Using Deauville Scoring to Guide Consolidative Radiotherapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The most common aggressive lymphoma in adults is diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Consolidative radiotherapy (RT) is often administered to DLBCL patients but guidelines remain unclear, which could lead to unnecessary RT. We aimed to evaluate the value of end-of-treatment PET-CT scans, interpreted using the Deauville score (DV), to guide the utilization of consolidative RT, which may help spare low-risk DLBCL patients from unnecessary RT. METHODS: We included all DLBCL patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2022 at the National Cancer Centre Singapore with DV measured at the end of the first-line chemoimmunotherapy. The outcome measure was time-to-progression (TTP). The predictive value of DV for RT was assessed based on the interaction effect between the receipt of RT and DV in Cox regression models. RESULTS: The data of 349 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 38.1 months (interquartile range 34.0-42.3 months). RT was associated with a significant improvement in TTP amongst the DV4-5 patients (HR 0.33; 95%CI 0.13-0.88; p = 0.027) but not the DV1-3 patients (HR 0.85; 95%CI 0.40-1.81; p = 0.671) (interaction's p = 0.133). Multivariable analysis reported that RT was again significantly associated with improved TTP among the DV4-5 patients (adjusted HR 0.29; 95%CI 0.10-0.80; p = 0.017) but not the DV1-3 group (HR 0.86; 95%CI 0.40-1.86; p = 0.707) (interaction's p = 0.087). CONCLUSION: Our results suggests that DLBCL patients with end-of-treatment PET-CT DV1-3 may not need consolidative RT. Longer follow-up and prospective randomized trials are still necessary to investigate long-term outcomes.

Novel clinical risk stratification and treatment strategies in relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) represents a group of heterogeneous hematological malignancies, which are notoriously challenging to treat and outcomes are typically poor. Over the past two decades, clinical prognostic indices for patient risk stratification have evolved, while several targeted agents are now available to complement combination chemotherapy in the frontline setting or as a salvage strategy. With further understanding of the molecular pathobiology of PTCL, several innovative approaches incorporating immunomodulatory agents, epigenetic therapies, oncogenic kinase inhibitors and immunotherapeutics have come to the forefront. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the progress in developing clinical prognostic indices for PTCL and describe the broad therapeutic landscape, emphasizing novel targetable pathways that have entered early phase clinical studies.

Recent updates on central nervous system prophylaxis in patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The use of central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial. Although uncommon, CNS relapses are invariably fatal in this otherwise curable disease. Accurate identification of patients at risk and the optimal approach to CNS prophylaxis therefore remains an area of unmet need. The existing literature, largely retrospective in nature, provides mixed conclusions regarding the efficacy of CNS prophylaxis. The utility of CNS prophylaxis has itself been challenged. In this review, we dissect the issues which render the value of CNS prophylaxis uncertain. We first compare international clinical guidelines for CNS prophylaxis. We then interrogate the factors that should be used to identify high-risk patients accurately. We also explore how clinical patterns of CNS relapse have changed in the pre-rituximab and rituximab era. We then discuss the efficacy of CNS-directed approaches, intensification of systemic treatment and other novel approaches in CNS prophylaxis. Improved diagnostics for early detection of CNS relapses and newer therapeutics for CNS prophylaxis are areas of active investigation. In an area where prospective, randomized studies are impracticable and lacking, guidance for the use of CNS prophylaxis will depend on rigorous statistical review of retrospective data.

Clinical features and prognostic outcomes of angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma in an Asian multicenter study.

In our Asian multicenter retrospective study, we investigated the clinical prognostic factors affecting the outcomes of AITL patients and identified a novel prognostic index relevant in the Asian context. In our 174-patient cohort, the median PFS and OS was 1.8 years and 5.6 years respectively. Age > 60, bone marrow involvement, total white cell count >12 × 109/L and raised serum lactate dehydrogenase were associated with poorer PFS and OS in multivariate analyses. This allowed for a prognostic index (AITL-PI) differentiating patients into low (0-1 factors, n = 64), moderate (2 factors, n = 59) and high-risk (3-4 factors, n = 49) subgroups with 5-year OS of 84.0%, 44.0% and 28.0% respectively (p < 0.0001). POD24 proved to be strongly prognostic (5-year OS 24% vs 89%, p < 0.0001). Exploratory gene expression studies were performed and disparate immune cell profiles and cell signaling signatures were seen in the low risk group as compared to the intermediate and high risk groups.

Post-Treatment Neutrophil and Lymphocyte Counts Predict Progression-Free Survival Following First-Line Chemotherapy in Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Hodgkin's lymphoma carries an excellent prognosis with modern chemotherapy, but a significant proportion of patients remain refractory to or relapse after first-line treatment. Immunological changes post-treatment, such as chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) or lymphopenia, have shown prognostic significance in multiple tumor types. Our study aims to investigate the prognostic value of immunologic changes in Hodgkin's lymphoma by examining the post-treatment lymphocyte count (pALC), neutrophil count (pANC) and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (pNLR). Patients treated for classical Hodgkin's lymphoma at the National Cancer Centre Singapore using ABVD-based regimens were retrospectively analyzed. An optimal cut-off value for high pANC, low pALC and high pNLR in predicting progression-free survival was determined by receiver operating curve analysis. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional models. Overall OS and PFS were excellent, with a 5-year OS of 99.2% and a 5-year PFS of 88.2%. Poorer PFS was associated with high pANC (HR 2.99, p = 0.0392), low pALC (HR 3.95, p = 0.0038) and high pNLR (p = 0.0078). In conclusion, high pANC, low pALC and high pNLR confer a poorer prognosis for Hodgkin's lymphoma. Future studies should evaluate the potential of improving treatment outcomes by the adjustment of chemotherapy dose intensity based on post-treatment blood counts.

Burkitt lymphoma - no impact of HIV status on outcomes with rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy.

We analyzed the prognostic factors for treatment outcomes amongst 34 patients with adult Burkitt lymphoma (BL) who received rituximab with standard first-line chemotherapy. Seven patients had human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated BL. Overall, we observed a complete remission (CR) rate of 91.2%, and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 84.8 and 88.2%, respectively. In patients with concomitant HIV, the prognosis was not different with 10-year PFS of 100% and OS of 88.2%. The majority (71.4%) of HIV-associated BL patients received dose-adjusted EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab) and had excellent outcomes with 100% CR and no relapses. Central nervous system (CNS) disease, bone marrow involvement and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels more than 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN) were associated with poorer survival outcomes. Patients with refractory disease, whilst uncommon (n = 4), had dismal outcomes. Patients with adult BL, including HIV-related cases, harbor generally good prognosis in the modern era.

A Prognostic Model Using Post-Steroid Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Overall Survival in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.

Background: Ratios of differential blood counts (hematological indices, HIs) had been identified as prognostic variables in various cancers. In primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs), higher baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in particular was found to portend a worse overall survival. However, it was often observed that differential counts shift drastically following steroid administration. Moreover, steroids are an important part of the arsenal against PCNSL due to its potent lymphotoxic effects. We showed that the effect of steroids on differential blood cell counts and HIs could be an early biomarker for subsequent progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: This study retrospectively identified all adult patients who received a brain biopsy from 2008 to 2019 and had histologically confirmed PCNSL, and included only those who received chemoimmunotherapy, with documented use of corticosteroids prior to treatment induction. Different blood cell counts and HIs were calculated at three time-points: baseline (pre steroid), pre chemoimmunotherapy (post steroid) and post chemoimmunotherapy. Tumor progression and survival data were collected and analyzed through Kaplan−Meier estimates and Cox regression. We then utilized selected variables found to be significant on Kaplan−Meier analysis to generate a decision-tree prognostic model, the NNI-NCCS score. Results: A total of 75 patients who received chemoimmunotherapy were included in the final analysis. For NLR, OS was longer with higher pre-chemoimmunotherapy (post-steroid) NLR (dichotomized at NLR ≥ 4.0, HR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21−0.83, p = 0.01) only. For platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), OS was better for lower post-chemoimmunotherapy PLR (dichotomized at PLR ≥ 241, HR 2.27, 95% CI: 1.00 to 5.18, p = 0.05) and lower pre-chemoimmunotherapy (post-steroid) LMR (dichotomized at LMR ≥25.7, HR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.10 to 4.31, p = 0.03), respectively, only. The decision-tree model using age ≤70, post-steroid NLR >4.0, and pre-steroid (baseline) NLR <2.5 and the division of patients into three risk profiles­low, medium, and high­achieved good accuracy (area-under-curve of 0.78), with good calibration (Brier score: 0.16) for predicting 2-year overall survival. Conclusion: We found that post-steroid NLR, when considered together with baseline NLR, has prognostic value, and incorporation into a prognostic model allowed for accurate and well-calibrated stratification into three risk groups.

Prognostication of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with Deauville score of 3 or 4 at end-of-treatment PET evaluation: a comparison of the Deauville 5-point scale and the ΔSUVmax method.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is treated with anti-CD 20 and multi-drug chemotherapy for cure. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans are performed at end of treatment (EOT) to assess response. EOT Deauville scores (DS) are equivocal for treatment response in some situations, requiring physicians to determine the need for further investigations or treatment. Studies have suggested the delta maximum standardised uptake value (ΔSUVmax) to be superior to DS for assessment of metabolic response at interim PET, although its use at EOT PET, especially in cases of equivocal response, has yet to be established. We investigated whether ΔSUVmax could better discriminate prognosis than DS 3 or 4 at EOT. ΔSUVmax did not outperform DS. Combination of DS 3 and International Prognostic Index (IPI) <3 selects for patients with extremely low risk of disease progression (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.62, p 0.018) compared to DS 4 and IPI ≥3.

Treatment Outcomes and Survival Patterns of Asian Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is widely considered an incurable malignancy even with current therapies and relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease to primary treatment remains common. With improved treatment guidelines and the advent of novel agents, patients are increasingly being treated with more lines of regimens. However, outcomes after each line of treatment remain poorly characterized, especially in the Asian population. In this paper, we described the survival outcomes in a group of R/R MCL patients. Methods: We retrospectively studied 35 patients with R/R MCL between 1998 and 2020 at the National Cancer Centre Singapore. Patients were followed longitudinally throughout their disease course. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median OS and PFS from diagnosis were 105 and 40 months, respectively. After first relapse, the median OS and PFS were 52 and 19 months, post-second relapse 32 and 8 months, and post-third relapse 12 and 6 months, respectively. Patients older than 65 years at first relapse had shorter survival (median OS: 22 vs. 55 months, P = 0.0417; median PFS: 9 vs. 29 months, P = 0.001). Early treatment failure after first line therapy was also associated with worse survival outcomes (median OS: 13 vs. 55 months, P < 0.001; median PFS: 9 vs. 26 months, P < 0.001). Conclusion: With each relapse, survival outcomes for patients with MCL are worse. Novel treatment and contemporary outcomes of R/R MCL are encouraging and support the need for continued research in this area.