with unretrieved IVC filters inserted between January 2001 and December 2013. These patients were invited back to clinic for review with CT imaging to determine complications, if any, and offer removal. Data collected included demographics, complications and retrieval characteristics. RESULTS: 289 patients were discovered to still have a filter in situ. Of these, 193 patients were verified as deceased. Eighty-nine patients were notified, with no current contact information available on the remaining seven. Thirty-six attended for review, 20 females, 16 males, with an average age of 63.5 years. Complications identified at CT were 2 occluded IVCs (5.8%), 4 fractured filters (11.7%) and filter penetration in all cases (37.5% grade 2, 56.25% grade 3). Sixteen patients agreed to proceed with filter removal, 10 declined the opportunity and 6 were unfit or had ongoing indication for the filter. Two are awaiting removal and two had IVC occlusion. Subsequent retrieval was successful in 93% of cases (14/15). The mean time to removal from implant was 3846.9 days (SD 980.3). Advanced techniques were utilized in 10 cases and there were no mortalities or morbidities. CONCLUSION: Retrievable inferior vena cava filters are not benign and practitioners need to be aware of regulatory guidelines. Unretrieved filters can be successfully retrieved using standard and advanced methods with low morbidity and mortality.

Initial Experience With Viabahn VBX as the Bridging Stent Graft for Branched and Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel balloon-expandable, heparin-bonded endoprosthesis (Viabahn VBX, W. L. Gore and Associates) when used as a bridging stent graft (BSG) with fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (FB-EVAR). FB-EVAR and BSGs increase repair complexity with the potential for endoleak formation, stenosis, thrombosis, and graft migration. The mechanical construction of the Viabahn VBX and its antithrombogenic properties may provide an advantage for FB-EVAR over existing BSGs. The efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes were assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Research ethics board approved, prospective, single arm cohort, pilot study of patients undergoing FB-EVAR between February 2017 and January 2018. Fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair was performed per the standard institutional protocol by a team composed of vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists. Viabahn VBX endografts were used for all intended visceral branches as long as appropriately sized devices were available (Under Investigational Testing Authorization from Health Canada). Patient characteristics, procedural details, and technical and clinical outcomes were reviewed and summarized. RESULTS: FB-EVAR was performed in 13 patients (9 male and 4 female) mean age of 74 (range: 61-83) with a total of 41 Viabahn VBXs stents implanted. Mean maximum aneurysm size was 6.7 cm (range: 5.5-9.0 cm) and included 5 juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms and 8 thoracoabdominal; 3 type V, 3 type IV, and 2 type III (Crawford Classification). The Viabahn VBX was successfully deployed in 40 (98%) of 41 of cases. At median follow-up of 223 days (range: 2-462), there was a (40/40) 100% Viabahn VBX patency rate. Seven endoleaks were identified intra- or post procedurally in 6 (46%) of 13 cases, including 1 type IB, 3 type II, 2 type III, and 1 unclassified. Nine complications occurred in 6 patients. CONCLUSION: The Viabahn VBX stent is a safe and effective BSG for FB-EVAR with no early stent thrombosis. Further evaluation is required to determine longer term stent efficacy.

Effect of portal vein embolization on treatment plan prior to major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein embolization (PVE) is used before major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to increase future liver remnant (FLR) volume. However, this may increase tumour growth rate, leading to more extensive resections. This study aimed to determine the effect of tumour growth, following PVE, on treatment plan. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study conducted on patients treated from 2008 to 2015 with PVE before major hepatectomy for HCC. Liver and tumour volumetry was performed on pre- and post-PVE CT scans. Image-based and actioned plans were compared before and after PVE. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients received PVE. Non-tumour total liver volume decreased (median 1440 to 1394 cm3; p = 0.031), while tumour (median 161-240 cm3; p < 0.001) and FLR volumes (median 430-574 cm3; p < 0.001) increased. The treatment plan changed in 15/31 patients: more extensive resection (n = 6), less extensive resection (n = 1), no resection as scheduled (n = 8). Tumour progression accounted for a clinically relevant change in treatment plan in 8/31 patients. CONCLUSION: Following PVE in the setting of HCC, tumour progression accounts for a change in treatment plan in approximately a quarter of patients. Further research is warranted to determine whether additional liver directed therapy should routinely be used to slow the growth of HCC post-PVE.

Utility of the Vascular Quality Initiative in improving quality of care in Canadian patients undergoing vascular surgery

The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) is a national cooperative quality-improvement initiative designed to evaluate processes of care and outcomes in vascular surgery. The purpose of this report is to show the utility of such a database to provide insight into the standard of care provided, to highlight areas of local quality improvement, to benchmark our data against local, regional and national trends, and to ultimately improve safety in Canadian patients undergoing vascular surgery. We present the history of the database, its spread in the Canadian health care system and examples of quality improvements achieved from analyses of data recorded and retrieved from the VQI. Using the VQI, our institution was able to decrease the length of stay after endovascular aneurysm repair, decrease the contrast volume in endovascular aneurysm repair, save on costs, and provide medium-term outcome data on peripheral vascular interventions and smoking cessation strategies. The VQI is a powerful tool to improve patient safety and quality in vascular surgery. Its ability to create local regional improvement groups fosters a quality-focused culture and is important for Canadian patients.

La Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) est une initiative de collaboration nationale axée sur l'amélioration de la qualité, conçue pour évaluer les processus de soins et les résultats en chirurgie vasculaire. Le but du présent rapport est de montrer l'utilité d'une telle base de données pour situer les normes de soins actuelles, mettre en lumière les secteurs d'amélioration de la qualité locale, évaluer nos données à la lumière des tendances locales, régionales et nationales et ultimement, améliorer la sécurité des patients canadiens de chirurgie vasculaire. Nous retraçons l'historique de cette base de données, son adoption par le système de santé canadien et donnons des exemples d'améliorations de la qualité obtenues grâce à l'analyse des données enregistrées et récupérées à partir de la base VQI. Cette base de données nous a permis d'abréger les séjours hospitaliers après la réparation endovasculaire des anévrismes, d'épargner sur les coûts et de compiler les résultats à moyen terme des interventions vasculaires périphériques et des stratégies d'abandon du tabagisme. La VQI est un outil puissant pour améliorer la sécurité des patients et la qualité de la chirurgie vasculaire. Sa capacité de créer des groupes loco-régionaux d'amélioration de la qualité favorise une culture axée sur la qualité et est importante pour les patients canadiens.