Chyle Leak After Axillary Node Clearance in Breast Cancer Surgery-A Rare Complication and a Proposed Management Strategy from the British and Italian Experience.

BACKGROUND: Chyle leak after axillary surgery is a rare complication that lacks consensus and management guidelines. This study aimed to present the experiences of two centers in chyle leak management after axillary node clearance for breast cancer. Furthermore the authors provide a review of its pathophysiology and clinical diagnostic methods. They compare approaches for management of the axilla with those for other locations. METHODS: A multicentre case series descriptive analysis of chyle leak after breast cancer axillary node clearance between 1 January 2013 and 31 May 2020 was performed. RESULTS: The center in the United Kingdom and the center in Italy performed 655 and 4969 axillary node clearances, respectively. Four patients experienced chyle leaks. All the leaks had left-sided surgery (3 patients had level 3 clearances with mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstructions; 1 patient had level 2 clearance with therapeutic mammoplasty). All the leaks appeared within 3 days after surgery. Leak duration was between 11 and 29 days. The maximum daily output was 600 mL. All the leaks were treated conservatively with nutritional team support together with close drainage monitoring. The management strategy included a low-fat diet, a high-protein diet, total parenteral nutrition, and medium chain triglyceride supplements, as well as other elements. No negative effects on oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery wound-healing and no delays in adjuvant treatment were observed. CONCLUSION: The incidence of chyle leak after breast cancer axillary node clearance was 0.07%. Early diagnosis and close monitoring together with conservative management involving nutritional team support can result in successful treatment of chyle leak without negative sequalae of breast cancer oncologic treatment.

Comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery for treatment of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 studies.

AIMS: To evaluate comparative outcomes of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OBCS) versus conventional breast conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer treatment. METHODS: A systematic search of multiple electronic data sources was conducted, and all eligible studies comparing OBCS and BCS were included. Characteristics of the tumour includes preoperative size of tumour on imaging and the weight of the specimen after resection. While positive margins rate, re-excision rate, completion mastectomy rate and loco-regional recurrence were considered as oncological outcome parameters. Post-operative complications include surgical site infection (SSI), seroma, haematoma and skin/nipple necrosis. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies reporting a total number of 115011 patients who underwent OBCS (n = 11978) or BCS (n = 103033) were included. OBCS group showed lower risk of positive margins rate [OR 0.76, P = 0.05], re-excision rate [OR 0.72, P = 0.02], and loco-regional recurrence [OR 0.62, P = 0.03] compared to BCS group. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding post-operative complications. CONCLUSION: Although there is a lack of level 1 evidence, the available studies clearly demonstrate superior or at least equivalent outcomes when comparing OBCS with conventional BCS. The benefits of OBCS include dealing with larger tumours, wider surgical margins and better aesthetic results for patients.