Self-management support by health care providers in prenatal Shared Medical Appointments (CenteringPregnancy©) and prenatal individual appointments.

OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional questionnaire study investigates if there a difference in the extent to which health care providers in prenatal Shared Medical Appointments (CenteringPregnancy©) and in prenatal individual appointments support self-management in patient education. It also investigates if there is a difference in the extent to which health care providers in CenteringPregnancy@ and in individual appointments pay attention to the factors of the Integrated Model for Behavioral Change (I-Change) in supporting self-management. METHODS: Dutch health care providers in prenatal care were invited to fill out a questionnaire. Respondents who provided care in CenteringPregnancy© formed the CenteringPregnancy© group, the others were categorized in the individual appointments' group. After a definition of self-management and an introduction of the I-Change model, respondents were asked if they supported self-management and if they paid attention to the I-Change model for each of 17 themes of prenatal patient education. Pearson's chi-squared tests and Fisher's Exact tests were performed to compare both groups. RESULTS: We included 133 respondents. Health care providers in the CenteringPregnancy@ group supported self-management to a higher extent compared to the individual appointments group. This difference was statistically significant for eight themes (body position and exercises, oral health, domestic violence, birth mechanism and premature birth, postnatal period, transition from pregnancy to parenthood, taking care of the baby and newborn's safety). In both groups, health care providers paid most attention to information or to awareness factors instead of motivation factors. CONCLUSION: We found a first prove that health care providers in CenteringPregnancy@ support self-management to a higher extent than health care providers in individual appointments. This could be explained by factors as time, feelings of safety and bonding, continuity of care and emphasis on future health behaviour changes. For effective self-management support, attention to motivation factors is important. However, we found that health care providers in both groups paid more attention to information or to awareness factors than to motivation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health care providers in prenatal individual appointments should be aware of the fact that they possibly support self-management less than health care providers in CenteringPregnancy@ . Health care providers in both types of prenatal care should be aware of the fact that they pay little attention to motivation factors. They might need some skills to change their role from teaching professional to supportive leader.

Intrapartum synthetic oxytocin, behavioral and emotional problems in children, and the role of postnatal depressive symptoms, postnatal anxiety and mother-to-infant bonding: A Dutch prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between intrapartum synthetic oxytocin and child behavioral and emotional problems and to assess if maternal depressive or anxious symptoms or mother-to-infant bonding play a mediating role in this association. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Population-based Pregnancy Anxiety and Depression Study. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women in their first trimester of pregnancy visiting a total of 109 primary and nine secondary obstetric care centers in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2014 were invited to participate. Follow-up measures used for the present study were collected from May 2010 to January 2019. Women with multiple gestations and with a preterm birth were excluded. MEASUREMENTS: Intrapartum synthetic oxytocin exposure status was based on medical birth records and was defined as its administration (Yes/No), either for labour induction or augmentation. Child behavioral and emotional problems were measured with the Child Behavior Checklist at up to 60 months postpartum. Maternal depressive symptoms, anxiety and mother-to infant bonding were measured with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, State Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale from 6 months postpartum. We used multivariable linear regression models to estimate standardized beta coefficients and unique variance explained. FINDINGS: 1,528 women responded. In total 607 women received intrapartum synthetic oxytocin. Intrapartum synthetic oxytocin administration was not associated with child behavioral and emotional problems, mother-to-infant bonding nor with postnatal anxiety. Intrapartum synthetic oxytocin was however significantly but weakly associated with more postnatal depressive symptoms (ß=0.17, 95%CI of 0.03 to 0.30) explaining 0.6% of unique variance. Maternal postnatal depressive symptoms, postnatal anxiety symptoms and suboptimal mother-to-infant bonding were positively associated with child behavioral and emotional problems. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: We found no evidence that intrapartum synthetic oxytocin is associated with child behavioral and emotional problems, mother-to-infant bonding, or with postnatal anxiety symptoms. Because there was no association between intrapartum synthetic oxytocin and behavioral and emotional problems in children no mediation analysis was carried out. However, intrapartum synthetic oxytocin was positively but weakly associated with postnatal depressive symptoms. The clinical relevance of this finding is negligible in the general population, but unknown in a population with a high risk of depression.

Development of a risk classification model in early pregnancy to screen for suboptimal postnatal mother-to-infant bonding: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies identified demographic, reproduction-related and psychosocial correlates of suboptimal mother-to-infant bonding. Their joint informative value was still unknown. This study aimed to develop a multivariable model to screen early in pregnancy for suboptimal postnatal mother-to-infant bonding and to transform it into a risk classification model. METHODS: Prospective cohort study conducted at 116 midwifery centers between 2010-2014. 634 women reported on the Mother-to-Infant Bonding questionnaire in 2015-2016. A broad range of determinants before 13 weeks of gestation were considered. Missing data were described, analyzed and imputed by multiple imputation. Multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination was used to develop a screening model. The explained variance, the Area Under the Curve of the final model were calculated and a Hosmer and Lemeshow test performed. Finally, we designed a risk classification model. RESULTS: The prevalence of suboptimal mother-to-infant bonding was 11%. The estimated probability of suboptimal mother-to-infant can be calculated: P(MIBS≥4) = 1/(1+exp(-(-4.391+(parity× 0.519)+(Adult attachment avoidance score× 0.040))). The explained variance was 14% and the Area Under the Curve was 0.750 (95%CI 0.690-0.809). The Hosmer and Lemeshow test had a p-value of 0.21. This resulted in a risk classification model. CONCLUSION: Parity and adult attachment avoidance were the strongest independent determinants. Higher parity and higher levels of adult attachment avoidance are associated with an increased risk of suboptimal mother-to-infant bonding. The model and risk classification model should be externally validated and optimized before use in daily practice. Future research should include an external validation study, a study into the additional value of non-included determinants and finally a study on the impact and feasibility of the screening model.

Correlates of prenatal and postnatal mother-to-infant bonding quality: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Mother-to-infant bonding is defined as the emotional tie experienced by a mother towards her child, which is considered to be important for the socio-emotional development of the child. Numerous studies on the correlates of both prenatal and postnatal mother-to-infant bonding quality have been published over the last decades. An up-to-date systematic review of these correlates is lacking, however. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review correlates of prenatal and postnatal mother-to-infant bonding quality in the general population, in order to enable targeted interventions. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched through May 2018. Reference checks were performed. Case-control, cross-sectional or longitudinal cohort studies written in English, German, Swedish, Spanish, Norwegian, French or Dutch defining mother-to-infant bonding quality as stipulated in the protocol (PROSPERO CRD42016040183) were included. Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts, full-text articles and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional studies and was rated accordingly as poor, fair or good. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity were examined. MAIN RESULTS: 131 studies were included. Quality was fair for 20 studies, and poor for 111 studies. Among 123 correlates identified, 3 were consistently associated with mother-to-infant bonding quality: 1) duration of gestation at assessment was positively associated with prenatal bonding quality, 2) depressive symptoms were negatively associated with postnatal mother-to-infant bonding quality, and 3) mother-to-infant bonding quality earlier in pregnancy or postpartum was positively associated with mother-to-infant bonding quality later in time. CONCLUSION: Our review suggests that professionals involved in maternal health care should consider monitoring mother-to-infant bonding already during pregnancy. Future research should evaluate whether interventions aimed at depressive symptoms help to promote mother-to-infant bonding quality. More high-quality research on correlates for which inconsistent results were found is needed.

Addressing transition to motherhood, guideline adherence by midwives in prenatal booking visits: Findings from video recordings.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if and how primary care midwives adhere to the guideline by addressing transition to motherhood at the first prenatal booking visit and to what extent there was a difference in addressing transition to motherhood between nulliparous and multiparous women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study of video-recorded prenatal booking visits. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 126 video recordings of prenatal booking visits with 18 primary care midwives in the Netherlands taking place between August 2010 and April 2011. MEASUREMENTS: Five observers assessed dichotomously if midwives addressed seven topics of transition to motherhood according to the Dutch guideline prenatal midwifery care from the Royal Dutch Organization of Midwives and used six communication techniques. Frequencies and percentages of addressing each topic and communication technique were calculated. Differences between nulliparous and multiparous women were examined with Chi-Square tests or Fischer Exact tests, were appropriate. The agreement between the five observers was quantified using Fleiss' Kappa. FINDINGS: During all visits at least one of the seven topics of transition to motherhood was addressed. The topics mother-to-infant bonding and support were addressed respectively in 2% and 16% of the visits. In almost all visits the topics desirability of the pregnancy, experience with the ultrasound examination or abdominal palpation or hearing the foetal heartbeat and practical preparation were addressed. Open questions for addressing transition to motherhood were used in 6% of the prenatal booking visits. Dutch midwives addressed transition to motherhood mostly by giving information (100%) and by using closed-ended questions (94%) and following woman's initiative (90%). Nulliparous women brought up transition to motherhood on their own initiative more often than multiparous women (97% versus 84%). For the topics 'desirability of the pregnancy 'and' practical preparations' and for conversation techniques 'giving information' and 'closed-ended questions', 100% agreement was achieved. However, the topic 'Support' had poor agreement (kappa = 0.19). KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Although during every visit the transition of motherhood was addressed, the topics mother-to-infant bonding and support should get more attention. Midwives should improve adherence to the guideline by addressing transition to motherhood and by using more open questions. Furthermore, they should focus on taking the initiative to address the transition to motherhood in multiparous women themselves.