Ethical issues encountered by French intensive care unit caregivers during the first COVID-19 outbreak.

PURPOSE: We aimed to describe the ethical issues encountered by health care workers during the first COVID-19 outbreak in French intensive care units (ICUs), and the factors associated with their emergence. METHODS: This descriptive multicentre survey study was conducted by distributing a questionnaire to 26 French ICUs, from 1 June to 1 October 2020. Physicians, residents, nurses, and orderlies who worked in an ICU during the first COVID-19 outbreak were included. Multiple logistic regression models were performed to identify the factors associated with ethical issues. RESULTS: Among the 4,670 questionnaires sent out, 1,188 responses were received, giving a participation rate of 25.4%. Overall, 953 participants (80.2%) reported experiencing issue(s) while caring for patients during the first COVID-19 outbreak. The most common issues encountered concerned the restriction of family visits in the ICU (91.7%) and the risk of contamination for health care workers (72.3%). Nurses and orderlies faced this latter issue more than physicians (adjusted odds ratio [ORa], 2.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87 to 4.76; P < 0.001 and ORa, 4.35; 95% CI, 2.08 to 9.12; P < 0.001, respectively). They also faced more the issue "act contrary to the patient's advance directives" (ORa, 4.59; 95% CI, 1.74 to 12.08; P < 0.01 and ORa, 10.65; 95% CI, 3.71 to 30.60; P < 0.001, respectively). A total of 1,132 (86.9%) respondents thought that ethics training should be better integrated into the initial training of health care workers. CONCLUSION: Eight out of ten responding French ICU health care workers experienced ethical issues during the first COVID-19 outbreak. Identifying these issues is a first step towards anticipating and managing such issues, particularly in the context of potential future health crises.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Notre objectif était de décrire les enjeux éthiques rencontrés par les personnels de santé lors de la première éclosion de COVID-19 dans les unités de soins intensifs (USI) françaises, ainsi que les facteurs associés à leur apparition. MéTHODE: Cette enquête multicentrique descriptive a été réalisée en distribuant un questionnaire à 26 unités de soins intensifs françaises, du 1er juin au 1er octobre 2020. Les médecins, les internes, le personnel infirmier et les aides-soignant·es qui travaillaient dans une unité de soins intensifs pendant la première éclosion de COVID-19 ont été inclus·es. Des modèles de régression logistique multiple ont été réalisés pour identifier les facteurs associés aux questions éthiques. RéSULTATS: Parmi les 4670 questionnaires envoyés, 1188 réponses ont été reçues, soit un taux de participation de 25,4 %. Dans l'ensemble, 953 personnes participantes (80,2 %) ont déclaré avoir éprouvé un ou des problèmes alors qu'elles s'occupaient de patient·es lors de la première éclosion de COVID-19. Les problèmatiques les plus fréquemment rencontrées concernaient la restriction des visites des familles dans les USI (91,7 %) et le risque de contamination pour les personnels de la santé (72,3 %). Le personnel infirmier et les aides-soignant·es étaient davantage confronté·es à ce dernier problème que les médecins (rapport de cotes ajusté [RCa], 2,98; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 1,87 à 4,76; P < 0,001 et RCa, 4.35; IC 95 %, 2,08 à 9,12; P < 0,001, respectivement), tout comme ils étaient davantage confrontées à la question d'« agir contrairement aux directives médicales anticipées du/de la patient·e ¼ (RCa, 4,59; IC 95 %, 1,74 à 12,08; P < 0,01 et RCa, 10,65; IC 95 %, 3,71 à 30,60; P < 0,001, respectivement). Au total, 1132 répondant·es (86,9 %) estimaient que la formation en éthique devrait être mieux intégrée à la formation initiale des personnels de santé. CONCLUSION: Huit travailleuses et travailleurs de santé français·es des soins intensifs sur dix ont été confronté·es à des problèmes éthiques lors de la première éclosion de COVID-19. L'identification de ces enjeux est une première étape vers leur anticipation et leur gestion, en particulier dans le contexte d'éventuelles crises sanitaires futures.

Personality traits affect anticipatory stress vulnerability and coping effectiveness in occupational critical care situations.

The present study aimed at investigating the influence of personality on both anticipatory stress vulnerability and the effectiveness of coping strategies in an occupational stressful context. Following assessment of individual personality traits (Big Five Inventory), 147 volunteers were exposed to the anticipation of a stressful event. Anxiety and cardiac reactivity were assessed as markers of vulnerability to anticipatory stress. Participants were then randomly assigned to three groups and subjected to a 5-min intervention: relaxation breathing, relaxation breathing combined with cardiac biofeedback, and control. The effectiveness of coping interventions was determined through the cardiac coherence score achieved during the intervention. Higher neuroticism was associated with higher anticipatory stress vulnerability, whereas higher conscientiousness and extraversion were related to lower anticipatory stress vulnerability. Relaxation breathing and biofeedback coping interventions contributed to improve the cardiac coherence in all participants, albeit with greater effectiveness in individuals presenting higher score of openness to experience. The present findings demonstrated that personality traits are related to both anticipatory stress vulnerability and effectiveness of coping interventions. These results bring new insights into practical guidelines for stress prevention by considering personality traits. Specific practical applications for health professionals, who are likely to manage stressful situations daily, are discussed.

Effects of relaxing breathing paired with cardiac biofeedback on performance and relaxation during critical simulated situations: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Active participation in high-fidelity simulation remains stressful for residents. Increased stress levels elicited during such simulation impacts performance. We tested whether relaxing breathing, paired or not with cardiac biofeedback, could lead to enhanced performance of residents during simulation. METHODS: This randomized pilot study involved the fifth-year anesthesiology and critical care residents who participated in high-fidelity at Lyon medical simulation center in 2019. Residents were randomized into three parallel interventions: relaxing breathing, relaxing breathing paired with cardiac biofeedback, and control. Each intervention was applied for five minutes immediately after the scenario briefing. The primary endpoint was the overall performance during the simulation rated by two blinded independent investigators. The secondary endpoints included component scores of overall performance and changes in psychological states. RESULTS: Thirty-four residents were included. Compared to the control group, residents in the relaxing breathing (+ 7%, 98.3% CI: 0.3 to 13.7, P = 0.013) and relaxing breathing paired with cardiac biofeedback (+ 8%, 98.3% CI: 0.82 to 14.81, P = 0.009) groups had a higher overall performance score. Following the interventions, compared to the control group, stress level was lower when participants had performed relaxing breathing alone (P = 0.029) or paired with biofeedback (P = 0.035). The internal relaxation level was higher in both the relaxing breathing alone (P = 0.016) and paired with biofeedback groups (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Performing five minutes of relaxing breathing before the scenario resulted in better overall simulation performance. These preliminary findings suggest that short breathing interventions are effective in improving performance during simulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT04141124 , 28/10/2019).