The effect of prophylactic oral vitamin C use on DNA double-strand breaks after abdominal contrast-enhanced CT: A preliminary study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the protective effect of oral Vitamin C on DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) after abdominal contrast-enhanced CT examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing abdominal multiphase contrast-enhanced CT were divided into control group (n = 30) and prevention group (n = 30). Patients in the prevention group were orally administered 1 g Vitamin C 30-120 minutes prior to CT examination. Blood samples were obtained prior to and 5 min following CT examination for each subject. γ-H2AX foci representing DSBs in the nucleus of lymphocytes were marked by fluorescent markers. Change in γ-H2AX foci/cell was compared through Student t-tests or ANOVA testing. The relationship between physical parameters and increase in γ-H2AX foci was analyzed through Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis. RESULTS: The mean increase in γ-H2AX was 0.49 foci /cell in the control group and 0.19 foci/cell in the prevention group (p < 0.001), corresponding to a 61% reduction in the mean increase in γ-H2AX foci in the prevention group compared to the control group. In the prevention group, increase in γ-H2AX foci/cell positively correlated with dose length product and volume CT dose index (r = 0.449 and 0.403, respectively; both p < 0.05). No difference in the increase in γ-H2AX foci/cell was found between the different time interval subgroups of 30, 60, and 120 min between Vitamin C administration and CT examination (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Oral Vitamin C can significantly reduce the level of DSBs after abdominal contrast-enhanced CT examination and is a simple and effective method to decrease DNA damage.

The effect of abdominal contrast-enhanced CT on DNA double-strand breaks in peripheral blood lymphocytes: an in vitro and in vivo study.

BACKGROUND: As abdominal computed tomography (CT) radiation dose can be higher compared with other organ systems, monitoring the radiation exposure from this exam type is especially important. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of abdominal contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) on levels of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in peripheral blood lymphocytes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was performed in two parts: (i) an in vitro study: venous blood samples from 12 volunteers were divided into four groups. Samples in group A did not undergo radiation exposure, while groups B, C, and D received one CT scan with 1-3 times the radiation dose equivalent to abdominal CE-CT scan, respectively; and (ii) an in vivo study: blood was taken before CT and 5 min after CT in 30 patients. Lymphocytes were isolated and stained by immunofluorescence of γ-H2AX protein. DSB levels were compared by variance analysis or paired t-test. The relationship between radiation dose and γ-H2AX focus increase was analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. RESULTS: In the in vitro study, DSBs levels in groups B, C, and D were 49.4%, 96.6%, and 149.4% higher than those in Group A, respectively (all P < 0.001). Radiation dose in the four subgroups had a linear correlation to DSB levels ( P < 0.001). In the in vivo study, the DSB level was 43.5% higher after CT ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Abdominal CE-CT significantly increased DSB levels in both in vitro and in vivo experiments. A positive linear correlation of CT radiation dose with intracellular DSBs levels was observed in the in vitro study.

Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a reliable clinical tool for evaluating transplant renal artery stenosis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate image quality of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and compare transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) seen by non-contrast-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 330 patients receiving 369 non-contrast-enhanced MRA examinations from July 2014 to June 2017 were included. Thirty patients received at least two MRA examinations. Image quality was independently assessed by two radiologists. Inter-observer agreement was analyzed. Transplant renal artery anatomy and complications were evaluated and compared with DSA. If possible, accuracy was calculated on a per-artery basis. RESULTS: Good or excellent image quality was found in 95.4 % (352/369) of examinations with good inter-observer agreement (K=0.760). Twenty-two patients with DSA had 28 non-contrast-enhanced MRA examinations within a 2-month period. Of these, 19 patients had TRAS, two patients had pseudoaneurysms, and one patient had a normal transplant renal artery but an occluded external iliac artery. Non-contrast-enhanced MRA correctly detected 19 TRAS and nine normal arteries, giving 96.6 % accuracy on a per-artery basis. CONCLUSIONS: Non-contrast-enhanced MRA demonstrates a good depiction of the transplanted renal artery and shows good correlation with DSA in cases where there was TRAS. KEY POINTS: • Good or excellent image quality was found in 95.4 % of examinations. • Non-contrast-enhanced MRA can clearly map transplant renal artery anatomy. • Non-contrast-enhanced MRA is a reliable tool to detect TRAS.

Comparison of the effect of radiation exposure from dual-energy CT versus single-energy CT on double-strand breaks at CT pulmonary angiography.

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of dual-source dual-energy CT versus single-energy CT on DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in blood lymphocytes at CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-two patients underwent either dual-energy CTPA (Group 1: n = 21, 80/Sn140 kVp, 89/38 mAs; Group 2: n = 20, 100/Sn140 kVp, 89/76 mAs) or single-energy CTPA (Group 3: n = 21, 120 kVp, 110 mAs). Blood samples were obtained before and 5 min after CTPA. DSBs were assessed with fluorescence microscopy and Kruskal-Walls tests were used to compare DSBs levels among groups. Volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP) and organ radiation dose were compared using ANOVA. RESULTS: There were increased excess DSB foci per lymphocyte 5 min after CTPA examinations in three groups (Group 1: P = .001; Group 2: P = .001; Group 3: P = .006). There were no differences among groups regarding excess DSB foci/cell and percentage of excess DSBs (Group 1, 23%; Group 2, 24%; Group 3, 20%; P = .932). CTDIvol, DLP and organ radiation dose in Group 1 were the lowest among the groups (all P < .001). CONCLUSION: DSB is increased following dual-source and single-source CTPA, while dual-source dual-energy CT protocols do not increase the estimated radiation dose and also do not result in a higher incidence of DNA DSBs in patients undergoing CTPA.

Acute kidney injury in patients with nephrotic syndrome undergoing contrast-enhanced CT for suspected venous thromboembolism: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether intravenous iodinated contrast material administration increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with nephrotic syndrome undergoing contrast-enhanced CT. METHODS: Patients with nephrotic syndrome undergoing contrast-enhanced CT were retrospectively identified (n = 701). Control group consisted of patients with nephrotic syndrome receiving non-contrast CT (n = 1053). Two different 1:1 propensity score matching models using three or 10 variables were developed for each estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) subgroup. Incidence of post-CT AKI for the two groups was assessed and compared by standard AKI criteria and Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria. RESULTS: After matching with three variables, the AKI incidence in the contrast-enhanced CT and non-contrast CT groups was 2.7% vs 2.5% (standard AKI criteria) and 4.2% vs. 6.7% (AKIN criteria) (p = 1.00 and 0.05), respectively. After matching with 10 variables, AKI incidences were 3.1% vs. 2.6% (standard AKI criteria) and 4.1% vs. 7.4% (AKIN criteria) (p = 0.72 and 0.03), respectively. AKI incidences of each eGFR subgroup in the contrast-enhanced CT group were not higher than in the non-contrast CT group (lowest p = 0.46). CONCLUSION: Intravenous contrast material administration during CT was not found to be a risk factor for AKI in this large cohort of patients with nephrotic syndrome. KEY POINTS: • AKI incidence of contrast-enhanced CT and non-contrast CT had no difference. • AKI incidences of eGFR subgroup in contrast-enhanced CT were not increased. • Studies without a non-contrast CT control group may overestimate CIN incidence.

Contrast-induced nephropathy in CT: incidence, risk factors and strategies for prevention.

UNLABELLED: In the past, a high percentage of hospital-acquired renal failure was attributed to contrast media. That position is now very controversial. Recently, doubts have been raised regarding the real relationship between acute kidney injury and intravenous contrast media administration. Similarly, statements about specific methods of preventing contrast-inducing nephropathy have been challenged. This review article addresses the controversies of incidence, causation, and prevention in an attempt to help the practicing radiologist adopt methods for their own department. KEY POINTS: • The reported CIN incidence ranges from 2-12 % following contrast-enhanced CT. • Studies without a non-contrast CT control group may overestimate CIN incidence. • Development and application of a comprehensive CIN prevention strategy is recommended.