Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Bipolar Coagulation System for the Treatment of Grade I and II Internal Hemorrhoids.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhoids are common and affect mainly the young and middle-aged populations. Current guidelines recommend treating grade I and II hemorrhoids with office-based procedures. These therapies usually require multiple applications. Hemorrhoid energy therapy treats the hemorrhoids at 1 treatment session. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hemorrhoid energy therapy. DESIGN: This was a prospective pilot study evaluating patients with symptomatic grade I and II internal hemorrhoids. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Patients over the age of 18 years with chronic, symptomatic grade I and II internal hemorrhoids who failed 2 weeks of conservative therapy were enrolled between July 2015 and January 2019. Exclusion criteria included patients with grade III or IV internal hemorrhoids, external hemorrhoids, nonhemorrhoidal GI bleeding, active proctitis, and IBD. INTERVENTIONS: Hemorrhoid energy therapy was administered in clinic, and 2 postprocedure visits were completed. A pretreatment hemorrhoid symptom score was obtained from each patient. A visual analog score was assessed posttreatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was to evaluate the effect of hemorrhoid energy therapy on hemorrhoid symptoms and its safety. The secondary end point was evaluation of postprocedural pain. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were enrolled. The mean duration of hemorrhoid symptoms was 3.3 ± 6.4 years, and rectal bleeding and hemorrhoidal prolapse were the most common symptoms. After the procedure, patient hemorrhoid symptom scores decreased from mean 5.5 to 1.4. The mean immediate postprocedural visual analog score was 2.4 ± 2.1 and decreased to <1.0 after 14 days. LIMITATIONS: The limitations include lack of comparative groups, single-center design, and small cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The application of hemorrhoid energy therapy in the treatment of grade I and II internal hemorrhoids is safe and results in reduction of symptoms, low rate of short-term complications, and minimal pain. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B491. EVALUACIÓN DE UN SISTEMA DE COAGULACIÓN BIPOLAR MÍNI-INVASIVA PARA EL TRATAMIENTO DE HEMORROIDES INTERNAS GRADOS I Y II: La enfermedad hemorroidal es muy común y afecta principalmente poblaciones jóvenes y de mediana edad. Las guías actuales recomiendan tratar las hemorroides de grado I y II con procedimientos en el consultorio. Estos tratamientos suelen requerir múltiples aplicaciones. La aplicación de energía para tratar las hemorroides requiere de una sola sesión.Evaluar la seguridad y eficacia del tratamiento hemorroidal con una fuente de energía.Estudio piloto prospectivo que evalúa los pacientes con hemorroides internas de grado I y II sintomáticas.El estudio se realizó en un centro académico terciario.Entre julio de 2015 y enero de 2019 se inscribieron pacientes mayores de 18 años con hemorroides intomáticas internas crónicas grado I y II que fracasaron luego de 2 semanas de tratameinto conservador. Los criterios de exclusión incluyeron pacientes con hemorroides internas de grado III o IV, hemorroides externas, sangrado de orígen gastrointestinal no hemorroidal, proctitis activa y enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.Se realizó la aplicación de energía sobre las hemorroides en el consultorio y se completó el procedimiento con dos visitas posteriores. Se obtuvo una puntuación analógica de síntomas hemorroidarios en cada paciente antes del tratamiento. Se evaluó la puntuación analógica visual luego del procedimiento.El principal criterio final fué evaluar el efecto de la terapia energética hemorroidaria con relación a los síntomas y la seguridad del dispositivo. El segundo criterio final fué el evaluar el dolor posoperatorio.Se registraron un total de 35 pacientes. La duración media de los síntomas hemorroidarios fué de 3,3 ± 6,4 años, el sangrado rectal y el prolapso hemorroidal fueron los síntomas más frecuentes. Después del procedimiento, las puntuaciones de los síntomas hemorroidarios disminuyeron en una media de 5,5 a 1,4. La puntuación analógica visual media inmediatamente posterior al procedimiento fue de 2,4 ± 2,1 y disminuyó a <1 después de 14 días.Las limitaciones incluyen la falta de grupos comparativos, el diseño de un solo centro y una pequeña cohorte de pacientes.La aplicación de energía como tratamiento de la enfermedad hemorroidal interna grado I y II es segura y da como resultados la reducción de los síntomas, una baja tasa de complicaciones a corto plazo y mínimo dolor. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B491. (Traducción-Dr Xavier Delgadillo).

Acute diverticulitis in renal transplant patients: should we treat them differently?

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines suggest that transplant patients with acute diverticulitis should be managed aggressively with early operative intervention to reduce morbidity and mortality. This study compared the treatment choices and clinical outcomes between renal transplant patients and immunocompetent patients with acute diverticulitis. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who were admitted with acute diverticulitis between 2002 and 2015 at a single academic institution. Patient demographics, comorbidities, physiologic and radiologic disease severity, management, and disease-specific outcomes were recorded and compared between renal transplant patients and immunocompetent patients. Predictors of complications also were analyzed. RESULTS: In the study, 20 renal transplant patients and 134 immunocompetent patients were admitted for acute diverticulitis and were followed for a median time of 36 and 40 months, respectively. Patient demographics were similar between the groups. Transplant patients had significantly more comorbidities. Overall, there were no differences in physiologic disease severity or rates of elective or urgent operation, ostomy, permanent ostomy, duration of stay, 30-day readmission, disease recurrence or disease-specific complications, organ failure, or death. Among patients with complicated disease, renal transplant patients were significantly more likely to undergo an urgent operation and had more complications. On multivariate analysis, undergoing operative therapy remained the sole predictor of complications. CONCLUSION: Nonoperative management of renal transplant patients who present with uncomplicated diverticulitis is safe as outcomes are similar to immunocompetent patients. However, the optimal management of renal transplant patients with complicated diverticulitis remains unclear as both treatment choices and complication rates differed from immunocompetent patients.