Quantification of push-off and collision work during step-to-step transition in amputees walking at self-selected speed: Effect of amputation level.

Maintaining forward walking during human locomotion requires mechanical joint work, mainly provided by the ankle-foot in non-amputees. In lower-limb amputees, their metabolic overconsumption is generally attributed to reduced propulsion. However, it remains unclear how altered walking patterns resulting from amputation affect energy exchange. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of self-selected walking speed (SSWS) on mechanical works generated by the ankle-foot and by the entire lower limbs depending on the level of amputation. 155 participants, including 47 non-amputees (NAs), 40 unilateral transtibial amputees (TTs) and 68 unilateral transfemoral amputees (TFs), walked at their SSWS. Positive push-off work done by the trailing limb (WStS+) and its associated ankle-foot (Wankle-foot+), as well as negative collision work done by the leading limb (WStS-) were analysed during the transition from prosthetic limb to contralateral limb. An ANCOVA was performed to assess the effect of amputation level on mechanical works, while controlling for SSWS effect. After adjusting for SSWS, NAs produce more push-off work with both their biological ankle-foot and trailing limb than amputees do on prosthetic side. Using the same type of prosthetic feet, TTs and TFs can generate the same amount of prosthetic Wankle-foot+, while prosthetic WStS+ is significantly higher for TTs and remains constant with SSWS for TFs. Surprisingly and contrary to theoretical expectations, the lack of propulsion at TFs' prosthetic limb did not affect their contralateral WStS-, for which a difference is significant only between NAs and TTs. Further studies should investigate the relationship between the TFs' inability to increase prosthetic limb push-off work and metabolic expenditure.

[Prospective evaluation of mouth and eye dryness induced by antimuscarinic drugs used for neurogenic overactive bladder in 35 patients with multiple sclerosis]. / Évaluation prospective de l'impact des anticholinergiques sur la sécheresse buccale et oculaire chez 35 patients atteints de sclérose en plaque avec hyperactivité vésicale neurogène.

INTRODUCTION: Mouth and eye dryness are frequently reported by patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) as side effects of antimuscarinic drugs used for neurogenic overactive bladder. We evaluated the impact of antimuscarinic drugs prescription on these symptoms. METHODS: MS patients consulting for overactive bladder were included. Xerostomia were evaluated at baseline and thirty days after treatment by self-reporting questionnaires (Xerostomia Quality of Life [X-Qol] and Xerostomia Questionnaire [XQ]), by salivary flow rate and sugar test. Xerophtalmia were evaluated by a self-reporting questionnaire (Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI]) and Schirmer test. Iatrogenic anticholinergic impregnation was evaluated by the Anticholinergic Drug Scale. RESULTS: From January to December 2014, 35 patients were included. Mean age was 50.1±10.2 years, mean EDSS=4.9. Mean anticholinergic impregnation was 0.6±1.0. Before treatment, none correlation was found between anticholinergic impregnation and other parameters. Twenty-two patients were evaluated after treatment. At baseline and thirty days after treatment, mean scores were respectively: 0.78±0.51 and 0.73±0.43 (P=0.67) for X-Qol, 9.22±11.8 and 7.03±11.4 (P=0.32) for XQ, 18.8±14.9 and 13.9±11.6 (P=0.06) for OSDI. Mean salivary flow rates were respectively 1.54±1.11 and 1.22±1.3 (P=0.53), positive sugar tests concerned respectively 68% and 55% of patients (P=0.53), and positive Schirmer test concerned 50% before and after treatment. CONCLUSION: Eye and mouth dryness exist in our MS population, even before prescription of antimuscarinic treatment, and is not getting worse after prescription. Those symptoms should not be the reason to stop an efficient treatment, but should be the reason to find and treat their aetiology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Urethral meatus deformities and urethra hypospadias in women: prevalence, problems and definitions. Study of 12,739 patients]. / Méat urétral enfoui et urètre hypospade chez la femme : prévalence, problématiques et définitions. Étude sur 12 739 patientes.

UNLABELLED: The difficulty to access to the urethral meatus is found in women in relation to morphological abnormalities of urogenital or ectopic locations meatus, whether acquired (urethral meatus buried [UMB]) or congenital reality (urethra hypospadias [UH]). The pathophysiology is not unequivocal with lack of clear and specific studies. PURPOSE: Verify the existence of specific functional problems, assess the prevalence and identify the anatomical features of UMB and UH. MATERIALS: UMB and UH were sought in a computerized database listing the patients attending a neurourology department between 2000 and 2014 for a pelvic-perineal disease. Each case was analysed for specific reached leaks, urinary tract infections and difficulties catheterization. RESULTS: Of the 12,739, 131 patients (1%) met the inclusion criteria, including 18 UH and 113 UMB. Ninety-one patients consulted for urinary disorders of neurological origin. The circumstances of UMB and UH discovery were: perineal systematic review in 63 cases (48%); difficulties of urethral catheterization in 65 cases (49%); urinary incontinence for 3 patients (3%). Urinary tract infections have not led to the discovery of UMB or UH. Difficulties locating the urethral meatus were congenital (UH) in 18 cases (13%). In 113 cases (87%), it was an acquired abnormality (UMB) overweight for 16 patients (12%), troublesome spasticity of the adductor muscles in 18 cases (14%), vulvovaginal atrophy in 5 cases (4%) and a patient (1%) with a pelvic organ prolapse. No details were given for the remaining 72 patients (54%). CONCLUSION: The urethral meatus difficult access due to MUE or UH can be met in a specialized service but the exact concept of MUE be defined. It can be considered as urethral meatus difficult to access and the cause is acquired. Functional impairment may be particularly important in patients requiring catheterization for bladder emptying. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Sympathetic skin response and multiple sclerosis: descriptive and prospective study, and association with neuroperineal disorders]. / Réponses cutanées sympathiques et sclérose en plaques : étude descriptive, prospective et association aux troubles neuropérinéaux.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the sympathetic skin responses (SSRs), reflecting the sweat activity mediated by the sympathetic nervous system, in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) followed for urinary disorders and associate SSRs abnormalities with neuroperineal disorders. METHODS: Prospective monocentric study of a population suffering from MS, who received symptom scores (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS], Urinary Symptoms Profile [USP], Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction [NBD], International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] and Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI]) and whose SSRs were collected from the hand palm, the foot sole and the genital skin after mechanical stimulation, before and after anticholinergic drug. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included. Among them, 18 had an abolition of SSR, respectively 10, 14 and 17 at palm, perineum and foot sole. The absence of SSR was not related (P>0.05) with the duration of disease, the EDSS score, USP, IIEF15 or NBD scores. There was a statistically significant relationship between the abolition of SSR at perineum and women genitosexual disorders (P=0.01). Anticholinergic drugs remove 40 % of SSRs at hand and 67% at foot. The abolition of SSR at perineum was associated with the abolition of the SSR at sole (P=4 × 10(-5)). CONCLUSION: In these MS patients with neuroperineal disorders, more than half showed abnormal SSR. These abnormalities did not seem associated with urinary or rectal disorders but with genitosexual disorders in women. Under anticholinergic treatment, SSR frequently disappeared at palm and foot sole. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.