RESUMO
Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is one of the most common allergic diseases triggered by indoor and outdoor allergens. Certain arthropods, such as mites and cockroaches, contain protozoa like Lophomonas blattarum in their intestines to help with digestion that may have some role in AR. We aimed to determine the frequency of L. blattarum in nasal smears of patients with AR in comparison with healthy controls. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study (March 2015-March 2016), 36 patients with a clinical presentation of AR (with a positive prick test including mites) and 34 normal controls were included at ear, nose, and throat (ENT) clinic at Imam Reza Hospital of Mashhad, Iran. Nasal secretions were evaluated to examine presence of L. blattarum in the patients and control group by direct method. Diagnosis of L. blattarum was based on microscopic observation both on direct smear and Giemsa stained specimens. Results: Patients with AR had a higher frequency of L. blattarum in their nasal smears than the control group (25% vs. 2.9%) (P=0.001). Conclusion: We found L. blattarum more frequently in the nasal secretion of AR patients compared with healthy subjects; this protozoon may have some role in this condition. However, the relationship between L. blattarum and AR requires further studies to allow a greater understanding.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare the surgical outcomes of modified extracorporeal septoplasty and anterior septal reconstruction for the management of the severe deviated nose. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, we selected 86 patients referred for septorhinoplasty to a tertiary center in May 2015-April 2017 with a primary complaint of nasal obstruction and deformity. They had moderate-to-severe septal deviation and severely deviated noses, particularly in the dorsum. Forty-three patients underwent each procedure. The cohorts were age- and sex-matched, and were operated at a similar time point. Surgical outcome was assessed and compared using anthropometric measurement of photographs, acoustic rhinometry, and The Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness questionnaire (including a visual analog scale). RESULTS: In all patients, MCA1 (initial minimum cross-sectional area) and MCA2 (minimum cross-sectional area after topical decongestion of the nasal mucosa), anthropometric angles (nasolabial, nasofacial and tip projection), and The Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness questionnaire significantly improved after surgery in both groups (p = 0001), with no significant difference in improvement between two groups. However, anthropometric angles and minimal cross-sectional area were better in anterior septal reconstruction group. CONCLUSION: Both methods are effective in patients with a severely deviated nose for correction of deviation and obstruction. Anterior septal reconstruction is the preferable method in patients with more deviation.
Assuntos
Obstrução Nasal , Septo Nasal , Deformidades Adquiridas Nasais , Rinoplastia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obstrução Nasal/diagnóstico , Obstrução Nasal/etiologia , Obstrução Nasal/cirurgia , Septo Nasal/patologia , Septo Nasal/cirurgia , Deformidades Adquiridas Nasais/complicações , Deformidades Adquiridas Nasais/fisiopatologia , Deformidades Adquiridas Nasais/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Rinometria Acústica/métodos , Rinoplastia/efeitos adversos , Rinoplastia/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Escala Visual AnalógicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Insufficient septal cartilage is a common finding when performing revision rhinoplasty. Such cases require costal or conchal cartilage to be harvested, which is time consuming and brings the risk of morbidity. A new technique involves the use of a septal bone-cartilage composite graft or a bone-cartilaginous (BC) unit as a rhinoplasty graft. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this research was to evaluate the subjective and objective effects of using a BC unit graft in revision rhinoplasty. METHODS: In this clinical trial, we examined 40 patients with insufficient septal cartilage for grafting who were referred to a tertiary center and a private setting from January 2016 to March 2017 for revision septorhinoplasty. The patients had nasal deformity and nasal obstruction. Assessment of surgical outcome was based on anthropometric measurements and by measuring the width of the middle nasal third from photographs, and on 2 patient questionnaires: the Nasal Obstruction and Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) and the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaires. RESULTS: Nasolabial angles and the middle nasal third improved significantly after surgery (P < 0.005). Based on the NOSE questionnaire, 85% of patients had no or mild nasal obstruction, and the ROE questionnaire indicated that 62.5% were completely or very satisfied with the appearance of their nose. CONCLUSIONS: The BC unit is an effective graft in revision rhinoplasty, and can be used in place of the rib graft. In skilled hands, harvesting of this graft results in no morbidity and is not time consuming.
Assuntos
Osso Nasal/transplante , Cartilagens Nasais/transplante , Septo Nasal/transplante , Reoperação/métodos , Rinoplastia/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obstrução Nasal/cirurgia , Deformidades Adquiridas Nasais/cirurgia , Satisfação do Paciente , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Congenital vomer agenesis is an extremely rare condition in which the vomer bone does not fully develop, which can lead to septal perforation. CASE REPORT: We report two cases with a defect in the vomer bone in the posteroinferior portion of the septum, found accidentally while performing a pre-operative CT scan for nasal obstruction evaluation. They were diagnosed with congenital vomer agenesis. CONCLUSION: There are afew reports of vomer agenesis in literatures. By increasing usage of sinonasal endoscopic examination,we expect to address more cases in the future.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of foreign bodies in the upper aerodigestive tract is usually straightforward but sometimes it can be delayed or the location of esophageal and upper airway foreign bodies can be mistakenly interchanged. CASE REPORT: We present two interesting cases that caused diagnostic challenges which could have led to serious complications if a greater delay in diagnosis had occurred. CONCLUSION: In order to diagnose upper aerodigestive tract foreign bodies without delay, a careful history and physical examination with proper X-rays are helpful.