Do PD-1 and PD-L2 expressions have prognostic impact in hematologic malignancies?

Background/aim: PD-1 (programmed death-1) is an immune checkpoint receptor that modulates T-cell activity in peripheral tissues via interaction with its ligands, PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) and PD-L2 (programmed death-ligand 2). Tumor cells upregulate PD-L1 or PD-L2 to inhibit this T lymphocyte attack. Our goal was to determine the PD-1 and PD-L2 expression rates of various hematologic malignancies, and evaluate whether PD-1 and PD-L2 expressions have an impact on prognosis. Materials and methods: For this purpose, pretreatment bone marrow biopsy specimens of 83 patients [42 multiple myeloma (MM), 21 acute leukemia, and 20 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)] were stained with monoclonal antibody immunostains of PD-1 and PD-L2. Results: As a result, the overall expression rate of PD-1 was 26.2%, 4.8%, and 60% in patients with MM, acute leukemia, and CLL, respectively, whereas the PD-L2 expression rate was 61.9%, 14.3%, and 10% in patients with MM, acute leukemia, and CLL, respectively. Conclusion: Finally, we concluded that the role of the PD-1 pathway can be demonstrated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Since we evaluated whether there is a correlation between the (IHC) results and survival of patients with MM, acute leukemia, and CLL, we could not demonstrate meaningful evidence that these markers have an impact on prognosis.

SPARC: As a prognostic biomarker in rectal cancer patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to search the prognostic value of SPARC expression in rectum cancer cases receiving postoperative radiotherapy. METHODS: Forty three rectal cancer patients are recruited to this retrospective study. All patients received postoperative radiotherapy which the median dose was 5040 cGy and concomitant chemotherapy. Samples taken from their paraffin blocks were examined with immunohistochemical procedures. RESULTS: When the association between SPARC expression and the clinicopathological feature was examined, there was a significant association between age and expression levels. Overall survival of patients with low expression was found to be 67 months whereas the overall survival of the patients with high expression was 32 months and the difference was statistically significant. Time to local recurrence of patients with low expression was found to be 74 months whereas time to local recurrence of the patients with high expression was 31 months. Progression free survival of the patients with low expression and high expression were 67 months and 32 months, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, high expression of SPARC was found to be associated with a statistically significant shorter overall survival and progression free survival. CONCLUSIONS: High expression of SPARC is related to worse prognosis in rectal cancer patients.

Prognostic value of SPARC expression in unresectable NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the predictive/prognostic value of the secreted protein, acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) in cases of unresectable, locally advanced, non-small cell lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 84 patients with Stage IIIA-B non-small cell lung cancer, undergoing simultaneous chemoradiotherapy including radiotherapy at a dose of 66 Gy and weekly docataxel (20 mg/m2) and cisplatin (20 mg/m2). SPARC expression was studied in biopsy material by immunohistochemical methods and correlations with treatment responses or survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 16±2.73 (11.55-20.46) months for low expression vs 7±1.79 months (7.92-16.08) months for high expression (p=0.039), while median local control was 13±2.31 (8.48-17.5) months for low expression vs 6±0.85 (4.34-7.66) months for high expression (p=0.045) and median progression-free survival was 10±2.31 (5.48-14.5) months for low expression vs 6±1.10 (3.85-8.15) months for high expression (p=0.022). In both univariate and multivariate analyses, high SPARC expression was associated with significantly shorter overall survival (p=0.003, p=0.007, respectively), local control (p=0.008, p=0.036) and progression-free survival (p=0.004, p=0.029) when compared to low SPARC expression. No significant difference was detected between high and low SPARC expression groups regarding age, sex, T stage, N stage, histopathology and stage-related patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: High SPARC expression was identified as a poor prognostic factor in cases with locally advanced NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.