The Designed Ankyrin Repeat Protein Antiviral Ensovibep for Nonhospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: Results From EMPATHY, a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was characterized by rapid evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, affecting viral transmissibility, virulence, and response to vaccines/therapeutics. EMPATHY (NCT04828161), a phase 2 study, investigated the safety/efficacy of ensovibep, a multispecific designed ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin) with multivariant in vitro activity, in ambulatory patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Methods: Nonhospitalized, symptomatic patients (N = 407) with COVID-19 were randomized to receive single-dose intravenous ensovibep (75, 225, or 600 mg) or placebo and followed until day 91. The primary endpoint was time-weighted change from baseline in log10 SARS-CoV-2 viral load through day 8. Secondary endpoints included proportion of patients with COVID-19-related hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits, and/or all-cause mortality to day 29; time to sustained clinical recovery to day 29; and safety to day 91. Results: Ensovibep showed superiority versus placebo in reducing log10 SARS-CoV-2 viral load; treatment differences versus placebo in time-weighted change from baseline were -0.42 (P = .002), -0.33 (P = .014), and -0.59 (P < .001) for 75, 225, and 600 mg, respectively. Ensovibep-treated patients had fewer COVID-19-related hospitalizations, ER visits, and all-cause mortality (relative risk reduction: 78% [95% confidence interval, 16%-95%]) and a shorter median time to sustained clinical recovery than placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 44.3% versus 54.0% of patients in the ensovibep and placebo arms; grade 3 events were consistent with COVID-19 morbidity. Two deaths were reported with placebo and none with ensovibep. Conclusions: All 3 doses of ensovibep showed antiviral efficacy and clinical benefits versus placebo and an acceptable safety profile in nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19.

NASHmap: clinical utility of a machine learning model to identify patients at risk of NASH in real-world settings.

The NASHmap model is a non-invasive tool using 14 variables (features) collected in standard clinical practice to classify patients as probable nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or non-NASH, and here we have explored its performance and prediction accuracy. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) NAFLD Adult Database and the Optum Electronic Health Record (EHR) were used for patient data. Model performance metrics were calculated from correct and incorrect classifications for 281 NIDDK (biopsy-confirmed NASH and non-NASH, with and without stratification by type 2 diabetes status) and 1,016 Optum (biopsy-confirmed NASH) patients. NASHmap sensitivity in NIDDK is 81%, with a slightly higher sensitivity in T2DM patients (86%) than non-T2DM patients (77%). NIDDK patients misclassified by NASHmap had mean feature values distinct from correctly predicted patients, particularly for aspartate transaminase (AST; 75.88 U/L true positive vs 34.94 U/L false negative), and alanine transaminase (ALT; 104.09 U/L vs 47.99 U/L). Sensitivity was slightly lower in Optum at 72%. In an undiagnosed Optum cohort at risk for NASH (n = 2.9 M), NASHmap predicted 31% of patients as NASH. This predicted NASH group had AST and ALT mean levels above normal range of 0-35 U/L, and 87% had HbA1C levels > 5.7%. Overall, NASHmap demonstrates good sensitivity in predicting NASH status in both datasets, and NASH patients misclassified as non-NASH by NASHmap have clinical profiles closer to non-NASH patients.

Development of a novel machine learning model to predict presence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a computer model to predict patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) using machine learning (ML). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study utilized two databases: a) the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) adult database (2004-2009), and b) the Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record dataset (2007-2018), a real-world dataset representative of common electronic health records in the United States. We developed an ML model to predict NASH, using confirmed NASH and non-NASH based on liver histology results in the NIDDK dataset to train the model. RESULTS: Models were trained and tested on NIDDK NAFLD data (704 patients) and the best-performing models evaluated on Optum data (~3,000,000 patients). An eXtreme Gradient Boosting model (XGBoost) consisting of 14 features exhibited high performance as measured by area under the curve (0.82), sensitivity (81%), and precision (81%) in predicting NASH. Slightly reduced performance was observed with an abbreviated feature set of 5 variables (0.79, 80%, 80%, respectively). The full model demonstrated good performance (AUC 0.76) to predict NASH in Optum data. DISCUSSION: The proposed model, named NASHmap, is the first ML model developed with confirmed NASH and non-NASH cases as determined through liver biopsy and validated on a large, real-world patient dataset. Both the 14 and 5-feature versions exhibit high performance. CONCLUSION: The NASHmap model is a convenient and high performing tool that could be used to identify patients likely to have NASH in clinical settings, allowing better patient management and optimal allocation of clinical resources.

The dose-response relationship of peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in the treatment of patients coinfected with HIV-HCV.

PURPOSE: The relationship between peginterferon/ribavirin exposure and the probability of achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR) in HIV-HCV coinfected patients is not well described. We conducted a retrospective analysis of HIV-HCV coinfected patients randomized to 48 weeks of treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kD) 180 µg/week and ribavirin 800 mg/day in the multinational APRICOT study to define optimal exposure thresholds. METHOD: Actual drug exposure was estimated in 287 patients, taking into consideration dose reductions for adverse events or laboratory abnormalities. RESULTS: SVR overall and SVR in those completing treatment was, respectively, 29% and 37% among HCV genotype-1 patients and 59% and 68% among genotype non-1 patients. No patients with ≤40% exposure to ribavirin achieved an SVR. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified that threshold exposures to both drugs of >75% (genotype-1) and >60% (genotype non-1) are associated with SVR. An existing generalized additive model populated with data from HCV monoinfected patients was updated to predict an overall SVR of 37% if genotype-1 patients received ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg/day but at the cost of a higher incidence of anemia (23%). CONCLUSION: Completion of scheduled treatment and exceeding certain thresholds for exposure to peginterferon alfa 2a (40 kD) and ribavirin is associated with higher SVR rates.

Efficacy and safety of peginterferon α-2a (40 KD) plus ribavirin in treatment-naive chronic hepatitis C patients in Central and Eastern Europe.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the safety and efficacy of 24 or 48 weeks of treatment with peginterferon α-2a (40 KD) plus ribavirin in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: All patients in this open-label multinational study were assigned at the investigator's discretion to receive peginterferon α-2a (40 KD) 180 µg/week plus ribavirin (800 mg/day) for a total of 24 weeks or peginterferon α-2a (40 KD) 180 µg/week plus ribavirin (1000/1200 mg/day) for a total of 48 weeks. Treatment success was defined as sustained virological response [sustained virological response (SVR); hepatitis C virus RNA less than 50 IU/ml after completion of untreated follow-up]. RESULTS: A total of 789 treatment-naive patients were enrolled, of whom 91% (138 of 152) of nongenotype 1 patients and 77% (490 of 637) of genotype 1 patients completed 24 and 48 weeks of treatment, respectively. The overall SVR rate was 58% (459 of 789), and was 70 and 55% in nongenotype 1 and genotype 1 patients, respectively. Age (per 10-year decrement) and baseline hepatitis C virus RNA level (≤ 400 000 vs. >4 00 000 IU/ml) were significantly associated with SVR by multiple logistic regression analysis. The safety profile of peginterferon α-2a (40 KD) plus ribavirin was similar to that reported in pivotal trials, with no new or unexpected safety signals. CONCLUSION: The combination of peginterferon α-2a (40 KD) plus ribavirin was well tolerated and produced an overall SVR rate of 58% in treatment-naive patients. This study confirms that SVR rates achieved in pivotal clinical trials in Western Europe and the USA can be achieved in routine clinical practice in Central and Eastern Europe.

Efficacy and safety of peginterferon α-2a (40 kD) plus ribavirin among patients with chronic hepatitis C and earlier treatment failure to interferon and ribavirin: an open-label study in central and Eastern Europe.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of 48 weeks of re-treatment with peginterferon α-2a (40 kD) plus ribavirin in previously treated hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 patients. METHODS: HCV genotype 1 patients previously treated with conventional interferon with or without ribavirin were assigned to 48 weeks of treatment with peginterferon α-2a (40 kD; 180 µg/week) plus ribavirin (recommended dose: 1000/1200 mg/day) in this open-label trial conducted in central and Eastern Europe. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR, HCV RNA <50 IU/ml) after 24 weeks of untreated follow-up. Early virological response (EVR) was defined as an undetectable HCV RNA or at least 2-log drop at week 12. RESULTS: A total of 154 of the 203 (76%) treatment-experienced genotype 1 patients completed the treatment. Overall, 113 patients (56%) achieved an EVR, 107 (53%) had an end-of-treatment response and 63 patients (31%) achieved an SVR [including 38% (40/105) of those with an earlier breakthrough or relapse and 24% (21/88) of those with earlier nonresponse]. Among patients with an EVR, 47% (53/113) achieved an SVR (positive predictive value=47%), compared with 3% (1/34) of patients without an EVR (negative predictive value=97.1%). Rates of SVR were higher in patients without cirrhosis (54/169, 32%), with a baseline viral load of 800 000 IU/ml or less (29/68, 43%) and younger than 40 years of age (36/77, 47%). CONCLUSION: The combination of peginterferon α-2a (40 kD) plus ribavirin produced an overall SVR rate of 31% in difficult-to-treat genotype 1 patients who had not responded to the previous treatment with conventional interferon plus ribavirin.

Low-dose peginterferon alfa-2a is safe and produces a sustained virologic response in patients with chronic hepatitis C and end-stage renal disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic hepatitis C increases mortality of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Ribavirin is not recommended for patients with renal dysfunction; peginterferon monotherapy is the most appropriate treatment for chronic hepatitis C in such patients. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 2 dosages of peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) in patients with chronic hepatitis C and ESRD on hemodialysis. METHODS: We performed a randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical study of 85 patients with chronic hepatitis C and ESRD who were receiving hemodialysis at specialist outpatient hepatology clinics. Patients were treated with subcutaneous peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) at dosages of 135 or 90 µg/wk for 48 weeks. RESULTS: The incidences of overall sustained virologic responses (SVRs) (undetectable hepatitis C virus [HCV] RNA [<50 IU/mL] after 24 weeks of untreated follow-up) were 39.5% (15/38) in the 135 µg/wk group and 34.9% (15/43) in the 90 µg/wk group (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-3.06; P = .67). Among patients with undetectable HCV RNA at week 12, 60.9% (14/23) of those in the 135 µg/wk group and 87.5% (14/16) of those in the 90 µg/wk group achieved an SVR. Therapy was well-tolerated with no new safety concerns. The most common adverse events (>10% of patients in at least 1 treatment group) included conditions associated with ESRD (anemia and hypertension) and with interferon treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Forty-eight weeks of treatment with low-dose peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) is safe and produces an SVR in 35%-40% of patients with chronic hepatitis C and ESRD on hemodialysis.

A sustained virologic response is durable in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A sustained virologic response (SVR) to therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is defined as the inability to detect HCV RNA 24 weeks after completion of treatment. Although small studies have reported that the SVR is durable and lasts for long periods, it has not been conclusively shown. METHODS: The durability of treatment responses was examined in patients originally enrolled in one of 9 randomized multicenter trials (n = 1343). The study included patients who received pegylated interferon (peginterferon) alfa-2a alone (n = 166) or in combination with ribavirin (n = 1077, including 79 patients with normal alanine aminotransferase levels and 100 patients who were coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and HCV) and whose serum samples were negative for HCV RNA (<50 IU/mL) at their final assessment. Patients were assessed annually, from the date of last treatment, for a mean of 3.9 years (range, 0.8-7.1 years). RESULTS: Most patients (99.1%) who achieved an SVR had undetectable levels of HCV RNA in serum samples throughout the follow-up period. Serum samples from 0.9% of the patients contained HCV RNA a mean of 1.8 years (range, 1.1-2.9 years) after treatment ended. It is not clear if these patients were reinfected or experienced a relapse. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients monitored for the durability of an SVR, the SVR was maintained for almost 4 years after treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a alone or in combination with ribavirin. In patients with chronic hepatitis C infection, the SVR is durable and these patients should be considered as cured.

Identifying hepatitis C virus genotype 2/3 patients who can receive a 16-week abbreviated course of peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin.

UNLABELLED: The objective of this analysis was to compare sustained virological response (SVR) and relapse rates in patients with a rapid virological response (RVR, HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at week 4) randomized to 24 or 16 weeks of treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) 180 microg/week plus ribavirin 800 mg/day in the multinational ACCELERATE study. The analysis was restricted to patients who received treatment for 80% or more of the planned duration. Of 1309 eligible patients, 863 individuals (65.9%) achieved an RVR and were included in this analysis (458 assigned to 16 weeks and 405 assigned to 24 weeks). The overall SVR rate was significantly higher in patients randomized to 24 weeks of treatment (91% versus 82%; P = 0.0006) and among patients infected with genotype 2 (92% versus 81%; P = 0.0010) but not genotype 3 (90% versus 84%; P = 0.1308). Relapse rates were significantly lower among all patients randomized to 24 weeks of treatment: overall (6% versus 15%, P < 0.0001); in those infected with genotype 2 (5% versus 17%, P = 0.0001), and genotype 3 (7% versus 14%, P = 0.0489). SVR rates in patients with a viral load of 400,000 IU/mL or less randomized to 24 and 16 weeks of treatment were similar, 95% and 91% (P = 0.2012). Significant pretreatment predictors of SVR included assignment to 24 weeks of treatment (P = 0.0006), absence of advanced fibrosis on liver biopsy (P = 0.0032), lower HCV RNA level (P = 0.0017), and lower body weight (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The standard 24-week regimen of peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin is significantly more effective than an abbreviated 16-week regimen in genotype 2/3 patients who achieve an RVR. Abbreviated regimens may be considered in patients with a low baseline viral load who achieve an RVR.

Re-treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C who do not respond to peginterferon-alpha2b: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic hepatitis C have not responded to therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate use of peginterferon-alpha2a plus ribavirin to re-treat nonresponders to peginterferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin. DESIGN: Randomized, parallel-group trial conducted between September 2003 and February 2007. Patients and researchers were not blinded to intervention assignment. Random assignment was centralized, computer-generated, and stratified by geographic region, hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype, and histologic diagnosis. SETTING: 106 international centers. PATIENTS: 950 nonresponders to 12 or more weeks of therapy with peginterferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin. INTERVENTION: Peginterferon-alpha2a, 360 microg/wk, for 12 weeks, then 180 microg/wk to complete 72 weeks (group A) or 48 weeks (group B), or peginterferon-alpha2a, 180 microg/wk for 72 weeks (group C) or 48 weeks (group D). All patients received ribavirin, 1000 or 1200 mg/d. MEASUREMENTS: Sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as undetectable (<50 IU/mL) HCV RNA levels 24 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: The SVR rates in groups A (n = 317), B (n = 156), C (n = 156), and D (n = 313) were 16%, 7%, 14%, and 9%, respectively (relative risk [RR] for group A vs. group D [the primary comparison], 1.80 [95% CI, 1.17 to 2.77]; P = 0.006). Extended treatment duration increased SVR rates (16% for 72 weeks [groups A and C] vs. 8% for 48 weeks [groups B and D]; RR, 2.00 [CI, 1.32 to 3.02]; P < 0.001). Complete viral suppression (HCV RNA level <50 IU/mL)at week 12 was achieved in 21% of patients in groups A and B and 13% of those in groups C and D. Rates of SVR were 49% (77 of 157 patients) and 4% (32 of 719 patients) among those with and without complete viral suppression at week 12, respectively. LIMITATION: Nonresponders to peginterferon-alpha2a plus ribavirin were not evaluated. CONCLUSION: Re-treating nonresponders to therapy with peginterferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin for 72 weeks significantly increases SVR rates compared with re-treating them for 48 weeks. The overall SVR rate was low, but patients who are most likely to respond to re-treatment can be identified at week 12. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Roche.

Throat swabs are necessary to reliably detect carriers of Staphylococcus aureus.

The anterior nares are the most important screening site of colonization with Staphylococcus aureus. We screened 2966 individuals for S. aureus carriage with swabs of both nares and throat. A total of 37.1% of persons were nasal carriers, and 12.8% were solely throat carriers. Screening of throat swabs significantly increases the sensitivity of detection among carriers by 25.7%.

Octenidine hydrochloride for the care of central venous catheter insertion sites in severely immunocompromised patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of octenidine hydrochloride, a non-alcoholic skin antiseptic, for the care of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion sites. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Bone marrow transplantation unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients with a nontunneled CVC were enrolled prospectively after informed consent. METHODS: Octenidine hydrochloride (0.1%) was applied for disinfection at the CVC insertion site during dressing changes. The following cultures were performed weekly as well as at the occurrence of any systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria: cultures of the skin surrounding the CVC entry site, cultures of the three-way hub connected to the CVC, blood cultures, and cultures of the CVC tip on removal. Enhanced microbiological methods (skin swabs of a 24-cm2 standardized area, roll plate, and sonication of catheter tips) were applied. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five CVCs were inserted in 62 patients during the study period and remained for a mean period of 19.1 days, corresponding to 2,462 catheter-days. Bacterial density at the insertion site declined substantially over time, and most cultures became negative 2 weeks after insertion. Only 6 patients had a documented catheter-related bloodstream infection. The incidence density was 2.39 catheter infections per 1,000 catheter-days. No side effects were noted with application of the antiseptic. CONCLUSIONS: Disinfection with a skin antiseptic that contains octenidine hydrochloride is highly active and well tolerated. It leads to a decrease in skin colonization over time and may be a new option for CVC care.

Disseminated coinfection with Actinomyces graevenitzii and Mycobacterium tuberculosis: case report and review of the literature.

We report the first case of disseminated infection with both Actinomyces graevenitzii and Mycobacterium tuberculosis and review the medical literature. Concomitant actinomycosis and tuberculosis is very rare. The potential of the facultatively aerobic, newly described A. graevenitzii for disseminated invasive infection needs to be evaluated.

Guide to sexually transmitted disease resources on the Internet.

The Internet provides patients, clinicians, teachers, and researchers with immediate access to reliable information, authoritative recommendations, and the latest research findings and statistics, but quickly finding the best sources while avoiding the unreliable and obsolete can be a problem. We searched the Internet for the most useful English-language Web sites on sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), with annotations, in 4 tables: sites for patients, for clinicians and teachers, and for researchers, and sites dedicated to a single STD. In the process, we found that government-sponsored sites tended to have the most reliable information. This held true regardless of the kind of information we were seeking. Several university-sponsored sites contained information that was outdated or erroneous. Commercial and nonprofit sites sometimes evinced a bias that could mislead some readers. Both health care professionals and laypersons seeking information about STDs on the World Wide Web should generally start their search at government-sponsored sites.

Fulminant liver failure associated with clarithromycin.

OBJECTIVE: To report a patient developing fulminant liver failure while being treated with clarithromycin for pneumonia. CASE SUMMARY: A 58-year-old white woman developed fulminant liver failure while being treated with the macrolide antibiotic clarithromycin for pneumonia. Comedication included N-acetylcysteine, atenolol, and isradipine. Other causes of liver failure, such as viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, toxins, and heart failure, were excluded by appropriate diagnostic means. All drugs were stopped, and the patient was transferred to another hospital for liver transplantation. She recovered spontaneously within several days, making transplantation unnecessary. A liver biopsy obtained 10 days after the initial presentation revealed centroacinar necrosis and beginning fibrous reorganization, compatible with recent centroacinar damage. DISCUSSION: Since no other cause could be identified, liver injury was considered to be drug related. Fulminant liver failure has not previously been described with concomitant use of atenolol and N-acetylcysteine. Although isradipine has been associated with hepatocellular injury, there are no reports of fulminant liver failure with this agent, and our patient had been treated for >2 years without signs of toxicity. The most likely cause of liver failure in this patient was, therefore, clarithromycin, which undergoes hepatic metabolism and has been reported to cause fulminant hepatic failure. A second possibility is an interaction between clarithromycin and isradipine, potentially increasing the hepatic toxicity of isradipine. CONCLUSIONS: Clarithromycin may be a cause of fulminant liver failure either alone or by inhibiting the metabolism of other drugs.