How do general practitioners handle complexities? A team ethnographic study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) are often faced with complex problems, including patients with socio-economic and medical problems. However, the methods they use to approach these complexities are still not understood. We speculated that elucidating these methods using complex adaptive systems (CAS) methodology to comprehensively assess GPs' daily activities would contribute to improving the professional development of GPs. This study aimed to clarify how expert GPs handle complex problems and adapt to their community context through the ethnography of GPs and other healthcare professionals in terms of CAS. METHODS: We adopted the interdisciplinary team-ethnographic research approach. Five hospitals and four clinics in Japan which were considered to employ expert GPs were selected by purposive sampling. 62 individuals of various backgrounds working in these nine facilities were interviewed. Using field notes and interview data, the researchers iteratively discussed the adequacy of our interpretations. The first author (JH) prepared a draft report, which was reviewed by the GPs at the participating facilities. Through critical and iterative consideration of the different insights obtained, the final findings emerged together with representative data. RESULTS: We identified four approaches used by GPs to deal with complexities. First, GPs treat patients with complex problems as a whole being and address their problems multi-directionally. Second, GPs build horizontal, trusting relationships with other healthcare professionals and stakeholders, and thereby reduce the degree of complexity of problems. Third, GPs change the learning climate while committing to their own growth based on societal needs and by acting as role models for other professionals through daily interpersonal facilitation. Fourth, GPs share community vision with multi-professionals and thereby act as a driving force for organizational change. These various interactions among GPs, healthcare professionals, organizations and communities resulted in systematization of the healthcare and welfare network in their community. CONCLUSIONS: Expert GPs developed interconnected multidimensional systems in their community health and welfare networks to adapt to fluctuating social realities using four approaches. GPs' work environment may be considered as a complex adaptive system (CAS) and the approach of GPs to complexities is CAS-based. Our findings are expected to have practical applications for GPs.

[How have Japanese primary care physicians carried out vaccinations against COVID-19? : Attempts at making the non-scalable 'scalable']. / 日本のプライマリ・ケア医のコロナワクチン接種の実践についての文化人類学的考察­­ã‚¹ã‚±ãƒ¼ãƒ©ãƒ“リティとノンスケーラビリティのはざまで.

Vaccine rollouts have been underway to combat the COVID-19 pandemic globally. Based on ongoing interviews with ten primary care physicians 'in the field', this paper elucidates how in practice the vaccinations were carried out in Japan in 2021 from a cultural anthropological perspective. We examine what the primary care physicians did to prepare for the rollouts, what problems they faced, and how they responded to these problems. Large-scale vaccination projects are supposed to proceed smoothly and quickly, or to have what Anna Tsing calls 'scalability'. In practice, however, they required a variety of tasks for coordination, information sharing, and promotion. Despite feeling stressed by the lack of information and exhausted by the work overload, the primary care physicians carried out the vaccinations as an important service to their patients and communities. The findings of this paper will provide valuable materials for improving future vaccine rollouts.

Primary care physicians' narratives on COVID-19 responses in Japan: Professional roles evoked under a pandemic.

Background: Within the vague system of primary care and COVID-19 infection control in Japan, we explored how primary care (PC) physicians exhibited adaptive performance in their institutions and communities to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic from January to May 2020. Methods: Narrative analysis conducted by a team of medical professionals and anthropologists. We purposefully selected 10 PC physicians in community-based hospitals and clinics and conducted a total of 17 individual and group interviews. The verbatim transcript data were analyzed using the conceptual framework of adaptive performance. Results: We identified three "phases" of the time period (January-May 2020). In Phase 1, PC physicians initially perceived the disease as a problem unrelated to them. In Phase 2, the Diamond Princess outbreak triggered adaptive performance of the physicians, who began to deal with medical issues related to COVID-19 by using social networking services and applying the collected information to their organization and/or communities. Following this, in Phase 3, the PC physicians' adaptive performance in their own communities and institutions emerged in the face of the pandemic. Reflecting their sensitivity to local context, the PC physicians were seen to exhibit adaptive performance through dealing with context-dependent problems and relationships. Conclusions: PC physicians exhibited adaptive performance in the course of coping with the realities of COVID-19 in shifting phases and in differing localities in the early stages of the pandemic. The trajectories of adaptive performance in later stages of the pandemic remain to be seen.

Factors Associated with Difficulty in Returning to School in Students After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often causes behavioral problems and difficulties with school work, but the specific factors associated with difficulty in returning to school after TBI still remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate factors associated with difficulty in returning to school within 1 year of injury in students with traumatic brain injury. This study is a secondary analysis of existing data sets. We recruited patients aged 16 years in the United States with a primary rehabilitation diagnosis of TBI registered in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database. We compared variables between the students who returned to school and those who did not return to school. In addition, subgroup analyses were performed focused on traumatic brain injury severity. We excluded those were received <10 years of schooling, and 309 eligible students were identified for the analysis. Of these, 246 (80%) did not return to school within 1 year of injury. There were fewer cases of severe TBI in the group of students who returned to school than in the group who did not return to school (29% vs 44%, P = 0.03). The duration of rehabilitation was significantly longer in the group who returned to school than in the group who did not return to school (mean days 40 vs 29, P = 0.001), and a subgroup analysis showed in the severe traumatic brain injury group (mean days 46 vs 29; P = 0.02) and the non-severe traumatic brain injury group (mean days 37 vs 26; P = 0.02) similar results. Insufficient amount of rehabilitation was associated with difficulty in returning to school in students after TBI, regardless of the severity of the injury.

[On two ends of minority politics: an anthropological analysis of hattatsu shogai and hikikomori communities].

This paper provides a comparative analysis of two communities in Japan based on long-term anthropological fieldwork: one is the community of those with hattatsu shogai (developmental disorder) and their families and the other is the community of those who have experienced hikikomori and their families. The purpose of this paper is to examine the similarities and differences between the two communities in terms of the ways in which medical diagnoses are understood, identities are formed and certain perspectives on society are shared. By doing so, we attempt to move beyond the clinical sphere to capture the sociocultural significance of "being" an individual with developmental disorder or hikikomori experience.