RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Serology testing is explored for epidemiological research and to inform individuals after suspected infection. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, frontline healthcare professionals (HCP) may be at particular risk for infection. No longitudinal data on functional seroconversion in HCP in regions with low COVID-19 prevalence and low pre-test probability exist. METHODS: In a large German university hospital, we performed weekly questionnaire assessments and anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunoglobulin G (IgG) measurements with various commercial tests, a novel surrogate virus neutralisation test, and a neutralisation assay using live SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: From baseline to week 6, 1080 screening measurements for anti-SARS CoV-2 (S1) IgG from 217 frontline HCP (65% female) were performed. Overall, 75.6% of HCP reported at least one symptom of respiratory infection. Self-perceived infection probability declined over time (from mean 20.1% at baseline to 12.4% in week 6, p < 0.001). In sera of convalescent patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, we measured high anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels, obtained highly concordant results from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) using e.g. the spike 1 (S1) protein domain and the nucleocapsid protein (NCP) as targets, and confirmed antiviral neutralisation. However, in HCP the cumulative incidence for anti-SARS-CoV-2 (S1) IgG was 1.86% for positive and 0.93% for equivocal positive results over the study period of 6 weeks. Except for one HCP, none of the eight initial positive results were confirmed by alternative serology tests or showed in vitro neutralisation against live SARS-CoV-2. The only true seroconversion occurred without symptoms and mounted strong functional humoral immunity. Thus, the confirmed cumulative incidence for neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was 0.47%. CONCLUSION: When assessing anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune status in individuals with low pre-test probability, we suggest confirming positive results from single measurements by alternative serology tests or functional assays. Our data highlight the need for a methodical serology screening approach in regions with low SARS-CoV-2 infection rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at DRKS00021152.
RESUMO
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Patient education is an essential part of cardiac patients' care targeting self-management behaviour to reduce risk factors and subsequent events. There has been no Vietnamese questionnaire to assess patient's knowledge about CAD; therefore, the purpose of this study was to translate, cross-culturally adapt and validate the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire-Short Version (CADE-Q SV) for use in Vietnam. METHODS: Translation and cross-cultural adaption of the tool were carried out in five stages: (a) two independent translations from English into Vietnamese were produced; (b) these two translations were then synthesized; (c) two translators blinded to the outcome measurements independently created separate back translations into English; (d) nine experts reached consensus on all items of the Vietnamese version of the CADE-Q SV; and (e) a pilot study was conducted on 35 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The validity and reliability of the questionnaires were then evaluated in 117 Vietnamese patients with ACS. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed by Cronbach's alpha and Cohen's kappa coefficient, respectively. Construct validity was determined by examining the relationship between knowledge scores and patient characteristics. RESULTS: The Vietnamese version of CADE-Q SV was created, including 20 items divided into two domains: medical and psychological condition, and nutrition and exercise. There was good equivalence between the original and the Vietnamese versions in all four areas: semantic, idiomatic, experiential and conceptual equivalence. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were acceptable for the questionnaire as a whole (0.78) and for the two domains: medical and psychological condition (0.71) and nutrition and exercise (0.52). All Cohen's kappa coefficients confirmed test-retest reliability (Kappa > 0.600; P < .001). Construct validity was confirmed by a significant correlation of knowledge scores with education level (P = .004). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The Vietnamese version of CADE-Q SV can be considered a valid and reliable questionnaire to evaluate patient's knowledge of CAD. Further studies could investigate the influence of knowledge scores on adherence to medications and clinical outcomes of patients with CAD.