RESUMO
These guidelines for Legally Defensible Workplace Drug Testing have been prepared and updated by the European Workplace Drug Testing Society (EWDTS). The European Guidelines are designed to establish best practice procedures whilst allowing individual countries to operate within the requirements of national customs and legislation. The EWDTS recommends that all European laboratories that undertake legally defensible workplace drug testing should use these guidelines as a template for accreditation. These guidelines are relevant to laboratory-based testing only. These guidelines follow current best practices and are constantly under review.
Assuntos
Drogas Ilícitas/análise , Saliva/química , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/legislação & jurisprudência , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/métodos , Local de Trabalho/legislação & jurisprudência , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Laboratórios/legislação & jurisprudência , Laboratórios/organização & administração , Pessoal de Laboratório/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoal de Laboratório/organização & administração , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Estudos de Validação como AssuntoRESUMO
These European Guidelines for Workplace Drug Testing in Urine have been prepared and updated by the European Workplace Drug Testing Society (EWDTS). The first version of these urine guidelines was published in 2002. Since then, the guidelines have been followed by many laboratories in different European countries and their role has been essential particularly in countries lacking legislation for workplace drug testing. In 2014, the EWDTS started a guidelines updating project and published a new version of the urine guidelines in 2015. Here we represent this updated version of the urine guidelines. The European Guidelines are designed to establish best practice procedures whilst allowing individual countries to operate within the requirements of national customs and legislation. The EWDTS recommends that all European laboratories that undertake legally defensible workplace drug testing should use these guidelines as a template for accreditation. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Assuntos
Drogas Ilícitas/urina , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/métodos , Urinálise/métodos , Local de Trabalho , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Laboratórios/legislação & jurisprudência , Controle de Qualidade , Sociedades Médicas , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/legislação & jurisprudência , Estudos de Validação como Assunto , Local de Trabalho/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
C-reactive protein (CRP) has been suggested to contribute to the development of atherosclerosis. We previously found binding of CRP to cholesterol in modified low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles. Here, we characterize the interaction between CRP and cholesterol in more detail. When lipids of native LDL were separated by thin-layer chromatography, CRP bound only to cholesterol. When various cholesterol analogues were compared for their ability to bind CRP, we found that any modification of the 3beta-OH group blocked binding of CRP to cholesterol. Similarly, enrichment of LDL with cholesterol but not with its analogues triggered the binding of CRP to LDL. Finally, with the aid of anti-CRP monoclonal antibodies and by molecular modeling, we obtained evidence for involvement of the phosphorylcholine-binding site of CRP in cholesterol binding. Thus, CRP can bind to cholesterol, and the interaction is mediated by the phosphorylcholine-binding site of CRP and the 3beta-hydroxyl group of cholesterol.
Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , LDL-Colesterol/química , LDL-Colesterol/metabolismo , Hidróxidos/metabolismo , Proteína C-Reativa/química , Humanos , Hidróxidos/química , Modelos Moleculares , Estrutura Molecular , Fosforilcolina/metabolismo , Estrutura Terciária de ProteínaRESUMO
C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute-phase reactant, is present in atherosclerotic human arterial intima in association with lipids. In the present work we studied interactions between CRP and LDL on microtitre wells, where either CRP or LDL was immobilized. LDL was modified by vortex-mixing, oxidation, or by lipolysis with phospholipase A(2) or with sphingomyelinase or a combination of trypsin and cholesterol esterase. We found that CRP bound only to LDL modified by trypsin/cholesterol esterase or by sphingomyelinase and that this binding was Ca(2+)-dependent. In these two forms of modified LDL, non-esterified cholesterol was susceptible to cholesterol oxidase, indicating exposure of non-esterified cholesterol on particle surfaces and suggesting a role for non-esterified cholesterol in mediating CRP binding. Consistent with this hypothesis were the following findings: (i) increasing the amount of non-esterified cholesterol in LDL with cyclodextrin increased, and decreasing its amount decreased, the binding of CRP to LDL; (ii) modification of non-esterified cholesterol in LDL by cholesterol oxidase decreased the binding of CRP to LDL; and (iii) CRP bound to purified non-esterified cholesterol. The binding was Ca(2+)-dependent and could be competed out with phosphocholine. Taken together, these findings suggest that CRP can bind to modified lipoproteins, notably to the non-esterified cholesterol on their surface. These interactions may be related to the suggested role of CRP in the local inflammation present in atherosclerotic plaques.