Nutrition delivery and the relationship with changes in muscle mass in adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Adverse changes in muscle health (size and quality) are common in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Nutrition delivery may attenuate such changes, yet the relationship with muscle health remains poorly understood. This study explored the association between energy and protein delivery and changes in muscle health measured using ultrasound from baseline to day 10 and 20 in patients receiving ECMO. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from a prospective study quantifying changes in muscle health using ultrasound in adults receiving ECMO was completed. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were prescribed artificial nutrition within 3 days of enrolment and had >1 ultrasound measurement. The primary outcome was the association between protein delivery (grams delivered and percentage of targets received) and change in rectus femoris cross-sectional area (RF-CSA) till day 20. Secondary outcomes were the association between energy and protein delivery and change in RF-CSA till day 10, RF-echogenicity, and quadriceps muscle layer thickness to day 10 and 20. Associations were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (age: 48 [standard deviation {SD}: 14], 44% male) were included. Mean energy and protein delivery were 1633 kcal (SD: 374 kcal) and 70 g (SD: 17 g) equating to 79% (SD: 19%) of energy and 73% (SD: 17%) of protein targets. No association was observed between protein delivery (r = 0.167; p = 0.495) or the percentage of targets received (r = 0.096; p = 0.694) and change in RF-CSA till day 20. No other significant associations were found between energy or protein delivery and change in RF-CSA, echogenicity, or quadriceps muscle layer thickness at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study observed no association between nutrition delivery and changes in muscle health measured using ultrasound in patients receiving ECMO. Larger prospective studies are required to investigate the association between nutrition delivery and changes in muscle health in patients receiving ECMO.

Nutrition considerations for patients with persistent critical illness: A narrative review.

Critically ill patients experience high rates of malnutrition and significant muscle loss during their intensive care unit (ICU) admission, impacting recovery. Nutrition is likely to play an important role in mitigating the development and progression of malnutrition and muscle loss observed in ICU, yet definitive clinical trials of nutrition interventions in ICU have failed to show benefit. As improvements in the quality of medical care mean that sicker patients are able to survive the initial insult, combined with an aging and increasingly comorbid population, it is anticipated that ICU length of stay will continue to increase. This review aims to discuss nutrition considerations unique to critically ill patients who have persistent critical illness, defined as an ICU stay of >10 days. A discussion of nutrition concepts relevant to patients with persistent critical illness will include energy and protein metabolism, prescription, and delivery; monitoring of nutrition at the bedside; and the role of the healthcare team in optimizing nutrition support.

Dietary assessment methods for measurement of oral intake in acute care and critically ill hospitalised patients: a scoping review.

Quantification of oral intake within the hospital setting is required to guide nutrition care. Multiple dietary assessment methods are available, yet details regarding their application in the acute care setting are scarce. This scoping review, conducted in accordance with JBI methodology, describes dietary assessment methods used to measure oral intake in acute and critical care hospital patients. The search was run across four databases to identify primary research conducted in adult acute or critical care settings from 1st of January 2000-15th March 2023 which quantified oral diet with any dietary assessment method. In total, 155 articles were included, predominantly from the acute care setting (n = 153, 99%). Studies were mainly single-centre (n = 138, 88%) and of observational design (n = 135, 87%). Estimated plate waste (n = 59, 38%) and food records (n = 43, 28%) were the most frequent assessment methods with energy and protein the main nutrients quantified (n = 81, 52%). Validation was completed in 23 (15%) studies, with the majority of these using a reference method reliant on estimation (n = 17, 74%). A quarter of studies (n = 39) quantified completion (either as complete versus incomplete or degree of completeness) and four studies (2.5%) explored factors influencing completion. Findings indicate a lack of high-quality evidence to guide selection and application of existing dietary assessment methods to quantify oral intake with a particular absence of evidence in the critical care setting. Further validation of existing tools and identification of factors influencing completion is needed to guide the optimal approach to quantification of oral intake in both research and clinical contexts.

Nutrition care processes from intensive care unit admission to inpatient rehabilitation: A retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Extended duration of nutrition interventions in critical illness is a plausible mechanism of benefit and of interest to inform future research. The aim of this study was to describe nutrition processes of care from intensive care unit (ICU) admission to discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study conducted at a health care network in Melbourne, Australia. Adult patients in the ICU >48 h and discharged to inpatient rehabilitation within 28 d were included. Dietitian assessment data and nutrition impacting symptoms were collected until day 28. Data are presented as n (%), mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). RESULTS: Fifty patients were included. Of the 50 patients, 28 were men (56%). Patients were 65 ± 19 y of age with an Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II score 15.5 ± 5.2. ICU length of stay (LOS) was 3 d (3-6), acute ward LOS was 10 d (7-14), and rehabilitation LOS was 17 d (8-37). Patients assessed by a dietitian and days to assessment in ICU, acute ward, and rehabilitation were 43 (86%) and 1 (0-1); 42 (84%) and 1 (1-3), and 32 (64%) and 2 (1-4) d, respectively. Oral nutrition was the most common mode: 40 (80%) in the ICU and 48 (96%) on the acute ward and rehabilitation. There was at least one nutrition impacting symptom reported in 44 patients (88%). CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation LOS was longer than in the ICU or acute wards, yet patients in rehabilitation were assessed the least by a dietitian and time to assessment was longest. Symptoms that impact nutrition intake were common; nutrition interventions beyond the acute care setting in critical illness need investigation.

Modified indirect calorimetry for patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a pilot feasibility study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Traditional indirect calorimetry is unable to capture complete gas exchange in patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). We aimed to determine the feasibility of using a modified indirect calorimetry protocol in patients receiving VA ECMO, report measured energy expenditure (EE) and compare EE to control critically ill patients. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Mechanically ventilated adult patients receiving VA ECMO were included. EE was measured within 72 h of VA ECMO commencement (timepoint one [T1]) and on approximately day seven of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission (timepoint two [T2]). Traditional indirect calorimetry via the ventilator was combined with calculations of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production derived from pre- and post-ECMO membrane blood gas analyses. Completion of ≥60% EE measurements was deemed feasible. Measured EE was compared between T1 and T2 and to control patients not receiving VA ECMO. Data is presented as n(%) and median[interquartile range (IQR)]. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were recruited; 16(76%) male, aged 55[42-64] years. The protocol was feasible to complete at T1 (14(67%)) but not at T2 (7(33%)) due to predominantly ECMO decannulation, extubation or death. EE was 1454[1213-1860] at T1 and 1657[1570-2074] kcal/d at T2 (P = 0.043). In patients receiving VA ECMO versus controls, EE was 1577[1434-1801] versus 2092[1609-2272] kcal/d, respectively (P = 0.056). CONCLUSION: Modified indirect calorimetry is feasible early in admission to ICU but is not possible in all patients receiving VA ECMO, especially later in admission. EE increases during the first week of ICU admission but may be lower than EE in control critically ill patients.

How do guideline recommended energy targets compare with measured energy expenditure in critically ill adults with obesity: A systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients with obesity have unique and complex nutritional needs, with clinical practice guidelines conflicting regarding recommended energy targets. The aim of this systematic review was to 1) describe measured resting energy expenditure (mREE) reported in the literature and; 2) compare mREE to predicted energy targets using the European (ESPEN) and American (ASPEN) guideline recommendations when indirect calorimetry is not available in critically ill patients with obesity. METHODS: The protocol was registered apriori and literature was searched until 17th March, 2022. Original studies were included if they reported mREE using indirect calorimetry in critically ill patients with obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2). Group-level mREE data was reported as per the primary publication using mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range]. Where individual patient data was available, Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess mean bias (95% limits of agreement) between guideline recommendations and mREE targets (i.e. ASPEN for BMI 30-50, 11-14 kcal/kg actual weight compared to 70% mREE and ESPEN 20-25 kcal/kg adjusted weight compared to 100% mREE). Accuracy was assessed by the percentage (%) of estimates within ±10% of mREE targets. RESULTS: After searching 8019 articles, 24 studies were included. mREE ranged from 1607 ± 385 to 2919 [2318-3362]kcal and 12-32kcal/actual body weight. For the ASPEN recommendations of 11-14 kcal/kg, a mean bias of -18% (-50% to +13%) and 4% (-36% to +44%) was observed, respectively (n = 104). For the ESPEN recommendations 20-25 kcal/kg, a bias of -22% (-51% to +7%) and -4% (-43% to +34%), was observed, respectively (n = 114). The guideline recommendations were able to accurately predict mREE targets on 30%-39% occasions (11-14 kcal/kg actual) and 15%-45% occasions (20-25 kcal/kg adjusted), for ASPEN and ESPEN recommendations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Measured energy expenditure in critically ill patients with obesity is variable. Energy targets generated using predictive equations recommended in both the ASPEN and ESPEN clinical guidelines have poor agreement with mREE and are frequently not able to accurately predict within ±10% of mREE, most commonly underestimating energy needs.

Indirect calorimetry: should it be part of routine care or only used in specific situations?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Indirect calorimetry (IC) is increasingly recommended to guide energy delivery in the ICU. This review aims to provide a critical overview of current literature in support of these recommendations. RECENT FINDINGS: There is insufficient evidence to ascertain a mortality benefit from IC-guided energy delivery. However, large variations in energy expenditure during critical illness pose a risk for significant under- and overfeeding if IC is not routinely used. SUMMARY: Even in the absence of demonstrable clinical benefits, there is a strong physiological rationale in favor of performing IC. Measurements can be prioritized in complex patients and should be repeated during prolonged ICU stay.

Fasting practices of enteral nutrition delivery for airway procedures in critically ill adult patients: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: There is limited understanding of fasting practices and reported safety concerns for airway procedures in critically ill adults. OBJECTIVE: To describe fasting practices including safety concerns for airway procedures in critically ill adult patients in the reported literature. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies conducted in adult critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition (EN) and undergoing an airway procedure (endotracheal intubation, endotracheal extubation, and tracheostomy) were included if EN fasting practices and/or prespecified nutrition and clinical outcomes were reported. METHODS: A scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was conducted. MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched from 2000 to January 19, 2022. Results are presented via narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included, with only one randomised control trial (RCT). Twelve studies reported on fasting practices with varied EN fasting durations (0-34 h) and two reported data on nutrition adequacy. Three studies investigated continued EN in one study arm and four studies minimised fasting duration by including gastric suctioning prior to the airway procedure. Safety concerns primarily related to aspiration events (61%) were reported in nine studies. CONCLUSION: In the reported literature, there is wide variation in EN fasting practices for airway procedures in critically ill patients with limited evidence to inform practice.

Methodological Rigor and Transparency in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nutrition Care in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review Using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX Tools.

Background: To evaluate the methodological quality of (1) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that inform nutrition care in critically ill adults using the AGREE II tool and (2) CPG recommendations for determining energy expenditure using the AGREE-REX tool. Methods: CPGs by a professional society or academic group, intended to guide nutrition care in critically ill adults, that used a systematic literature search and rated the evidence were included. Four databases and grey literature were searched from January 2011 to 19 January 2022. Five investigators assessed the methodological quality of CPGs and recommendations specific to energy expenditure determination. Scaled domain scores were calculated for AGREE II and a scaled total score for AGREE-REX. Data are presented as medians (interquartile range). Results: Eleven CPGs were included. Highest scoring domains for AGREE II were clarity of presentation (82% [76-87%]) and scope and purpose (78% [66-83%]). Lowest scoring domains were applicability (37% [32-42%]) and stakeholder involvement (46% [33-51%]). Eight (73%) CPGs provided recommendations relating to energy expenditure determination; scores were low overall (37% [36-40%]) and across individual domains. Conclusions: Nutrition CPGs for critically ill patients are developed using systematic methods but lack engagement with key stakeholders and guidance to support application. The quality of energy expenditure determination recommendations is low.

Doubly labelled water for determining total energy expenditure in adult critically ill and acute care hospitalized inpatients: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Doubly labelled water (DLW) is considered the reference standard method of measuring total energy expenditure (TEE), but there is limited information on its use in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and acute care setting. This scoping review aims to systematically summarize the available literature on TEE measured using DLW in these contexts. METHODS: Four online databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare and CINAHL) were searched up to Dec 12, 2020. Studies in English were included if they measured TEE using DLW in adults in the ICU and/or acute care setting. Key considerations, concerns and practical recommendations were identified and qualitatively synthesized. RESULTS: The search retrieved 7582 studies and nine studies were included; one in the ICU and eight in the acute care setting. TEE was measured over 7-15-days, in predominantly clinically stable patients. DLW measurements were not commenced until four days post admission or surgery in one study and following a 10-14-day stabilization period on parenteral nutrition (PN) in three studies. Variable dosages of isotopes were administered, and several equations used to calculate TEE. Four main considerations were identified with the use of DLW in these settings: variation in background isotopic abundance; excess isotopes leaving body water as carbon dioxide or water; fluctuations in rates of isotope elimination and costs. CONCLUSION: A stabilization period on intravenous fluid and PN regimens is recommended prior to DLW measurement. The DLW technique can be utilized in medically stable ICU and acute care patients, with careful considerations given to protocol design.

Micronutrient intake from enteral nutrition in critically ill adult patients: A retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the intake of micronutrients including vitamins B12, D, C, and A; folate; thiamine; iron; zinc; and selenium that are delivered from enteral nutrition (EN) during routine clinical practice in critically ill adults, expressed as a percentage of the Australia and New Zealand nutrient reference values. METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study was conducted in Melbourne, Australia during the first 7 d of intensive care unit admission. Mechanically ventilated patients prescribed exclusive EN were considered for inclusion. The primary and secondary outcomes were micronutrient intake expressed as a percentage of the recommended dietary intake (daily intake intended to meet the needs of 97% to 98% of a healthy population) and the upper level of intake (highest daily intake unlikely to pose adverse health effects), respectively. Data are presented as mean (SD) or median [interquartile range]. RESULTS: In total, 57 patients were included (62 (16) y, 67% male). EN was delivered for 5 [4-6] d, with 47% (20) energy adequacy achieved. EN delivery met the recommended dietary intake for vitamin B12, vitamin C, thiamine, and iron and did not meet the recommended dietary intake for vitamin D, vitamin A, folate, zinc, and selenium. No micronutrients exceeded the upper level of intake. CONCLUSION: EN delivery met the recommended intake for four micronutrients, did not meet the recommended intake for five micronutrients, and did not exceed the upper level of intake for any micronutrient when approximately 50% energy adequacy was achieved types.

Use of a sensitive multisugar test for measuring segmental intestinal permeability in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Increased intestinal permeability (IP) is associated with sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to pilot a sensitive multisugar test to measure IP in the nonfasted state. METHODS: Critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults were recruited from 2 ICUs in Australia. Measurements were completed within 3 days of admission using a multisugar test measuring gastroduodenal (sucrose recovery), small-bowel (lactulose-rhamnose [L-R] and lactulose-mannitol [L-M] ratios), and whole-gut permeability (sucralose-erythritol ratio) in 24-hour urine samples. Urinary sugar concentrations were compared at baseline and after sugar ingestion, and IP sugar recoveries and ratios were explored in relation to known confounders, including renal function. RESULTS: Twenty-one critically ill patients (12 males; median, 57 years) participated. Group median concentrations of all sugars were higher following sugar administration; however, sucrose and mannitol increases were not statistically significant. Within individual patients, sucrose and mannitol concentrations were higher in baseline than after sugar ingestion in 9 (43%) and 4 (19%) patients, respectively. Patients with impaired (n = 9) vs normal (n = 12) renal function had a higher L-R ratio (median, 0.130 vs 0.047; P = .003), lower rhamnose recovery (median, 15% vs 24%; P = .007), and no difference in lactulose recovery. CONCLUSION: Small-bowel and whole-gut permeability measurements are possible to complete in the nonfasted state, whereas gastroduodenal permeability could not be measured reliably. For small-bowel IP measurements, the L-R ratio is preferred over the L-M ratio. Alterations in renal function may reduce the reliability of the multisugar IP test, warranting further exploration.

How much underfeeding can the critically ill adult patient tolerate?

Critical illness leads to significant metabolic alterations that should be considered when providing nutritional support. Findings from key randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that underfeeding (<70% of energy expenditure [EE]) during the acute phase of critical illness (first 7 days of intensive care unit [ICU] admission) may not be harmful and could instead promote autophagy and prevent overfeeding in light of endogenous energy production. However, the optimal energy target during this period is unclear and full starvation is unlikely to be beneficial. There are limited data regarding the effects of prolonged underfeeding on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, but recent studies show that oral food intake is suboptimal both in the ICU and following discharge to the acute care setting. It is hypothesized that provision of full nutrition (70-100% of EE) may be important in the recovery phase of critical illness (>7 days of ICU admission) for promoting recovery and rehabilitation; however, studies on nutritional intervention delivered from ICU admission through hospital discharge are needed. The aim of this review is to provide a narrative synthesis of the existing literature on metabolic alterations experienced during critical illness and the impact of underfeeding on clinical outcomes in the critically ill adult patient.

Micronutrient intake from enteral nutrition in critically ill adults: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the intake of important micronutrients provided from enteral nutrition to critically ill patients with the Australia and New Zealand recommended dietary intakes. A secondary objective was to compare the upper levels of intake and investigate prespecified subgroups. REVIEW METHOD USED: A systematic literature review was performed. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were used. REVIEW METHODS: Databases were searched for randomised controlled trials that investigated an enteral nutrition intervention as the sole source of nutrition, were published in English between January 2000 and January 8th, 2021, and provided data to calculate micronutrient intake. The primary outcome was the % recommended dietary intake. The quality of individual trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Outcomes are presented as either mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range], with a p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirteen trials were included (n = 1538 patients). Trials investigating hypocaloric nutrition were excluded from the primary outcome assessment (conducted in nine trials (n = 1220)). All nine trials delivered ≥104% of the recommended dietary intakes and <100% of the upper level of intakes of all micronutrients. In subgroup analyses, trials with ≥80% target energy delivered a higher % of the recommended dietary intake of vitamin B12, thiamine, zinc, and vitamin C. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores ≥20 delivered a higher % of the recommended dietary intake of vitamin B12 and vitamin A. Antioxidant formulas compared with standard formulas delivered a higher % recommended dietary intake of vitamin C and thiamine. In the four trials that investigated hypocaloric feeding compared with control, there was no difference in micronutrient intake. The quality was low. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral nutrition delivery frequently met the recommended dietary intakes for all micronutrients investigated and did not exceed the upper levels of intake set for health. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020178333.

Nutrition guidelines for critically ill adults admitted with COVID-19: Is there consensus?

INTRODUCTION: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has overwhelmed hospital systems globally, resulting in less experienced staff caring for critically ill patients within the intensive care unit (ICU). Many guidelines have been developed to guide nutrition care. AIM: To identify key guidelines or practice recommendations for nutrition support practices in critically ill adults admitted with COVID-19, to describe similarities and differences between recommendations, and to discuss implications for clinical practice. METHODS: A literature review was conducted to identify guidelines affiliated with or endorsed by international nutrition societies or dietetic associations which included recommendations for the nutritional management of critically ill adult patients with COVID-19. Data were extracted on pre-defined key aspects of nutritional care including nutrition prescription, delivery, monitoring and workforce recommendations, and key similarities and discrepancies, as well as implications for clinical practice were summarized. RESULTS: Ten clinical practice guidelines were identified. Similar recommendations included: the use of high protein, volume restricted enteral formula delivered gastrically and commenced early in ICU and introduced gradually, while taking into consideration non-nutritional calories to avoid overfeeding. Specific advice for patients in the prone position was common, and non-intubated patients were highlighted as a population at high nutritional risk. Major discrepancies included the use of indirect calorimetry to guide energy targets and advice around using gastric residual volumes (GRVs) to monitor feeding tolerance. CONCLUSION: Overall, common recommendations around formula type and route of feeding exist, with major discrepancies being around the use of indirect calorimetry and GRVs, which reflect international ICU nutrition guidelines.

Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials Investigating an Enteral or Parenteral Nutrition Intervention in Critical Illness According to the CONSORT Statement: A Systematic Review and Recommendation of Minimum Standard Reporting Criteria.

Lack of reporting consistency is common in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in critical care nutrition. This impacts synthesis and interpretation and may misinform clinical practice. The objective was to evaluate reporting of parallel-group RCTs of enteral or parenteral nutrition interventions in critically ill adults against the recommendations in the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 guidelines and a priori-defined nutrition criteria. A systematic search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL was conducted to identify RCTs published from January 2011 to February 14, 2020. The primary outcome was the percentage of CONSORT criteria "completely met" (a score of 1) from all included studies (out of a total possible score of 37). Secondary outcomes included the percentage of CONSORT criteria that were "partially" or "not met" and the percentage of a priori-defined nutrition criteria that were "completely," "partially," or "not met" (adjusted to reflect criteria applicable to the paper). Data are presented as mean (standard deviation). Comparisons of normally distributed continuous data were made using a t-test (P < .05). Of 18,969 articles identified, 56 studies met inclusion criteria. Of these, 60% (19%) of the eligible CONSORT criteria were "completely met," 20% (9%) "partially met," and 20% (15%) "not met." For the nutrition criteria, 41% (20%) of the eligible criteria were "completely met," 25% (14%) "partially met," and 34% (17%) "not met." Reporting against CONSORT guidelines was variable and often incomplete in relation to important a priori-defined nutrition variables.

Nutrition management of obese critically ill adults: A survey of critical care dietitians in Australia and New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Guideline recommendations for nutrition therapy in critically ill obese adults are inconsistent. This study aimed to describe how dietitians working in an intensive care unit (ICU) in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) approach managing the nutritional needs of an obese, critically ill adult. METHODS: Invitations to participate were via personal email communication. The survey was also disseminated through a research email list and a dietitian-based newsletter. The multiple-choice case-based survey consisted of 12 questions relating to nutrition prescription and were based on international nutrition guideline recommendations including (i) weight used in energy and protein predictive equations; (ii) energy and protein prescription at ICU admission and day 7, (iii) commencement of enteral nutrition, and; (iv) use of supplemental protein. Data are reported as n (%). RESULTS: Sixty-three dietitians participated in the survey. Most commonly, adjusted body weight calculated as 'weight at BMI 25 kg/m2 + 25% excess weight' was used in equations to guide energy (44 respondents, 70%) and protein (39 respondents, 62%) prescription. At day 1, energy and protein prescription was most commonly based on the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN) guideline recommendation of 20-25 kcal/kg (39 respondents, 62%) and 1.3 g protein/kg adjusted body weight (36 respondents, 57%). Thirteen (21%) respondents had an indirect calorimetry device in their ICU to measure energy expenditure. On day 7, the ESPEN recommendations were again the most common method used for prescribing energy (30 respondents, 48%) and protein (23 respondents. 48%) needs. Thirty-eight dietitians (60%) reported they would use early supplemental protein to meet protein requirements. CONCLUSIONS: ICU dietitians in ANZ who responded to the survey most commonly report using the ESPEN ICU guideline recommendations (20-25 kcal/kg and 1.3 g protein/kg adjusted body weight) to guide nutrition prescription in an obese critically ill adult. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Serum zonulin measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay may not be a reliable marker of small intestinal permeability in healthy adults.

The association between intestinal permeability (IP) and body composition remains unclear. The gold standard differential sugar-absorption test is arduous to complete, with zonulin being increasingly used as an independent biomarker of IP. This pilot study aimed to explore the association between small IP, zonulin concentrations, and body composition in healthy adults. The urinary lactulose-rhamnose ratio was used to measure small IP. Serum zonulin, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were analyzed in serum. Body composition was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometric measurements were collected. In total, 34 participants were included (12 males, median age 28 years, body mass index 24 kg/m2, waist circumference 77cm). No correlation was observed between the lactulose-rhamnose ratio and zonulin (r = -.016, P = .929). The lactulose-rhamnose ratio displayed a strong positive correlation with LPS (n 20, r = .536, P = .018) but did not correlate with body composition measures. Conversely, zonulin displayed a moderate positive correlation with waist circumference (r = .437, P = .042) in female participants and hs-CRP (r = .485, P = .004) in all participants. These findings raise important considerations for the measurement of small IP, warranting exploration in larger powered studies that address the limitations of the present study.