Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Commun Biol ; 7(1): 497, 2024 Apr 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658677

RESUMO

Most lung cancer patients with metastatic cancer eventually relapse with drug-resistant disease following treatment and EGFR mutant lung cancer is no exception. Genome-wide CRISPR screens, to either knock out or overexpress all protein-coding genes in cancer cell lines, revealed the landscape of pathways that cause resistance to the EGFR inhibitors osimertinib or gefitinib in EGFR mutant lung cancer. Among the most recurrent resistance genes were those that regulate the Hippo pathway. Following osimertinib treatment a subpopulation of cancer cells are able to survive and over time develop stable resistance. These 'persister' cells can exploit non-genetic (transcriptional) programs that enable cancer cells to survive drug treatment. Using genetic and pharmacologic tools we identified Hippo signalling as an important non-genetic mechanism of cell survival following osimertinib treatment. Further, we show that combinatorial targeting of the Hippo pathway and EGFR is highly effective in EGFR mutant lung cancer cells and patient-derived organoids, suggesting a new therapeutic strategy for EGFR mutant lung cancer patients.


Assuntos
Acrilamidas , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Receptores ErbB , Indóis , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mutação , Pirimidinas , Fatores de Transcrição , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Receptores ErbB/genética , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Fatores de Transcrição/metabolismo , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Acrilamidas/farmacologia , Acrilamidas/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Sinalização YAP/metabolismo , Proteínas de Sinalização YAP/genética , Compostos de Anilina/farmacologia , Compostos de Anilina/uso terapêutico , Gefitinibe/farmacologia , Via de Sinalização Hippo , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/genética , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/metabolismo , Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transdução de Sinal/genética , Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transdução de Sinal/metabolismo , Transdução de Sinais , Fatores de Transcrição de Domínio TEA , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Repetições Palindrômicas Curtas Agrupadas e Regularmente Espaçadas , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(10): 1689-1698, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33991671

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Pain remains a common complication after gynecologic laparoscopy. Use of local anesthesia may be beneficial in reducing postoperative pain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether local anesthetic decreases postoperative pain after laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. DATA SOURCES: We searched Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, and Medline from inception to November 2020 using Medical Subject Headings and free text combinations. METHODS OF TRIAL SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials of patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy receiving port site subcutaneous, subfascial, or intraperitoneal local anesthetic compared with placebo or no intervention. We included 20 trials (1861 participants) with size varying between 28 and 164 participants. TABULATIONS, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom), with standard mean differences (SMDs) and random-effects model. Port site infiltration reduces postoperative pain at 4 hours (SMD -0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.44 to -0.06; 4 trials; 545 participants) and 6 hours (SMD -0.44; 95% CI, -0.82 to -0.06; 4 trials; 455 participants) after surgery. The administration of intraperitoneal local anesthetics reduces pain at 6 hours (-1.42; 95% CI, -3.22 to -0.30; 4 trials; 277 participants) after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The use of port site and intraperitoneal local anesthetic decreases immediate postoperative pain in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy, although its impact on analgesia requirements is unclear. Routine usage of local anesthetics should be considered for people undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais , Laparoscopia , Anestesia Local , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA