Outcomes of internal fixation with Femoral Neck System (FNS) for intracapsular femoral neck fractures.

Background: Internal fixation of hip fractures is associated with high reoperation rates. This study investigated the reoperation rates after internal fixation with the femoral neck system (FNS). Materials and Methods: A single-institution cohort study was conducted on patients aged 18 years or older who sustained intracapsular femoral neck fractures and underwent internal fixation with a fixed-angle implant. Surgeons, patients, and investigators were not blinded. The primary outcome was any hip reoperation at the final follow-up. Secondary outcomes were to characterize a cohort of patients regarding demographics, fracture classification, intraoperative findings, postoperative fracture complications and union rates, and postoperative pain. Results: This study found that internal fixation with FNS for intracapsular femoral neck fractures was associated with a 23% rate of revision surgery. Of the initial 94 patients who received FNS internal fixation, 44 patients were included for analysis; of those, 10 patients underwent revision surgery. Patients had a 22% rate of in-hospital medical adverse events with a 30-day readmission rate of 9%. Increasing body mass index was associated with increased revision rates (P = 0.037). Patients who sustained displaced femoral neck fractures had a significant decrease in SF-12 Mental Health Composite, SF-12 Physical Health Composite, and quality-of-life subscale scores. Conclusions: The FNS is a viable alternative for internal fixation of intracapsular femoral neck fractures. The observed rate of revision after internal fixation was comparable with previously published outcomes following fixation with cannulated screws and sliding hip screws. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

Improving Medical Student Mentorship in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Introduction: Owing to limited clinical clerkships and travel restrictions related to COVID-19, recent medical student mentorship in orthopaedic surgery has been impacted negatively. The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to determine if medical student awareness of orthopaedics as a possible career field may be improved through a mentoring program designed and delivered by orthopaedic residents. Methods: A five-resident QI team developed four educational sessions aimed at a medical student audience. Forum topics included: (1) orthopaedics as a career, (2) fracture conference, (3) splinting workshop, and (4) residency application process. Pre- and post-forum surveys were administered to student participants to assess changes in their perceptions regarding orthopaedic surgery. Data derived from the questionnaires were analyzed with nonparametric statistical tests. Results: Of 18 forum participants, 14 were men and 4 were women. A total of 40 survey pairs were collected, averaging 10 per session. In the all-participant encounter analysis, there were statistically significant improvements in all outcome measures including interest in, exposure to, and knowledge of orthopaedics; exposure to our training program; and ability to interact with our residents. Those undecided regarding their specialty demonstrated larger increases in post-forum responses, suggesting that the learning experience was more impactful for that subgroup. Conclusions: This QI initiative was a successful demonstration of orthopaedic resident mentorship of medical students, wherein perceptions of orthopaedics were influenced favorably by the educational experience. For some students with limited access to orthopaedic clerkships or formal one-on-one mentoring, forums like these may be an acceptable alternative.

Improving Electronic Patient Handoff in an Orthopaedic Residency using the Listrunner© Application.

Introduction: Miscommunication during shift change and other handoff events is a common source of malpractice claims and patient-care errors. An efficient patient handoff system is imperative to prevent miscommunication. Owning to limitations with our current handoff system and to an ever-increasing reliance on electronic health information, our residency program sought to modernize our handoff method. Methods: To improve handoff communication, the HIPAA-compliant application Listrunner© was adopted. Members of the orthopaedic trauma team were oriented to the new application. Change-of-shift patient handoff was transitioned from the current email system to List-runner©. After three months of using the new application, a web-based questionnaire was administered to all members of the care team to assess their experiences, including perceived benefits and limitations of the Listrunner© application. Results: Seventeen orthopaedic resident physicians and three orthopaedic trauma attending physicians completed the survey. While almost half of the respondents were satisfied using email as a checkout tool, more than half of study participants indicated that it lacked security and several users believed there was a need for improvement. Most indicated that Listrunner© was easy to use, improved clinical efficiency, and improved patient care and safety. Seventeen of 20 respondents reported that they would like to continue using Listrunner© as a check-out tool. Conclusions: The Listrunner© application was adopted quickly by our orthopaedic trauma team, whose members opined that the application increased the efficiency and accuracy of handoff when compared to the previous secure email system.