Dual effects of ARX poly-alanine mutations in human cortical and interneuron development.

Mutations in ARX , an X-linked gene, are implicated in a wide spectrum of neurological disorders including patients who have intellectual disability and epilepsy. Mouse models have shown that Arx is critical for cortical development and interneuron migration, however they do not recapitulate the full phenotype observed in patients. Moreover, the epilepsy in many patients with poly-alanine tract expansion (PAE) mutations in ARX show pharmacoresistance, emphasizing the need to develop new treatments. Here, we used human neural organoid models to study the consequences of PAE mutations, one of the most prevalent mutations in ARX . We found that PAE mutations result in an early increase in radial glia cells and intermediate progenitor cells, and premature differentiation leading to a loss of cortical neurons at later timepoints. Moreover, ARX expression is upregulated in CO derived from patient at 30 DIV which alters the expression of CDKN1C , SFRP1 , DLK1 and FABP7 , among others. We also found a cell autonomously enhanced interneuron migration, which can be rescued by CXCR4 inhibition. Furthermore, ARX PAE assembloids had hyper-activity and synchrony evident from the early stages. These data provide novel insights to the pathogenesis of these and likely related human neurological disorders and identifies a critical window for therapeutic interventions.

Nicotine: A Targeted Therapy for Epilepsy Due to nAChR Gene Variants.

OBJECTIVE: Genetic variants of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) cause autosomal dominant sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy. Approximately 30% of autosomal dominant sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy patients are medically intractable. In preclinical models, pathogenic nAChR variants cause a gain of function mutation with sensitivity to acetylcholine antagonists and agonists. Nicotine modifies the activity of nAChRs and can be used as targeted therapy. METHODS: We reviewed next-generation sequencing epilepsy panels from a single laboratory (GeneDx) from patients at Children's Medical Center Dallas between 2011 and 2015 and identified patients with nAChR variants. Retrospective review of records included variant details, medical history, neuroimaging findings, and treatment history. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were identified. Four patients were prescribed nicotine patches for intractable seizures. Three of 4 patients had a clinical response, with >50% seizure reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a nicotine patch can be an effective therapy in epilepsy patients with nAChR gene variants. We propose consideration of transdermal nicotine treatment in intractable epilepsy with known nAChR variants as an experimental therapy. Further clinical trials are needed to fully define therapeutic effects.

Genomic testing in pediatric epilepsy.

Genomic testing has become routine in the diagnosis and management of pediatric patients with epilepsy. In a single test, hundreds to thousands of genes are examined for DNA changes that may not only explain the etiology of the patient's condition but may also inform management and seizure control. Clinical genomic testing has been in clinical practice for less than a decade, and because of this short period of time, the appropriate clinical use and interpretation of genomic testing is still evolving. Compared to the previous era of single-gene testing in epilepsy, which yielded a diagnosis in <5% of cases, many clinical genomic studies of epilepsy have demonstrated a clinically significant diagnosis in 30% or more of patients tested. This review will examine key studies of the past decade and indicate the clinical scenarios in which genomic testing should be considered standard of care.

Clinical Utility of Reinterpreting Previously Reported Genomic Epilepsy Test Results for Pediatric Patients.

Importance: Clinical genomic tests that examine the DNA sequence of large numbers of genes are commonly used in the diagnosis and management of epilepsy in pediatric patients. The permanence of genomic test result interpretations is not known. Objective: To investigate the value of reinterpreting previously reported genomic test results. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study retrospectively reviewed and reinterpreted genomic test results from July 1, 2012, to August 31, 2015, for pediatric patients who previously underwent genomic epilepsy testing at a single tertiary care pediatric health care facility. Reinterpretation of previously reported variants was conducted in May 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient reports from clinical genomic epilepsy tests were reviewed, and all reported genetic variants were reinterpreted using 2015 consensus standards and guidelines for interpreting hereditary genetic variants. Three classification tiers were used in the reinterpretation: pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant, variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or benign or likely benign variant. Results: A total of 309 patients had genomic epilepsy tests performed (mean [SD] age, 5.6 [0.8] years; 163 [52.8%] male), and 185 patients had a genetic variant reported. The reported variants resulted in 61 patients with and 124 patients without a genetic diagnosis (VUS variants only). On reinterpretation of all reported variants, 67 of the 185 patients (36.2%) had a change in variant classification. Of the 67 patients with a genetic variant change in interpretation, 21 (31.3%) experienced a change in diagnosis. During the 5 years of the study, 19 of 61 patients (31.1%) with a genetic diagnosis and 48 of 124 patients (38.7%) with undiagnosed conditions (VUS only) had their results reclassified. Review of genomic reports issued during the final 2 years of the study identified reclassification of variants in 4 of 16 patients (25.0%) with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant and 11 of 41 patients (26.8%) with a VUS. Conclusions and Relevance: The identified high rate of reinterpretation in this study suggests that interpretation of genomic test results has rapidly evolved during the past 5 years. These findings suggest that reinterpretation of genomic test results should be performed at least every 2 years.

Neural stem cells and epilepsy: functional roles and disease-in-a-dish models.

Epilepsy is a disorder of the central nervous system characterized by spontaneous recurrent seizures. Although current therapies exist to control the number and severity of clinical seizures, there are no pharmacological cures or disease-modifying treatments available. Use of transgenic mouse models has allowed an understanding of neural stem cells in their relation to epileptogenesis in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Further, with the significant discovery of factors necessary to reprogram adult somatic cell types into pluripotent stem cells, it has become possible to study monogenic epilepsy-in-a-dish using patient-derived neurons. This discovery along with some of the newest technological advances in recapitulating brain development in a dish has brought us closer than ever to a platform in which to study and understand the mechanisms of this disease. These technologies will be critical in understanding the mechanism of epileptogenesis and ultimately lead to improved therapies and precision medicine for patients with epilepsy.

Does Autoimmunity have a Role in Myoclonic Astatic Epilepsy? A Case Report of Voltage Gated Potassium Channel Mediated Seizures.

BACKGROUND: There is expanding knowledge about the phenotypic variability of patients with voltage gated potassium channel complex (VGKC) antibody mediated neurologic disorders. The phenotypes are diverse and involve disorders of the central and peripheral nervous systems. The central nervous system manifestations described in the literature include limbic encephalitis, status epilepticus, and acute encephalitis. PATIENT DESCRIPTION: We report a 4.5 year-old boy who presented with intractable Myoclonic Astatic Epilepsy (MAE) or Doose syndrome and positive VGKC antibodies in serum. Treatment with steroids led to resolution of seizures and electrographic normalization. CONCLUSION: This case widens the spectrum of etiologies for MAE to include autoimmunity, in particular VGKC auto-antibodies and CNS inflammation, as a primary or contributing factor. There is an evolving understanding of voltage gated potassium channel complex mediated autoimmunity in children and the role of inflammation and autoimmunity in MAE and other intractable pediatric epilepsy syndromes remains to be fully defined. A high index of suspicion is required for diagnosis and appropriate management of antibody mediated epilepsy syndromes.

Practice experience in the treatment of infantile spasms at a tertiary care center.

BACKGROUND: The current treatment guidelines for treatment of infantile spasms is ambiguous regarding individuals with known etiology and is backed by limited evidence. Recently published survey data reveal diverse treatment variation for infantile spasms. We conducted a retrospective medical record review to better understand the clinical variables which affect treatment selection for new-onset infantile spasms. METHODS: We systematically extracted demographic data and treatment response of children with new onset infantile spasms over a 3-year period at a single institution. Treatment was divided into three groups: vigabatrin, hormone treatment, and other therapies. RESULTS: Our final cohort had 65 patients; 74% had a known etiology. Sixty-two percent were initially treated with vigabatrin. Other therapies were used more often in known etiology than in unknown etiology as initial treatment (40% versus 6%; P = 0.002). Treatment response at 3 months was not statistically different between unknown etiology and known etiology groups (71% versus 46%; P = 0.08). Overall, initial treatment choice was effective in 35% (23 of 65). Eighty-six percent (37 of 42) who failed the initial medication had subsequent medication trials within 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Etiology was strongly associated with initial treatment choice. The variation in treatment choice at our center reflects the limited evidence derived from well-designed clinical trials.