Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 17651, 2024 07 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39085334

RESUMO

The evidence supporting additional hemoperfusion (HP) with cytokine adsorbents for improving clinical outcomes in severe to critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients remains limited. We compared severe to critical COVID-19 patients who received additional HP with a cytokine adsorbent to matched cases receiving standard medical treatment (SMT). The primary outcome was hospital mortality. In our study, we matched 45 patients who received additional HP 1:1 with the SMT group based on key clinical parameters. The hospital mortality rates did not differ between the groups (33% vs 38%, p = 0.83). The HP group had a significantly shorter ICU stay (22 vs 32 days; p = 0.017) and reduced mechanical ventilation duration (15 vs 35 days; p < 0.001). Additionally, the incidence of pulmonary complications (20% vs 42%; p = 0.04), sepsis (38% vs 64%; p = 0.02), and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) (13% vs 33%; p = 0.046) were significantly lower in the HP group. In conclusion, among severe to critical COVID-19 patients, additional HP with a cytokine adsorbent did not improve hospital mortality. However, it reduced ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilator days, and incidences of lung complications, sepsis, and DIC. Trial registration: TCTR20231002006. Registered 02 October 2023 (retrospectively registered).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hemoperfusão , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/complicações , Hemoperfusão/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Respiração Artificial , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Resultado do Tratamento , Tempo de Internação , Citocinas/sangue , Hospitalização , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
2.
World J Gastrointest Surg ; 15(3): 362-373, 2023 Mar 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37032797

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has been proved to improve postoperative outcome for many surgical procedures, including liver resection. There was limited evidence regarding the feasibility and benefit of ERAS in patients who underwent liver resection for cholangiocarcinoma. AIM: To evaluate the feasibility of ERAS in patients who underwent liver resection for cholangiocarcinoma and its association with patient outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 116 cholangiocarcinoma patients who underwent hepatectomy at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University between January 2015 and December 2016. The primary outcome was the compliance with ERAS. To determine the association between ERAS compliance and patient outcomes. the patients were categorized into those adhering more than and equal to 50% (ERAS ≥ 50), and below 50% (ERAS < 50) of all components. Details on type of surgical procedure, preoperative and postoperative care, tumor location, postoperative laboratory results, and survival time were evaluated. The compliance with ERAS was measured by the percentage of ERAS items achieved. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used for survival analysis. RESULTS: The median percentage of ERAS goals achieved was 40% (± 12%). Fourteen patients (12.1%) were categorized into the ERAS ≥ 50 group, and 102 patients were in the ERAS < 50 group. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS ≥ 50 group [8.9 d, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.3-10.4 d] than in the ERAS < 50 group (13.7 d, 95%CI: 12.2-15.2 d) (P = 0.0217). No hepatobiliary-related complications or in-hospital mortality occurred in the ERAS ≥ 50 group. Overall survival was significantly higher in the ERAS ≥ 50 group. The median survival of the patients in the ERAS < 50 group was 1257 d (95%CI: 853.2-1660.8 d), whereas that of the patients in the ERAS ≥ 50 group was not reached. CONCLUSION: Overall ERAS compliance for patients who underwent liver resection for cholangiocarcinoma is poor. Greater ERAS compliance could predict in-hospital, short-term, and long-term outcomes of the patients.

3.
Int J Hepatol ; 2021: 1625717, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34484836

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Major hepatectomy is the mainstay of the treatment for cholangiocarcinoma. Infrahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) clamping is an effective maneuver for reducing blood loss during liver transection. The impact of this procedure on major hepatectomy for cholangiocarcinoma is unknown. This study evaluated the effect of infrahepatic IVC clamping on blood loss during liver transection. METHODS: Clinical and pathological data were collected retrospectively for 116 cholangiocarcinoma patients who underwent major hepatectomy between January 2015 and December 2016, to investigate the benefit of infrahepatic IVC clamping. Two of five surgeons adapted the policy performing infrahepatic IVC clamping during liver transection in all cases. Patients, therefore, were divided into those (n = 39; 33.6%) who received infrahepatic IVC clamping during liver transection (C1) and those (n = 77; 66.4%) who did not (C0). RESULTS: The patients' backgrounds, operative parameters, and extent of hepatectomy did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, except for gender. A significantly lower blood loss (p = 0.028), blood transfusion (p = 0.011), and rate of vascular inflow occlusion requirement (p < 0.001) were observed in the C1 group. The respective blood losses in the C1 group and the C0 group were 498.9 (95% CI: 375.8-622.1) and 685.6 (95% CI: 571-800.2) millilitres. CONCLUSIONS: The current study found infrahepatic IVC clamping during liver transection for cholangiocarcinoma reduces blood loss, blood transfusion, and rate of vascular inflow occlusion requirement.

4.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 6(9): e1954, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30349800

RESUMO

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

5.
Case Rep Vasc Med ; 2018: 4037683, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29862116

RESUMO

Introduction. Infected aortoiliac aneurysms are rare, representing only 1% to 2% of all aortic aneurysms; we present a case of infected suprarenal aortic aneurysm with a nearly occluded celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery treated using an endovascular technique to preserve collateral in the retroperitoneal space from the inferior mesenteric artery for supplying visceral organs.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA