Hip fracture has profound psychosocial impacts: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture is a common and serious traumatic injury for older adults characterised by poor outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to synthesise qualitative evidence about the psychosocial impact of hip fracture on the people who sustain these injuries. METHODS: Five databases were searched for qualitative studies reporting on the psychosocial impact of hip fracture, supplemented by reference list checking and citation tracking. Data were synthesised inductively and confidence in findings reported using the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach, taking account of methodological quality, coherence, relevance and adequacy. RESULTS: Fifty-seven studies were included. Data were collected during the peri-operative period to >12 months post fracture from 919 participants with hip fracture (median age > 70 years in all but 3 studies), 130 carers and 297 clinicians. Hip fracture is a life altering event characterised by a sense of loss, prolonged negative emotions and fear of the future, exacerbated by negative attitudes of family, friends and clinicians. For some people after hip fracture there is, with time, acceptance of a new reality of not being able to do all the things they used to do. There was moderate to high confidence in these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture is a life altering event. Many people experience profound and prolonged psychosocial distress following a hip fracture, within a context of negative societal attitudes. Assessment and management of psychosocial distress during rehabilitation may improve outcomes for people after hip fracture.

Hospital discharge processes: Insights from patients, caregivers, and staff in an Australian healthcare setting.

Hospital discharge is a pivotal point in healthcare delivery, impacting patient outcomes and resource utilisation. Ineffective discharge processes contribute to unplanned hospital readmissions. This study explored hospital discharge process from the perspectives of patients, caregivers, and healthcare staff. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with adult patients being discharged home from a medical ward, their caregivers, and healthcare staff at an Australian hospital. Thematic analysis followed established guidelines for qualitative research. A total of 65 interviews and 21 structured observations were completed. There were three themes: i) Communication, ii) System Pressure, and iii) Continuing Care. The theme 'Communication' highlighted challenges and inconsistencies in notifying patients, caregivers, and staff about discharge plans, leading to patient stress and frustration. Information overload during discharge hindered patient comprehension and satisfaction. Staff identified communication gaps between teams, resulting in uncertainty regarding discharge logistics. The theme 'System Pressure' referred to pressure to discharge patients quickly to free hospital capacity occasionally, even in the face of inadequate service provision on weekends and out-of-hours. The 'Continuing Care' theme drew attention to gaps in patient understanding of follow-up appointments, underscoring the need for clearer post-discharge instructions. The lack of structured systems for tracking referrals and post-discharge care coordination was also highlighted, potentially leading to fragmented care. The findings resonate with international literature and the current emphasis in Australia on improving communication during care transitions. Furthermore, the study highlights the tension between patient-centred care and health service pressure for bed availability, resulting in perceptions of premature discharges and unplanned readmissions. It underscores the need for strengthening community-based support and systems for tracking referrals to improve care continuity. These findings have implications for patient experience and safety and suggest the need for targeted interventions to optimise the discharge process.

Understanding the influences on hospital discharge decision-making from patient, carer and staff perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Gaps in discharge planning are experienced by 41% of hospital patients in Australia. There is an established body of knowledge regarding the features of the discharge process that need to be improved to avoid subsequent hospital readmission and enhance the discharge experience. However, many of these studies have focused solely on factors related to unplanned hospital readmissions and there has been limited success in operationalising improvements to the discharge process. The aim of this study was to explore and describe the factors that influence the decision to discharge adult medical patients from hospital, from patient, carer and staff perspectives. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted in one acute medical ward in Melbourne, Australia. The study data were collected by observations of clinical practice and semi-structured interviews with patients, carers and staff. Participants were: i) English-speaking adults identified for discharge home, ii) patient carers, and iii) staff involved in the discharge process. Observation data were analysed using content analysis and interviews data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one discharges were observed, and 65 participants were interviewed: 21 patients, two carers, and 42 staff. Most patients (76%) were identified as being ready for discharge during morning medical rounds, and 90% of discharge decisions were made collaboratively by the medical team and the patient. Carers were observed to be notified in 15 discharges by the patient (n = 8), doctors (n = 4), or nursing staff (n = 3). Five themes were constructed from thematic analysis of interviews: Readiness for Home, Fragmented Collaboration, Health Literacy, Unrealistic Expectations, and Care beyond Discharge. A collaborative team and supportive carers were considered to enhance risk assessment and discharge planning, however fragmented communication between clinicians, and between clinicians and patients/carers was a barrier to discharge decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the need for a more coordinated approach to discharge decision-making that optimises communication with patients and carers and multidisciplinary workflows and reduces fragmentation. The importance of patient-centred care and a personalised approach to care are well established. However, there is a need to design systems to customise the entirety of the patient journey, including the approach to discharge decision making.

Physiotherapists may influence hospital patient physical activity levels indirectly through workforce training.

BACKGROUND: Lower levels of patient physical activity in hospital are associated with poorer functional outcomes. Physiotherapists may influence physical activity outside of therapy time through nursing workforce training. OBJECTIVE: To estimate physical activity levels in acute inpatients after the Risk Assessment for Moving Individuals SafEly (RAISE) manual handling training intervention for nurses. The secondary aims evaluated nurse experiences of training and the extent to which nurses learnt RAISE skills and incorporated them in clinical practice. METHODS: Using a pre-post design, nurses from an acute neurological and medical ward participated in a physiotherapy-led, 4-hour training session teaching dynamic risk assessment to safely move patients. Patient physical activity and clinical observation audits of patient transfers were assessed prior to, and 1-week following, training. Surveys evaluated nurse experiences of training. RESULTS: Among 26 patients, there was a non-significant, moderate positive effect size favoring increased daily steps by 43% (g=.35, MD 208, 95% CI -263 to 679, p = .370). There was no change in sit-to-stand transitions (g=-.02, MD -0.4, 95% CI -16 to 15, p =.963) or daily sedentary hours (g=.05, MD 0.05, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.9, p=.908). Training was well received by all nurse participants, and the physical risk assessment was implemented into practice 89% of the time post training (X2(1) = 5.00, p = .025). CONCLUSION: A physiotherapy-led manual handling training program involving dynamic risk assessment may help hospital inpatients to increase physical activity outside of therapy time.

'Making a connection': a qualitative study of experiences from a cancer telerehabilitation program.

PURPOSE: Specialised group-based exercise rehabilitation is beneficial for cancer survivors but access to these services is limited. Telerehabilitation provides an opportunity to expand reach, but we do not know about the experiences of those who participate in this way. This study explored participant experiences of an exercise-based telerehabilitation program for people with cancer. METHOD: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was completed. Twenty-two cancer survivors were purposively sampled from the experimental group of a randomised controlled trial evaluating exercise-based cancer telerehabilitation delivered in groups using synchronous videoconferencing. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were coded independently by two reviewers and analysed inductively by thematic analysis. RESULTS: 'A feeling of connection' was the overarching theme. Participants perceived they connected with the health service, expert health professionals, and peers through participating in the telerehabilitation program. These connections provided a personalised rehabilitation experience and improved perceptions of physical and emotional well-being. Two subthemes suggested connection was facilitated by (1) the acceptability of telerehabilitation and (2) enhanced accountability to exercise. Participants felt disconnected when they were unable to participate in the program due to cancer treatment and side effects (e.g. fatigue), feeling unwell, and co-morbidities. CONCLUSION: We identified that telerehabilitation facilitated connections that enhanced the reach of exercise to cancer survivors. Our findings support using telerehabilitation to deliver specialised group-based exercise programs alongside more traditional models of care to increase participation in exercise among people with cancer.

Two thirds of patients may not need routine 12-month specialist review in an epilepsy clinic: A cross-sectional study of clinic appointments.

OBJECTIVES: Timely access to specialist outpatient clinics can be difficult to achieve as outpatient services are often oversubscribed leading to unacceptable wait times. New patients, or those with emergent issues may wait for appointments whilst existing patients are booked in for routine reviews "just in case" there is a problem, using considerable clinic resources. We investigated routine 12-month review appointments to assess whether these appointments changed patient management. METHODS: The medical records of 100 randomly selected adult patients attending annual review appointments over 12 months at a publicly-funded specialist outpatient epilepsy clinic in Melbourne, Australia were audited. Demographic and clinical data as well as information about the content of each appointment were analysed to determine whether the appointment resulted in changes to epilepsy management (eg medication change), administrative actions (eg drivers license approval) or the provision of information or education. Logistic regression was performed to assess what clinical factors were associated with changes in patient care arising from the 12-month review appointment. RESULTS: Almost half (47%) of appointments resulted in no change to patient care and 37% had only administrative outcomes, such as the completion of a regulatory driving report. Only 16% of appointments resulted in a change in medical management. The only factor that independently predicted a change in medical management was the occurrence of a seizure in the previous year. The only factor independently associated with not having any change in medical management or administrative action was having an unknown seizure type. CONCLUSIONS/ SIGNIFICANCE: Only a small number of patients experience a change in medical management when attending a 12-month epilepsy clinic appointment, with a need for management change associated with the presence of ongoing seizure. Outpatient services should limit the use of routine annual follow up to those patients most likely to need intervention or support, creating "just in time" capacity for timely access to review as issues arise.

Outcomes of the My Therapy self-management program in people admitted for rehabilitation: A stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Self-management programs can increase the time spent on prescribed therapeutic exercises and activities in rehabilitation inpatients, which has been associated with better functional outcomes and shorter hospital stays. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether implementation of a self-management program ('My Therapy') improves functional independence relative to routine care in people admitted for physical rehabilitation. METHODS: This stepped wedge, cluster randomized trial was conducted over 54 weeks (9 periods of 6-week duration, April 2021 - April 2022) across 9 clusters (general rehabilitation wards) within 4 hospitals (Victoria, Australia). We included all adults (≥18 years) admitted for rehabilitation to participating wards. The intervention included routine care plus 'My Therapy', comprising a sub-set of exercises and activities from supervised sessions which could be performed safely, without supervision or assistance. The primary outcomes were the proportion of participants achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Functional Independence Measure, (FIM™) and change in total FIM™ score from admission to discharge. RESULTS: 2550 participants (62 % women) were recruited (control: n = 1458, intervention: n = 1092), with mean (SD) age 77 (13) years and 37 % orthopedic diagnosis. Under intervention conditions, participants reported a mean (SD) of 29 (21) minutes/day of self-directed therapy, compared to 4 (SD 14) minutes/day, under control conditions. There was no evidence of a difference between control and intervention conditions in the odds of achieving an MCID in FIM™ (adjusted odds ratio 0.93, 95 % CI 0.65 to 1.31), or in the change in FIM™ score (adjusted mean difference: -0.27 units, 95 % CI -2.67 to 2.13). CONCLUSIONS: My Therapy was delivered safely to a large, diverse sample of participants admitted for rehabilitation, with an increase in daily rehabilitation dosage. However, given the lack of difference in functional improvement with participation in My Therapy, self-management programs may need to be supplemented with other strategies to improve function in people admitted for rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000313831), https://www.anzctr.org.au/.

Prefabricated contoured foot orthoses to reduce pain and increase physical activity in people with hip osteoarthritis: A randomised feasibility trial.

BACKGROUND: Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and burdensome condition that leads to impaired quality of life and a substantial economic burden. Encouraging physical activity, particularly walking, is crucial for OA management, but many individuals with hip OA fail to meet recommended activity levels. Prefabricated contoured foot orthoses have shown promise in improving hip muscle efficiency during walking in laboratory settings, but their real-world feasibility and efficacy remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of conducting a fully powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of prefabricated contoured foot orthoses, prescribed via telehealth, in people with hip OA. METHODS: This feasibility trial randomised 27 participants with hip OA into two groups: prefabricated contoured foot orthoses or flat shoe inserts. Feasibility outcomes were assessed, including recruitment rate, adherence, logbook completion, and dropout rate. Patient-reported outcomes and accelerometer-measured physical activity were collected as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: While the recruitment rate was low (0.88 people/week), adherence to the intervention (59%), logbook completion (93%), and dropout rates (7%) met or exceeded our predefined feasibility parameters. Participants found the intervention acceptable, and practicality was demonstrated with minor adverse events. Preliminary efficacy testing indicated that prefabricated contoured foot orthoses positively affected physical activity (adjusted mean difference = 2590 [260 to 4920] steps/day), with comparable outcomes for hip-related quality of life and pain. CONCLUSION: This trial supports proceeding to a fully powered RCT to assess the effect of teleheath prescribed prefabricated contoured foot orthoses on physical activity in people with hip OA. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: National Institutes of Health Trial Registry (NCT05138380).

Allied health assistant management of people with hip fracture is feasible and may improve patient adherence to hip fracture mobilisation guidelines: a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Determine the feasibility of allied health assistant (AHA) management of people with hip fracture an acute hospital. DESIGN: Assessor-blind, parallel, feasibility randomised controlled trial with qualitative component. SETTING: Acute orthopaedic ward. PARTICIPANTS: People with surgically-managed hip fracture, who walked independently pre-fracture and had no cognitive impairment. INTERVENTIONS: Rehabilitation from an AHA, under the supervision of a physiotherapist, compared with rehabilitation from a physiotherapist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility was evaluated according to focus areas of demand, acceptability, practicality and implementation. Secondary outcomes included estimates of effect of adherence to hip fracture mobilisation guidelines, discharge destination, 30-day readmission, functional activity, and length of stay. RESULTS: Fifty people were allocated to receive rehabilitation from an AHA (n = 25) or physiotherapist (n = 25). AHA rehabilitation had high demand with 60% of eligible participants recruited. Satisfaction with AHA rehabilitation was comparable with physiotherapy rehabilitation (acceptability). The AHA group received an average of 11 min (95% CI 4 to 19) more therapy per day than the physiotherapy group (implementation). The AHA group may have had lower cost of acute care (MD -$3 808 95% CI -7 651 to 35) and adverse events were comparable between groups (practicality). The AHA group may have been 22% (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.61) more likely to walk on any day and may have had a shorter length of stay (MD -0.8 days, 95% CI -2.3 to 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: AHA management of patients with hip fracture was feasible and may improve adherence to mobilisation guidelines and reduce cost of care and length of stay. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12620000877987. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

"You don't know what you don't know": Knowledge, attitudes, and current practice of physiotherapists in recognising and managing metabolic syndrome, a mixed methods study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the knowledge, attitudes, and current practice of primary care physiotherapists in recognising and managing clients with metabolic syndrome. DESIGN: Mixed-methods research design comprising an online survey and focus groups. PARTICIPANTS: Australian and English physiotherapists (n = 183) working in a primary care setting responded to the survey. Twelve physiotherapists participated in focus groups. RESULTS: Metabolic syndrome was not on physiotherapists radar. They did not screen for metabolic syndrome nor provide management for it in primary care. Although most physiotherapists had some awareness of metabolic syndrome, they were not knowledgeable. Physiotherapists reported a need to focus on their clients' presenting condition, and there was uncertainty on whether metabolic syndrome management was within their scope of practice. Despite this, physiotherapists felt they had an important role to play in exercise and physical activity prescription for chronic disease management and were keen to further their knowledge and skills related to metabolic syndrome. Survey responses and focus group data were convergent. CONCLUSION: Physiotherapists working in primary care settings are well-placed to identify metabolic risk factors in their clients and provide physical activity interventions to enhance management but currently lack knowledge to embed this in clinical practice. Training and resources are required to enable physiotherapists to identify and manage metabolic syndrome within their practice. CONTRIBUTION OF PAPER.

Metabolic syndrome is prevalent and undiagnosed in clients attending private practice physiotherapy: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in clients presenting for primary care physiotherapy within private practice settings, and the factors that may be associated with metabolic syndrome. The secondary aim was to determine client's attitudes towards lifestyle change. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study in which self-report and biometric data were collected. The study was conducted in physiotherapy private practices across metropolitan and regional areas, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 230 clients (mean age 54 (SD18) years, 64% women) presenting for physiotherapy participated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participant socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics were collected. Metabolic syndrome presence was determined by the existence of three or more risk factors on physical examination and capillary blood sample: abdominal obesity, hypertension, elevated random blood glucose, elevated triglycerides and/or reduced HDL cholesterol. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of participants had metabolic syndrome, but none knew they had it. Metabolic syndrome was associated with older age and poorer socio-economic status and may have been associated with lower levels of physical activity but not diet. Of those identified as having hypertension and elevated triglycerides, many were undiagnosed (56% and 29% respectively). CONCLUSION: Metabolic syndrome is prevalent and undiagnosed in clients attending private practice physiotherapy. Clients felt lifestyle change was important and they were willing to make changes. This study highlights the need for greater screening of metabolic risk factors in primary care and presents an opportunity for physiotherapists in private practice to identify risk and intervene to improve the overall health of their clients and contribute to chronic disease prevention. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

Embedded motivational interviewing combined with a smartphone application to increase physical activity in people with sub-acute low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Moderately vigorous physical activity (PA) may be beneficial for people with sub-acute low back pain (LBP), but may initially be painful for patients and challenging for physical therapists to facilitate. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated motivational interviewing (MI) delivered by physical therapists and a smartphone app for increasing PA in people with LBP. METHODS: A mixed methods cluster randomised controlled trial involving 46 adults with LBP in Melbourne, Australia. Participants attended weekly 30-min physical therapy consultations for 6 weeks. Experimental group physical therapists were taught to embed MI into consultations and patients were provided with a self-directed app. The primary outcome was accelerometer-derived moderately vigorous PA. Secondary outcomes were LBP disability (Oswestry Disability Index), functional capacity (Patient Specific Functional Scale), and self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire). Between-group differences were analysed by ANCOVA post-intervention. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the experimental group and control group for PA. Between-group differences in LBP disability (MD= 19.4 units, 95% CI: 8.5, 30.3), functional capacity (primary MD= -4.1 units, 95% CI: -6.9, -1.3; average MD= -3.1, 95% CI: -4.9, -1.2) and self-efficacy (MD -11.3 units, 95%CI -20.2, -2.5) favoured the control group with small to moderate effect sizes. There were low levels of overall engagement with the app. CONCLUSION: The embedded MI intervention was no more beneficial than physical therapy alone for PA and was associated with poorer LBP disability, function, and self-efficacy. The effectiveness of embedding MI and a smartphone app into usual care for LBP was not supported.

Self-management Programs Within Rehabilitation Yield Positive Health Outcomes at a Small Increased Cost Compared With Usual Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if self-management programs, supported by a health professional, in rehabilitation are cost effective. DATA SOURCES: Six databases were searched until December 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials with adults completing a supported self-management program while participating in rehabilitation or receiving health professional input in the hospital or community settings were included. Self-management programs were completed outside the structured, supervised therapy and health professional sessions. Included trials had a cost measure and an effectiveness outcome reported, such as health-related quality of life or function. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations was used to determine the certainty of evidence across trials included in each meta-analysis. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated based on the mean difference from the meta-analyses of contributing health care costs and quality of life. DATA EXTRACTION: After application of the search strategy, two independent reviewers determined eligibility of identified literature, initially by reviewing the title and/or abstract before full-text review. Using a customized form, data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS: Forty-three trials were included, and 27 had data included in meta-analyses. Where self-management was a primary intervention, there was moderate certainty of a meaningful positive difference in quality-of-life utility index of 0.03 units (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.06). The cost difference between self-management as the primary intervention and usual care (comprising usual intervention/therapy, minimal intervention [including education only], or no intervention) potentially favored the comparison group (mean difference=Australian dollar [AUD]90; 95% confidence interval, -AUD130 to AUD310). The cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for self-management programs as a stand-alone intervention was AUD3000, which was below the acceptable willingness-to-pay threshold in Australia per QALY gained (AUD50,000/QALY gained). CONCLUSIONS: Self-management as an intervention is low cost and could improve health-related quality of life.

A self-management program increases the dosage of inpatient rehabilitation by 26 minutes per day: a process evaluation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the implementation of a self-management program, My Therapy, designed to increase inpatient rehabilitation therapy dosage via independent practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A process evaluation of My Therapy for adult patients admitted for rehabilitation for any condition supervised by physiotherapists and occupational therapists across eight rehabilitation wards compared usual care. Outcomes included reach, dosage, fidelity and adaptation. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the process evaluation sample (n = 123) was 73 (11) years with a mean (SD) length of stay of 14.0 (6.6) days. The My Therapy program reached 68% of participants (n = 632/928), and resulted in an average increase in therapy dosage of 26 (95% CI 12 to 40) minutes/day of independent practice. All My Therapy audited programs (n = 28) included body function/structure impairment-based exercises, and half (n = 13/28) included activity/participation-based exercises. On average, participants completed programs 1.8 (SD 1.2) times/day, which were prescribed in accordance with the My Therapy criteria, demonstrating fidelity. There were no between-group differences in daily steps or standing time, however, My Therapy participants spent more time sitting (p ≤ 0.05). Implementation adaptations were minimal. CONCLUSION: A self-management rehabilitation program was implemented with fidelity for two in three rehabilitation patients, resulting in increased therapy dosage with minimal adaptations.

The My Therapy self-management program was implemented with good reach (68% of participants received My Therapy) across four public and private inpatient rehabilitation services.Under My Therapy conditions, the dosage of inpatient rehabilitation therapy participation increased by an average of 26 minutes per day, which will help close the evidence-practice gap between the current rehabilitation dosage of about 1-hour per day, and the recommended rehabilitation dosage of 3-hours per day.My Therapy programs most frequently included impairment-based exercises that were completed in sitting, and did not increase time spent standing and walking.Consideration should be given to prescribing My Therapy (content and dosage) at an optimal level to promote patient functional independence, while maintaining safety.

Walking self-confidence and lower levels of anxiety are associated with meeting recommended levels of physical activity after hip fracture: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: To explore whether psychological factors are associated with ability to meet recommended physical activity thresholds after hip fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study of 216 community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 years after hip fracture (mean age 79 SD 7 years, 70% female). Multiple ordinal regression analysis determined factors associated with meeting physical activity thresholds related to positive health outcomes: 4,400 and 7,100 daily steps. Explanatory variables were: walking self-confidence; falls self-efficacy; depression; anxiety; co-morbidities; previous gait aid use; nutritional status; age; and gender. RESULTS: Forty-three participants (20%) met the lower threshold of ≥4,400 to <7,100 steps and thirty participants (14%) met the upper threshold of ≥7,100 steps. Walking self-confidence was positively associated with meeting higher physical activity thresholds (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.32: 95% CI 1.11 to 1.57, p = 0.002). Age (AOR 0.93: 95% CI 0.89 to 0.98, p = 0.003), DASS-21 anxiety score (AOR 0.81: 95% CI 0.69 to 0.94, p = 0.008) and comorbidity index score (AOR 0.52: 95% CI 0.36 to 0.72, p < 0.001) were negatively associated with meeting higher physical activity thresholds. CONCLUSION: Walking self-confidence and anxiety are potentially modifiable factors associated with meeting physical activity thresholds related to positive health outcomes after hip fracture.

Older people are often physically inactive after hip fracture, which can lead to negative health outcomes and increased risk of mortality.The potentially modifiable psychological factors of walking self-confidence and anxiety are associated with meeting recommended physical activity levels after hip fracture.Therapists should include assessment of psychological factors to help guide rehabilitation of patients after hip fracture.

Aphasia disrupts usual care: "I'm not mad, I'm not deaf" - the experiences of individuals with aphasia and family members in hospital.

PURPOSE: Communication difficulties are highly prevalent in the stroke population, with implications for patient experience, safety and outcomes. This study explores the experiences of people with aphasia and family members regarding healthcare communication in acute and subacute stroke settings. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A phenomenological approach was used to understand participants' experiences. Participants took part in a focus group and data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: For individuals with aphasia (n = 4) and family members (n = 2), five themes were generated: "aphasia makes it hard to communicate," "hospital staff focus on the patient's medical status only," "people with aphasia do not get the help they need to improve," "staff lack the skills to communicate with people with aphasia," and "staff are crucial to improving healthcare communication." CONCLUSIONS: The stroke team has expertise in the medical management of stroke but struggle to communicate with patients with aphasia. Patients' experience of healthcare communication is often one-way and limited to following instructions, with missed opportunities to discuss core topics such as prognosis, rehabilitation, and person-specific needs. Patients and families assert that all members of the stroke healthcare team should be able to adapt communication to accommodate patients.

Person-centred care is not a reality for many patients with aphasia.Many healthcare conversations, including informal assessments and discussing prognosis, are not accessible for people with aphasia.Consequently, for people with aphasia, healthcare in hospital is characterised by confusion and exclusion.Staff are crucial to improving healthcare communication; when appropriate strategies were used, these were not only effective but very meaningful to patients.

Safety-related outcomes for patients with a tracheostomy and the use of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) for assessment and management of swallowing: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine safety-related outcomes for patients with tracheostomy after flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) to assess and manage their swallow, when compared to other non-instrumental swallow assessments such as clinical swallowing examination (CSE) and/or a modified Evans blue dye test (MEBDT). METHOD: Three databases were searched for articles referring to safety-related outcome data for adults with a tracheostomy, who underwent FEES and CSE and/or MEBDT. Articles were screened using predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. RESULT: The search strategy identified 2097 articles; following abstract and full-text screening, seven were included for review. The summary of evidence found low to very low certainty that FEES was associated with improved outcomes across swallow safety, physiological outcomes, tracheostomy cannulation duration, functional outcomes, and detection of upper airway pathologies. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrated low to very low certainty evidence from seven heterogeneous studies with low sample sizes that incorporating FEES may be associated with improved safety-related outcomes. There is less evidence supporting the accuracy of other swallow assessments conducted at the point of care (i.e. CSE and MEBDT). Future research requires studies with larger sample sizes and routine reporting of safety-related outcomes with use of FEES.

Patient handling training interventions and musculoskeletal injuries in healthcare workers: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Workplace injuries are a serious issue for the health and social care industry, with the sector accounting for 20 % of all serious claims reported. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether patient handling training interventions that included instruction on patient transfer techniques are effective in preventing musculoskeletal injuries in healthcare workers. Methods: Electronic databases MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Health and Safety Science Abstracts (ProQuest) were searched for controlled trials from January 1996-August 2022. Risk of bias was evaluated using the PEDro scale and overall certainty of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation for each meta-analysis. Results: A total of nine studies (3903 participants) were included. There is moderate certainty evidence that could not conclude whether patient handling training affects the 12-month incidence of lower back pain (OR = 0.83, 95 % CI [0.59, 1.16]). There is low certainty evidence that patient handing training does not prevent lower back pain in health professionals without pre-existing pain (MD = -0.06, 95 % CI [-0.63, 0.52]) but may reduce lower back pain in those with pre-existing pain (MD = -2.92, 95 % CI [-5.44, -0.41]). The results also suggest that there may be a positive effect of training incorporating risk assessment on musculoskeletal injury rates; however the evidence is of very low certainty. There is low certainty evidence from a single study that training may have a short-term effect on sickness absences.) Conclusions: There is a lack of evidence to support patient handling training when delivered to all healthcare staff. Training in its current form may be an ineffective strategy for reducing musculoskeletal injuries and pain. High quality disinvestment studies or trials incorporating risk assessment strategies are warranted. Practical Applications: This review suggests health service managers question the effectiveness of current patient handling training practices and consider evaluating current practices before allocating resources to meet employee risk reduction obligations.

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo without dizziness is common in people presenting to falls clinics.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo without dizziness, a treatable falls risk factor in people attending outpatient falls clinics. METHODS: Over 6 years, 618 people at risk of falls attending 2 falls clinics were assessed for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, whether dizzy or non dizzy. Data regarding demographics, canal location of positive tests and comorbidities were collected from medical records. RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent (238) of people with falls risk tested positive for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo; 62 (26%) or 1 in 4 of those testing positive were not dizzy. Thirty-nine of 104 (38%) testing positive for single canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and twenty-four of 134 (18%) testing positive for multiple canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo were not dizzy. Comorbidities were common for all with falls risk but did not differentiate for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo on testing. CONCLUSIONS: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo is common in people attending falls clinics and contributes to falls risk. Dizziness is common in BPPV though 26% or 1 in 4 people testing positive were not dizzy and would be missed without mandatory testing. Testing should also include all semicircular canals as multiple-canal involvement was high.

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo is a common and treatable falls risk factor, however screening for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in people who fall usually only occurs if they are dizzy.1 in 4 people with falls risk who have benign paroxysmal positional vertigo do not report symptoms of dizzinessScreening for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in all people who fall whether dizzy or not, is required to comprehensively identify and treat benign paroxysmal positional vertigoAll semicircular canals should be screened for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo as the incidence of multiple-canal involvement is high.

Staying Active with Multimorbidity In Acute hospital settings (StAMInA) trial: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of allied health assistant mobility rehabilitation for patients with multimorbidity.

INTRODUCTION: Key to improving outcomes for patients with multimorbidity is increasing mobility through prescription of a physical activity programme, but this can be difficult to achieve in acute hospital settings. One approach that would assist physiotherapists to increase levels of physical activity is delegation of rehabilitation to allied health assistants. We aim to conduct a randomised controlled trial to determine the feasibility of an allied health assistant providing daily inpatient mobility rehabilitation for patients with multimorbidity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using a parallel group randomised controlled design, participants will be allocated to allied health assistant mobility rehabilitation or physiotherapist mobility rehabilitation. Adult inpatients (n=60) in an acute hospital with a diagnosis of multimorbidity who walked independently preadmission will be included. The experimental group will receive routine mobility rehabilitation, including daily mobilisation, from an allied health assistant under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The comparison group will receive routine rehabilitation from a physiotherapist. Feasibility will be determined using the following areas of focus in Bowen's feasibility framework: Acceptability (patient satisfaction); demand (proportion of patients who participate); implementation (time allied health assistant/physiotherapist spends with participant, occasions of service); and practicality (cost, adverse events). Staff involved in the implementation of allied health assistant rehabilitation will be interviewed to explore their perspectives on feasibility. Secondary outcomes include: Physical activity (daily time spent walking); daily mobilisation (Y/N); discharge destination; hospital readmission; falls; functional activity (Modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale); and length of stay. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe feasibility. Secondary outcomes will be compared between groups using Poisson or negative binomial regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, survival analysis, linear regression or logistic regression. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from Peninsula Health (HREC/97 431/PH-2023). Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12623000584639p.