RESUMO
Implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical decision-making is still in early development. We developed an AI robot intervention prototype with a health literacy-friendly interface that uses interactive voice response (IVR) surveying to assist in decision-making for weight loss. The weight-specific health literacy instrument (WSHLI) and Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDMQ) were used to measure factors influencing weight-loss decisions. Factors associated with participants choosing to lose weight were analyzed using logistic regression, and factors influencing the selection of specific weight-loss plans were examined with one-way analysis of variance. Our study recruited 144 overweight or obese adults (69.4% women, 58.3% with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24). After interacting with the AI robot, 78% of the study population made the decision to lose weight. SDMQ score was a significant factor positively influencing the decision for weight-loss (odds ratio [OR]: 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-4.29, p = 0.027). Individuals who selected self-monitored lifestyle modification (mean ± SD: 11.52 ± 1.95) had significantly higher health literacy than those who selected dietician-assisted plan (9.92 ± 2.30) and physician-guided treatment (9.60 ± 1.52) (both p = 0.001). The study results demonstrated that our prototype AI robot can effectively encourage individuals to make decisions regarding weight management and that both WSHLI and SDMQ scores affect the choice of weight-loss plans.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The present nationwide population-based cohort study aims to assess the effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) on ruptured and unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) by evaluating the haemorrhage rates. DESIGN: A nationwide, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). PARTICIPANTS: An observational study of 1515 patients who were diagnosed with brain AVMs between 1997 and 2013 from the Taiwan NHIRD. PRIMARY OUTCOME AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We performed a survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to explore the relationship between treatment modalities (GKS vs non-GKS) and haemorrhage, adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: The GKS and non-GKS groups included 317 and 1198 patients, respectively. Patients in the GKS group (mean±SD, 33.08±15.48 years of age) tended to be younger than those in the non-GKS group (37.40±17.62) (p<0.001). The 15-year follow-up revealed that the rate of bleeding risk was lower in the GKS group than in the non-GKRS group (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.61; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.92). The bleeding risk of ruptured AVMs was significantly lower in GKS group than in the non-GKS group (aHR 0.34; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.62). On the other hand, the bleeding risk of unruptured AVMs was higher in the GKS group than in the non-GKS group (aHR 1.95; 95% CI 1.04 to 3.65). In the unruptured AVM group, the incidence of bleeding was significantly higher among patients in the GKS group that were of >40 years of age (aHR 3.21; 95% CI 1.12 to 9.14). CONCLUSIONS: GKS is safe and it reduces the risk of haemorrhage in patients with ruptured AVMs. The administration of GKS to patients with unruptured AVMs who are above the age of 40 years old male might increase the risk of haemorrhage.