Early experience of a new national lung allocation scheme in the UK based on clinical urgency.

INTRODUCTION: A new UK Lung Allocation Scheme (UKLAS) was introduced in 2017, replacing the previous geographic allocation system. Patients are prioritised according to predefined clinical criteria into a three-tier system: the super-urgent lung allocation scheme (SULAS), the urgent lung allocation scheme (ULAS) and the non-urgent lung allocation scheme (NULAS). This study assessed the early impact of this scheme on waiting-list and post-transplant outcomes. METHODS: A cohort study of adult lung transplant registrations between March 2015 and November 2016 (era-1) and between May 2017 and January 2019 (era-2). Outcomes from registration were compared between eras and stratified by urgency tier and diagnostic group. RESULTS: During era-1, 461 patients were registered. In era-2, 471 patients were registered (19 (4.0%) SULAS, 82 (17.4%) ULAS and 370 (78.6%) NULAS). SULAS patients were younger (median age 35 vs 50 and 55 for urgent and non-urgent, respectively, p=0.0015) and predominantly suffered from cystic fibrosis (53%) or pulmonary fibrosis (37%). Between eras 1 and 2, the odds of transplantation within 6 months of registration were increased (OR=1.41, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.85, p=0.0142) despite only a 5% increase in transplant activity. Median time-to-transplantation during era-1 was 427 days compared with waiting times in era-2 of 8 days for SULAS, 15 days for ULAS and 585 days for NULAS patients. Waiting-list mortality (15% era-1 vs 13% era-2; p=0.5441) and post-transplant survival at 1 year (81.3% era-1 vs 83.3% era-2; p=0.6065) were similar between eras. CONCLUSION: The UKLAS scheme prioritises the critically ill and improves transplantation odds. The true impact on waiting-list mortality and post-transplant survival requires further follow-up.

Patient outcomes from time of listing for lung transplantation in the UK: are there disease-specific differences?

BACKGROUND: The demand for lung transplantation vastly exceeds the availability of donor organs. This translates into long waiting times and high waiting list mortality. We set out to examine factors influencing patient outcomes from the time of listing for lung transplantation in the UK, examining for differences by patient characteristics, lung disease category and transplant centre. METHODS: Data were obtained from the UK Transplant Registry held by NHS Blood and Transplant for adult lung-only registrations between 1January 2004 and 31 March 2014. Pretransplant and post-transplant outcomes were evaluated against lung disease category, blood group and height. RESULTS: Of the 2213 patient registrations, COPD comprised 28.4%, pulmonary fibrosis (PF) 26.2%, cystic fibrosis (CF) 25.4% and other lung pathologies 20.1%. The chance of transplantation after listing differed by the combined effect of disease category and centre (p<0.001). At 3 years postregistration, 78% of patients with COPD were transplanted followed by 61% of patients with CF, 59% of other lung pathology patients and 48% of patients with PF, who also had the highest waiting list mortality (37%). The chance of transplantation also differed by height with taller patients having a greater chance of transplant (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.04, p<0.001). Patients with blood group O had the highest waiting mortality at 3 years postregistration compared with all other blood groups (27% vs 20%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The way donor lungs were allocated in the UK resulted in discrepancies between the risk profile and probability of lung transplantation. A new donor lung allocation scheme was introduced in 2017 to try to address these shortcomings.

Lung Transplantation in Alpha-1-Antitrypsin Deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage lung disease and a survival benefit has been described in patients with alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (A1ATD). The aims of the current study were to determine the survival and health benefits of lung transplantation in UK patients with A1ATD compared to carefully matched non-transplant patients. METHODS: Patients with the PiZZ (alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency) genotype who had undergone lung transplantation between 1996 and 2011 were identified from the UK A1ATD registry. Lung physiology, health status and survival were compared pre- and post-transplant using carefully matched non-transplant patients. RESULTS: Thirty-two A1ATD patients who had undergone lung transplant were identified. Lung function decline pre-transplant was not different to the closely matched non-transplanted cohort. The transplant group pre-transplant, although matched for FEV1, had lower gas transfer measurements, (mean KCO% predicted 41.0% SE ± 3.86 vs 55.6% SE ± 3.10 p < 0.001) and worse health status (SGRQ mean score 64.2 SE ± 2.5 vs 55.3 SE ± 2.0, p < 0.001). Post-transplant, physiology and health status improved significantly (p < 0.002). However, the post-operative mortality over 5 years was no better than for a second group of non-transplant patients further matched for gas transfer or a third group also matched for SGRQ. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent lung transplant had lower gas transfer and quality-of-life pre-transplant compared to non-transplant patients matched for FEV1, age and sex, suggesting that these parameters provide extra information helpful in decision making. Lung transplantation for A1ATD patients significantly improves quality-of-life but not survival.