Effects of plant growth regulator application on the malting quality of barley.

BACKGROUND: Lodging can negatively affect yield and quality of barley grain. Synthetic plant growth regulators (PGRs) reduce lodging by producing shorter, thicker, and stronger stems. However, the impact of applying PGRs on malting performance of barley is not known. The objective of this work was to assess the effect of application of three PGRs (ethephon, chlormequat chloride, and trinexapac-ethyl) in combination with different seeding rates on the malting quality of barley grown in several locations and years in western Canada. RESULTS: The kernel weight in PGR-treated barley was reduced by 1.7% to 6.5% compared with the nontreated grain. Application of PGRs had no effect on the concentration of proteins and germination energy. Seeding rates significantly affected kernel weight, protein content, and germination index (GI), but no interactions between PGRs and seeding rates were observed. The smaller kernels of ethephon- and trinexapac-treated barley showed good hydration and grain modification during malting, as indicated by high levels of starch-converting enzymes, high Kolbach indices, and low levels of wort ß-glucans. Overall, the fine extract of malt from PGR-treated barley was slightly lower than that of the control malt; however, the extract reduction was statistically significant only for chlormequat- and trinexapac-treated barley. CONCLUSIONS: The application of PGRs had significant effects on kernel plumpness and kernel weight, but the effects of PGR application on the malting quality were generally small and insignificant. The decision of PGRs application on malting barley needs to be considered in combination with potential benefits of PGRs in mitigating lodging and their effects on the agronomic performance of barley. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2019.

Opportunities and challenges for harvest weed seed control in global cropping systems.

The opportunity to target weed seeds during grain harvest was established many decades ago following the introduction of mechanical harvesting and the recognition of high weed-seed retention levels at crop maturity; however, this opportunity remained largely neglected until more recently. The introduction and adoption of harvest weed seed control (HWSC) systems in Australia has been in response to widespread occurrence of herbicide-resistant weed populations. With diminishing herbicide resources and the need to maintain highly productive reduced tillage and stubble-retention practices, growers began to develop systems that targeted weed seeds during crop harvest. Research and development efforts over the past two decades have established the efficacy of HWSC systems in Australian cropping systems, where widespread adoption is now occurring. With similarly dramatic herbicide resistance issues now present across many of the world's cropping regions, it is timely for HWSC systems to be considered for inclusion in weed-management programs in these areas. This review describes HWSC systems and establishing the potential for this approach to weed control in several cropping regions. As observed in Australia, the inclusion of HWSC systems can reduce weed populations substantially reducing the potential for weed adaptation and resistance evolution. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.