Misconceptions and Facts About Orthostatic Hypotension.

Orthostatic hypotension (orthostatic hypotension) is a highly prevalent medical condition that is an independent risk factor for falls and mortality. It reflects a condition in which autonomic reflexes are impaired or intravascular volume is depleted, causing a significant reduction in blood pressure upon standing. This disorder is frequently unrecognized until later in its clinical course. Symptoms like orthostatic dizziness do not reliably identify patients with orthostatic hypotension, who are often asymptomatic, lending further to the difficulty of this diagnosis. We summarize 7 clinically important misconceptions about orthostatic hypotension.

Sudden death in epilepsy: the overlap between cardiac and neurological factors.

People with epilepsy are at risk of premature death, of which sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), sudden cardiac death (SCD) and sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (SADS) are the primary, partly overlapping, clinical scenarios. We discuss the epidemiologies, risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms for these sudden death events. We reviewed the existing evidence on sudden death in epilepsy. Classification of sudden death depends on the presence of autopsy and expertise of the clinician determining aetiology. The definitions of SUDEP, SCD and SADS lead to substantial openings for overlap. Seizure-induced arrhythmias constitute a minority of SUDEP cases. Comorbid cardiovascular conditions are the primary determinants of increased SCD risk in chronic epilepsy. Genetic mutations overlap between the states, yet whether these are causative, associated or incidentally present is often unclear. Risk stratification for sudden death in people with epilepsy requires a multidisciplinary approach, including a review of clinical history, toxicological analysis and complete autopsy with histologic and, preferably, genetic examination. We recommend pursuing genetic testing of relatives of people with epilepsy who died suddenly, mainly if a post-mortem genetic test contained a Class IV/V (pathogenic/likely pathogenic) gene variant. Further research may allow more precise differentiation of SUDEP, SCD and SADS and the development of algorithms for risk stratification and preventative strategies.

The relative contribution of hemodynamic parameters to blood pressure decrease in classical orthostatic hypotension.

PURPOSE: We studied the relative contributions of total peripheral resistance (TPR), stroke volume (SV) and heart rate (HR) to low blood pressure in classical orthostatic hypotension (cOH) on group and individual levels. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed tilt test records from cOH patients and age/sex-matched controls. We quantified relative effects of HR, SV and TPR on mean arterial pressure (MAP) with the log-ratio method. We studied relations of changes of HR, SV or TPR with the change of MAP across patients and variability of contributions of HR, SV and TPR to MAP. We also explored neurogenic vs. nonneurogenic causes. RESULTS: MAP responded to tilt with a decrease in patients (n = 80) and an increase in controls (n = 80). A too small TPR-increase contributed most to cOH, followed by a too large SV-decrease; both effects were partially corrected by a larger increase of HR. Only TPR changes consistently affected MAP change in patients and controls. TPR decreased almost exclusively in patients, most in those with severe cOH. Contributions of HR, SV and TPR to MAP did not differ between probable neurogenic and nonneurogenic causes. CONCLUSION: HR, SV and TPR all contributed to cOH, with a key role for TPR; a decrease of TPR was almost unique to patients and may be due to hyperventilation. The lack of differences between neurogenic and nonneurogenic causes needs further study.

Antiseizure Medications and Cardiovascular Events in Older People With Epilepsy.

Importance: How epilepsy may promote cardiovascular disease remains poorly understood. Objective: To estimate the odds of new-onset cardiovascular events (CVEs) over 6 years in older people with vs without epilepsy, exploring how enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EIASMs) and traditional cardiovascular risk factors mediate these odds. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective cohort study using the comprehensive cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), with 6 years of follow-up (2015-2021, analysis performed in December 2023). The CLSA is an ongoing, national study of 51 338 adults aged 45 to 85 years at baseline who are recruited in Canada. The comprehensive cohort includes 30 097 individuals living near 1 of 11 data collection centers. Participation in the CLSA was voluntary; participation rate was 45%. Among those in the comprehensive cohort, individuals reporting no previous history of CVEs (ie, stroke, transient ischemic attack [TIA], or myocardial infarction [MI]) at baseline were excluded. No other exclusion criteria were applied. A total of 86% of participants completed follow-up. Exposure: Lifetime history of epilepsy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was new-onset CVEs over 6 years. Secondary outcomes were new-onset strokes, TIAs, and MIs. Logistic models were fitted for these outcomes as a function of epilepsy, age, sex, household income, and education level. Mediation analyses were conducted for strong EIASM use, weak EIASM use, Framingham score, Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) score, and waist to hip ratio. Results: Among the 30 097 individuals in the comprehensive cohort, a total of 27 230 individuals (mean [SD] age, 62.3 [10.1] years; 14 268 female [52.4%]) were included, 431 with a lifetime history of epilepsy. New-onset CVEs were more likely in epilepsy, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.20 (95% CI, 1.48-3.27). The proportion of the effect of epilepsy on new-onset CVEs was mediated as follows by each of the following variables: strong EIASM use, 24.6% (95% CI, 6.5%-54.6%), weak EIASM use, 4.0% (95% CI, 0.8%-11.0%), Framingham score, 1.4% (95% CI, -1.6% to 4.5%), PASE score, 3.3% (95% CI, 1.4%-6.8%), and waist to hip ratio, 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4%-3.7%). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study reveal that epilepsy was associated with new-onset CVEs. Nearly one-third of this association can be explained by EIASMs. These findings should be considered when choosing an antiseizure medication for a person at risk for cardiovascular disease.

Real-world smartphone data can trace the behavioural impact of epilepsy: A case study.

BACKGROUND: Neurobehavioural comorbidities have a detrimental effect on the quality of life of people with epilepsy, yet tracking their impact is challenging as behaviour may vary with seizures and anti-seizure medication (ASM) side effects. Smartphones have the potential to monitor day-to-day neurobehavioural patterns objectively. We present the case of a man in his late twenties with drug-resistant focal epilepsy in whom we ascertained the effects of ASM withdrawal and a convulsive seizure on his touchscreen interactions. METHODS: Using a dedicated app, we recorded over 185 days the timestamps of 718,357 interactions. We divided the various smartphone behaviours according to the next-interval dynamics of the interactions by using a joint interval distribution (JID). During two ASM load transitions, namely before versus during tapering and tapering versus restarting medication, we used cluster-based permutation tests to compare the JIDs. We also compared the JID of the seizure day to the average of the previous 3 days. RESULTS: The cluster-based permutation tests revealed significant differences, with accelerated next-interval dynamics during tapering and a reversal upon medication restart. The day of the convulsion exhibited a marked slowing of next-interval dynamics compared to the preceding 3 days. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the temporal dynamics of smartphone touchscreen interactions may help monitor neurobehavioural comorbidities in neurological care.

Antiseizure Medications and Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy: An Updated Review.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is responsible for most epilepsy-related deaths. It is mainly related to unwitnessed nocturnal convulsions, either focal to bilateral or generalised tonic-clonic seizures (TCS). Targeted preventive strategies are currently lacking as underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. Antiseizure medications (ASMs) modulate SUDEP risk through seizure reduction, but it is yet undetermined whether individual ASMs or other medications could also influence the internal SUDEP cascade. Seizure detection devices (SDD) may offer an alternative strategy by preventing TCS from being unwitnessed. Here, we critically evaluated the current evidence on the influence of ASMs, non-epilepsy concomitant drugs and SDD on SUDEP occurrence. We found no robust evidence for the effect of starting ASMs on SUDEP beyond TCS control, but we found some indications of a protective effect for polytherapy. We found no signs that specific ASMs exert a risk for SUDEP. One study suggested a possible protective effect of levetiracetam requiring further investigation. Only a few small studies addressed the association between non-epilepsy concomitant drugs and SUDEP, with no consistent effect for psychotropic medications and one more extensive study suggesting a lower risk among statin users. We only found indirect evidence indicating a protective effect for enhancing nocturnal supervision without explicitly addressing the impact of SDD on SUDEP occurrence. Further work is needed to explore the potential of ASMs and other interventions to modulate SUDEP risk, and they should accurately account for TCS frequency, polypharmacy and markers of non-adherence.

Grading objective diagnostic components in paroxysmal events: One-year follow-up at a tertiary epilepsy center.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to develop a model and perform a preliminary internal validation study of the Scale for Objective Diagnostic Components of Paroxysmal Events (STAMP). METHODS: We developed STAMP, which builds on the International League Against Epilepsy task force scale for functional seizures with additional categories for epileptic seizures and syncope. We included 200 consecutive referrals to a Dutch tertiary epilepsy center to evaluate seizurelike events. We recorded demographic and clinical data and collected the clinical evaluation at referral and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of follow-up. We ascertained the STAMP at each time point and evaluated factors predicting an improvement in STAMP grade during follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 200 referrals at baseline, 131 were classified as having epileptic seizures, 17 as functional seizures, and three as syncope, and 49 were unclassifiable. STAMP grade at baseline was 4 (absent) in 56 individuals, 3 (circumstantial) in 78, 2 (clinically established) in six, and 1 (documented) in 11. Over time, 62 cases STAMP grades improved, and 23 remained unclassifiable. A refinement of STAMP grade during follow-up was due to successful event recordings in 34 people (30 video-electroencephalographic [EEG] recordings, four tilt table testing), home videos or clinician-witnessed events in 13, and identification of interictal EEG or magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in seven. An improved STAMP grade after 12 months of follow-up was significantly more likely in those with higher event frequency, unclassifiable events, longer event duration, and a shorter time since the first event and less likely in those with a history suggestive of seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: This epilepsy service evaluation underscores the crucial role of event recording in improving diagnostic certainty. STAMP may be used to monitor diagnostic performance over time but requires further validation.

Detection of short-lasting and ictal spike-and-wave discharges in around-the-ears EEG recordings in children with absence epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Long-term ambulatory EEG recordings can improve the monitoring of absence epilepsy in children, but signal quality and increased review workload are a concern. We evaluated the feasibility of around-the-ears EEG arrays (cEEGrids) to capture 3-Hz short-lasting and ictal spike-and-wave discharges and assessed the performance of automated detection software in cEEGrids data. We compared patterns of bilateral synchronisation between short-lasting and ictal spike-and-wave discharges. METHODS: We recruited children with suspected generalised epilepsy undergoing routine video-EEG monitoring and performed simultaneous cEEGrids recordings. We used ASSYST software to detect short-lasting 3-Hz spike-and-wave discharges (1-3 s) and ictal spike-and-wave discharges in the cEEGrids data. We assessed data quality and sensitivity of cEEGrids for spike-and-wave discharges in routine EEG. We determined the sensitivity and false detection rate for automated spike-and-wave discharge detection in cEEGrids data. We compared bihemispheric synchrony across the onset of short-lasting and ictal spike-and-wave discharges using the mean phase coherence in the 2-4 Hz frequency band. RESULTS: We included nine children with absence epilepsy (median age = 11 y, range 8-15 y, nine females) and recorded 4 h and 27 min of cEEGrids data. The recordings from seven participants were suitable for quantitative analysis, containing 82 spike-and-wave discharges. The cEEGrids captured 58 % of all spike-and-wave discharges (median individual sensitivity: 100 %, range: 47-100 %). ASSYST detected 82 % of all spike-and-wave discharges (median: 100 %, range: 41-100 %) with a false detection rate of 48/h (median: 6/h, range: 0-154/h). The mean phase coherence significantly increased during short-lasting and ictal spike-and-wave discharges in the 500-ms pre-onset to 1-s post-onset interval. CONCLUSIONS: cEEGrids are of variable quality for monitoring spike-and-wave discharges in children with absence epilepsy. ASSYST could facilitate the detection of short-lasting and ictal spike-and-wave discharges with clear periodic structures but with low specificity. A similar course of bihemispheric synchrony between short-lasting and ictal spike-and-wave discharges indicates that cortico-thalamic driving may be relevant for both types of spike-and-wave discharges.

Clinical outcome assessment in patients with epilepsy: The value of health-related quality of life measurements.

This narrative review provides an overview of the current knowledge on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), a relevant clinical outcome in patients with epilepsy. It shows that the most important factor determining HRQOL in this patient group is seizure frequency. In particular, seizure-freedom is associated with better HRQOL scores. Many other factors may impact perceived HRQOL aspects, but their interrelation is complex and requires further research. Novel analytical approaches, such as hierarchical cluster and symptom network analyses might shed further light on this, and may result in recommendations for interventions on the most 'central' factors influencing different aspects of HRQOL in patients with epilepsy. Next, an overview of the HRQOL tools and analytical methods currently used in epilepsy care, with a focus on clinical trials, is provided. The QOLIE-31 is the most frequently applied and best validated tool. Several other questionnaires focusing on specific aspects of HRQOL (e.g., mood, social impact) are less frequently used. We show some pitfalls that should be taken into account when designing study protocols including HRQOL endpoints. This includes standardized statistical analysis approaches and predefined reporting methods for HRQOL in epilepsy populations. It has been shown in other patient groups that the lack of such standardisation negatively impacts the quality and comparability of results. We conclude with a number of recommendations for future research.

Study protocol for the Heads-Up trial: a phase II randomized controlled trial investigating head-up tilt sleeping to alleviate orthostatic intolerance in Parkinson's Disease and parkinsonism.

BACKGROUND: In persons with Parkinson's Disease (PD) or certain forms of atypical parkinsonism, orthostatic hypotension is common and disabling, yet often underrecognized and undertreated. About half of affected individuals also exhibit supine hypertension. This common co-occurrence of both orthostatic hypotension and supine hypertension complicates pharmacological treatments as the treatment of the one can aggravate the other. Whole-body head-up tilt sleeping (HUTS) is the only known intervention that may improve both. Evidence on its effectiveness and tolerability is, however, lacking, and little is known about the implementability. METHODS: In this double-blind multicenter randomized controlled trial (phase II) we will test the efficacy and tolerability of HUTS at different angles in 50 people with PD or parkinsonism who have both symptomatic orthostatic hypotension and supine hypertension. All participants start with one week of horizontal sleeping and subsequently sleep at three different angles, each maintained for two weeks. The exact intervention will vary between the randomly allocated groups. Specifically, the intervention group will consecutively sleep at 6°, 12° and 18°, while the delayed treatment group starts with a placebo angle (1°), followed by 6° and 12°. We will evaluate tolerability using questionnaires and compliance to the study protocol. The primary endpoint is the change in average overnight blood pressure measured by a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure recording. Secondary outcomes include orthostatic blood pressure, orthostatic tolerance, supine blood pressure, nocturia and various other motor and non-motor tests and questionnaires. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that HUTS can simultaneously alleviate orthostatic hypotension and supine hypertension, and that higher angles of HUTS are more effective but less tolerable. The Heads-Up trial will help to clarify the effectiveness, tolerability, and feasibility of this intervention at home and can guide at-home implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05551377; Date of registration: September 22, 2022.

Variation in seizure risk increases from antiseizure medication withdrawal among patients with well-controlled epilepsy: A pooled analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines suggest considering antiseizure medication (ASM) discontinuation in seizure-free patients with epilepsy. Past work has poorly explored how discontinuation effects vary between patients. We evaluated (1) what factors modify the influence of discontinuation on seizure risk; and (2) the range of seizure risk increase due to discontinuation across low- versus high-risk patients. METHODS: We pooled three datasets including seizure-free patients who did and did not discontinue ASMs. We conducted time-to-first-seizure analyses. First, we evaluated what individual patient factors modified the relative effect of ASM discontinuation on seizure risk via interaction terms. Then, we assessed the distribution of 2-year risk increase as predicted by our adjusted logistic regressions. RESULTS: We included 1626 patients, of whom 678 (42%) planned to discontinue all ASMs. The mean predicted 2-year seizure risk was 43% [95% confidence interval (CI) 39%-46%] for discontinuation versus 21% (95% CI 19%-24%) for continuation. The mean 2-year absolute seizure risk increase was 21% (95% CI 18%-26%). No individual interaction term was significant after correcting for multiple comparisons. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] risk increase across patients was 19% (IQR 14%-24%; range 7%-37%). Results were unchanged when restricting analyses to only the two RCTs. SIGNIFICANCE: No single patient factor significantly modified the influence of discontinuation on seizure risk, although we captured how absolute risk increases change for patients that are at low versus high risk. Patients should likely continue ASMs if even a 7% 2-year increase in the chance of any more seizures would be too much and should likely discontinue ASMs if even a 37% risk increase would be too little. In between these extremes, individualized risk calculation and a careful understanding of patient preferences are critical. Future work will further develop a two-armed individualized seizure risk calculator and contextualize seizure risk thresholds below which to consider discontinuation. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Understanding how much antiseizure medications (ASMs) decrease seizure risk is an important part of determining which patients with epilepsy should be treated, especially for patients who have not had a seizure in a while. We found that there was a wide range in the amount that ASM discontinuation increases seizure risk-between 7% and 37%. We found that no single patient factor modified that amount. Understanding what a patient's seizure risk might be if they discontinued versus continued ASM treatment is critical to making informed decisions about whether the benefit of treatment outweighs the downsides.

Vigilance and circadian function in daytime and nocturnal epilepsy compared to controls.

BACKGROUND: People with epilepsy often experience daytime vigilance problems and fatigue. This may be related to disturbed sleep due to nocturnal seizures. AIM: To compare subjective and objective markers of vigilance and circadian function in adults with epilepsy with nocturnal seizures to those with daytime seizures and healthy controls and to identify determinants of impaired daytime vigilance in epilepsy in an explorative study. METHODS: We included 30 adults with epilepsy (15 with daytime seizures and 15 with nocturnal seizures), and 15 healthy controls. All participants filled out the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), fatigue severity scale (FSS), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and the Munich chronotype questionnaire (MCTQ). Each participant performed two trials of the sustained attention to response task (SART) as a measure of vigilance, and had a post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) assessment as a marker for the circadian function. RESULTS: Both epilepsy groups reported more fatigue on the FSS than healthy controls (p < .001) and had higher SART error scores (p = .026). The poorer FSS and SART scores were most prominent among those with nocturnal seizures. The ESS, PSQI, MCTQ and the primary PIPR outcome did not differ between groups. Having nocturnal seizures (p = .010) and using more antiseizure medications (p = .004) were related to increased SART error scores. CONCLUSIONS: Nocturnal epilepsy is associated with poorer vigilance, indicating lower quality of wake time. We could not relate this to circadian dysfunction. Further studies should focus on vigilance problems in people with nocturnal epilepsy and explore interventions to improve the quality of wake time.

Variability of cardioinhibition in vasovagal syncope: differences between subgroups during cardioinhibition and beyond.

PURPOSE: We compared hemodynamic parameters between subjects with marked, intermediate and minimal cardioinhibition during vasovagal syncope. METHODS: The study included subjects with a decrease in heart rate while experiencing a complete vasovagal syncope during tilt-table testing. The subjects were classified as having marked, intermediate or minimal cardioinhibition, based on tertile values of the decrease in heart rate. Hemodynamic parameters between these groups were compared before tilt in the supine position, shortly after tilt and during cardioinhibition. RESULTS: A total of 149 subjects with a median age of 43 (interquartile range 24-60) years were included in the study. Among the three groups with different levels of cardioinhibition, the highest heart rate was observed in subjects with marked cardioinhibition both before and shortly after tilt and at the start of cardioinhibition. The heart rate decrease in these subjects was both larger and faster compared to subjects with minimal and intermediate cardioinhibition. CONCLUSION: Subjects with marked cardioinhibition have both a larger and faster decrease in heart rate compared to subjects with intermediate and minimal cardioinhibition, as early as from the start of cardioinhibition. Marked cardioinhibition is related to differences in hemodynamic profiles already present well before the start of cardioinhibition.

EFAS/EAN survey on the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on European clinical autonomic education and research.

PURPOSE: To understand the influence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on clinical autonomic education and research in Europe. METHODS: We invited 84 European autonomic centers to complete an online survey, recorded the pre-pandemic-to-pandemic percentage of junior participants in the annual congresses of the European Federation of Autonomic Societies (EFAS) and European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the pre-pandemic-to-pandemic number of PubMed publications on neurological disorders. RESULTS: Forty-six centers answered the survey (55%). Twenty-nine centers were involved in clinical autonomic education and experienced pandemic-related didactic interruptions for 9 (5; 9) months. Ninety percent (n = 26/29) of autonomic educational centers reported a negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education quality, and 93% (n = 27/29) established e-learning models. Both the 2020 joint EAN-EFAS virtual congress and the 2021 (virtual) and 2022 (hybrid) EFAS and EAN congresses marked higher percentages of junior participants than in 2019. Forty-one respondents (89%) were autonomic researchers, and 29 of them reported pandemic-related trial interruptions for 5 (2; 9) months. Since the pandemic begin, almost half of the respondents had less time for scientific writing. Likewise, the number of PubMed publications on autonomic topics showed the smallest increase compared with other neurological fields in 2020-2021 and the highest drop in 2022. Autonomic research centers that amended their trial protocols for telemedicine (38%, n = 16/41) maintained higher clinical caseloads during the first pandemic year. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial negative impact on European clinical autonomic education and research. At the same time, it promoted digitalization, favoring more equitable access to autonomic education and improved trial design.

Non-Pharmacological Treatment of Autonomic Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease and Other Synucleinopathies.

Symptoms of autonomic dysfunction are prevalent and can be very debilitating, reducing the quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and other synucleinopathies such as dementia with Lewy bodies and multiple system atrophy. Non-pharmacological therapies are key to effective management and are frequently used alone in patients with mild autonomic symptoms, or in combination with pharmacological therapies in patients with moderate and severe symptoms. This article focuses on non-pharmacological approaches. Our objective was to review the non-drug and non-surgical approaches to treating autonomic symptoms in patients with PD and other synucleinopathies, focusing on cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary autonomic dysfunction. Evidence supporting the effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatment for the management of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, supine hypertension, constipation, and bladder and sexual dysfunction is available. High-quality prospective trials are scarce, yet some non-pharmacological interventions (e.g., physical counter maneuvers) can be evaluated relatively quickly on an individual basis and often seem effective. The emerging variety of clinical presentations advocates for a stepwise, individualized, and non-pharmacological approach for the management of autonomic symptoms. Often, the first step is to reduce or discontinue drugs that cause or aggravate autonomic symptoms followed by lifestyle measures. While non-pharmacological and non-surgical treatments are available and, in many cases, effective to improve symptoms of autonomic dysfunction in PD and other synucleinopathies, they are often overlooked. Large randomized trials testing and comparing non-pharmacological approaches are warranted.

Nocturnal seizure detection: What are the needs and expectations of adults with epilepsy receiving secondary care?

INTRODUCTION: Seizure detection devices (SDDs) may lower the risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and provide reassurance to people with epilepsy and their relatives. We aimed to explore the perspectives of those receiving secondary care on nocturnal SDDs and epilepsy in general. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited adults with tonic or tonic-clonic seizures who had at least one nocturnal seizure in the preceding year. We used semi-structured interviews and questionnaires to explore their views on SDDs and their experiences of living with epilepsy. None of the participants had any previous experience with SDDs. We analyzed the data using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Eleven participants were included with a nocturnal seizure frequency ranging from once every few weeks to less than once a year. Some participants experienced little burden of disease, whereas others were extremely impaired. Opinions on the perceived benefit of seizure detection varied widely and did not always match the clinical profile. Some participants with high SUDEP risk displayed no interest at all, whereas others with a low risk for unattended seizures displayed a strong interest. Reasons for wanting to use SDDs included providing reassurance, SUDEP prevention, and improving night rest. Reasons for not wanting to use SDDs included not being able to afford it, having to deal with false alarms, not having anyone to act upon the alarms, having a relative that will notice any seizures, not feeling like the epilepsy is severe enough to warrant SDD usage or not trusting the device. CONCLUSIONS: The interest in nocturnal seizure detection varies among participants with low seizure frequencies and does not always match the added value one would expect based on the clinical profile. Further developments should account for the heterogeneity in user groups.

The Impact of Head-Up Tilt Sleeping on Orthostatic Tolerance: A Scoping Review.

To systematically summarize the evidence of head-up tilt sleeping (HUTS) on orthostatic tolerance, we conducted a systematic, predefined search in PubMed, OVID Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science. We included studies assessing the effect of HUTS on orthostatic tolerance and other cardiovascular measures and rated the quality with the American Academy of Neurology risk of bias tool. We included 10 studies (n = 185) in four groups: orthostatic hypotension (OH; 6 studies, n = 103), vasovagal syncope (1 study, n = 12), nocturnal angina pectoris (1 study, n = 10) and healthy subjects (2 studies, n = 58). HUTS duration varied (1 day-4 months) with variable inclinations (5°-15°). In two of six OH studies, HUTS significantly improved standing systolic blood pressure. Orthostatic tolerance was consistently enhanced in OH studies with higher angles (≥12°), in 2 out of 3 with smaller angles (5°) but also in one studying horizontal sleeping. In vasovagal syncope, HUTS significantly augmented resilience to extreme orthostatic stress. One study was rated as a class II risk of bias, one of Class II/III and eight of Class IV. The evidence favouring HUTS to improve orthostatic tolerance is weak due to variable interventions, populations, small samples and a high risk of bias. Despite this, we found some physiological signs suggesting a beneficial effect.