Transcriptional reprogramming during recovery from drought stress in Eucalyptus grandis.

The importance of drought as a constraint to agriculture and forestry is increasing with climate change. Genetic improvement of plants' resilience is one of the mitigation strategies to curb this threat. Although recovery from drought stress is important to long-term drought adaptation and has been considered as an indicator of dehydration tolerance in annual crops, this has not been well explored in forest trees. Thus, we aimed to investigate the physiological and transcriptional changes during drought stress and rewatering in Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden. We set up a greenhouse experiment where we imposed drought stress on 2-year-old seedlings and rewatered the recovery group after 17 days of drought. Our measurement of leaf stomatal conductance (gs) showed that, while gs was reduced by drought stress, it fully recovered after 5 days of rewatering. The RNA-seq analysis from stem samples revealed that genes related to known stress responses such as phytohormone and reactive oxygen species signaling were upregulated, while genes involved in metabolism and growth were downregulated due to drought stress. We observed reprogramming of signal transduction pathways and metabolic processes at 1 day of rewatering, indicating a quick response to rewatering. Our results suggest that recovery from drought stress may entail alterations in the jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, ethylene and brassinosteroid signaling pathways. Using co-expression network analysis, we identified hub genes, including the putative orthologs of ABI1, ABF2, ABF3, HAI2, BAM1, GolS2 and SIP1 during drought and CAT2, G6PD1, ADG1 and FD-1 during recovery. Taken together, by highlighting the molecular processes and identifying key genes, this study gives an overview of the mechanisms underlying the response of E. grandis to drought stress and recovery that trees may face repeatedly throughout their long life cycle. This provides a useful reference to the identification and further investigation of signaling pathways and target genes for future tree improvement.

The Threat of the Combined Effect of Biotic and Abiotic Stress Factors in Forestry Under a Changing Climate.

Plants encounter several biotic and abiotic stresses, usually in combination. This results in major economic losses in agriculture and forestry every year. Climate change aggravates the adverse effects of combined stresses and increases such losses. Trees suffer even more from the recurrence of biotic and abiotic stress combinations owing to their long lifecycle. Despite the effort to study the damage from individual stress factors, less attention has been given to the effect of the complex interactions between multiple biotic and abiotic stresses. In this review, we assess the importance, impact, and mitigation strategies of climate change driven interactions between biotic and abiotic stresses in forestry. The ecological and economic importance of biotic and abiotic stresses under different combinations is highlighted by their contribution to the decline of the global forest area through their direct and indirect roles in forest loss and to the decline of biodiversity resulting from local extinction of endangered species of trees, emission of biogenic volatile organic compounds, and reduction in the productivity and quality of forest products and services. The abiotic stress factors such as high temperature and drought increase forest disease and insect pest outbreaks, decrease the growth of trees, and cause tree mortality. Reports of massive tree mortality events caused by "hotter droughts" are increasing all over the world, affecting several genera of trees including some of the most important genera in plantation forests, such as Pine, Poplar, and Eucalyptus. While the biotic stress factors such as insect pests, pathogens, and parasitic plants have been reported to be associated with many of these mortality events, a considerable number of the reports have not taken into account the contribution of such biotic factors. The available mitigation strategies also tend to undermine the interactive effect under combined stresses. Thus, this discussion centers on mitigation strategies based on research and innovation, which build on models previously used to curb individual stresses.