Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of laparoscopic versus open Sg4b-5 bi-segmentectomy in patients with gallbladder cancer.

Sg4b-5 anatomical bi-segmentectomy with regional lymphadenectomy (Sg4b5) is a surgical option for gallbladder cancer (GBC) treatment. The laparoscopic approach to this challenging operation is still controversial. Aim of this study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open Sg4b5 in a single institution series of patients. All consecutive patients who underwent Sg4b5 for GBC from January 2000 to September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed. 75 patients were analyzed, 18 in the laparoscopic and 57 in the open group. After IPTW, laparoscopic approach was associated with a significantly decreased median intraoperative blood loss (100 vs 237.09 ml, p = 0.001), shorter median length of hospital stay (4 vs 8 days, p = < 0.001) and a higher median number of harvested nodes (9 vs 7, p = 0.026). Operation time was shorter in the open group (355 vs 259 min, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found regarding clear resection margins, overall and major (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) morbidity, bile leakage rate, 90 days post-operative mortality, overall and disease-free survival. Laparoscopic Sg4b-5 anatomical bi-segmentectomy and regional lymphadenectomy is feasible and safe with long term outcome comparable to open approach at least in early stages. Laparoscopic approach confirms its well-known short-term benefits with less intraoperative bleeding and shorter length of stay. Moreover, it might allow a better lymphadenectomy.

Bile leak after hepatectomy: predictive factors of spontaneous healing.

BACKGROUND: Bile leakage after hepatectomy usually has spontaneous healing, but some patients require interventional procedures. To identify early predictive factors of conservative management failure. METHODS: This study focused on patients with bile leak after hepatectomy without extrahepatic biliary resection from 1996 through 2006. RESULTS: Bile leakage occurred in 34 of 593 patients (5.7%). Conservative management was successful in 26 patients (76.5%). At univariate analysis overall associated resections, vascular associated resections, and drainage output on days 1, 3, and 10 from leak onset were significant negative predictors of spontaneous healing. At multivariate analysis drainage output greater than 100 mL on day 10 was the only independent prognostic factor of conservative management failure (relative risk, 55.985; P = .008) with 80% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity, and 90% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Wait-and-see treatment is successful in most cases. Patients with drainage output greater than 100 mL 10 days after bile leakage diagnosis should be scheduled for interventional treatments.