Transcutaneous Bilirubin Accuracy Before, During, and After Phototherapy: A Meta-Analysis.

CONTEXT: Transcutaneous bilirubinometry (TcB) is used as a valid screening to identify neonates requiring measurement of total serum bilirubin (TSB) before phototherapy. Its use during and after phototherapy is not advised yet because of unknown reliability. OBJECTIVES: To determine the agreement of TcB and TSB measurements before, during, and after phototherapy. DATA SOURCES: PubMed Medline, Cochrane Library, and references of eligible studies were searched. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective and retrospective cohort and cross-sectional studies reporting Bland-Altman statistics of paired TcB and TSB measurements in term and preterm newborns. DATA EXTRACTION: Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel weighted approach. The agreement between TcB and TSB in µmol/L was described by pooled mean differences (MDs) and limits of agreement (LoA). RESULTS: Fifty-four studies were included. The pooled MD before phototherapy is 2.5 µmol/L (LoA -38.3 to 43.3). The pooled MD during phototherapy is -0.3 µmol/L (LoA -34.8 to 34.2) on covered skin and -28.6 µmol/L (LoA -105.7 to 48.5) on uncovered skin. The pooled MD after phototherapy is -34.3 µmol/L (LoA -86.7 to 18.1) on covered skin and -21.1 µmol/L (LoA -88.6 to 46.4) on uncovered skin. Subgroup analysis revealed the best agreement at the forehead. We did not find any difference in agreement between term and preterm neonates. LIMITATIONS: Language restriction. CONCLUSIONS: TcB measurements before and during phototherapy on covered skin show good agreement compared with TSB in term and preterm newborns. More studies are needed to evaluate the accuracy after phototherapy.

Fatigue and Physical Activity Patterns in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Fatigue is a common symptom in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Diagnostic tests to evaluate biological causes of fatigue commonly include markers of inflammation and hemoglobin (Hb), yet functional parameters have been inadequately studied in pediatric IBD. In this study, we compared fatigued and non-fatigued children with IBD from both a biological and functional point of view. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 104 pediatric IBD patients with mild to moderately active IBD was conducted. Fatigued children were defined as those with a Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale z score <-2.0. Non-fatigued children had a z score ≥-2.0. Disease-specific quality of life (measured with IMPACT-III score), C-reactive protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin (FC), hemoglobin z score (Hb z score), and physical activity tests including 6-minute walking distance z score (6MWD z score) and triaxial accelerometry (TA) were evaluated. RESULTS: Fatigued children (n = 24) had a significant lower IMPACT-III score than non-fatigued children (n = 80). Hb z scores, CRP, FC, and 6MWD z scores were not significantly different between groups. TA was performed in 71 patients. Wear time validation requirements were met in only 31 patients. Fatigued patients spent significant shorter median time in moderate-to-vigorous activity than non-fatigued patients (18.3 vs 37.3 minutes per day, P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Biological parameters did not discriminate fatigued from non-fatigued patients. TA possibly distinguishes fatigued from non-fatigued patients; the potential association may provide a target for interventions to combat fatigue and improve quality of life.

Evaluation of exclusive enteral nutrition and corticosteroid induction treatment in new-onset moderate-to-severe luminal paediatric Crohn's disease.

To induce remission in luminal paediatric Crohn's disease (CD), the ESPGHAN/ECCO guideline recommends treatment with exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) or oral corticosteroids. In newly diagnosed moderate-to-severe paediatric CD patients, we determined the proportion of patients in which EEN or corticosteroids induced remission and maintained remission on azathioprine monotherapy. We included patients from the "TISKids" study assigned to the conventional treatment arm. Patients were aged 3-17 years and had new-onset, untreated luminal CD with weighted paediatric CD activity index (wPCDAI) > 40. Induction treatment consisted of EEN or oral corticosteroids; all received azathioprine maintenance treatment from start of treatment. The primary outcome of this study was endoscopic remission defined as a SES-CD score < 3 without treatment escalation at week 10. Secondary outcomes included proportion of patients without treatment escalation at week 52. In total, 27/47 patients received EEN and 20/47 corticosteroids. At baseline, patient demographics and several inflammation parameters were similar between the two treatment groups. At 10 weeks, clinical remission rates were 7/23 (30%) for EEN and 7/19 (37%) for corticosteroids (p = 0.661). Twenty-nine of 47 consented to endoscopy at 10 weeks, showing endoscopic remission rates without treatment escalation in 2/16 (13%) of EEN-treated patients and in 1/13 (8%) of corticosteroid-treated patients (p = 1.00). At week 52, 23/27 (85%) EEN-treated patients received treatment escalation (median 14 weeks) and 13/20 (65%) corticosteroid-treated patients (median 27 weeks), p = 0.070.Conclusion: In children with moderate-to-severe newly diagnosed CD, induction treatment with EEN or CS regularly is insufficient to achieve endoscopic remission without treatment escalation at week 10. Trial registration number: NCT02517684 What is Known: • Endoscopic remission is associated with a low risk of disease progression. • FL-IFX was superior to conventional treatment in achieving and maintaining remission in paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe CD the first year from diagnosis. What is New: • In children with newly diagnosed moderate-to-severe CD, clinical remission rates and endoscopic remission rates without treatment escalation at week 10 were 30% and 13% after EEN and 37% and 8% after corticosteroid induction treatment. • The current treatment target was often not achieved by either EEN or corticosteroid induction treatment after bridging to azathioprine.

First-line treatment with infliximab versus conventional treatment in children with newly diagnosed moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease: an open-label multicentre randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: In newly diagnosed paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD), infliximab (IFX) is initiated once exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), corticosteroid and immunomodulator therapies have failed. We aimed to investigate whether starting first-line IFX (FL-IFX) is more effective to achieve and maintain remission than conventional treatment. DESIGN: In this multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial, untreated patients with a new diagnosis of CD (3-17 years old, weighted Paediatric CD Activity Index score (wPCDAI) >40) were assigned to groups that received five infusions of 5 mg/kg IFX at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22 (FL-IFX), or EEN or oral prednisolone (1 mg/kg, maximum 40 mg) (conventional). The primary outcome was clinical remission on azathioprine, defined as a wPCDAI <12.5 at week 52, without need for treatment escalation, using intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: 100 patients were included, 50 in the FL-IFX group and 50 in the conventional group. Four patients did not receive treatment as per protocol. At week 10, a higher proportion of patients in the FL-IFX group than in the conventional group achieved clinical (59% vs 34%, respectively, p=0.021) and endoscopic remission (59% vs 17%, respectively, p=0.001). At week 52, the proportion of patients in clinical remission was not significantly different (p=0.421). However, 19/46 (41%) patients in the FL-IFX group were in clinical remission on azathioprine monotherapy without need for treatment escalation vs 7/48 (15%) in the conventional group (p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: FL-IFX was superior to conventional treatment in achieving short-term clinical and endoscopic remission, and had greater likelihood of maintaining clinical remission at week 52 on azathioprine monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02517684).

Gut-directed hypnotherapy versus standard medical treatment for nausea in children with functional nausea or functional dyspepsia: protocol of a multicentre randomised trial.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of chronic functional nausea or nausea due to functional dyspepsia in children is generally symptomatic. Moreover, these disorders pose a risk for worse psychosocial and health outcomes in children. Hypnotherapy (HT), by its ability to positively influence gastrointestinal and psychosocial functioning, may be an effective treatment for chronic nausea. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To test efficacy, this multicentre, parallel, randomised controlled, open label trial evaluates whether gut-directed HT is superior to standard medical treatment (SMT) for reducing nausea. The study will be conducted at eleven academic and non-academic hospitals across the Netherlands. A total of 100 children (8-18 years), fulfilling the Rome IV criteria for chronic idiopathic nausea or functional dyspepsia with prominent nausea, will be randomly allocated (1:1) to receive HT or SMT. Children allocated to the HT group will receive six sessions of HT during 3 months, while children allocated to the SMT group will receive six sessions of SMT+supportive therapy during the same period. The primary outcome will be the difference in the proportion of children with at least 50% reduction of nausea, compared with baseline at 12 months' follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the changes in abdominal pain, dyspeptic symptoms, quality of life, anxiety, depression, school absences, parental absence of work, healthcare costs and adequate relief of symptoms, measured directly after treatment, 6 and 12 months' follow-up. If HT proves effective for reducing nausea, it may become a new treatment strategy to treat children with chronic functional nausea or functional dyspepsia with prominent nausea. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Results of the study will be publicly disclosed to the public, without any restrictions, in peer-reviewed journal and international conferences. The study is approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committees United (MEC-U) in the Netherlands. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5814.